Modern âLiberalismâ is a mental disorder
Understanding how Modern Liberals think, from a former Leftist that left the Left when it no longer stood for Classical Liberal principles. Modern âLiberalismâ is a mental disorder caused by a psychological need to remove all moral judgment from the world to create a sort of communistic, morally stoic society where no thing is either right or wrong, thinking this will eliminate all of the worldâs problems. But such thinking creates in itself an immoral, evil philosophy that causes only increasing ills and evil in the world. Liberalism is caused by seeking to have a world that is void of the moral absolutes. Evan lays the foundation for what would soon become known as the âUnified Field Theory of Liberalismâ and how and why that ideology leads the Left to side only and always with evil over good, wrong over right, ugly over beautiful, profane over profound and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.  Â
Tammy Bruce blasts the leftâs crackdown on dissent and their desire for control and conformity.
[Video Transcript:]Â âTucker Carlson: Tammy Bruce is a radio host and president of womenâs â Iâve never said this. I worked at fox for ten years. Iâve never said this on the air, but I thought it the whole time. Youâve got one channel that disagrees with all the other channels, and islands of dissent in the middle of the sea of sameness, and thatâs too much for them. I wonder if weâve been lying to ourselves with the extent they like to shut this channel down.â
Tammy Bruce: Â âI donât think so. What you describe in your commentary is totalitarianism. Itâs part of the reason why I left the Left, my first book is The New Thought Police, warning about this trajectory, the complaining about words, opinions, was beyond the conversations we normally have. It was being designed and the environment was being designed To be able to destroy people. I love coming on the show. I am honored to be part of Fox news what you discussed. Iâve never been told what to say, Iâve never been told what not to say, Iâve never been removed because of a presumption of what my opinion will be, you and I will disagree have disagreed on many issues. Weâll disappoint each other on occasions. But what we embody here is that We care about each other, we will have those conversations, and we will be able to have them About other people and have that exchange.Â
Whatâs manifesting here is a desire to shut that down across The board and if the Left thinks that is the monster theyâll be able to control and just aim at us? They are going to be very surprised when the monster gets out and begins to move amongst all of them. This is what I think is a problem for society in general and for the larger effort about being able to have these conversations become a better Nation, become better people, and embrace ourselves. The first amendment especially when itâs difficult.âÂ
Tucker: âI donât really understand the mind-set that leads â you see it on display In the other channels even now, to want to shut down people who disagree. I grew up in in a world where magazines are important, you have the National Review, the American spectator, The Nation, âMother jones,â village voice, sure. Never occurred to me to shut the other side down. Why would they want to stop all dissent. Whatâs the point of that?âÂ
Tammy: âPart of what I had a hand in and what I still work on making up for in these years is this design of individuals who we really couldnât argue the details or the issues. We couldnât really persuade people on the issues. And the way then â of course, Itâs not just the American Left, but the Left of the world, the only way the Left can survive is by shutting down dissent literally and eliminating the Individuals who might speak up, even with a different idea, the idea as youâve noted on the Issue of conformity.
Any voice or any individual that Is a reminder that we can approach things differently and sometimes offend people and sometimes make mistakes in Issues where they apologize, but the differences is that the Left cannot stand an environment where there is any challenging because they rely on the Collective or they donât rely on ideas. They rely on fear and division and controlling people in that framework. You see it unfolding still in Venezuela, in Cuba. Itâs the collapse of the soviet union.Â
Itâs the antithesis to Individual personal freedom which involves the need to have larger conversations, to be able to speak our minds without fear and without being bullied or threatened because we might deviate what the Left deems to be a proper and impure thought.â
ellievsbear
origamiaround
areudirty
pixelskylines
gracieabrams
discoholicmusic
germansingergirl
gamechangershow
