UNBOXED. UNBOUND.

an exploration of inner self, by manner of word, thought, and photo. 

[immxrtal-bitch-deactivated20200]

!!!

the music industry is being hit hard at the moment. with a lot of tours being cancelled because of the corona virus, its really important that we support our favourite artists right now!! we need to be doing the most for them, considering a lot of money and financial revenue is being lost because of cancellations. buy their merchandise, stream their songs. this isn’t just about the big artists either, support upcoming ones too!! help them achieve their dreams!! now is the time to support music, its been there through every step of our lives, we need to be there for the artists now.

[unboxedunbound]

your multimillionaire faves will be fine quarantined in their mansions. dont waste your money buying merch that will never come and support your local businesses and low income neighbors who are ACTUALLY being affected the MOST from this

my fucking god people

[ginadanielsjfc]

every time I use “they” to refer to a single gender-unknown person on Tumblr, another piece of my grammar-filled heart shatters, and the pieces scatter at the bottom of hell

[davidemmerich]

“They” has been a singular pronoun for hundreds of years, you melodramatic dipshit.

[miguel-the-sexy-and-powerful-god]

well… actually… no… they is plural. people use they when they should use he, she, or it.

[baras-deactivated20150906]

dense motherfucker, the pronoun “they” is an english equivalent for the third person indefinite singular and has been for literally centuries. it remains morphologically and syntactically plural therefore you don’t need to shit your little pantaloons at compromising your surely rock solid grammar rules.

i guarantee every fuckin time you’ve ever had to refer to a person of an unknown gender you’ve used “they” subconsciously. (“The post clerk gave me a message for you.” “Oh, what did they say?”) but you only have a problem with it when people specify it as a pronoun for themselves because you’re a shitlord i fuckin guess.

[manthedog]

grammarized straight into hell

[coffeestainedx]

David Bowie - Interview - Afternoon plus - 1979  [x]

[chaos--themralds]

Not much has changed in the way people treat bisexuality smh

[reaperfromtheabyss]

“are you bisexual” “yes” “i’m not sure i understand” “I’m bisexual” “what do you mean” “ThAT I AM BISEXUAL”

[littlewitchlingrowan]

Bi person: “I’m bisexual”

Other person: “Is that code for-“

Bi person:

[vethox]

you don’t protect your heart by acting like you don’t have one

[unboxedunbound]

that ain’t gonna stop me from trying

[liberal-memes]

Political Memes

[liberal-memes]

Funny Political Memes

[did-you-know]

In Finland, speeding tickets are calculated based on your income - causing some Finnish millionaires to pay fines of over $100,000. Source

[redbloodedamerica]

This is what “equality” looks like in that liberal fairy tale land of Finland.  They punish you proportionately to how successful you are.  Sounds really “fair.”

[tsukishima-tadashi]

Except… it is fair? Because it’s proportionate. I don’t get what’s difficult about that. An impoverished person paying $400 dollar fine isn’t the same as a millionaire paying the same amount. For the poor person, $400 dollars could mean starving. Would you really claim it would have the same consequence for a rich man? Would it even be noticeable to him, while the absence of food in their stomach would be glaring to a poorer man? Would it be fair for a man to starve for the same crime as a man that would be having a three course meal?

By taking income into account, it allows the impoverished able to still survive while paying any fines they may incur. And, ultimately, while $100,000 dollars would be noticeable to a millionaire, they would still get by. And, assuming the law is properly implemented, they would be paying the same equivalent of their yearly income that a poorer person would. That’s what makes it fair. They would be impacted the same way - but you are looking at the amount rather than the equation.

Also, it’s important to make sure that even the rich would pause at the cost of a fine. They need to fear the law just as a poor man does. 

[reproductivejusticeandliberty]

Oh no… rich people facing fines that might actually make them consider not doing illegal things because the punishments might actually hurt them… how unfair… -V

[lewmzi]

Finnish person here. Our speeding ticket system owns and only people who bitch about them are people who wanna break the laws - the loudest whiners are the rich people who think they can just pay their way out of trouble and that’s why we have laws like that.

[thespectacularspider-girl]

400 dollar ticket.

Person making 10 dollars an hour: “Fuck, I better slow down”

Millionaire driving a Jaguar: “LOL 400 DOLLARS, FUCK THAT, NYOOM”

Compared to a proportional ticket.

Person making 10 dollars an hour and must pay 400 dollar ticket: “Fuck, I better slow down.”

Millionaire who must pay 100,000 dollar ticket: “Fuck, I better slow down.”

[futureevilscientist]

Like wtf. Some people have been so brainwashed by capitalism and worship of the rich that they literally can’t tell the difference between fairness and unfairness anymore.

It IS fair. The fact that it flies in the status quo so much should make you think about that status quo.

[timetraveldean]

when someone says I’m being over dramatic

[sir-scandalous-deactivated20181]

No but this is actually me with every little petty issue I have

[bumbleshark]

david: virgo, libra, sagittarius, taurus  alex: LEO, gemini, aries table: cancer, pisces, scorpio, aquarius

[blackgirlsreverything]

[hearttraining]

[darksilenceinsuburbia]

[love]

[viinnttaaggee]

[cerixe]

[uniej]

[naturalpalettes]

[queertasm]