I love baby foxes. Nothing has ever had less of an idea.
buffering
feather obtained, purpose unclear
leaf obtained, purpose unclear
ground:
unclear
sibling obtained, purpose: biting
Claire Keane
Phantogram Three
Fieri Frames

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

No title available

No title available
$LAYYYTER

Discoholic 🪩
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
The Bright Sessions

PR's Tumblrdome

blake kathryn
Cosmic Funnies
untitled
Cosimo Galluzzi
almost home
🪼
noise dept.

shark vs the universe
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from T1

seen from Peru
seen from Argentina
seen from Uruguay
seen from India
seen from United States

seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from Iraq

seen from Japan

seen from Colombia
seen from Brazil

seen from New Zealand

seen from India
seen from Iraq
@achray1
I love baby foxes. Nothing has ever had less of an idea.
buffering
feather obtained, purpose unclear
leaf obtained, purpose unclear
ground:
unclear
sibling obtained, purpose: biting
I'm thinking about AI again because we're in the Nexus that creates Torment for profit.
And there's a thought rattling around in my head over the fact that a lot of the issues with AI are not brand new to the technology era--a source of chronic and easy misinformation; a technology that causes people to withdraw and isolate and often self-harm; an environmental scourge; an absolute machete to critical thinking, disciplined learning, and meaningful study because why bother with hard and long tasks when you can get fast and easy dopamine hits--all of these can be applied to social media as well.
But something makes AI so foot-to-the-gas-pedal worse in such a festering and pervasive and sudden way, and I think my conclusion for that lies in this emergent technology debuting to the public already under the control of big tech mega-conglomerates who--and this part is critical--were absolutely panickingly desperate at the exact moment ChatGPT hit the scene.
And I'm going to bother you with graphs about this. Because I think it will help explain a lot of the Full-Shove-Down-Throatedness you've no doubt noticed with AI.
And like to back up a second--modern social media is controlled by these exact same mega-conglomerates. But the social media platforms didn't start that way. They were a lot of guy-in-his-basement style inventions--tumblr included--which developed to serve an organic and natural niche people wanted. No throat-shoving yet. Most of us (tumblr demographic) were probably sparkle-dogging on deviantart and--yeah whatever--superwholocking over here. And that was by no means perfect or necessarily even good but there was opportunity to ease in and learn the good and bad.
THEN the mega-conglomerates got it and Facebook is a festering cesspit and Twitter is Like That. But there was a bit of a gradual enshittification there, and I imagine most people following my blog are old enough such that you were able to recognize what enshitted itself and disengage appropriately.
AI--for all the way its ills mirror social media--was born a fully formed fucking asshole directly into the cradles of big tech. And it's weird to consider the technology behind LLMs is not, inherently, evil. And that feels weird because it never really had the chance to exist in the public eye in any capacity before it was the throat-shoved and desperate weapon of big tech downright begging you to rot your brain out your ears and steal your work and pollute the earth and stop thinking and stop trying and stop learning.
Which maybe then begs the question, WHY the crazy desperation? Why the complete disregard for sense, law, legal ownership, and customer voices? Why does 'fetch' need to happen and why do Tech CEO's talk about it like they're gonna bite the cyanide pill in their molars if you don't buy a fucking gemini subscription.
Well I promised you graphs.
Here's your first graph. And here's a little fun fact for those following at home: ChatGPT came out Dec 20, 2022.
This graph shows the stock price for Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Meta (nee Facebook) between August 2016 (10 years ago) and Dec 20, 2022.
Now see that peak right before the start of 2022? Cover the downward side of it with your finger. Go on. Don't you see a beautiful exponential future of infinite growth? Don't you love when exponential growth is forever? Some of those returns were 400% in just 5 years. Sure, Covid caused a blip but what's a global pandemic in the face of a bullish stock run?
Okay now uncover the right side. That side is the screaming crying sobbing coaster of rich people feelings. And they were so very in their feels.
I'm zooming in on the graph for you. Welcome to November 2021 to Dec 20, 2022.
If you bought Amazon at peak? You were down 50%. Meta at peak? Down 60%. And every rich person investor is a money genius until the market turns, at which point it's panic to right the ship.
There were whispers of recession all throughout 2022 and it made the tech market crumble, because tech stock prices are highly speculative, and they ride market whiplash with more aggressive slingshotting than companies grounded in material value.
And then something happened on Dec 20, 2022. Obviously you know, I've said it 3 times. ChatGPT released. And oh boy.
