*smacks you over the head with a poorly put-together history textbook I made in crafts* LEARN BISEXUAL HISTORY BEFORE YOU ACT KNOWLEDGABLE
“Bisexual—being emotionally and physically attracted to all genders.” - GLSEN in fucking 1998
“Do not assume that bisexuality is binary or duogamous in nature [...] In fact, don’t assume that there are only two genders.” 1990 Bi Manifesto
“But there are also many bis, such as myself, for whom gender has no place in the list of things that attract them to a person.“ 2002
“Bisexual people are those for whom gender is not the first criteria in determining attraction.” 2003
“Assuming that all bisexuals are never attracted to trans or genderqueer folk is harmful, not only to bi individuals, but to trans and genderqueer individuals who choose to label themselves as bi.”
“Bisexual: A person who is attracted to people regardless of gender (a person does not have to have a relationship to be bisexual!)” 2003
“These data support the argument that, for some bisexual individuals, sexual attraction is not gender-linked.” 1992
Now that we’re approaching 20,000 notes I want to share what I’ve learned since this post first gained traction.
It is increasingly apparent that only a select minority of certain communities are willing to listen to this post and accept that bisexuality’s inclusivity and definition are not up for debate, and that this definition and inclusivity are not new to our community.
It is equally difficult to get through to people who have chosen Latin meanings over history, a hypocritical stance they don’t take up with words like gay or lesbian.
I’ve had more people deny this post’s truth than recognize it as history. I’ve spent hours having to reply to people who do not care about bisexuals than I have talking to people this post helped.
This post is not my opinion, it is a collection of sourced quotes. Despite this being stated over and over again, the content of this post is treated as discourse that is original and unique to my blog.
Cool, just don't use this to be shitbags to pan folx eh?
The only functional difference between bi and pan is that bi still leaves room for a preference. Not that there must be one, just that its open to one. Whereas pan is specifically no preference.
Preference is not inherent to any sexuality. I do not have a preference in gender and I know pansexuals who do.
It’s insulting for you to say that on this post considering I linked a whole study that said bisexuals don’t have an inherent preference in gender in the OP because I’ve had this exact conversation before and I wasn’t interested in repeating it.
The labels have no difference at all. None. Not even a little. Not even some weird sort of technicality. They’re the same label under different names. And if people keep trying to set bisexuals apart from pansexuals with these untrue blanket generalizations we’re never going to get along or come together as a community because in the end those separations just make bisexuals look bad and stereotype us.
OP no longer uses this blog, so I give no more fucks
I agree that the statement on preferences is incorrect. I myself and a pan with preferences, so ✔ boom.
However, if you use any other the above sources (or any others) to be a panphobic asshat, I'll go full Rapunzel on you
Pansexuals are pansexuals, not bisexuals. Respect us or face our wrath.
I still get notifications here and there but not many, I muted most versions of this post a while ago. Anyways, Tangled is cool have you ever skipped the first few minutes of narration and watched it that way? I like doing that











