TooToomuhs

This is just for me to post my shitty ideas/fanfics. Don't expect excellence. They/she

[tootoomuhs]

Hello there,

Guess I should make one of these now??

Idk what name you should call me if anything.

I use she/they pronouns.

I'm 30 with an adult job (How unfortunate I know)

As of now I only write ghost x reader fics. (I don't see that changing any time soon as he is my love.)

English is my first language though I feel I suck at it.

Anyways I finally made a master list and I try to update it as I post.

Yeah that probably sums up what you need to know.

Always feel free to reach out to me for anything.

If anything I write inspires you, please let that inspiration strike. Just let me know and tag me so I can cry.

DO NOT USE MY WORK FOR AI. I DETEST AI.

[dufrau]

i dont think straight people should be allowed to do "enemies to lovers" i think if a man is your enemy you need to trust that you were correct the first time and slay him in battle

[this-is-trans-solidarity]

So about the “transmascs have done nothing for the queer community so theyre worthless” thing that transandrophobes have been saying…

not only is it transphobic

not only is it just straight up wrong

its also ableist as FUCK to imply somebody is only worth anything if they are able to do something substantial for others.

as a disabled transmasc, fuck you

[rkkuna]

everyday struggle i fear

[birdplushie]

they should make it illegal to end your story with an epilogue where your main female character is suddenly randomly married and has children when she's never once expressed a desire for this previously

[innerchildabortionclinic]

also I don't think parents "these days" are uniquely terrible, I just think neglect is showing up in new ways as technology progresses. today's ipad kid would've been wandering around in a ditch alone all day and night before. parents not wanting to have to deal with children is not a new phenomenon.

[woundsodomy]

So scary to like a mutual's post because what if they remember they hate me and then shoot me with a gun

[flesh-is-the-fever]

I'm up to the "I dunno maybe children working 13 hour shifts is bad, guys" part of Capital and it feels important to inform people that haven't read it yet that capitalists in the 19th century were not by any means wringing their hands and twirling their mustaches about employing children to squeeze out profits, they were hiring "experts" to write newspaper articles for them, explaining how "well, the socialists have these big demands about an 8-hour work day, and taking Saturdays off, but it's actually just so complicated, it's too complicated for most people to understand, we just NEED to hire children for night shifts because the stamina of their strong, youthful bodies is the only way we can survive as a business! It's science, you see. Economics doesn't work like that, just ask our economics professors at Oxford. You CAN'T turn a profit only working people 8 hours! Trust the experts, they know. It's just so complicated..."

That exact infuriating cadence that you read in New York Times articles, in the Atlantic Monthly, in the WaPo and all the other bourgeois rags where "everything is so complicated, and it's actually a lot more complicated than you think.." that has been around since the beginning. It is nothing new. So the next time you see some op-ed from Matt Yglesias or any of those other guys huffing their own farts about how "complicated" everything is, and how "unrealistic" a 30-hour work week is, remember that Marx was dealing with that exact class of "intellectuals" "explaining" how working 13 hours at age 10 was "vital" to the "moral fibre" of those poor kids.

[wizardnaturalist]

a book should be $5 a little drink should be $2 and museum access should be free and all hours

[fondesmode]

I think flinching is such a hit or miss reflex. Like yea a tiny bit of boiling water touched my hand but i dont think reflexivly throwing the water everywhere is a good defensive measure perhaps. might be even worse actually

[overwhelmedfernfrond]

hot take but i would still be staunchly against genAI even if it weren’t bad for the environment. i think some people have completely lost the plot in that their main talking point against chatgpt and the like is the environment point rather than… the fact that it is literally theft and turning people’s brains to mush and driving struggling people to suicide

[animentality]

[quakerjoe]

[themanwhooncedweltinavault]

[animentality]

[homunculus-argument]

If you adamantly refuse to even hear an opinion or point of view that differs from the one you've been taught to believe, you don't actually believe the one you've been taught. A genuine conviction doesn't waver from something as flimsy as mere exposure to disagreeing ideas. If you fear that hearing an idea that deviates from the "right" ones might make you accidentally adapt it, get the two confused and forget which one was the "right" and which one was the "wrong" idea, and get rejected by your peers by accidentally echoing the wrong kind of thoughts, you don't actually truly think that the things you've been taught as right are right.

Not because you would somehow deep down secretly think that the "wrong" ideas are "right" and the "right" ideas are "wrong", but because you simply do not actually think at all.

[literary-sparks]

“Why don’t you use ai” idk man beyond the obvious environmental and “this machine causes psychosis and encourages people to kill themselves” thing I think asking the equivalent of a solid D student who is also a pathological liar if they can answer my question/do the work for me seems pretty fucking stupid