I've never really gotten the chance to address why, originally, TITP plagued me with despondence. I do remember taking a lot of time to analyze the issue from every angle. I'm not one to jump to a conclusion solely based off of my own emotional discord, but from the beginning it struck me the wrong way.Â
After reading this part of their FAQ, I began to gain more perspective as to why. It was this passage specifically that stood out to me.
 The first is that being told to go eat a sandwich or being forced to take in a baggy pair of pants is not oppression. Privilege is institutional; it doesnât always resolve to the individual level. Privileged people have problems. They might even experience some of the same problems oppressed people have. But in no way do they experience the oppression of the underprivileged.
 The word institutional perfectly describes body oppression (note that I said body oppression and not singularly fat body oppression). It has been stated on this blog several times that I feel the media and government contributes to body oppression. We can all 100% agree on this, I'm sure.
The only division here that keeps all of us from jumping up, clapping, shouting "YEAH!" with our chests out and fist in the air, is the last sentence.Â
 But in no way do they experience the oppression of the underprivileged.
Okay, yeah that is fair when talking about other oppressions, but it doesn't apply to "thin privilege". This is the part where I got kind of angry and wanted to stop reading so badly because I knew what was to come next, but I continued forward.
Secondly, thin shaming is in no way comparable to what fat people go through.
 And this is the sentence, that stopped me from jumping onto the thin privilege wagon. I'm sorry, but to be frank, what the fuck? The word "thin shaming" aside, what about body shaming in general? For the life of me, I still can't understand this backwards philosophy. Â
They mention that oppression is INSTITUTIONAL, therefore stating that condemning less than ideal body types is an INSTITUTIONAL issue. That means diet media and government superfluous on health and body type is INSTITUTIONAL.Â
I'm not going to repeat myself a thousand times on this blog, but I've stated before and graphed out the percentage of people who are naturally thin and it's staggeringly low (like, you'd be shocked right of your hair follicles, that's how low it is.)
You cannot look at a thin person and snidely think "That person is privileged, look how thin they are!" when behind closed doors they could very well be starving themselves and spending over 8 hours a day working out because of INSTITUTIONAL body shaming. It's nearly impossible with our food industry for most people to not experience excessive weight gain (strongly encourage those of TITP to do some research on the dangers of mainstream food) being that most people are not naturally thin.
I'm not saying that gaining weight is the end of the world either, but it seems that this fear is bread due to our media, government, and fat shaming. That means that more than half of the populace is killing themselves everyday to meet this "ideal" standard of beauty that seems to fluctuate and change every decade.Â
Normally I wouldn't butt into the business of what one oppressed group does over another, but I feel like "thin privilege" not only has a negative effect on thin people, but it negatively affects fat people as well and all of what's in between. "Thin privilege" glorifies being thin just like the media does, but in such a horrible way that people honestly believe it's helping their self image.Â
TITP should take their own advice. Privilege is in fact institutional, and it is not resolved to an individual.Â