Anti-Anti-Contact Movement

The AAC Movement strives for para unity while resisting the toxicity anti contacts have brought to the para community. Created by @Germanicdemon . Hate and unrelated asks won't be shown or answered.

[aacmovement]

The Anti-Anti-Contact Movement

The Anti-Anti-Contact Movement strives for a united para community without the toxicity and exclusion the anti contacts have brought here.

Founded by @germanicdemon

Flag meaning:

Greenish Cyan: Acceptance and inclusion of individuals who don't want to have contact and aren't toxic towards those who do

Tealish Green: Fighting for paraphile rights and normalization

Black: Pushing the paraphile community towards unity without toxicity and exclusion

Dark Teal: Resistance against Anti Contacts' exclusionary and toxicity towards other contact stances

Symbols:

ΑΑς, 🦏πφ, 💚🩵🦏

Tags:

#ΑΑς , #🦏πφ , #💚🩵🦏 , #Anti-Anti-Contact , #AAC Movement #AAC Questions , #AAC Concerns , #AAC Submissions , #AAC Graphics

Carrd.co:

https://aacmovement.carrd.co/

Original post:

https://archive.ph/MhAMw

Para coinings:

https://archive.ph/PFyfW

https://archive.ph/3A6vd

[aacmovement]

Why be anti-anti something when you can just be pro? Genuinely asking bc this just seems weird to me and like you are trolling or not taking your stance very seriously.

I named the movement Anti-Anti-Contact because it is against the hatred and exclusion Anti-Contacts have brought to the paraphile community. The movement accepts all contact stances, including anti-contacts that aren't hateful and/or exclusionary; it is not made just for Pro-Contacts.

[aacmovement]

reply to the last post (not reblog)

antis gotta learn to read one of these days 😭

"pro-rape pro predator" this account has literally said the opposite, it's pro consensual relationships!! not child rape or abuse or anything

it's been stated, they just saw "yeah antis can be mean" and decided to prove you right 😭

-🐈‍⬛☀️

Right, right. Even if they were referring to me identifying as a basedqueer on my personal account, I just do it because I am very low empathy. But for this movement, I do want to be a better and more caring person. If I someone about something bad happening to them, I will feel bad for them. I want this movement to bring unity and positivity disassociated from my own unrelated struggles. I want to make a positive impact on the world, even if it is this niche.

[radq-hot-takes]

theres too many anti cs who hate pro cs and not enough pro c community (maybe im just not on the right platforms)

even the radqueer discord servers that say things like they "accept all contact stances" or "no contact discourse" in practice harass anyone who says anything pro contact or unsure away, or directly ban them, but extreme anti contact people can say all their opinions and bigoted reasons for being anti contact with no argument, or if someone does say they disagree then theyre the problem

⚗️

Agree

Disagree

Fair

It’s complicated

No opinion

Voting ended onAug 4

Any nuances, thoughts, opinions, comments or anything you can put them in the comments, reblogs or ask box with the post linked.

[animal-creature]

If any transid or para needs to hear this,

You will be alright.

You will be safe, you will be comfortable, you will be free, you will be happy.

We will be accepted. It's inevitable. We're making progress day by day. Our communities grow rapidly, people who were once skeptical change their minds and become accepting.

You will survive, and you will live.

Please keep going on.

There's always someone fighting for you.

[d34dqueer]

poster made by me, free to use

[seraphimfailure]

You are not pro-para if you only like the palatable ones.

You are not pro-para if you can accept necros and biastos, but not MAP/AAMs and zoos.

You are not pro-para if you only think the ones that are common in the paraphile tag are okay.

If you cannot accept all paraphiles, you are not pro-para.

[clockiphilia]

YOU ARE VALID THE WAY YOU ARE!

I’m sorry about the quality ok

[aacmovement]

". . .report @/aacmovement" also them in the same post "thinks being anti contact is "toxic"". Okay well what do you call what you are doing now? Is trying to falsely report and get this account taken down not toxic? Also my account is not going any time soon, I do not post anything guidelines breaking and/or illegal.

Anti-contacts are truly something...

[aacmovement]

https://www.tumblr.com/paramisic-blocklist/823610306941075456/a-little-different-than-usual-as-it-is-not?source=share

say this post and it made me giggle a lil

what do you mean you're putting paraphiles on the paramisic blocklist do they hear themselves?? 😭

I agree when people confuse anti-contact with pro-consent cause they are just not the same, plus if you wanna tell people your pro consensual relationships than maybe use that and not "you should act on anything ever!" aka anti-contact

-🐈‍⬛☀️

Here for those who can't see the linked post.

I don't know who choco is, maybe we are mutuals, but I follow a lot of people.

If they block me then good, this movement is not made for those kinds of people anyways. I did not make the name just because of my trauma. Of course not all anti-contacts are vile like this. Some are good people, others are groomed into hating us.

