You Silly Twisted Boy

I'm Kez. I'm British. Overcaffeinated, queer-ish, of questionable sanity and morals with a barely existent grasp on humanity.

[whirligiga]

I’ve been thinking since I watched the Hbomberguy video and it occurred to me

He said that one of the reasons he started looking into James Somerton’s stuff, is because he was being accused of plagiarism. He looked into it because he wanted to verify wether that was true, because queer people often get falsely accused of things, and harassed because of it. He wanted to make sure that wasn't happening.

In the end, his downfall was the kindness of the community that he exploited.

[knackeredforever]

I love how hbomberguy videos can be summarised as:

I’m gonna do research on this thing…

The situation has escalated

The situation has escalated

THE SITUATION HAS ESCALATED

Anyway here’s my finished video that is now on a completely different thing.

[fanonical]

You know, an interesting (and, presumably, unintentional) thing that's happened as a result of both hbomberguy and Todd in the Shadows' videos about James Somerton is that they show how two people can talk about the same thing and still use different words, or approaches, or give their unique spins on the material.

There's a few areas where Todd and hbomb's videos overlap in content, for example the criticism of Somerton's claims that straight women are en-masse misunderstanding gay content or being homophobic, but there's a huge difference in the way they talk about it and the language they use. Sure, they're making the same or similar points, because there's only so ways of saying 'this claim is unsubstantiated and there is no evidence for it', but they're still using different words, different approaches, and different arguments. Their scripts are not copy-pasted from each other with a few words changed, unlike Somerton's videos and the articles/books/videos that he plagiarises.

And I think that's interesting, you know? They've unintentionally become a really good example of how to do this kind of video right - just don't fucking plagiarise, ultimately.

[castellankurze]

Okay.

You fucked up.

But look on the bright side.

At least you didn't "youtube essayist releases a 4-hour video on plagiarism and half of it is dedicated to exposing your channel, followed a day later by another youtuber releasing a 1-hour-40 minute video about the lies you just made up, and there's almost no overlap between the two" level fuck up.

[natjennie]

dom allen is so incredibly talented at building horror and suspense. playing on classic supernatural themes but making them engaging and full of tension every time. truly some of the most spine-tingling storytelling I've ever heard.

[natjennie]

OAUGUGUHHH the way all the nrb call of cthulhu episodes are connected is soooo fascinating to me !!!! all the little family names that match and tiny easter eggs. I love you dom allennnnn

[lunawho47]

Ok, I've refrained from making an official post on anything related to the Watcher Entertainment situation (I've reblogged but kept silent on my general thoughts), mostly because after that first weekend I had hoped most of the hate posting from so-called "fans" would blow over and we could resume our regular lives.

But it hasn't stopped. Every time something new from Watcher drops, people use it as an opportunity to post hatred about Steven Lim (which is disgusting and you should all be ashamed of yourselves) or show a grievous misunderstanding of how the company makes money.

A few days ago, the company apparently sent out a mass email to the subscribers of WatcherTV (and I say "apparently" because I am subscriber to WatcherTV and got no such email, and I've checked my deleted emails and junk mail) about a forthcoming sponsor made episode of one of their shows. Based on the screenshot I read of the email, they said it was originally going to be a YouTube exclusive, but after having gotten some inquiries from WatcherTV subscribers requesting they put it on the website, they were taking a poll to see if the people wanted it to be YouTube exclusive or to have the sponsored episode on the website.

People were acting like WatcherTV had run off with their money because after setting up a subscriber based streaming service, they were still going to be doing sponsored content. Y'know, the thing they wanted to leave YouTube originally. And people are acting like Watcher is saying that their money isn't enough and the subscribers are being ripped off.

And yeah, your money isn't enough. And that's the fandom's fault.

Originally, the idea was that if you didn't pay for the subscription service, you were going to miss out on a good chunk of their content going forward. The fandom gave a huge, riotous outcry about it and they backtracked to make it so that everything would eventually be on YouTube. WatcherTV subscribers just get it earlier (a month only.) That means that they aren't making a large amount of money from their subscription service because only the die-hards who have the money to spend are bothering to pay money to see content a month early. Most people don't mind waiting a month. (Hell, for years I had to wait longer than that to see DW in the US after it premiered in the UK over six months before. Needless to say, spoilers never bother me because it was how I engaged with the more British based DW audience for four whole years.)

So, yeah, they're going to have to do sponsorships, even with people investing in WatcherTV. And I am fucking sick and tired of seeing people complain about it. If you want them to keep making content and most of the fandom complains about the boys DARING to ask for them to pay to see it, then you're going to have deal with whole episodes of shows that are based around promoting games and films.

They have not stolen your money from you or lied to you about the situation. You're just either very naive about what the fallout of the fandom's tantrum would be or you're being willfully ignorant so that you can feel yourself righteously angry (but, sorry. You're wrong there. You're not righteously angry, just stupidly so.)

[neithrain]

bonus:

[telumendils]

“Look at them. I would die for them. I would KILL for them. Either way, what bliss!”

— — Zevran Arainai about the Warden, probably 

[midisdying]

Me every time I play DA: Inquisition:

I'm going to romance someone else this time!

Dorian:exists

Me: Godfuckingdamn it

[incorrect-dragon-age-quotes]

Morrigan: "Ladies and Gentlemen" is unnecessarily gendered, overly formal, lengthy, and honestly puts me to sleep.

Morrigan: "Cowards" on the other hand is inclusive to all genders, casual and fun, short and to the point, exciting, and dramatic.

[elfrooting]

I was going through my old art and found this aslashjkhsdf

[untimely-proposals]

Lavellan: How petty can you get? Dorian: I once edited a Wikipedia article to win an argument I was wrong about.

[untimely-proposals]

Morrigan: Before I do anything, I ask myself, would Alistair do that? And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing.

[untimely-proposals]

Dorian: I was born for politics. I have great hair and I love lying.

[incorrect-dragon-age-quotes]

Morrigan: I know we have the unspoken rivalry.

Alistair: It's not a rivalry, you're just always mean to me. And it's not unspoken, you talk about it all the time.

[agentlemanofthevoid]

alistair, seeing duncan: oh thank the maker, my dad is here. i mean warden-commander dad. i mean duncan. i mean, i know who my dad is. i mean, whaaat?