I reblog almost exclusively hockey things, usually Penguins and Capitals. I write fic for both teams (specifically Sid/Geno and Nicky/Ovi), so feel free to hit me up with a prompt. All tumblr fics are tagged "fic stuff"
Okay, so I was going about my usual business, looking at some Steven Universe fanart, looking up stuff, when I stumble upon Wikipedia.
They’re in trouble.
Guys, I know that not all of you live in the U.S., but if you do, I want you to go to Wiki right now and donate. Legit, its the first thing that should pop up on Wiki. Whatever you have left over, donate, and don’t forget: big companies have tried to buy Wikipedia, but by making small donations, people have kept it the reliable, up-to-date, FREE encyclopedia, so keep it free and keep donating.
Actor names powerful elites connected to global pedophilia network - Movie star Robert Downey Jr. has made a shocking revelation and lifted the lid on a major Hollywo... | NEON NETTLE
Movie star Robert Downey Jr. has made a shocking revelation and lifted the lid on a major Hollywood pedophile ring that connects powerful Elites “all over the globe”.The Iron Man star has gone on the record to expose a huge network of pedophilia, prostitution, and human trafficking that involves a whole host of, what he calls, “sick f*cks”.
Not only has he named some well known Hollywood celebrities, but he’s also ousted one of the most powerful people in America, who he says is a “Rosetta Stone of every perversion from Hwood all over the globe” and provides depraved services for “Arabs, Wall Street, DC, Royals, and Hollywood elites”.
Mr. Downey is one of a long line of stars to come forward to expose pedophilia in politics and the entertainment industry, but up to know, he’s been the most forth coming with names and details.
In a statement, he said one of his reasons is that he wants to “right some wrongs”, adding:
“I have no issue with ANYTHING people voluntarily do in their private life as long as it is consenting - (kids and animals cannot consent!), and NOT hurting another mentally or physically.”
Robert Downey Jr. stunning exposé states:
I am a FORMER personal “friend” of a woman named Diana Jenkins. Doubt you know her, but she’s the Rosetta Stone of every scandal and perversion from Hwood all over the globe. She’s an Uber-wealthy divorcee whose hubby ran UK’s Barclay’s bank - and she ran the Arab investors for the bank! She’s been running a high-class call girl/party-girl ring for Arabs, Wall Street, DC, Royals, and Hollywood elites.
She’s also a MAJOR philanthropist, arts supporter, political donor, and social hostess to EVERYONE. Her best Hwood pals include Sean Penn, Clive Davis[Whitney Houston’s mentor], Ari Emanuel, George Clooney, Cindy Crawford, and her “little pet” named Hayden [Hayden “Leslie P” Panettiere]. Diana is the connector of wealthy Arabs and Asians and Athletes with Hwood actresses/models. She also is a sick and twisted b*tch. When Hayden and her own Mommy went on the outs, Diana Jenkins took that place in her life, by Hayden’s choice.
Leslie P. is not just a poor victim in this train wreck. Trust me. She’s at LEAST 50% responsible (if not more) for encouraging, enabling, and at times even participating in her hubby’s twisted fucking life. Leslie’s kinks cross the line into depravity, illegality, and inhuman sickness. As in Ryan ONeal, John Phillips, Tish Cyrus, and Dan Schnieder territory.
(Far worse than Pimpa Joe Simpson!)She’s not just had chances to stop it or walk away with the kids, but she elected to not protect her kids - and give in to the hedonistic sickness in her bedroom (all for her own greed). You think Dina Lohan is bad?
It’s easy to argue that Hayden is forever a victim which drives her own insane life choices - and I’m not a psychologist - but she has taken it further into becoming a willing perpetrator of it (and saying she loves it). Not just the physical and mental violence she enjoys, but her insatiable appetite for the most bizarre shit she can indulge in to “top” herself. She was offered help by some who genuinely cared for her and worried for her. She mocked them and tore off on her own streak. Now? She craves it and considers nothing taboo. NOTHING! Just ask Mario Lopez.
According to Jezebel, Robert Downey Jr. has also made allegations about the sexual perversions of actor turned Nickelodeon producer Dan Schneider and implications that Diana Jenkins’ coffee table book Room 23 is actually a catalog of clients and call girls.
He went on to follow up on his statement on a positive note by declaring that there are also good people in Hollywood and even gave a list of name of those who are “no saints” but are NOT pedophiles, saying:
There are some AWESOME and GOOD people in Hollywood. Sadly, you don’t get ink for being good. (That’s twisted, yes I know).But consider Hwood as a microcosm of the world: Recall the Your Turn about the gross/sick teacher pedos?
