Game of Thrones Daily
Show & Tell
Kiana Khansmith
gracie abrams
tumblr dot com
titsay
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
RMH
Discoholic ๐ชฉ
KIROKAZE
No title available
$LAYYYTER
blake kathryn
No title available
Game Changer & Make Some Noise
todays bird
Cosmic Funnies
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
tannertan36
occasionally subtle
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Tรผrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from Tรผrkiye
seen from Tรผrkiye
seen from Australia
seen from Nepal
seen from Egypt
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from T1
seen from Tรผrkiye
seen from Tรผrkiye
@antiship-milesfairchild
"ใใ๐ด havent made the best impression , have ๐ด ?ใใ ,,
fuck haunting adeline and those booktok mfs btw I hope both them, the book and the author burns in hell . trauma is not a romance, and I saw someone straight up say "well, thats book banning if you want both the book banned and the movie not made!!!" BITCH . THE BANNING OF QUEER BOOKS, BOOKS ABOUT RACISM, BOOKS ABOUT MISOGYNY AND SEXISM, ETC. LITERALLY IS NOT THE SAME AS SAYING A BOOK AND THE UPCOMING FILM ADAPTION THAT ROMANTICIZES RAPE SHOULD NOT BE MADE NOR SOLD . THIS IS NOT A "DON'T LIKE DON'T READ" SITUATION YOU FUCKING HONDA CIVIC .
oh my god heaven forbid a woman writes about her sexual fantasies
If someone's sexual fantasies involve rape and the romanticizing of it, then I do not trust them around victims .
I said what I said, and I'm not taking anything back . It's not "purity culture," it's actually caring about victims and knowing that dark romance like haunting adeline perpetuates rape culture bullshit that holds back victims from ever speaking out, victims of all genders, mind you .
physiological body reactions such as an orgasm does not equal consent, nor that the victim enjoyed it . and adeline's thoughts both during the assault, and the supposed "dubcon" scenes match that of a victim's perfectly .
why are "harmful" paraphiles in your dni?? /gen
"harmful" is vague and subjective. there are genuinely some people who think that objectum is harmful. i take it youre not one of those people
im personally a VEHEMENTLY anti-contact necrophile and im literally in therapy for it? im recovering? i dont plan on going to a graveyard and raping corpses thanks
you cant just. stop being a paraphile. therapy doesnt make it go away; it teaches you coping mechanisms to deal with it and ways to mitigate it
paraphilic disorders. doesnt apply to me personally but why would you have a disorder on your dni
sorry if this ask comes off as rude but im just so tired of people brushing off and outcasting paraphiles because of something they cant control
ok i'm sorry if i sound mean at all during this just woke up an hour ago plus a possible mixed hypomania episode i went through that i am still recovering from because it exhausted me severely ( doing okay now but mehhhhhh i'm still going through the aftershocks or whatever of it ) but
i am more so talking about the more obvious harmful paraphilias such as pedophilia, biastophilia, etc. and more so the people who do not want to recover. i'm sorry if it feels like i am outcasting those who are paraphiles, that is never my intention . i will definitely reassure u but, i do not see this as being mean but it definitely is a bit.... iffy to ask why someone has something on their dni list since dnis are personal to that person but, honestly, i'm glad you asked because i can clarify .
and with the contact thing it's because i don't think contact stances should exist, i talked about it before, and it would be hypocritical of me to be talking about recovering harmful paraphilias when i call myself pro-recovery . and yes, i do not see objectum as harmful, again, i'm talking about bodily harm associated paraphilias that focus on hurting another person or thing such as an animal .
will definitely say too, you are kind of implying that i did accused every paraphilia that is harmful as people apart of it going out and doing it which... is not what i say??? but, anyways .
i know it doesn't go away, i have shit like depression and shit like that, obviously i know if i go to therapy and continue doing my own coping mechanisms like yume/selfshipping, then it's not gonna go away . i know that is true for other disorders .
paraphilic disorders cause distress, they wouldn't be flaunting it online if it was the case for them .
i'm not saying paraphilies can inherently stop being paraphiles or that they can control what happens with their condition .