Companies started promising AI. Investors started listening. The stock prices got happy.
Welcome to the graph 2022 to current day
And if the dance is working, they don't fucking stop dancing.
Do you WANT AI? Do you NEED AI? Will it actually help you? Might it in fact harm you? Will it harm the planet? Will it harm learning, and discipline, and the vulnerable, in the exact ways big tech companies are shoving it down people's throats?
Who give a shit! Whogiveasshitwhogiveasshitwhogiveahit. Money up! Desperate crying tech company HAPPY now. Money happy now!
Now the entire 10 year graph looks like this
And that scary scary scary scary drop off in 2022 that course corrected itself nigh exactly on December 20, 2022?
Well, you love AI, don't you? 🙂 As long as it's shoved down your throat.
Welcome to another round of W2 Tells You What You Should See, where W2 (me) tries to sell you (you) on something you should be watching. Today's choice: 南部档案 / Archives: The Nanyang Mystery.
The Southern Archives (which is what I'm going to call it) is a 2026 prequel series that's part of the Lost Tomb/DMBJ cosmos, featuring two almost-brothers/besties/coworkers, their terrible mom/boss, and the various adventures they have in early 20th-century Southeast Asia.
Yes, the Southern Archives -- like Reunion and Sand Sea and Time Raiders and the Mystic Nine -- is part of a long-running franchise based on a set of books written by a guy we're going to refer to as NPSS. However, this show is such a prequel that honestly, reading my recs for the others is more than enough to prepare you. You don't even need to read them! Look, here is a (mostly) complete list of things you need to know in advance to appreciate this specific show:
You are meant to recognize and have positive associations with the name "Zhang Qishan".
That's it! I have, with that one bullet point, sufficiently prepared you to watch this drama. Everything else will be given to you in exposition or can be picked up from context clues. I promise.
This show is a high-energy, high-emotion, wild-ass ride starring beautiful people in dashing period costumes. If you are intrigued by the idea of a bromance for the ages directed by the same guy who did Guardian, come a little closer and let me give you five rambling and semi-coherent reasons to watch these adventures.
1. The insanely compelling taste of salt-baked shrimp
Like Reunion, the Southern Archives is fundamentally a bunch of solid yet frequently goofy action sequences strung together like precious beads along a thin, unevenly paced plot, and if all that were put on the backs of mediocre talent, it would be amusing but missable junk food. However, also like Reunion, the production cast charming and engaging actors who are almost too good for the material, which elevates the shenanigans to something actually worth watching. And nobody here is more charming or engaging than than the leads.
The main acting kudos go to Steven Zhang as Zhang Hailou, because he has to carry large portions of the show singlehandedly. I loved him so much in Justice in the Dark that he was my #1 selling point, and I might have made him alone the #1 selling point here too except that his costars rise to meet him. Zhang Hailou is one of my favorite character types: a cocky, charismatic motherfucker whose (only slightly unearned) confidence leads him to fuck up real bad and have to deal with the catastrophic fallout of his thoughtless actions.
Also, he stores razor blades under his tongue and fights by expertly spitting them at people like he's a triggerfish, and you are not prepared for how stupidly hot it is when he does it.
He is matched in performance and intensity (if not screentime) by Ding Yixi as Zhang Haixia, the guy who's been cleaning up Hailou's messes since they were kids. He's the brains of the operation -- which of course means you have to nerf him and/or take him off the board frequently, lest he be too smart for the situations Hailou has to work himself out of. Besides, he's going through some stuff.
(For the record, the 'xia' in Haixia's name is a homophone of the word for 'shrimp', and the 'lou' in Hailou's name can also be read as 'yan', which is a homophone of the word for 'salt', in case you've been seeing all the seafood jokes and are like, I don't get it.)
When this show is silly, it's so so silly. When it's serious, it's a gut punch about grief and guilt. And the reason that gut punch lands is pretty much entirely due to how both leads can sell the idea that even the goofiest goings-on have real emotional weight to them. They are going to tell you with the straightest of faces that you can use a snake as a GoPro, and you are going to cry about it.
Both these lads also have track records of doing a whole lot with not a lot. Steven Zhang was the emotional lighthouse that cut through much of the fog of Justice in the Dark, and Ding Yuxi somehow managed to turn in a strangely affecting performance in White Cat Legend despite also being the titular white cat. And if it sweetens the pot, you should know that both of them spent those respective shows being very purposefully in love with various other boys.
Q: ...So are they gay for each other here too or what? A: [laughs hysterically for thirty-three episodes solid]
Tja
Found here 🦋
Depending on context:
* well then.
* ain't nothing you can do about it.