You knew TONS of them right? But imagine trying to list the GOOD and moral teachers? Would take forever.
On the news, each day, all we hear are BAD THINGS and bad people. It’s what sells and intrigues. We ALL love Blinds and gossip because we’re human.
Flawed, but human. Sometimes you just need to realize that Hwood is no more fucked up than the rest of the world - we just get more coverage - in a 24/7 scandal cycle.So yes, a few awesome Hwood people I know personally: (They have flaws and are not perfect, but they are GREAT people who are the opposite of the other sick fucks):
David Kelley John Hughes (was the best)
Natasha Gregson
Wagner Bryan Lourd
Neil Patrick Harris
Jon Hamm
Guy Ritchie
Tommy Lee Jones
Susanna Hoffs
Kevin Kline & Phoebe Cates
Drew Barrymore
Steve Martin
Rachel McAdams
Bob Kosberg
Sofia Coppola
Zoe Cassavetes
Moon Zappa
Brad Pitt
John Favreau
Amber Heard
Jerry Bruckheimer
Molly Ringwald
Tom Hanks
Rob Reiner
Susan Downey
Will Staeger
Miranda Cosgrove
Seth Macfarlane
Richard Lovett
Johnny Depp
Akiva Goldsman
Alan Horn
Elton John
Kate Beckinsale
Ron Meyer
and yes…even Mel Gibson (faults and all.)
And about 2,000 other people whose names you’d never recognize. They’re not angels, and not perfect - neither am I. But they are REAL people who know what it means to be a real friend. :-)
Who is Diana Jenkins?
One of the major players in Robert Downey Jr. exposé was a woman named Daina Jenkins.Sanela Diana Jenkins is a Bosnian-born former refugee who was married to a top banker and former head of Barclays bank in the UK, Roger
Allan Jenkins.According to Mr. Jenkins’ Wikipedia page:
In 2008 he played a key role in a £7.3 billion investment in Barclays made by the ruling families of Abu Dhabi and Qatar, and by the Qatari sovereign wealth fund. Since 2011 he has been a member of the Management Committee and Investment Committee of the Brazilian investment bank BTG Pactual.
Estimates suggested that in 2005 Jenkins made somewhere between £40 million and £75 million, making him reputedly the highest paid banker in the City of London.
Diana Jenkins has since divorced Roger Allen Jenkins and relocated to California where she has established herself as one of the most powerful and influential people in America, yet, has somehow remained in the shadows.She is a major investor and project stakeholder in the Clinton Foundation, and in March 2010, she raised more than $1 million for Bill and Hillary Clinton’s “charitable” organization.Ms. Jenkins was also named in the Congressional Pay-to-Play Clinton Foundation inquiry letter.
It has also been alleged that she is connected to global human trafficking networks, and if what Mr. Downey is saying is correct, she may be one of the biggest players in the largest trafficking and pedophilia rings in the United States, if not the world.Robert Downey Jr. coming forward in this way has been an extremely brave move and a sign that the veil is slowly being lifted.
In recent times, other celebrities such as Corey Haim, Corey Feldman, Brad Pitt, and Elija Wood, to name just a few, have spoken up to warn the public about the abuse that is being suffered at the hands of wealthy, powerful Elites.
FOR MORE SEE > Brad Pitt: ‘Elite Hollywood Pedophiles Control America’
Millie Bobby Brown was awarded sexiest actress and she’s 13 years old.
THIRTEEN YEARS OLD. She’s still a child and she doesn’t need to be subjected to disgusting sexualisation because male producers and media workers can’t keep their junk in their pants for 2 seconds and want to be able to make pedophilia look okay.
She’s a thirteen year old girl and you’re sexualising her the same way you’ve sexualised every child star.
What the fuck is wrong with you people?
Legal adults shouldn’t be sexualising child actors, this includes the IT cast and the STs cast. These kids are exactly that, KIDS.
As someone who was subjected to years of abuse as a child I can’t fathom why anyone thinks it’s okay to openly sexualise and make sexual comments about minors?
