No title available
trying on a metaphor
ojovivo
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
KIROKAZE
Mike Driver
Sade Olutola

if i look back, i am lost

oozey mess

Discoholic šŖ©

Janaina Medeiros
Game of Thrones Daily
Monterey Bay Aquarium
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Peter Solarz

@theartofmadeline
YOU ARE THE REASON
Stranger Things
d e v o n
dirt enthusiast

seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Brazil
seen from Australia
seen from Tunisia
seen from Spain

seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from Algeria
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Iraq
seen from Singapore
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from Tunisia
@yes-one-direction-again
ashes-fall-in-fading-beautyĀ here you go ugh
but is blended cucumber as applesauce good enough lbr
stiles is me. we are one.
āOkay, I want details. Please! Come on, I was nice to you.ā
Happy Thanksgiving, hope you hear a good Dad joke
GIFS VIA NBC NEWS
theyāre so beautiful
wtf this is so dad i canāt believe that obama can even dad joke
the flowers that we grew together died of thirst
A VERY SHORT RECAP (NOT REALLY A RECAP) OF TONIGHTāS EPISODE:
Keep reading
wtf idk if this is even real
Uber A: What's in a Name?
Marlene may have said too much.
Or, how I may have accidentally solved Pretty Little Liarsā big mystery.
Keep reading
These songs were once about my life. Now they are about yours.
I was thinking about the Grim Reaper recently. Theyāre not tied to any particular religion, they just personify death and collect the soul and take themā¦where? What if theyāre like afterlife HR?
āSo hey! Youāre right on time! Okay,Ā your chart saysĀ āHellenic.ā Got your coin for the ferryman? No?! Alright, hereās the deal:Ā sign here, River Styx is down the next hall on the left, but you canāt cross for another hundred years. Hey, I donāt make the rules! What do you think a last will and testamentās for, Felix?!ā
āGina! Almost had you there inĀ ā93 with that heart attack, eh? Eh? Anyway, Catholic, right? Hang a left, St. Peterās waiting behind the gates, heāll give you your assignment.ā
āHey boss, this oneĀ didnāt believe in afterlife or having a soulā Iām headed to my next appointment.ā
āSanjay! Nice long life you had there, buddy. So you remember where the Great Revolving Door of Reincarnation isā oh wait! You qualify for nirvana! Look at you!ā
āSo Sam, youāreā¦agnostic. Come to my office, weāll discuss your options.ā
verati404, this one!
I really love this take on the Grim Reaper, actually.Ā It takes everybody into account.Ā Kinda reminds me of the afterlife several mediums have described.
me: so how do you feel about mikasa ackerman?
date: oh my god she's so clingy and weak
me, shoving breadsticks into my purse: sorry I just remembered I have to go home immediately.
Here is where I display my true colors. I am a little heartbroken to see this. I commissioned the piece and the image is very meaningful to me. I donāt begrudge Alice making a profit off of it at all, and I donāt mind that it was the LP coverā how cool is that?! But to know that somebody out there is going to win a copy of the print with Benedictās signature on it? That guts me. I need another hobby.
I personally seeĀ it like this: when I commission andĀ pay for an artwork, the copyright for said artworkĀ belongs to me and it cannot be sold to someone else. Bad style.
No, rights always belong to the artist, if you didnāt buy them too, there are different types of rights for different costs, so if you want it to be only yours you buy rights.
Rights donāt belong to the artist when theyāve sold them. And what am I paying for, please, when I donāt obtain the rights to an artwork that only exists because I commissioned and PAID it?
I thought fan artists always asked the person who commissioned and bought their work if they could even post it online, let alone do something else with it. Isnāt the whole idea that itās supposed to be unique? Something personal and special thatĀ belongs to the person who paid for it?Ā
Iād demand my money back.
Really, thatās why I have such a deep mistrust towards fan artists. Iāve already commissioned and paid two artworks which I never received (in other fandoms than Sherlock).
When I risked a third attempt (in this fandom), everything worked out beautifully though.
Now I hear of Midonzās experience and am disappointed again.
She says she was only sad because herĀ copy didnāt come with Benedictās autograph. Doesnāt change what I think, though.
