GMO OMG: Label GMOs!
Imagine if half the world’s population were autistic.
A recent study by MIT predicts that by 2025, one in two children will be diagnosed with autism.
This silent perpetrator is glyphosate (aka Roundup), an herbicide sprayed on genetically modified crops – 88% of corn and 93% of soy in the United States. These plants are bred with a resistance to this powerful toxin so they are unharmed by the treatment. Humans, however, have not developed a resistance so even traces of glyphosate can be toxic.
Glyphosate is found in corn syrup, cornstarch, soy lecithin, animal feed – if it doesn’t say “organic,” it was probably treated with Roundup. Glyphosate is an endocrine disruptor. In simple terms – it disturbs the body’s natural production of hormone, causing organ and neurological damage. This includes diabetes, obesity, kidney and liver cancers, miscarriages, birth defects and developmental disorders. While there has been no long-term research conducted on the effects of glyphosate on the human body, the study found a Pearson coefficient of .985 – indicating that the as rates of glyphosate treatments spiked in the 1990s, so too did rates of autism.
With these problems so widely recognized, why has the US government failed to take action?
Currently 64 countries require the labeling of GMOs – 50 have bans or restrictions on any artificial crop treatment. However, the US still has no legislation requiring GMO labeling. How could this happen?
Companies that produce GMOs and crop treatments like Monsanto, Dow, and Genentech have been fighting labeling ever since glyphosate’s introduction in 1976. They have powerful lobbyists and in some cases, employees serve as government officials, a dirty practice aptly called the “revolving door.”
For instance, Linda Fisher served in the EPA’s Office of Pollution Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances before becoming VP of Government and Public Affairs for Monsanto. Michael Kantor was a former Secretary of the US Dept. of Commerce and is now a member of the board of directors for Monsanto. The list continues – Michael Taylor, Josh King, Michael Philips – all Monsanto, Genentech, or Dow executives that have served on the very organizations intended to regulate these companies.
Therefore, a full ban on GMOs could not be feasible. However, food manufacturers should be required to label the products that contain GMOs so consumers can make more informed decisions. These labels would be similar to the nutritional information printed on all packaged food, informing the consumer and hopefully, leading them to organic and GMO-free products.
Until there is sufficient long-term research conducted, a ban on GMOs would be unreasonable and could hinder the growth of the US farm industry. However with 91% of Americans in favor of labeling GMOs, we deserve to know what’s in our food.











