Listing "proshippers" alongside terfs, racists and pedophiles is so terminally online. You desperately need some perspective if you think "these fictional characters should fuck" is an idea as equally damaging as "these minorities should be killed".
“proshippers” write cp- so yeah actually it makes sense to put them in the same list as pedos.
Learn what cp is or shut the entire fuck up
shipping a child and an adult is cp wtf
sorry you like it written instead of in pictures it’s different means to the same ends
Survivor of childhood exploitation here. Your last comment is REPREHENSIBLE.
I don't like proship. I won't interact with proship blogs. But god damn it, the shit that I went through— that children go through— with CSEM? It isn't even comparable.
Don't reduce the trauma down to a simple difference of "written vs in pictures"
You want to advocate for children? Do better.
Shame on you!
adults who write “proship” content of a child/adult relationship- are adults who are getting off to children. they are normalizing/actively taking part in the sexualization of children. It’s cp.
Child abuse bad. writing about child abuse in a romanticized way bad. i thought this would be simple for you to understand.
Romanticizing child abuse IS bad. Writing about it this way IS bad. It IS CP. We're in agreement here.
My point is that you can't just say it's "written vs in pictures" because it downplays what children suffer through. Taking pictures requires the act to be happening. How is that in any way the same?
Writing it? Yeah, fucking horrific. But it just isn't exactly the same; I meant to illustrate how your comment DID INDEED make the two equivalent.
I really hope you have a good day; I agree with your points, and in sorry if you interpret this as a defense of that kind of content.
okay we agree. my comment was not saying someone committing real child harm is the same as someone writing about child harm.
however i was saying this person and the other people who read/write this stuff are engaging in content that functions as cp. it is functionally the same as a photo/video.
the people who partake in both of these materials are getting off on the exploitation of children. someone who reads “proship” is for all intents and purposes the same as someone looking at/watching it happen in a photo/video.
i said this because op thinks that written material gets to skirt by on a technicality so they can’t be compared to pedos- even though they very much can.
Oh! I'm really sorry. I thought the former was was what you were saying.
that's my mistake entirely.