* well how about that then.
* you brought that upon yourself dude.
* it is what it is.
* that was completely to be expected.
* told you so.
Je nach Kontext:
* tja.
* tja.
* tja.
* tja.
* tja.
* tja.
* tja.
Ray Bradbury’s short story “There Will Come Soft Rains” that was written in 1950 is set on the day of August 4th, 2026 (tomorrow)!! Now’s your chance to read it around the time it’s based in!
Audio: A recording of Leonard Nimoy reading it on Internet Archive.
Text: A PDF version.
Graphic Novel: On Internet Archive.
I used to set this one for second year undergraduate creative writing seminars on writing science fiction on a double bill with Octavia E. Butler's "Bloodchild" and no-one here gets out alive.
1984 Soviet film by Nazim Tulyakhodzhaev based on "There Will Come Soft Rains" while taking place on December 31st 2026 (and January 1st) is too wonderful not to mention here in my opinion. It is in Russian (with a song in English) but I've found a version with subtitles. I do recommend watching it. It's really beautiful.
Gulliver's Travels was published in 1725. It's a satire. If you've never read it, it's a pretty brutal satire. It makes fun of literally everything. And not in, like, a fond and gentle way. In a way that's supposed to shake us and be like, LOOK HOW STUPID THIS ALL IS.
And here's a little bit of satire from the book. In this scene, Swift is satirizing the pointlessness of academia. And, to do so.....HE INVENTS GENERATIVE AI:
The first professor I saw, was in a very large room, with forty pupils about him. After salutation, observing me to look earnestly upon a frame, which took up the greatest part of both the length and breadth of the room, he said, “Perhaps I might wonder to see him employed in a project for improving speculative knowledge, by practical and mechanical operations. But the world would soon be sensible of its usefulness; and he flattered himself, that a more noble, exalted thought never sprang in any other man’s head. Every one knew how laborious the usual method is of attaining to arts and sciences; whereas, by his contrivance, the most ignorant person, at a reasonable charge, and with a little bodily labour, might write books in philosophy, poetry, politics, laws, mathematics, and theology, without the least assistance from genius or study.” He then led me to the frame, about the sides, whereof all his pupils stood in ranks. It was twenty feet square, placed in the middle of the room. The superficies was composed of several bits of wood, about the bigness of a die, but some larger than others. They were all linked together by slender wires. These bits of wood were covered, on every square, with paper pasted on them; and on these papers were written all the words of their language, in their several moods, tenses, and declensions; but without any order. The professor then desired me “to observe; for he was going to set his engine at work.” The pupils, at his command, took each of them hold of an iron handle, whereof there were forty fixed round the edges of the frame; and giving them a sudden turn, the whole disposition of the words was entirely changed. He then commanded six-and-thirty of the lads, to read the several lines softly, as they appeared upon the frame; and where they found three or four words together that might make part of a sentence, they dictated to the four remaining boys, who were scribes. This work was repeated three or four times, and at every turn, the engine was so contrived, that the words shifted into new places, as the square bits of wood moved upside down. Six hours a day the young students were employed in this labour; and the professor showed me several volumes in large folio, already collected, of broken sentences, which he intended to piece together, and out of those rich materials, to give the world a complete body of all arts and sciences; which, however, might be still improved, and much expedited, if the public would raise a fund for making and employing five hundred such frames in Lagado, and oblige the managers to contribute in common their several collections. He assured me “that this invention had employed all his thoughts from his youth; that he had emptied the whole vocabulary into his frame, and made the strictest computation of the general proportion there is in books between the numbers of particles, nouns, and verbs, and other parts of speech.” I made my humblest acknowledgment to this illustrious person, for his great communicativeness; and promised, “if ever I had the good fortune to return to my native country, that I would do him justice, as the sole inventor of this wonderful machine;” the form and contrivance of which I desired leave to delineate on paper, as in the figure here annexed. I told him, “although it were the custom of our learned in Europe to steal inventions from each other, who had thereby at least this advantage, that it became a controversy which was the right owner; yet I would take such caution, that he should have the honour entire, without a rival.”
This is exactly how an LLM works. Absolutely astonishing, that in 1725 Jonathan Swift was like, "Look at this stupid idea" lololololol
