On the Mogai Miraheze Wiki you link, it has a line that states "Xenopronouns are exclusive to alterhumans and headmates who identify as (or just are) animals, aliens, robots, or other non-human creatures." <- I've asked around about this before and people seem to agree that this just isn't true / is a stupid rule to begin with / have never heard this before. <- some of which comes from those who are Alterhumans.
Hello! I would love to delve a little deeper into this topic. Thanks for the ask!
I'd like to bring up, that, the definition could very well be altered, due to the original coining not being cited in the original source. It is very possible that the original definition wasn't as exclusionary as others say it is, or vice-versa; but, going into this discussion, I'm going to take it as it's written / what it implies.
Xenopronouns, in the many iterations I've seen (across the LGBTQIA+ wiki, the fandom pronoun wiki, and the MOGAI wiki), are listed as 'hypothetical', and further, are not able to be expressed via human language, or understood by humans. They may be listed as exclusive to alterhumans/nonhumans; this may be due to the fact, that humans aren't able to express or understand them.
However, I personally disagree with this sentiment. There are beings who consider themselves both alterhuman and human, both nonhuman and human. Identity can, and will be contradictory, so I personally, do not see a point in policing who uses xenopronouns.
There are many different paradoxes and ideas that humans can't solve, can't completely describe, or don't completely understand / understand at all, such as; what the "perfect pitch" is / actually sounds like, the exact cause of Synesthesia, the mechanisms behind photographic memory, the lottery paradox, certain feelings and emotions, etc etc. To tell someone that they cannot use something because they don't understand it / or can't explain it, goes against human nature. Unless there is a cultural reason for the exclusion, I don't see a reason against it, coming from an alterhuman who also considers themself human.
TLDR: While the definition of xenopronouns implies that humans wouldn't be able to use them, the original definition (due to not being sourced anywhere) could say otherwise. Either way, the definition found today can exclude beings who use contradictory labels, like nonhuman humans, alterhuman humans, and the like. Many things, even separate from identity, humans cannot grasp/describe, but continue to use/talk about it. There isn't a reason for identity policing unless there's a cultural reason, so I feel that it's safe to disregard the whole "humans can't use this" exclusion.
