We are calling to speak to you about your Tenno's extended warranty.
time for some chill Warframe space ninja'ing

blake kathryn

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

#extradirty

ellievsbear

Origami Around

Product Placement
Show & Tell

Discoholic 🪩
styofa doing anything
noise dept.

izzy's playlists!
Today's Document

JBB: An Artblog!
YOU ARE THE REASON

⁂
taylor price
sheepfilms
Claire Keane
Not today Justin

if i look back, i am lost
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from Barbados
seen from Poland

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@a-alhazred
We are calling to speak to you about your Tenno's extended warranty.
time for some chill Warframe space ninja'ing
Red-Pilled
I really liked Matrix 4. Rather than writing an essay (yet) I’m gonna post my thoughts on viewing #2 post-first-time-excitement where I actually start seeing things I don’t like.
Also basically every online critic who says the movie is too concerned with being self-aware hates it because the thing it’s self-aware about is modern-day commercialized nerd culture which they all think is great. Wil Wheaton is going to feel like this movie is a personal attack (but he can’t say it because he’ll get cancelled for trying to call out an LGBT writer/director.)
(I also don’t think the movie is quite as masochistic as some others who like it but it definitely is a little, at least.)
Spoilers, obviously.
Just playin' some games.
Metroid Dread, barring technical difficulties!
Just playin' some games.
more bugs with Aliens Fireteam Elite!
we've been trying to reach you about your vehicle's extended warranty
bug hunting in Aliens Fireteam Elite
reblog and put in the tags the fictional character death that destroyed you the most
This is most likely because I’m currently in the middle of a re-watch but still.
Please stop equating "this has tropes" to analysis.
Please stop equating "this has tropes" to "this is bad."
Recommendation engines and "lean-back" media
In William Gibson’s 1992 novel “Idoru,” a media executive describes her company’s core audience:
“Best visualized as a vicious, lazy, profoundly ignorant, perpetually hungry organism craving the warm god-flesh of the anointed. Personally I like to imagine something the size of a baby hippo, the color of a week-old boiled potato, that lives by itself, in the dark, in a double-wide on the outskirts of Topeka. It’s covered with eyes and it sweats constantly. The sweat runs into those eyes and makes them sting. It has no mouth…no genitals, and can only express its mute extremes of murderous rage and infantile desire by changing the channels on a universal remote. Or by voting in presidential elections.”
It’s an astonishingly great passage, not just for the image it evokes, but for how it captures the character of the speaker and her contempt for the people who made her fortune.
It’s also a beautiful distillation of the 1990s anxiety about TV’s role in a societal “dumbing down,” that had brewed for a long time, at least since the Nixon-JFK televised debates, whose outcome was widely attributed not to JFK’s ideas, but to Nixon’s terrible TV manner.
Neil Postman’s 1985 “Amusing Ourselves To Death” was a watershed here, comparing the soundbitey Reagan-Dukakis debates with the long, rhetorically complex Lincoln-Douglas debates of the previous century.
(Incidentally, when I finally experienced those debates for myself, courtesy of the 2009 BBC America audiobook, I was more surprised by Lincoln’s unequivocal, forceful repudiations of slavery abolition than by the rhetoric’s nuance)
https://memex.craphound.com/2009/01/20/lincoln-douglas-debate-audiobook-civics-history-and-rhetoric-lesson-in-16-hours/
“Media literacy” scholarship entered the spotlight, and its left flank — epitomized by Chomsky’s 1988 “Manufacturing Consent” — claimed that an increasingly oligarchic media industry was steering society, rather than reflecting it.
Thus, when the internet was demilitarized and the general public started trickling — and then rushing — to use it, there was a widespread hope that we might break free of the tyranny of concentrated, linear programming (in the sense of “what’s on,” and “what it does to you”).
Much of the excitement over Napster wasn’t about getting music for free — it was about the mix-tapification of all music, where your custom playlists would replace the linear album.
Likewise Tivo, whose ad-skipping was ultimately less important than the ability to watch the shows you liked, rather than the shows that were on.
Blogging, too: the promise was that a community of reader-writers could assemble a daily “newsfeed” that reflected their idiosyncratic interests across a variety of sources, surfacing ideas from other places and even other times.
The heady feeling of the time is hard to recall, honestly, but there was a thrill to getting up and reading the news that you chose, listening to a playlist you created, then watching a show you picked.
And while there were those who fretted about the “Daily Me” (what we later came to call the “filter bubble”) the truth was that this kind of active media creation/consumption ranged far more widely than the monopolistic media did.
The real “bubble” wasn’t choosing your own programming — it was everyone turning on their TV on Thursday nights to Friends, Seinfeld and The Simpsons.
The optimism of the era is best summarized in a taxonomy that grouped media into two categories: “lean back” (turn it on and passively consume it) and “lean forward” (steer your media consumption with a series of conscious decisions that explores a vast landscape).