Hello! Thank you for all your hard work~ I was wondering if you were aware of any stats or papers about commenting trends? I always see writers talking about getting less feedback these days, and I wonder if it's actually that people comment less, or if it is that there are more fandoms / writers / works spreading the fans who do comment thinner. Or if commenters used to be more likely to also be writers as well as readers and are now more likely to be one or the other. Thank you!
Hey! Those are good questions. I don't know of a ton of relevant data, but I'll throw it out to my readers -- does anyone else know of relevant studies/data?
I do have this comment data I collected recently:
We can see that nearly three quarters of fanworks on AO3 have fewer than 10 comments. I've looked at popularity metrics a number of times in the past, and when I examine the data from this post in 2014, I see that 12 years ago, over 40% of AO3 works had 0 comments (vs. 25% now). And at that time, only 5% of works had 25+ comments, whereas now 6% of works have 50+ comments.
So it looks like maybe things have actually gotten better, right? And possibly they have, in spite of the general sense from authors/creators that they're getting less feedback than they used to. But OTOH, the older works have now been around longer and had time to accumulate a bunch more comments. This histogram can't tell us about the age of the works with more comments, nor how quickly the comments have accumulated.
You are also right that fannish attention is probably spread thinner than before. There are a huge number of fandoms on AO3 (76K as of June 2026), and most of those fandoms are very small, meaning that a lot of attention is spread around -- and most people in those fandoms are probably not getting nearly as much feedback as people in some of the really big/really active fandoms. (Though I will note as someone who has made the first/only work in a fandom that the people who DO comment on such a work are often extremely enthusiastic to have found it! :) )
(Sidenote: It's worth me & other fandom data enthusiasts noting how few fandoms have 10K+ works, given how many fandom stats are about the big fandoms!)
I don't have historical numbers on fandom sizes for comparison. But I expect that there has been a significant shift toward more smaller fandoms on AO3 (and elsewhere), given how the general cultural attention to media has fragmented over time. I have seen indirect evidence of such fragmentation... I recently compared the popular ships from 2013 to those now (forthcoming work!) and shockingly, most of the top 5 ships are the same now as in 2013. Which is undoubtedly due to a variety of factors, but it is consistent with the idea that fannish attention has spread out from the early mega-fandoms to a much wider set of new fandoms and ships now, and so very few new ships have gotten as much attention as the early mega-ships.
I do think commenting culture has almost certainly changed some over time, too. But it's a bit tricky figure out how to quantify shifts. Even if we looked at a bunch of random works over AO3 's history and compared their numbers of comments to see how average comment number is changing over time, there are complications. As I mentioned before, newer works haven't had as much time to accumulate comments as older ones. And I've also seen in the past that average numbers of kudos/comments/etc. can vary wildly by fandom/ship/tags. But that said, I could imagine sampling a whole bunch of works from different time periods and looking at how quickly they got their first comment, second comment, etc. If commenting has slowed down, then the time to the Nth comment would be longer now than before. (That would only partially address your questions, but could be interesting.) I kinda expect that maybe that's not true for the new hotness like Heated Rivalry but is true for smaller fandoms, but that's pure speculation!
I guess I could also write code to scrape my own AO3 inbox info (and my own Works posted dates) to gather the timing info for all the comments on my works. Then I could look at how commenting rate has changed over time for me and my own stories. But that wouldn't tell me much unless I also got a ton of other people to use my code to scrape their own comment/work timing info and then shared that with me. On the one hand, that could help us look at longitudinal changes on the same creators over time, which would be interesting. On the other hand, it would introduce sampling bias (which creators are sharing their data? probably not a representative set!) and also be a heck of a lot of work. :)
I'm curious whether anyone else has ideas for methods of investigating! Maybe there are survey questions that would also be useful to ask, or other ways to investigate. I think the questions around how much writers overlap with commenters (or anything else involving individual commenter identities), are ones I would hesitate to try to address through scraping due to potential privacy issues -- so something like survey questions might be a better approach there.
(Note also that I'm not signing up to do further research here, mind you, but it's interesting to at least think through what would provide answers to these questions. :) )
One final note: For any histogram of things like number of comments or sizes of fandoms, it's almost always the case that most things are in the smallest bucket due to power laws. But interestingly, that's not what we see with comments when we zoom in:
It's very cool to see that there are more works with two comments than one, more with four than three, and so on. I think this speaks to how much authors appreciate comments: they often reply, and so comments frequently occur in pairs!
Of course he knows what he's talking about...
南部档案 Archives: The Nanyang Mystery · 2026
More DMBJ as cats because what else is Xiazi if not a scruffy stray who sleeps in trash cans
Cnetizens: Why the thousand-year-old stone statues at the Northern Song Mausoleums aren’t covered with glass enclosures.
The director of the Cultural Relics Bureau replies: "They’ve stood here largely intact for over a millennium. Why add extra barriers?"
Visitors worry wind, rain and sunlight in the farmland will wear them down. The director explains:
Glass covers speed up decay—it’s like locking the statues in a sauna. Trapped heat and moisture create sharp temperature shifts. Salt crystals inside the stone expand and crack the carvings far faster than open-air exposure.
These statues blend naturally with the farmland landscape. Glass barriers would destroy the sense of scale and historical atmosphere.
When first built, the mausoleum complex was a restricted royal compound ringed by walls, palaces and pine trees—no farmland at all. After the Song fell, protection systems collapsed. Wars and weather destroyed buildings. Local residents gradually dismantled the abandoned structures, reusing timber and bricks in nearby villages.
By the Ming and Qing dynasties, villagers turned the empty grounds into farmland, leaving stone figures scattered amid crops.
Few people damaged the statues for three reasons: each weighs several tons and is impossible to move; folk belief held that anyone who damaged the guardian statues would be cursed with misfortune; every later dynasty passed laws punishing those who vandalized former imperial mausoleums.
Once an exclusive imperial burial ground, now ordinary farmland—this shift tells the story of history. Glass covers would only be unnecessary. As an old Chinese poem puts it: 旧时王谢堂前燕,飞入寻常百姓家
The swallows that were wont to grace the halls of Wang and Xie, Now seek the humble roofs of common men.
(cr 大鹅呀eyaeyaeya,陈帆fotochen,摄色📸,腾腾兔兔🐰)
Reblog if you’re 30 or older
This is an experiment to see if there really are as few of us as people think.You can also use this to freak out your followers who think you’re 25 or something. Yay!
One million pounds to the writer of this caption in the Guardian please
listen i have an amazing theory:
if haixia is in-stasis for 77 years since 1933, he'd wake up perfectly in time for 2010. and what's going down in 2010?
The Final Leg of Busting Those Wangs For Good. (after the culmulative effort spanning 3 generations)
So, while it is a bit horrible to make haixia get to work right after waking up cuz they are on a tight schedule, but im already hearing boss music playing. also it's probably Hei Xiazi who picks him up, cuz Baye's calculations and Xiao Hua's money.
(this does not explain Blind Tomb however. and also it negates my one thought about haixia being the missing member of the Xisha Team, which i know nothing about but find it compelling to just have haixia there. always. in the background. providing secret support.)
all these puzzle pieces must fit together somehow (they dont, but it's a mosaic process not a custom-fitting process)
Q: Sanshu! I'd really like to know that since the Twilight Grass can age the human body and rebuild a person's constitution, did it originate from the Zhang Pavillion or did it come from the same place as the foreign evil god? A: The Twilight Grass had appeared in the Sha Hai drama before. A: There's some connection between the Twilight Grass and the Tibetan Sea Flower. (Reply from another fan): Actually the earliest version of Twilight Grass appeared in a story about a snake kingdom, categorised with the Zang Hai Hua novel. The earliest plans for these two short stories were related to the Bronze Gate and the Ultimate.
But of course! This is again to note that these Q&A are not Strictly Canon and it could just be promotional tactics to get audience to stream Sha Hai again. And also the fact that the Twilight Grass is called Wudou Disease in the novel, so this claim is crossing various streams.
The number one rule of DMBJ is there are no rules and you can have fun looking as closely or as distantly as you like.
Anyways, Wu Xie seeing Zhang Haixia sometime far after the events of Falling off A Cliff and going [gasp][pointing][rapid flashback to the a figure backlit and outlined by the sun] God who saved me when I had my throat slit?! You're Zhang Haiyan's dead wife?!
and Zhang Haixia is like :) yes. nice to meet you again.
new yucun update bringing you the very Groundbreaking Concept of---
"Voucher of Wu Xie Usage"
as in, you can use this voucher to make wu xie do something. and it is. for sale. pangzi sells these. as their new income.
new update: /LI CU/ is the first to use his voucher... npss the way you write relationships pulls me in like no other. wild.
oh my god 0_0
maybe li cu just wants him to do a full body check up. and watch him get prodded and poked with needles. surely, they can't do the whole back-ashing situation again, so an embarrassing trip to the hospital will do. pangzi probs supports this. he'll be laughing along with popcorn on the side.