ALSO I'M SO FUCKING DONE GETTING THIS SAME FUCKING ASK . /not at you
i've gotten a lot more ruder, like extremely harsher, asks saying this same thing and i just didn't want to give them fuel to harass me just for whatever i slip up on i guess i don't know
also, yes, harmful is subjective, but it's pretty glaringly obvious i am talking about paraphilias that cause bodily harm .
whenever pro/darkshippers and profic people defend ao3 or like, overall fanfics and books that romanticize really gross shit but go silent when you say that their "fiction doesn't affect reality" arguments are rooted and are inherently racist, ableist and anti-intellectualism that one image of the person with brown hair, and like white shirt with the pride flag that says like "love is love!" then like goes like "uhm" when asked about black people pops up in my head and I'm so sad I don't have that image saved into my phone because now I just want to respond to those people who jump me with it ๐ญ literally, nothing other than that image whenever people try jumping me in my inbox for critiquing them
hello everyone, okay, last post for tonight but!
I will be addressing a SINGULAR post sophie about me since my queer platonic partner just showed me posts she made about me and actually, I will be snapping into a more "professional" typing style for this. this is my last time ever addressing sophie because I would like to point out that calling her ableist is like saying something as factual as water is usually from a tap.
"TIL Alex Hirsch was ableist when he wrote Journal 3 in cursive..."
BREAKING NEWS: I actually never said that. And then she decides to straight up put this font
example
while responding to a post in which I admit that I can't read a lot of cursive, and saying this is ableist is just saying a fork was spotted in a kitchen draw or wherever one may keep their forks depending on their living environment. This was very clearly supposed to mock me. But eh... bad news, ragebait failed miserably because I actually can read that text and it's only in some examples in which I can't.
Not to mention the very loud elephant in the room; I said some cursive I cannot read, that doesn't go for all, and even some non-cursive text I need help reading.
"This might be a hot take, but not everything needs to be accessible for every person. Sometimes you want something that will be stylistically cool or pretty, and that's going to clash with the needs of others."
Well, surprise, I actually want accessibility for everyone. I do not believe that accessibility should be a privilege, it should be a more common thing among us as human beings or otherwise.
Another thing, it would be hypocritical of me to constantly speak out against ableism but use fonts that are not accessible without the decency of letting it so screen-readers and dyslexic people can read them. I rather not have something about me or my page to clash with the needs of others that I care about regardless of whatever.
"And you aren't even dyslexic! You're just bad at reading! And to an extent, I get this. We aren't great at reading cursive either. And actually did, in fact, struggle reading Journal 3 because of how much was written in cursive. It's not that we can't read it at all, but it does take a while to read compared with plain text. But the thing we never did was start whining about the style it was written in, because the style was integral to the aesthetic even if it made it more difficult for us to read. Not everything has to be catered for us specifically. It's okay if something just isn't for you."
I do admit I worded it incorrectly, I am quite literally autistic and severely prone to misreading the room, along with saying the wrong things because I do not exactly process social rules and adjacent very correctly. I can't exactly translate them. But, I do have multiple symptoms of dyslexia outside of the difficulty of reading. I just have never told anyone about them because I knew my symptoms would just be mislabeled as something merely apart of my autism. This is not new for me. I do actively keep my symptoms of OCD, bipolar, and dyspraxia exclusively to myself too. Because I know it'll just be labeled wrongly due to my age, accompanied by the only diagnosed condition I have to my knowledge.
It's also stupid how she summed up my difficulty reading as just being about Journal 3, since it's beyond a singular font or anything else, really.
But, with that out the way... I never said I had dyslexia? I quite literally said, not even paraphrasing; "I don't think I'm dyslexic." I do not see where in that sentence I tried saying I did have it.
Also people wanting accessibility is now "whining"? You're showing your hand again, Sophie.
"The thing about the internet is that there's infinite content out there. More than you can consume in several lifetimes. That is to say that if someone has a typing quirk or writes in a way that makes it hard for you to read, you aren't missing out on anything by just moving on and following someone else."
The thing is, typing quirks are fine as long as translation is given when asked or already there, and most of the sort of people I was even talking about in that post flat out refuse to ever give translations when asked. Because they're inherently an ableist community no matter how you try to twist and turn it on its head.
