Adventures in Canon #5: Let’s Talk About Rogue One
Rogue One is very much a first for the One Continuous Story. Star Wars has long explored the galaxy beyond the Skywalkers, but never on screen. Now, we get to see what that looks like. SPOILERS HO.
Before I go on I’m going to clarify my thinking regarding references in works to other works, as that’s something that’s crucial to understanding a film like this. Any film that is part of a larger universe will face the task of identifying itself as part of that universe while also being required to add to it. Too much familiarity and it feels masturbatory, too much novelty and it feels like badge engineering. The greatest criticism The Force Awakens faced was that it was a retread of the beats of A New Hope, but to say so misses a crucial detail: It is not just the film but it’s characters themselves who are doing the retreading. The First Order builds a bigger Death Star because it seeks to surpass the Empire it apes. Poe Dameron dares to fly his little ship into the heart of the beast because that is what his heroes did. Those great big facsimiles of the past are explicitly there for narrative purpose, and their egregiousness depends on how well that narrative works. As it happens, I thought that first part worked really well, but we shall have to see what the rest of it looks like.
Rogue One itself is replete with references. Blue Milk, Ponda Barba, Red Five, they’re all here. Again, that’s necessary to an extent in order to establish Rogue One as a Star Wars Story. The blue milk isn’t a problem in itself- surely other people like the drink as the Larses, and it’s something fun for the fans to notice- but the fact that it is the subject of a lingering shot is. This is Edwards making sure we get the reference; it interrupts the narrative for the sake of trivia. The same is true of Ponda Barba and Dr Evazan, but here there is a further issue. The appearance of these two so far from the Mos Eisley cantina makes the galaxy feel smaller, and therefore less interesting. Who wants to explore such a small world?
The appearance and demise of Red Five rehashes the oldest saw of any expanded universe: the need to Explain Everything. How did Luke get his callsign? Well there was a vacancy. Again that can be fine to an extent, the opportunity to clarify plot holes may as well be taken, provided it doesn’t interrupt the flow of things. However, Red Five is far from the only supposed inconsistency that Rogue One seeks to explain.
How did the Empire, with all it’s might, allow such a design flaw as the exhaust port to become part of the Death Star’s construction? Well, it turns out the flaw was deliberate, a creation of the secretly rebellious scientist Galen Erso. More than a simple happening of the plot, this detail recontextualises the theme of Rogue One, the purported rebellion built on Hope. Star Wars as originally presented posits that the rebellion finds the flaw in the Death Star because it believes it can. With no other explanation, we have to assume that the good guys succeed because they have the audacity to try and the wits to succeed. The Empire explicitly fails because it is arrogant enough to think such a thing is impossible. The revelation of Erso’s actions don’t invalidate that sense of hope as such; our heroes still need to believe in the goodness of Galen Erso in order to have a hope of success. But that’s a far smaller thing than the universal sense of hope Star Wars evoked without an explanation of the details of it all.
There is one great aspect of Star Wars that gains some much needed complexity from Rogue One, and that is The Force. At first the Force was a great hereditary mystical power, and then it was an equation: more midi-chlorians equals more The Force. We are told here that Chirrut Imwe doesn’t “have the Force”, and yet all indications are that his belief in it makes it strong with him. The blind monk navigates blaster shots and downs the enemy to an improbable degree, and it is an open question as to whether this is due to mundane skill or the supernatural. It’s mysterious and obtuse and not readily clarified by a blood test. It’s tempting to see this as a willful ignorance of the metaphysics of the prequel trilogy, but here at Adventures in Canon we can’t do that. We know that The Force can be scientifically analysed, and yet in profound ways it can’t. We don’t know to what extent an understanding of Jedi blood correlates to an understanding of the Force proper, and we can ask whether such a banal understanding is any understanding at all. Rogue One restores the Force to a place of mysticism, and yet we know it can be known empirically. That’s a complex thing indeed, and a good addition to the One Continuous Story.