✨🌿🪶 nav 🪶🌿✨
photo tags: faces / places / story vibes
on writing: tips / info / prompts / stories / creating characters / character traits

if i look back, i am lost

izzy's playlists!
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
ojovivo
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
cherry valley forever
No title available
dirt enthusiast
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Stranger Things

Discoholic 🪩

Origami Around

Kaledo Art
Claire Keane

titsay
tumblr dot com
Game of Thrones Daily
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

oozey mess
noise dept.
seen from Morocco
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Chile

seen from United Kingdom
seen from India

seen from South Korea

seen from Morocco
seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Guernsey
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Colombia

seen from Italy
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from United States
@winterhenry
✨🌿🪶 nav 🪶🌿✨
photo tags: faces / places / story vibes
on writing: tips / info / prompts / stories / creating characters / character traits
neighbor’s pier
via
on “the blond,” “the older man,” and other crimes against third-person limited
You know that thing where a story is written in tight third person limited — we’re meant to be inside someone’s head, seeing the world through their thoughts — and then suddenly the narration says “the blond frowned” or “the shorter woman sighed” about a person the POV character knows really well?
That’s called antonomasia — using a descriptive label instead of a name. And it’s fine when we’re talking about strangers: “the cashier handed her the receipt,” “the tall guy blocked the door.” The POV character doesn’t know their names, and we just need a quick way to tell people apart.
But the moment it’s used for someone the POV character already knows, it breaks immersion. Because that’s not how our minds work. We don’t think “the older man smiled at me.” We think “Mark smiled.” Or maybe “my boss” if that relationship matters in the moment.
Third person limited means the narration sits inside someone’s perception. Their inner monologue is the story’s voice. So when you switch from “Mark smiled” to “the blond smiled,” you’ve pulled the camera away from their mind and turned it into an outside shot.
If you want to create distance or irritation, you can do it on purpose —
“The idiot from accounting emailed again.”
That’s character voice. That’s judgment. That works.
But otherwise?
As soon as your POV character knows someone’s name, use it. While we do tend to worry about repetitions, names rarely register as such to the readers.
If you need variety for rhythm, use relational or emotional identifiers that make sense in their head: her friend, his partner, their teacher, the person they loved.
Because inside someone’s thoughts, there are no “blonds” or “brunettes.”
There are only people they know.
Really good explanation of the fundamental problem with this type of writing.
(and why it's one of my huge pet peeves)
I think we need to explore the body horror possibilities of hyperspace. Like, you know how it's bad for astronauts to be up in space for too long because of radiation and the effects of weightlessness on human physiology? What of hyperspace was like that, but *worse*. What if it had effects on your body, or even your mind, that are difficult even to imagine? What if if you spend too long out there, your body starts spreading out along the fourth dimension because there's nothing to hold it in place; and then when go back into normal space, you get 'flattened' back down into three dimensions but everything isn't quite where it's supposed to be? Or the matter displaced along the fourth dimension just clips out and whole chunks of your body just disappear? Or there's some exotic form of matter in hyperspace that, over time, replaces the normal matter in your body until you can't return at all because it can't exist in our spacetime? Open to other ideas.
Wish you were here, Inka & Niclas Lindergård
Also, consider. A magical version of the bends. Whenever someone from a non- or low-magical land has to go into a very magic rich forest or land or dimension, having to take breaks to let their bodies adjust to the new magic exposure or else their blood will boil in their veins or they'll Transform
actually the bends only kicks in when you try to LEAVE the high pressure area. or in this case, magic rich area?
Getting deeper and deeper into feywilds and knowing that however deep you get, it’s gonna take twice as long to escape without magic tearing its way out of you
"I have depression." - character who has been through extensive therapy.
"I feel dead inside all the time and nothing helps!" - character who does like, regular introspective thinking and is aware of the concept of mental health.
"Leave me the fuck alone I'll be fine once I get over my stupid shit." - repressed character.
"It's fine I'm just having an Empty Time. What? Yeah, empty times, you know, when everything is like bzzzzzz in your brain and you don't shower for two weeks. Why, what do you call it?" - ooooughhh now we're talkin
#this post is a jillion times better than all the posts that complaina bout therapyspeak #this one SHOWS the relationship between characterization and conceptualization #of depression #as an example of that relationship in general (via @rubynye)
David Maisel
imo the pov character should be lying to themselves and concealing shit from themselves constantly
interrupting others who might say something revealing or important, thinking around things, using words like “didn’t” or “doesn’t” or “imagines” to describe actions not taken or half taken, dreaming things and never talking about them or thinking about them during waking hours, lying to people, hiding true feelings, sitting in shadow or low light to keep any accidental flicker of emotion hidden, writing in obtuse ways that doesn’t let the reader know what they’re thinking or planning, avoiding adverbs in tense moments, describing actions in straightforward and almost clinical ways sometimes, hiding the truth from the character and the reader even though you both know or suspect but there is just enough space there to fill with doubt
Tragedy alignment chart. Feel free to use, but please reblog if you do.
And of course the second part of the tragedy, which is: which quadrant did you think you were in vs. which one you were really in
professor e fall 2025
David Dastmalchian Photographed by Gina Gizella Manning
do you all see my vision here
to me the thing about deification is that something fundamental is lost in the process
people can’t be immortal. so in order to be immortal you can’t be a person anymore. you have to be distilled. stripped of everything. till you come out the other side as an abstract concept.