Also, why were you even replying to that post? That had nothing to do with you, and also, was not at all syscourse because, shocker; I'm not a system. I can only ever give outsider perspective especially as someone who is immensely educated on ableism, sanism, among others and how it affects us sociologically and how it makes us face systemic discrimination at hand. I can give the facts that groups like Endogenics, plus it's many subtypes, are a hate group rooted from such and can never be reclaimed because of that. I can say that Endogenics are quite literallyโdirectlyโsourced from a group that wanted violence against pwCDDs. But, I can't give personal insight because I am a singlet. I haven't experienced any symptoms of conditions such as OSDD, DID and P-DID. I am a psychology nerd, but I simply cannot speak for those who are systems themselves. I have spent hours and even months documenting mental illnesses despite not being in college or anything. But, again, as aforementioned, I can't get deeply involved within syscourse because that is systems themselves own microphones to hold. Not mine, and never was. Nor have I ever claimed it was. In any capacity, actually.
Another thing, I have a whole thing in my head about why Tulpa "systems" are direct cultural appropriation but, once more, like I keep reiterating; I will let systems themselves, especially those of that culture, talk about that. They do not need a singlet speaking over them like history has shown itself time and time again doing constantly.
ahem . now that I got that off my chest, I will go to sleep now and I will not be replying to, nor address sophie either directly or indirectly, after this post .
ok . if u think like that one void person, aka that one person with like the thing that kind of looks like it being in the asexual flag colors in front of a purple background, which includes being against microlabels, apparently being RACIST??? and actively calling for a genocide of people with npd, I hope you burn in hell and do not ever interact with me you racist, sanist exclusionary fucks ๐
that person genuinely thought my "fiction affects reality" post that actively mentions how people with npd are demonized was a safe place to actively say "narcissists deserve to die though".... GENUINELY FUCK OFF YOU FUCKING SANIST . DO NOT JOKE . I DO NOT PLAY AROUND WHEN IT COMES TO THOSE WITH CLUSTER B PERSONALITY DISORDERS . I DON'T HAVE ANY YET I PROTECT THEM LIKE THEY'RE MY FUCKING FAMILY .
not to mention, it feels even more awful to see that bullshit because some of my CLOSET online friends have npd and they're wonderful people .
guys . are we seriously forgetting that mental illnesses do what they do best and DISTORT THE BRAIN??? GUYS .
IS THIS JUST MY PSYCHOLOGY SPECIAL INTEREST SPEAKING???? HAVE WE NEVER OPENED UP A WEBSITE MADE BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS THAT SPECIALIZE IN THIS SORT OF STUFF AND READ THROUGH EVERYTHING???? OR BETTER YET; TALKED TO THOSE WITH THE DISORDER TO GET MORE KNOWLEDGE?? HOW ABOUT A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL WITH NPD?? LITERALLY ANYONE WITH NPD?? ESPECIALLY SINCE I KNOW THOSE WEBSITES AND BOOKS AREN'T ALWAYS GOOD AND CAN DEMONIZE PEOPLE WITH A MENTAL ILLNESS MUCH LIKE WE AS A SOCIETY DO .
CHAT ARE WE SERIOUSLY FORGETTING THE AUTISM SPEAKS THING WHERE THEY SAID THEY WANTED A GENOCIDE OF AUTISTIC PEOPLE???? HOW IS WISHING A GENOCIDE UPON PEOPLE WITH NPD ANYWHERE NEAR DIFFERENT??? WHAT?? BECAUSE "NARCISSISTS DON'T HAVE EMPATHY" LIKE YOU GUYS ALWAYS SAY???? BITCH DON'T PMO. EMPATHY IS NOT AN IMMEDIATE SIGN OF COMPASSION OR MORAL RIGHTEOUSNESS IN GENERAL OVERALL .
YOU GET AWAY FROM THOSE WITH CLUSTER B PERSONALITY DISORDERS RIGHT NOW . THAT GOES FOR OTHER PERSONALITY DISORDERS . GET AWAY FROM THEM THIS INSTANT .
just a reminder; if you have npd or any other cluster b, you are incredibly welcomed here, you're loved by me ( /platonic ), and do not believe these people's beliefs that you guys are inherently evil just because they dont understand your condition .
hell, I'll take it a step further; if you're cluster b and don't want to get better, YOU'RE STILL WELCOMED HERE AND I STILL LOVE YOU AS MUCH AS I LOVE THOSE WHO WANT TO GET BETTER . YOU ARE NO LESS VALID TO ME .