Lean-forward media was intensely sociable: not just because of the distributed conversation that consisted of blog-reblog-reply, but also thanks to user reviews and fannish message-board analysis and recommendations.
I remember the thrill of being in a hotel room years after I’d left my hometown, using Napster to grab rare live recordings of a band I’d grown up seeing in clubs, and striking up a chat with the node’s proprietor that ranged fondly and widely over the shows we’d both seen.
But that sociability was markedly different from the “social” in social media. From the earliest days of Myspace and Facebook, it was clear that this was a sea-change, though it was hard to say exactly what was changing and how.
Around the time Rupert Murdoch bought Myspace, a close friend a blazing argument with a TV executive who insisted that the internet was just a passing fad: that the day would come when all these online kids grew up, got beaten down by work and just wanted to lean back.
To collapse on the sofa and consume media that someone else had programmed for them, anaesthetizing themselves with passive media that didn’t make them think too hard.
This guy was obviously wrong — the internet didn’t disappear — but he was also right about the resurgence of passive, linear media.
But this passive media wasn’t the “must-see TV” of the 80s and 90s.
Rather, it was the passivity of the recommendation algorithm, which created a per-user linear media feed, coupled with mechanisms like “endless scroll” and “autoplay,” that incinerated any trace of an active role for the “consumer” (a very apt term here).
It took me a long time to figure out exactly what I disliked about algorithmic recommendation/autoplay, but I knew I hated it. The reason my 2008 novel LITTLE BROTHER doesn’t have any social media? Wishful thinking. I was hoping it would all die in a fire.
Today, active media is viewed with suspicion, considered synonymous with Qanon-addled boomers who flee Facebook for Parler so they can stan their favorite insurrectionists in peace, freed from the tyranny of the dread shadowban.
But I’m still on team active media. I would rather people actively choose their media diets, in a truly sociable mode of consumption and production, than leaning back and getting fed whatever is served up by the feed.
Today on Wired, Duke public policy scholar Philip M Napoli writes about lean forward and lean back in the context of Trump’s catastrophic failure to launch an independent blog, “From the Desk of Donald J Trump.”
https://www.wired.com/story/opinion-trumps-failed-blog-proves-he-was-just-howling-into-the-void/
In a nutshell, Trump started a blog which he grandiosely characterized as a replacement for the social media monopolists who’d kicked him off their platforms. Within a month, he shut it down.
While Trump claimed the shut-down was all part of the plan, it’s painfully obvious that the real reason was that no one was visiting his website.
Now, there are many possible, non-exclusive explanations for this.
For starters, it was a very bad social media website. It lacked even rudimentary social tools. The Washington Post called it “a primitive one-way loudspeaker,” noting its lack of per-post comments, a decades old commonplace.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/05/21/trump-online-traffic-plunge/
Trump paid (or more likely, stiffed) a grifter crony to build the site for him, and it shows: the “Like” buttons didn’t do anything, the video-sharing buttons created links to nowhere, etc. From the Desk… was cursed at birth.
But Napoli’s argument is that even if Trump had built a good blog, it would have failed. Trump has a highly motivated cult of tens of millions of people — people who deliberately risked death to follow him, some even ingesting fish-tank cleaner and bleach at his urging.
The fact that these cult-members were willing to risk their lives, but not endure poor web design, says a lot about the nature of the Trump cult, and its relationship to passive media.
The Trump cult is a “push media” cult, simultaneously completely committed to Trump but unwilling to do much to follow him.
That’s the common thread between Fox News (and its successors like OANN) and MAGA Facebook.
And it echoes the despairing testimony of the children of Fox cultists, that their boomer parents consume endless linear TV, turning on Fox from the moment they arise and leaving it on until they fall asleep in front of it (also, reportedly, how Trump spent his presidency).
Napoli says that Trump’s success on monopoly social media platforms and his failure as a blogger reveals the role that algorithmically derived, per-user, endless scroll linear media played in the ascendancy of his views.
It makes me think of that TV exec and his prediction of the internet’s imminent disappearance (which, come to think of it, is not so far off from my own wishful thinking about social media’s disappearance in Little Brother).
He was absolutely right that this century has left so many of us exhausted, wanting nothing more than the numbness of lean-back, linear feeds.
But up against that is another phenomenon: the resurgence of active political movements.
After a 12-month period that saw widescale civil unrest, from last summer’s BLM uprising to the bizarre storming of the capital, you can’t really call this the golden age of passivity.
