Maenadism, Artemis and Dionysus
(Warning: Very long. Sorry.)
This is a topic that has been requested by @aimee-maroux and prompted by this quote by Richard Seaford in “Tragedy, Ritual and Money in Ancient Greece: Selected Essays”:
“Maenads leave home where they resist men, become like animals, and perform sacrifice. Hence the frequent association of Artemis with Dionysos. […] They go rather to reject the men of their own household and polis. Accordingly, the Dionysiac thiasos contains married as well as unmarried women, whose departure disrupts the household in different ways. […] In the Bacchae, the Theban maenads are compared to fillies that have LEFT the yoke.”
There is actually a lot that can be said about this short 5-sentence quote. So much so that we will be focusing on two main points: First, we will address what Seaford refers to when he says “Hence the frequent association of Artemis with Dionysos.” and then, I will comment briefly comment on the distinction between literary and cultic maenadism.
Dionysus and Artemis are mythologically and ritually connected, for they share an important common theme: wilderness. The term alone is muli-faceted. It can refer to the wildness of nature, animals and vegetation alike, or it can refer to the wilderness of spirit. Both deities know how to play with the duality of the concept. Because of their respective nature, neither were expected to be predictable. On a symbolic level, there is an union and contrast between the god of vegetal fertility and Artemis’ link to virginity.
The city of Patras and human sacrifice
Pausanias tells us of the tale of how the city of Patras came to be freed from performing human sacrifice to Artemis Triklaria. According to him, the ancient custom of human sacrifice itself was a punishment from the goddess in response to the actions of one of her priestesses. The priestess, Comaetho, had made love with her lover in the sanctuary of the goddess. Insulted, Artemis sent pestilence upon the city. The Pythia is then consulted to figure out how to appease Artemis, and she tells them to ritually sacrifice Camaetho and her lover to the goddess and that this sacrifice must be repeated annually with the fairest maiden and young man as victims. A prophecy indicated that the sacrifices would cease when a foreign king would bring with him a strange god. And so, it happened: when Troy was captured and the king Eurypylos recieved as war bounty a chest containing a statue of Dionysus crafted by Hephaestus himself. A statue so powerful that it would drive mad anyone who looked at it, and so it drove Eurpylos mad.
Trying to understand the source of his madness, he consults the Pythia as well, who proceeds to tell him that he will come across a city that performs strange sacrifices, and that this is where he should set down the chest and make his home. And indeed, the winds carried his ship to land in Patras. Upon landing, he comes across the couple that was to being carried to the altar that year and he understood the meaning of the oracle. The people of Patras, also recognizing the events of the prophecy, adopted the cult of of Dionysus (under the title of Aesymnetes) and stopped considered themselves fred from their bloody obligation to Artemis. As for Eurypylos, his madness faded away.
Still according to Pausanias, the cult of Dionysus Aesymnetes and Artemis Triklaria included that a procession of children led by a priest who would go down at night to the Meilichos River wearing wreaths made of ears of corn (not maize, corn as in some type of cereal). The children first wear this wreath of grain, a reminder of the wreath worn by the ancient sacrifical victims, and once they have bathed in the river, they change to wear a wreath of ivy and go to the temple of Dionysus Aesymnetes. This ritual thus symbolizes the city’s the liberation from Artemis’ punishement.
This ritual has been interpreted in various ways and we unfortunately probably don’t know enough about the rest of the festival(s?) to pinpoint the exact meaning of the cult. It does seem that the rites to Artemis Trikalia and Dionysus Aesymnetes were not held simultaneously. We also know that by the second century AD the cult of Artemis Triklaria in Patras was no more. However, what is interesting to keep from this is that Dionysus and Artemis seemed to have been considered as sharing enough common features to be substituted for one another.
There seems to have been other Greek cities where the cult of Artemis and Dionysus where somehow closely linked and suggestions have been made (eg. Dionysus’ absence in Sparta might be explained by the fact that Artemis held similar cultic functions), but the evidence is too sparse to make serious claims.
Now that we’ve seen the biggest chunk, I’ll quickly go through some smaller elements:
In the Odyssey, Artemis kills Ariadne “Dionusou marturiêisin” (on the denunciation of Dionysus), which some have interpreted as “on Dionysus’ indictment.” If this interpretation is correct, it would highlight Dionysus’ and Artemis’ role as destructive deities.
The use of masks during the Spartan Ortheia
They are the only Olympians to ever have the epithet “polynumia” (of many names)
A common ability for natural madness.
Maenadism in the Bacchae vs. in cult
So, we now have commented one (1) sentence of the original quote. Let’s move on to the main topic, that is, maenadism. It’s very important to point out what exactly Seaford is commenting on here: he is not making claims based on cultic reality. Rather, he is commenting on maenadism as portrayed in the Bacchae and, by extension, maenadism in the collective imagination of the Athenians.
The reason I’m bringing this up and making the clarification right away is because maenadism has been very discussed and debated, especially when asking the question of “does the Bacchae, and Greek art in general, portray a faithful image of a maenadic ritual?”. The general consensus since Henrichs articulated his thoughts about it in the 70s leans more towards the no, in the case of Athens. Maenadic rites were for the most part organized celebrations to which only restricted groups could participate. They more likely belonged to the elite of society.
While the maenads in the Bacchae do reject the men of their households, the sources we have rather seem to indicate that women had to gain their husband’s consent to participate in the ritual (as Plutarch tells us with the women of Amphissa). Of course nuance is needed also when handling those sources, which might have also tried to convey the idea that men were still in charge afterall, but it is also not impossible that men considered those rites as a necessity to please Dionysus. What is sure however, is that Greek women who participated in maenadic rites must have greatly enjoyed those short escapes from reality.
Sources:
Pausanias, Description of Greece, 7. 19. 1 - 20. 1 (exerpt available on theoi.com)
Bremmer J.N., Greek Maenadism Reconsidered, in; Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, Bd. 55, 1984
Henrichs, A., Greek Maenadism from Olympias to Messalina, in: Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 82, 121, 1978
Hughes D., Human Sacrifice in Ancient Greece, Routledge, 1991
Rangos, S., Cults of Artemis in Ancient Greece (Doctoral thesis), University of Cambridge, 1996