🪼
Game of Thrones Daily

Love Begins

#extradirty
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Misplaced Lens Cap

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Janaina Medeiros

if i look back, i am lost

oozey mess

blake kathryn
hello vonnie
macklin celebrini has autism

★
cherry valley forever
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

JBB: An Artblog!

JVL

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

seen from T1
seen from Finland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Belgium

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
@wheretheeternalare
“Teachers are often unaware of the gender distribution of talk in their classrooms. They usually consider that they give equal amounts of attention to girls and boys, and it is only when they make a tape recording that they realize that boys are dominating the interactions. Dale Spender, an Australian feminist who has been a strong advocate of female rights in this area, noted that teachers who tried to restore the balance by deliberately ‘favouring’ the girls were astounded to find that despite their efforts they continued to devote more time to the boys in their classrooms. Another study reported that a male science teacher who managed to create an atmosphere in which girls and boys contributed more equally to discussion felt that he was devoting 90 per cent of his attention to the girls. And so did his male pupils. They complained vociferously that the girls were getting too much talking time. In other public contexts, too, such as seminars and debates, when women and men are deliberately given an equal amount of the highly valued talking time, there is often a perception that they are getting more than their fair share. Dale Spender explains this as follows: “The talkativeness of women has been gauged in comparison not with men but with silence. Women have not been judged on the grounds of whether they talk more than men, but of whether they talk more than silent women.” In other words, if women talk at all, this may be perceived as ‘too much’ by men who expect them to provide a silent, decorative background in many social contexts.”
—
PBS: Language as Prejudice - Myth #6: Women Talk Too Much (via misandry-mermaid)
Every EVERY women’s studies class I’ve been in has had this problem and failed to address it.
(via iamayoungfeminist)
I have witnessed peak
can we please acknowledge that tma/tme is a meaningful distinction? a justice of the US supreme court is openly saying that it's legal to discriminate against trans women because the same laws do not target trans men. the transmisogyny is what makes it permissible. your transphobia is fine as long as it has carveouts for men.
Fascinating parallel here. This incapacity of the legal framework to protect groups who are at the intersection of two protected groups (trans women in this case, black women in the original) even while protecting both groups individually is Crenshaw's original reason for coining the word "intersectionality", which has since gone through the wringer.
It’s National Eraser Day (every day is eraser day), Present and Correct
Oh im sure
whats everyones favorite cocktails. i totally adore a sex on the beach. no rum and coke okay i want your favorite gay ass colorful fruity tasting type of drink okay? okay. i trust you. i love you
to vape or not to vape, according to jacob anderson and sam reid
pride month win: performed music for an event in which all the other speakers were women, mostly over age 65. guy in the q&a went "how come you didn't have any men involved." woman organizing it gave a good answer. moment of silence. i went "also i'm not a woman, for the record." all the old ladies around me applauded.
This is your reminder today that Irene Adler in the original Conan Doyle story is literally not a criminal. She never commits a crime.
Nor is she a seductress in any kind of negative or manipulative sense - she has a mutual relationship with a powerful man who then breaks up with her, and afterwards she keeps protection against him in the form of evidence that the relationship existed. She HAS blackmail material, she even waves it at him threateningly because he treated her like shit, but she never even uses it.
Irene Adler is not a thief, femme fatale, or blackmailer. She's just a cool lady that wants to be left alone.
@delphi-star You do recall correctly!! She does not give a shit about that man! She's happily married! She tipped him for being a witness at her wedding!
If your Sherlock Holmes adaptation has a character whose identifying qualities are that she is a seductive criminal in love with Holmes, you have created a character that is basically the literal opposite of Irene Adler and you should name her something else.
Rockweed gunnel (Apodichthys fucorum)
Photo by Marlin Harms
I saw a bumper sticker and thought “is that seductive Daffy Duck” and then when I looked closer I realized it was actually a fishing bumper sticker but also. also it is still very much seductive Daffy Duck???? somehow????????