So the screencap is a result of translations, where the original article referred to her as one of the “hottest” actresses, meaning “most popular right now”. Poorly and unfortunately translated, yes, uncomfortably believable, yes, but not actually as bad as it looks (and yes, I googled “millie bobby brown sexiest” to check this out, and yes, I’m very uncomfortable about that being on my search history, though happily pretty much all the results were just articles saying “Don’t call Millie Bobby Brown sexy”).
does anyone else sometimes remember that there are still 1 million people out there who like regularly watch supernatural??? and you just like wanna tell them hey it’s okay to let go sometimes,,,,,,,,,,,, just let it go
Here’s a quick tip: if people enjoy something harmless that you personally don’t care for, Shutting Up about it and letting them have their fun might be a good option for you.
Forgive me for sounding salty, but even if an interest seems trivial to you, you have no idea what it could mean to other people. For some reference, here’s an entire website devoted to stories about how Supernatural and its fandom have helped people through difficult times in their life, depression, mental illness, and trauma.
There are other popular fandoms that I don’t personally enjoy and find annoying, but I would never denigrate their interests for notes, as I understand how important they can be to people.
In general, negativity isn’t cool, bruh. Instead of talking about how much you dislike something, why don’t you talk about the things you do enjoy?
when all your friends are talking abt their trash bfs and your gay ass can’t relate so you feel good for a second before you remember how lonely you are
sorry for ranting again, you don't have to respond to these. i was just concerned and thought i'd give you a heads up. theres def stuff to be said regarding refugee crises, especially from an infrastructural standpoint, but propaganda probably isn't the right avenue to tackle that. that's all.
Understood, you're free to rant, and I appreciate your polite and well-spoken comments, especially considering the sensitive topic.
not trying to jump down your throat, I wrote my thesis on extreme right wing politics and publications so i have a vested interest. the circulation of this kind of "evidence" as though it's true or unbiased, and having it be taken as truth unquestionably, almost certainly contributes more to the far right than denial of moderate concerns. those kind of sources just exacerbate those beliefs. it's possible to acknowledge concerns without spreading misinformation or extreme-right propaganda.
Then as a fellow academic I get where you're coming from. I'm not removing the post from my blog because I originally reblogged to to refer back to later. I'm sure your thesis is accurate and like I said, I'm not taking any lessons from radical far-right news sources. Somehow I doubt any of my followers are either judging from the amount I lost just reblogging that lol
Then I would definitely give the sources in the post you reblogged some more scrutiny, as the vast majority seem to be either 1) individual anecdotal instances of violence without wider statistical support or 2) from extreme right wing publications that are very much lacking in statistical or journalistic integrity. if you're trying to add nuance to the conversation, it's a good idea to at least start with reliable sources. if you can't find them, theres a problem with your argument.
Believe me, if I were writing a thesis on this I would vet everything more carefully, but I'm not, I'm just saving a post that I think has a lot of interesting information that I'd like to look more into. Not really making any argument aside from stating that there are multiple sides to the issue of taking in migrants en masse. I'm lucky enough to live in a city with a large refugee population that has done a great job helping people start lives in the U.S., but not every city or country has had our success. Don't worry, I'm not trying to make a bold argument with Breitbart and the Daily Mail as my sources. Someone take me out back and shoot me if that ever happens.
So ... are you actually against refugees? or did you just not read what you reblogged
Absolutely not against refugees - I think people being displaced by wars, especially wars they didn't start, deserve safety and care. But I just got in a debate with a guy who completely denied that there could possibly be any issue with a sudden massive influx of migrants in any way shape or form, and it made me want to have some handy sources for next time it came up. I recognize that it's a complicated issue and should be treated as such, and simplifying it to just being for or against helping displaced people tends to drive formerly moderate people closer to extremism. You can't solve problems by denying then as they happen in front of your eyes, and you also can't solve problems by completely closing off your country to refugees. I think a major reason the (terrifying) far right has gained followers recently is because formerly moderately conservative people have a few valid concerns that are being aggressively denied by the left, and it drives them toward developing extreme opinions about those problems.
There are pro athletes who cheat on wives, beat girlfriends, take drugs, flaunt wads of money on social media, act like immature fools in public…and I haven’t seen any of them take HALF the abuse Sid has the past couple days. You don’t agree with Sid and the Pens going to to the WH to be honored for their accomplishment? Perfectly fine. That’s OK. I certainly don’t love it either. What’s NOT OK is personally attacking Sid’s character which the real fans know is good and decent and suddenly turning him into this racist, elitist, monster of a human being which has never ever been thought of or warranted. Be angry at the Pens, Sid, Mario, etc all you want, but for god sakes stop the character denigration.
ellievsbear
snowghoul
gummygunk
areudirty
germansingergirl
vaporwave