While Fox and OANN consumption might be the passive daily round of one of Idoru’s “vicious, lazy, profoundly ignorant, perpetually hungry organisms craving the warm god-flesh of the anointed,” that is in no way true of Qanon.
Qanon is an active pastime, a form of collaborative storytelling with all the mechanics of the Alternate Reality Games that the lean-forward media advocates who came out of the blogging era love so fiercely:
https://pluralistic.net/2020/08/06/no-vitiated-air/#other-hon
Meanwhile, the “clicktivism” that progressive cynics decried as useless performance a decade ago has become an active contact sport, welding together global movements from Occupy to BLM that use the digital to organize the highly physical.
That’s the paradox of lean-forward and lean-back: sometimes, the things you learn while leaning back make you lean forward — in fact, they might just get you off the couch altogether.
I think that Napoli is onto something. The fact that Trump’s cultists didn’t follow him to his crummy blog tells us that Trump was an effect, not a cause (something many of us suspected all along, as he’s clearly neither bright nor competent enough to inspire a movement).
But the fact that “cyberspace keeps everting” (to paraphrase “Spook Country,” another William Gibson novel) tells us that passive media consumption isn’t a guarantee of passivity in the rest of your life (and sometimes, it’s a guarantee of the opposite).
And it clarifies the role that social media plays in our discourse — not so much a “radicalizer” as a means to corral likeminded people together without them having to do much. Within those groups are those who are poised for action, or who can be moved to it.
The ease with which these people find one another doesn’t produce a deterministic outcome. Sometimes, the feed satisfies your urge for change (“clicktivism”). Sometimes, it fuels it (“radicalizing”).
Notwithstanding smug media execs, the digital realm equips us to “express our mute extremes of murderous rage and infantile desire” by doing much more than “changing the channels on a universal remote” — for better and for worse.
Image: Ian Burt (modified) https://www.flickr.com/photos/oddsock/267206444
CC BY: https://creativecommo
ns.org/licenses/by/2.0/
Hey I wrote something for a change.
It’s embarrassing fan-fiction but I’m posting it everywhere I can anyway because it’s been so long since I finished something.
Dreaming of a World Where all is Good...
It doesn't take Sam long to realize that inside the red armor, behind the toothy mask, is his son.
It's not until Jason comes home bruised and bloodied that Sam realizes his son could've died.
AO3 / FF.net
Shameless Referral Linking
if you pick up Division 2 while it's on sale for 3 bucks plz use my referral link so I can get the Hunter outfit. (All these people with FRIENDS and ACQUAINTANCES who got it easy, sheesh, what am I, sociable?)
https://www.ubisoft.com/en-us/game/the-division/the-division-2/friend-referral?refid=D_kGmFqFfP4GL-k-VJYuWQ
Twitch is the world's leading video platform and community for gamers.
old-skool FPS fun with Painkiller. There's a Giant Stake Gun and everything!
lol fake epic exclusivity
Back to #TheOuterWorlds in a few minutes!
Thoughts on how to make The Matrix 4 not shit.
As one of the four people in the world who actually liked Reloaded and Revolutions, I actually can't wait for #TheMatrix4. It'll probably be a giant dumpster fire even for someone of my... unpopular tastes... but I don't care, I want it anyway.
Here’s some realtalk on how maybe make The Matrix 4 good, though. Broadly, take the same idea Matrix Online had for what comes post-movies and tell it better. More specifically:
- Minimal appearances by the old characters. The ones who are still alive had special roles to play in that story arc, there is no reason for them to have special roles in civilization moving on. Maybe have Kid wearing Neo's coat.
- Show those civilizations. There are three: Zion, the Machines, and the Exiles. "The Second Renaissance" did an excellent job portraying the Machines as an actual species with individuals and not some nebulous hive entity, a point often missed. Show them with recognizable concepts (individuality, for example) but with bizarre non-human takes on those concepts. Rama Kandra and his family were an attempt at this that somehow missed even though it was one of the most literal, least symbolic things in the series. In a different context I might actually criticize that scene for abandoning the usual subtly of the series, but like the movie adaptation of Starship Troopers, it was somehow actually too subtle.
Show the Merovingian as a mob boss that the exiles have to live under. He can have a character arc because he would've been assimilated by Smith the same as everything else and there's no reason to assume he came out of that psychologically unscathed. He doesn’t have to go crazy, but he can be gain nuance beyond his snobby pursuit of hedonism 100% of the time.
- Actually focus on the Matrix to avoid what turned everyone off about Revolutions. The earth is still ruined and if it can recover, it won't be in the lifetime of several generations, so everyone needs the Matrix. The humans need it because they can't maintain a population larger than Zion by moving out, because there's nowhere to move to. There are still humans (the majority) who would choose the comfort of the Matrix over the real world anyway. The Machines need it for the same reason they always have. The exiles need it because it's their Zion; they have nowhere else to go.
