2013
         In Steyerlâs work, system errors like glitches are not just revealing of an inherently fallible and imperfect system, but are also the products of processes of image circulation in digital space. The tone and use of language throughout her essay, âA Thing Like You and Meâ, implies the violence of a transaction that is never equal or horizontal, and emphasizes how violence is manifested within the image itself. Images, hypervisible within the sophisticatedââyet fallibleââsurveillance apparatus, are reflections of terror and control.
         Steyerlâs emphasis on image resolution and the relentless gaze indicts a global system that attempts to colonize the geographies of the globe through surveillance for the sake of accumulation of information and control. Her reliance on image quality, and her insistence on pixelation and glitch, is telling of her position on the matter. Aesthetic manifestations of errorââlike glitch, jam, noise, and arguably, low resolutionââare described by Tim Barker in his essay âAesthetics of the Error: Media Art, the Machine, the Unforeseen, and the Errantâ as:
â...software [that] may articulate a link to the field of potentialââin this case a field of potential errorsââin order to generate unforeseen, and perhaps unwanted, information. [...] We can think of the error as just this potential that may or may not become actualized. The system that seeks the actualization of unforeseen potential is also a system that has the capacity to become errant; it is a system that is surrounded by a cloud of potential errors. (Barker 45)â.
          What is most revealing about this passage in relation to the work Steyerl is the notion of the errant, fallible system. HOW NOT TO BE SEEN (2013) situates images as unreliable, even the images generated through the supposedly errorless system of surveillance that strives for completeness and perfection. Even Steyerlâs inclusion of the U.S. Air Forceâs dilapidated, decaying, and outdated resolution targets within the âCalifornia desertâ indicates that state tools for measurement used to calibrate aerial photographs and videos of the landscape are still susceptible to the forces of nature, time, and the rapid changes of technology.
          In addition to the analysis of the physical remnants of the futile exercise in surveillance precision, it is productive to consider how Steyerl herself conceptualizes the glitch. She states:
âThe bruises of the images are its glitches and artifacts, the traces of its rips and transfers. Images are violated, ripped apart, subjected to interrogation and probing. They are stolen, cropped, edited, and re-appropriated. They are bought, sold, leased. Manipulated and adulated. Reviled and revered. To participate in the image means to take part in all of this.â (Steyerl 53).
Alex Santana, The Unreliable Image: Contemporary Art, Social Identity, & Self-Making in the Digital Age, 2016
MA Thesis, Tulane University, New Orleans