No. Owning the actual painting is not the same as owning copyright and reproduction rights in the painting: āIt is important to know that copyright nearly always rests with the artist, regardless of who owns the artworkā (āCopyright Law for Artists,ā Writers and Artists: The Insider Guide to the Media). Copyright is rarely included with a commission, and requires a special contract. The idea may have been yours, but the creativity that made that idea material belongs to the artist: you can own the artistic product, but the artistry aināt for sale. Fan artists are artists, and should be respected as such. (See also the āMoral Rightsā section of Harvard Law Schoolās Artistsā Rights page.)
THANK YOU PROF. Ā As an artist - a professional artist who creates original work for pay, as opposed to a fanartist who does it solely for the love of it (which is a sliding scale, btw, not two separate boxes) - I will fight tooth and nail for fanartists to be treated fairly, to be granted the same rights and respect as any other artists. Ā
Which means: commissioning artists should always always come with the assumption that the artist retains all the rights to the finished work, unless specified otherwise in the negotiations. Ā Thatās not nicety or convention, thatās the law. (at least in the US, though I know itās not uncommon in other countries, as well)
A lot of fanartists kind of handwave this part but, in discussions like this, itās very important to make that clear: unless specified otherwise, the buyer has no rights to display, license, print, (re)sell, or otherwiseĀ āownā the image, including the copyright or license to same. Ā āRights donāt belong to the artist if theyāve sold them,ā sure, but commissioning an artist does not include, by default, all rights to that image. Ā Copyright and licensing is not a single package deal like a salad bar, where you pay one low rate and get everything; rights to an image is more like an a la carte menu, unless you want to throw a bunch of money at the artist and buy the whole damn menu outright.
Many times, the negotiation is informal, likeĀ āhey can you make an [x] icon for me?ā - which usually means,Ā ācan you make an image of [x] that I can use for digital display, possibly across multiple platforms?ā Ā However, the artist still retains all rights to that image (including display on their own page(s), resale, printing rights, etc), unless the buyer specifically requests exclusivity. Ā Ā
The only reason you can reblog someone elseās art on sharing sites like tumblr is because in signing up to the website, every user grants tumblr the right to re-display our content on other blogs/pages - itās in the TOS that basically nobody reads. Ā But thatās also why reposting (making a new/separate post containing) someone elseās artwork without permission is not only tacky, but itās also illegal, because you donāt own display/distribution rights to that work.Ā
Artists, if youāre not charging extra for exclusive rights, you are underselling your work. Ā Licensing and copyright are important - yes, even if itās fanart. Ā (See: Hot Topic ripping off fanartists - thatās a violation of those fanartistsā rights, yeah? no matter who commissioned the work)
And the rest of yaāll? stop treating artists like pretty-picture vending machines, where you pop a quarter in and hit a button and get whatever you want. Ā You donāt own rights to shit, unless you negotiate and pay for it.
(I totally get Mid0nz being kind of bummed, though - from what I understand, itās not that she thinks she owns the image, just thatĀ she wishes sheād gotten a signed copy, which I can grok.)
If it helps, think about it in the reverse. Would you argue that for the small amount a comissioned piece costs (seriously, most comissions are very reasonably priced), the buyer has the right to reprint and sell it as much as they want, even though they did 0% of the work? Say you spent $30 on a drawing, are you going to turn around and mass produce it to sell for $10? By saying you own the rights, you are saying that the comissioner has every right to do just that. Copyright laws exist to protect artists from that very thing. While most artists are totally alright with not selling copies of a comissioned work, ultimately it is up to the artist. Contracts are very important.
(The irony is how this post is about a piece of fanart, which muddles the matter even more, since you have to consider the āsource materialā as well. Thatās why everyone is scared of Disneyās lawyers.)