Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Mike Driver
Janaina Medeiros
trying on a metaphor
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
@theartofmadeline
NASA
blake kathryn
DEAR READER
titsay
dirt enthusiast
noise dept.
Three Goblin Art
No title available
Today's Document
JBB: An Artblog!
Cosmic Funnies
izzy's playlists!
YOU ARE THE REASON
if i look back, i am lost
seen from Barbados
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands
seen from Thailand
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@wi-tch-ly
Andrew Thomas Huang | filmmaker + artist FKA twigs - cellophane • Kiss of the Rabbit God (兔兒神) • björk: the gate • SOLIPSIST • Atoms For Peace - Before Your Very Eyes • Kelela - LMK • björk : mutual core • INTERSTICE • serpentwithfeet - bless ur heart
Mugler Spring 1992 RTW
Sebastiane (1976) dir. Paul Humfress and Derek Jarman
Adut Akech by Renell Medrano for CR Fashion Book Fall/Winter 2021
david, commission. 2019
i am aware that this piece of mine has been re-posted a thousand times, but now you can re-blog it from the original artist! :~D
Kylie Minogue on the set of the “Spinning Around” music video (June, 2000)
this is definitely not the link to a google drive with free mandarin chinese practice books, definitely not
Interiors from the City Palace in Udaipur
xiao wen ju for shushu/tong spring-summer 2021
i was just thinking yesterday how much i thoroughly enjoy dark green and baby pink
Anya Taylor-Joy for alexa magazine
Lucy Liu as David Bowie, Madonna, Prince, Boy George, Debbie Harry, Andy Warhol and herself for Marie Claire China, April 2020. Photographed by Victor Demarchelier.
Solange’s cover of Selena Quintanilla‘s I Could Fall In Love, live at Nouveau Casino, Paris
people seem to have trouble understanding why i’m an anti-capitalist, so i’m going to try and put it into simple, real-life terms.
i work at a restaurant. i make $12 an hour, plus tips. minimum wage where i live is relatively high for my country - the national minimum wage is $7.25/hr, and has not been raised since 2009. before taxes, working full time, my yearly income is about $22,000 a year. ($25,000 if you count tips)
at my job, we sell various dishes, with an average price of about $10-$15. we get printouts every week detailing how much money we made that week; in one week, our restaurant makes about $30,000. (one of our other locations actually makes this much on a daily basis!)
i’m not going to go into details, but after the costs of production (payroll for employees, rent for the building, maintenance, and wholesale food purchasing) are accounted for, the restaurant makes an estimated profit of $20,000 per week.
this profit goes directly to the owner, who does not work at this location. the owner of my restaurant has actually been on vacation for a few months, but still profits from the restaurant, because they own it. i have met the owner exactly twice in my year of working here.
to put this into perspective, the owner of this restaurant earns in 2 days what they pay me in one year. and that’s just from this single location - the owner has several other restaurants, all of which make more money than the one i work at. this ends up resulting in the owner having an estimated net worth of tens of millions of dollars, even after accounting for the payroll for every single worker in their employ.
now, i have to ask you: does the owner of my restaurant deserve this income? did they earn it? did their labor result in this value being created?
the naive answer would be “yes”; the owner purchased the location and arranged for the raw ingredients to be delivered, did they not?
the actual answer is “no”. the owner may have used their initial capital to start the location, but the profit is a result of my labor, and the labor of my co-workers.
the owner purchases rice at a very low bulk price of about 25 cents a pound. i cook the rice, and within a few minutes, that pound of rice is suddenly worth about $30. the owner did not create this value, i did. the owner simply provided the initial capital investment required to start the process.
what needs to be understood here is that capitalists do not create value. they use the labor of their employees to create value, and then take the excess profit and keep it.
what needs to be understood is that capitalists accrue income by already HAVING money. the owner of my restaurant was only able to get this far because they started off, from the very beginning, with enough money to purchase a building, purchase food in bulk, and hire hundreds of employees.
that is to say: the rich get richer, and they do so by exploiting the labor of the poor.
the owner of my restaurant could afford to triple the income of every single person in their employee if they felt like it, but this would mean that they were generating less profit for themselves, so they do not.
the owner of my restaurant pays me the current minimum wage of my area, because to them, i am not a person. i am an investment. i am an asset. i am a means to create more money.
when you are paid minimum wage, the message your boss is sending you is this: “legally, if i could pay you less, i would.”
every capitalist on the planet exploits their workers for their own gain. every capitalist, even the small business owners, forces people to stay in poverty so that the capitalist can profit.
This is a really good post
Alexander McQueen fall 2012 rtw backstage
“I very proudly entered the forestry school as an 18-year-old and telling them that the reason that I wanted to study botany was because I wanted to know why asters and goldenrod looked so beautiful together. These are these amazing displays of this bright, chrome yellow and deep purple of New England aster, and they look stunning together. And the two plants so often intermingle rather than living apart from one another, and I wanted to know why that was. I thought that surely in the order and the harmony of the universe, there would be an explanation for why they looked so beautiful together. And I was told that that was not science, that if I was interested in beauty, I should go to art school. Which was really demoralizing as a freshman, but I came to understand that question wasn’t going to be answered by science, that science, as a way of knowing, explicitly sets aside our emotions, our aesthetic reactions to things. We have to analyze them as if they were just pure material, and not matter and spirit together. And, yes, as it turns out, there’s a very good biophysical explanation for why those plants grow together, so it’s a matter of aesthetics and it’s a matter of ecology. Those complimentary colors of purple and gold together, being opposites on the color wheel, they’re so vivid, they actually attract far more pollinators than if those two grew apart from one another. So each of those plants benefits by combining its beauty with the beauty of the other. And that’s a question that science can address, certainly, as well as artists. And I just think that “Why is the world so beautiful?” is a question that we all ought to be embracing.”
— Robin Wall Kimmerer, “The Intelligence of Plants”, from the podcast On Being with Krista Tippett
https://www.instagram.com/panexpane/
Rina Sawayama photographed by Jeff Hahn for King Kong magazine