Regardless, I agree with you. This makes no sense for a paramisic blocklist, as I am by no means paramisic. Pro-consensual contact and also being anti-contact is oxymoronic. "you are why (___) isn't widely accepted" is a very common phrase by actual paramisics and even terfs; it is unsurprising to see they use the same language.

Nevertheless this movement will prevail. We will continue to stand against this behavior and push the community towards unity and acceptance.

Image text:

canine-entertainment asked:

A little different than usual as it is not technically paramisic, but still unsafe nevertheless. Don't let this sentimentspread! Block aacmovement

Image of the aac movement flag meaning

Anti-contact is for anything that would cause non-consensual harm to another being. It is not pro-contact for objectums to date objects because no harm is being done. This is a pro-contact movement, watering down the stance meanings. We will exclude you because you are advocating for harm. You are why para pride isn't widely accepted. They think we're all like you. I'm not "uniting" with predators.

paramisic-blocklist answered:

Hell no, I am not gonna get along with preds and abusers. block aacmovement

paramisic-blocklist

Another thing is that aacmovement is run by a transnazi and the blog runner has affiliations with choco omfg

[aacmovement]

just got my first ask on my zoo account is I'm anti-contact (cause I don't have my contact stance listed anywhere) but like I'm using the zeta flag dawg what do you think 😭

like it's so annoying that people assume you're an evil villain if you don't plaster anti-contact everywhere on your account and tag everything we a fantasy cause god forbid someone wanna do that irl

sorry just came to rant lol

-🐈‍⬛☀️

I agree, people prop up being anti-contact far too much. I'm sorry your first ask wasn't something more interesting. On a side note, it is very lovely to see a zeta that doesn't mind the paraphile community.

[aacmovement]

I am planning on making a list of good sites and information later on that will be on the Carrd. It is just wishful thinking right now, but it is in the works. I will start with the more obvious ones then work my way down to specifics. :)

[aacmovement]

Lots of animals have been observed masturbating both in the wild and in domesticated settings, which implies that animals do feel sexual urges and seek out sexual pleasure/stimulus beyond instinctual procreation. Actually, im pretty sure some ape species do have sex as a bonding experience and for fun rather than purely for biological population purposes. But I’m not too knowledgeable on apes.

It’s actually pretty well known that dogs and horses can learn that sexual stimulus feels good and therefore will develop masturbatory habits because it feels good. And I’m not just talking about dogs mounting—because that is a complex behavior that is not entirely sexual in nature—but also licking and rubbing themselves as well.

Right, this is why I love for people to do research. It is great to be aware of these kinds of things. Animals are far smarter and complex than people give them credit for. We aren't the only species on the planet that has sex outside of just reproduction.

[averagefleurson]

Just fyi, being attracted to minors isn’t a political ideology.

Being an abuser/groomer doesn’t come with your attraction, people are abusive because they don’t give a fuck about themselves or the people they’re abusing.

Putting this type of blame on paraphiles is literally the same logic as “Men can’t help themselves, it’s just their hormones!” but being used against a group instead of in favor of a group.

Abusers are abusers because they choose to be so.

Stop shifting the blame on paraphiles, it won’t solve anything because being a paraphile doesn’t inherently make you abusive.

[kiyos-den]

paramisia is unfortunately super common in society, so lots of people can accidentally hold beliefs that are paramisic without even realisin !! even paraphiles can accidentally be paramisic - let's unlearn paramisia together !!

[dubiousdoobie]

We need acceptance, not ‘help’ or condemnation

Usually, when joe public hears the word ‘incest’ they immediately move to either condemn us as ‘perverts’ or insist that we are ‘sick’ peopl

we're far more normal than you'd ever imagine

[aacmovement]

responding to previous anon just a lil

body language is a varied thing which definitely can make it more difficult than when words can also be exchanged but can absolutely be done, bdsm does it all the time, whether it's petplay so the pet can't speak or some kind of choking device, etc, consent can still be given and revoked at any time

I believe a similar thing can happen with animals, say a dog, if that animal doesn't want to have sex it will merely stop or leave, whether giving or receiving, I don't think any kind of luring with treats or restricting them from leaving is ethical at all, the animal has to be able to change its mind at any point to prove it does in fact what this

(I did also want to write a side note saying I don't think all animals can consent, I believe it's a case by case basis, dogs horses pigs maybe? I haven't done my research but I wouldn't think something like a jellyfish could ya know?)

rambling again oh well

-🐈‍⬛☀️

I agree with this fully. Body language is complex, which is why I prefer people to do their research before getting into it. I have never liked zoos that suggest luring with treats as it is manipulative and coercion, instead of receiving actual consent. Restricting them is far worse because that prevents them from being able to dissent and stop. I also want to say that I believe anal is always abusive as their bodies are not made for that, they never like it, and it can very easily cause internal bleeding.

Also right, it definitely depends on the species. All animals are different, and not all of them are into us.