- That's all the worldbuilding. The plot should focus on how the three civilizations interact now that the Machines are willing to allow outside human life beyond their direct control. Since everyone needs the Matrix, a colder war for more control begins. The exiles still have to fight to survive, which is how the Merovingian maintains power, by being a unifying, organizing force. The Machines' agreement with Neo did not include them. The humans have extremists like Morpheus who still want to shut the whole thing down on principle and others who adhere to common sense and say "principles are fine but the reality is we either accept this or they'll go back to killing us."
The Machines are similarly split, wondering why they have to put up with this at all. The usual excuse given to answer “why don’t they just use cows for batteries” is “because they’re three-laws compliant and they must still technically serve man, so they made the Matrix to give man a comfortable life.” At a meeting, the Machine representative debunks by explaining that no, they aren't still three-laws compliant, if they ever even were at all. They didn’t need to build the Matrix to technically satisfy their programming, thank you very much, they didn't go with cows because as sentient beings who are not psychotic, they simply aren't genocidal maniacs. They spared humanity on moral grounds, but now that humanity is free, they need to not make it more trouble than it's worth. Great opportunity for nuance here; we know that the humans did not extend this morality to the Machines originally, which is why the war started to begin with. Maybe some of the Machines are not altruistic, but they hold their unwillingness to commit genocide as proof of moral superiority? Do they clash with Machines who say “that was so long ago and we’ve been manipulating them for so long that present-day humans should not be judged on their ancestors’ actions, they aren’t remotely the same civilization?” Do they hold this opinion out of altruism themselves, or is it just a logical conclusion? Rama Kandra explained that they can use the same words to describe their feelings the same way humans do but they aren’t human so they experience those things differently; are the Machines even capable of altruism as humans understand it? If not, does it even matter, so long as they’re capable of it in their own way?
I'm not trying to re-contextualize the Machines here to say they're pure victims and humanity were the real villains, but I *hate* how the fanbase (such as it is) always ignores that "The Second Renaissance" gave them characterization beyond flat villains. They aren't a villainous force of nature, the narrative equivalent of an evil, amorphous blob. They are a civilization, and the story and setting become much more interesting when they are acknowledged as such. Very important, actual line: "May there be mercy on Man and Machine for their sins."
This setting has so many elements ripe for interesting stories, if they would only be used.
People who get really into science in fantasy worldbuilding are the most boring and pedantic people alive
deadgripss: Not to state the obvious but it’s because people spend too much time on reddit. And that makes them believe that “realism” in a very narrow sense of the word is the most important thing ever.
Oh no, totally. And it’s like…I don’t care about climatology or tectonic plates or what fibers people make their clothing out of, unless that impacts trade! I don’t care if you think my mountains are unrealistic! There’s millions of guides on how to fucking construct climate zones, and none on how ancient politics actually worked beyond a vague elementary school understanding
also if it’s a fantasy world I should be able to have an entire volcano made out of nothing but obsidian because I say so
I’d make an exception if there’s an important character or characterss who is/are very into the topic at hand in-story, but other than that... yeaaaahhh.
I’m sure I’m preaching to the choir here but
“Internal consistency is more important than straight realism”
^words that need to be pounded into the heads of many many people who fancy themselves literary authorities
Goes for sci-fi, too. There’s the weird variation in Star Trek where fans get made fun of for being too pedantic, but the reason they’re pedantic is that 3.5 shows spent years setting up consistent rules for how things worked whenever a new problem came along (as a result, Star Trek is much more on the “hard” end of sci-fi than most realize) and then you get to Enterprise and especially Discovery where the material is made by people who don’t give enough of a shit to even pretend to be consistent. (Honestly one of the most damning things you can say about Discovery is that when you can use Voyager to school them on continuity, you know they done fucked up bad.)
All of this might be why I’ve been so taken by planetary romance like Derpstiny Destiny and Warframe as of late.
Twitch is the world's leading video platform and community for gamers.
Back to Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines!
Where do you want to go?
Twitch is the world's leading video platform and community for gamers.
Gonna get spookied with Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines!
Fan of LA By Night but never played this and wondering why everyone loves it when Nines Rodriguez, Isaac Abrams and Strauss show up? Some of ‘em might just show up here...
Twitch is the world's leading video platform and community for gamers.
Chillaxing with Division 2, may play something else later, maybe not, idk