I hadnât read or seen much comic book stuff when I was invited to watch Iron Man with my friends at the movie theater back in 2008. Iâd seen and enjoyed the DC cartoons as a kid and of course I knew of Iron Man, but I didnât know anything about him except that he looked like a rubber chicken version of Dr. Doom.
All this to say, Iron Man launched me into the world of comic books and superheroes. I was hooked from then on and I still love comics today. This movie quite literally changed my life, even if the change wasnât as profound as most life changes.
But then something genuinely surprising happened.
Somewhere along the line Iâve forgotten how to put down my critical analysis of media and not only was I pleasantly surprised at the great writing still hitting the mark, but I was able to notice the superb cinematography, something Iâd missed through no less than 3 rewatches. I mean, of course thereâs the surface-level awesomeness like the entire opening sequence with its fluid transitions or the perfectly tense scene where Pepper is collecting data from Obadiahâs files, but even beyond this facade lies near perfection.
That moment when the missile lands next to Tony in the desert, the camera does a short, quick zoom with a zshooom sound and itâs just so reminiscent of comics and the idea of being hyper-aware in a high-stress moment.
When Obadiah has Tony paralyzed and is giving his evil monologue, everything is perfect. The angled shot, the lighting, RDJâs violet veins, Bridgeâs cartoon-villain dress and demeanor. It all comes together in this scene and despite the minimal camera work, the room seems to be spinning as the monologue goes on.
These are still pretty surface level things, but throughout the film thereâs just a masterful execution of every element â lighting, costume & makeup, camera angles â just everything is absolutely seamless for 99% of the movie. Itâs kind of insane to think about a blockbuster superhero movie being so technically well-executed!
One thing in particular that caught my attention and stayed pretty true throughout the movie is the fact that this movie doesnât follow Tony Stark. In almost every scene with Tony, the camera is following another character. This does two things: it lets the audience know things that Tony doesnât, which helps build tension, yadda, yadda; and it makes a distinction between Tony Stark and Iron Man. Because when Tony Stark is in his suit, then the camera begins to follow him. Even the final shot of the movie plays to this, finally â finally â focusing on Tony Stark and Tony Stark alone, as he declares he is Iron Man.
Fucking chefâs kiss. Are you kidding me?! This movie was so fucking good; thatâs why itâs one of my favorite MCU movies of all time, despite being the first. (We donât talk about Hulk in this household.)
Robert Downey Jr. is the perfect Tony Stark. I found it a bit funny that at times the makeup crew tries to harken Downey back to his teen acting days with the extremely glossy eyelashes, but other than that it holds up overall and I would even go as far as to say that we probably havenât had a stand alone superhero movie that was as good as Iron Man since Iron Man.Â
Itâs just so damn unique; I can see exactly how it gripped the world with its melding of humor and action and reality and just everything we were all feeling at that moment, without shoving it down our throats that this is what we needed. Like, god, canât one of these rich guys turn good instead of evil for once? Canât someone get fed up and save us already? Are we finally getting a superhero movie as good as whatâs on WB Kids??
And then Iron Man swoops in, dripping in sarcasm and long-lost teen lust, acting as though itâs the most natural thing in the world for him to be a rich guy in a mech suit, and ultimately delivering us unto a new age of entertainment.
Okay, yes, letâs talk about Rhodey. I remember when he was replaced; I was so upset. I felt that Terrence Howard was the absolute best choice for Rhodey and that he did an impeccable job opposite RDJ. Rewatching the filmâŚgod damn it, itâs still very true! Whyâd you have to do it, Terrence? Why?! You were beautiful as you soared so highâŚ
Listen, I like Don Cheadle as much as the next person, and did back in 2009 too. But he is not a good Rhodey. I feel like there are many other black actors who would have done the role better and I half-remember people throwing around Denzel Washingtonâs name as a âbetterâ suggestion. Personally, Iâd have gone with someone closer to Howardâs look, like maybe Jamie Foxx or someone.
The fact of the matter is that while the character is a military guy, one of the main reasons heâs friends with Stark is because heâs a progressive, more laid-back and approachable kind of military guy; heâd almost have to be for his work as a liaison with civilian organizations. Both Cheadle and Washington have such stern looksâŚit just doesnât fit. (To be clear, I think Cheadle has done a good job with the role; I just think Howard wouldâve done it perfectly. God it hurt to hear him say, âNext time, baby.â)
I mean, this is just my opinion and I know that Cheadle has millions of fans for his role, but I just donât see it and never have. Terrence Howard is part of what makes the first Iron Man so great. But, câest la vie.
So, Iron Man â Great Success!Â
I guess I should rate these but Iâm afraid thereâs going to be a trendâŚ
Next week, Iâll see The Incredible Hulk, which I am only watching out of respect for the timeline.
But actually, I liked this movie well enough and thought Edward Norton was a great casting choice. Weâll see if it holds up because itâs been probably a decade since I last saw it.