What would it be like if Mexico is the one that gets intense with Chile?
(I mean, if they change roles and Chile is the calm one)
Thank you for writing your questions to me. First, there is something I want you to understand, my chile has a personality based on certain attitudes or personalities and thoughts at a social level that are common among people in the country.
That is why in the context of romantic relationships Chile is usually very intense, when in everyday life Chileans tend to be rocks or very harsh when speaking, many tend to be "cold", but not all, since there are others who are only calm or look calm, friendly or sweet, but in the latter they tend to be very selective, the problem is trusting strangers, although that is not what they boast about, that in many ways they are having a type of introversion, also within society there is a degree very high autism. Which is interesting when talking about situations and moments where adrenaline appears, like Chile, he tends to be very withdrawn or very "firm" at times, it is as if he accumulates his emotions within himself, therefore they explode or are extreme in adrenaline situations, that makes him very intense, sadness can be transformed into depression, joy into euphoria, wrath into anger, etc. The good thing is that it only lasts a moment, it's like a bomb and then it's all peace.
Mexico is quite the opposite, but also quite rude, due to his strong "virility", although as he does not withdraw and has good social skills he does not get angry so easily and can control his emotions, however, he is very reserved with his very deep feelings or thoughts, but he is also very dramatic.
So if the roles were changed, I feel that Mexico would be much more chaotic than Chile, the chaos would last longer.
At the level of intensity in the context you ask me about, Mexico would be much more intense than Chile, it would cause more chaos.
Notice: Chile would never hit Mexico, because it is a person who wants to maintain peace no matter what happens in its environment, but in the matter of its context, it would be more possible for Mexico to do it with Chile, that is why I would not like to reverse the roles as something canonical in my Au analyzing social reality. Whatever, I do not design the personality of the characters based on my preference but rather on a neutral sociological view of each country.
(Chile often does not fit into the international stereotype they have about what it means to "be Latin")