fuck haunting adeline and those booktok mfs btw I hope both them, the book and the author burns in hell . trauma is not a romance, and I saw someone straight up say "well, thats book banning if you want both the book banned and the movie not made!!!" BITCH . THE BANNING OF QUEER BOOKS, BOOKS ABOUT RACISM, BOOKS ABOUT MISOGYNY AND SEXISM, ETC. LITERALLY IS NOT THE SAME AS SAYING A BOOK AND THE UPCOMING FILM ADAPTION THAT ROMANTICIZES RAPE SHOULD NOT BE MADE NOR SOLD . THIS IS NOT A "DON'T LIKE DON'T READ" SITUATION YOU FUCKING HONDA CIVIC .
so I just cooked something fire;
pro/darkshippers alongside profic people use the same fear mongering tactics homophobic, transphobic and racist conservatives use . they're just repackaged so we oftentimes do not spot it .
calling us "antishippers" and saying that we're "against fictional ships" is actually a form of deflection . conservatives constantly use demonizing language to frame the other side of the political spectrum as inherently wrong and "evil," usually using their gender or race as evidence for that . that's actually where "too woke" came from, it came explicitly from the demonization of AAVE .
this makes more sense when you start picking apart their "fiction doesn't affect reality" arguments that are deeply rooted in racism, racist caricatures and the overall silencing of black people .
remember, jim crow wasn't named after the laws, the laws were named after the racist caricature of black people .
In fact, the "jim crow era" never left . black people are still being murdered, and it's constantly downplayed by police and they say "there was no foul play" even as evidence points to a completely different explanation which directly contradicts their response to the families begging to get some form of justice . but you'll never see these sort of people talk about that .
they always use the same logical fallacies as conservatives; ad hominems, strawmen, false dilemmas, false equivalency, etc. .
where did you guys even think the transphobic "trans people are transing your kids" lie come from?
also, conservatives use scary phrasing purposefully to put an inherently malicious, predatory framework upon people who are against issues like fascism, nazism, homophobia, racism, ableism, transphobia, misogyny, among other things . doesn't this sound familiar? pro/darkshippers or profic people actively try making every "antishipper" to be harassers . and all of it is for the same goal; get people further sucked down the pipeline .
they say they're against censorship but they silence and harass those whom disagree with them or introduce nuance into the conversation, much like conservatives that either ban or advocate for the banning of things like books, music, games, etc. just because they disagree with which the people who made them think, or the messages that the media sends .
alongside the other logical fallcies, they participate in another that is also immensely common for them to do; cherry-picking .
they pick and choose what they want to address, all while avoiding the actual elephant in the room which is the post by the "anti" itself as a whole . this is rooted in aforementioned ad hominems .
there's a bunch more but this post would take hours to finish reading if I continued on .
"u can't be anti-harassment/anti-ship and be anti-censorship!!"
we can, actually . not to mention it has always felt like censorship of our beliefs when you call us antishippers rather than saying we are against things like pedophilia so .
just a reminder: pro/darkshippers along with people who label themselves "profic" really like saying they care about disabled people but they misuse and steal concepts that are not able to be applied to them .
let me remind you all: "thought crimes" is from medical recognition involving ocd, particularly moral scrupulosity, also known as morality-focused ocd, moral scrupulosity ocd, or simply moral ocd . It's used to describe intrusive thoughts .
last time I checked, I don't go around flaunting my intrusive thoughts trying to get the topics at hand normalized among fandom spaces predominantly full of minors . my intrusive thoughts make me isolate myself, and make me cry while feeling like a dangerous person .
as someone with heavily suspected ocd that mainly focuses on moral scrupulosity, do not co-opt our real, painful struggles with your campaign to normalize the preying on children, alongside vulnerable people altogether . you're being inherently ableist when you do, and that doesn't scream "disability ally" to me .
after I wake up I may get back on that masterdebater grind... maybe... ๐ค
It honestly shocks me I've had to say this multiple times on multiple of my blogs because people harass me for it but
when you hear me yume/selfshipping with boris pavlikovsky and these are the versions of the character I am using to do so
maybe, surprise! I don't ship myself with the book version of him .
now, HOW does this circle around even into this blog?
because pro/darkshippers have been sending some.... interesting things both in my strawpage ask gimmicks and also inbox on this exact blog saying that "[I] can't speak since [I] yumeship with a racist"....
hey guys, I want you guys to just.... go back on my strawpage, go to the f/o button, and scroll a very tiny bit and you'll see "only the 2019 movie ver" beside boris's name .
not to mention, I did not finish the book until like a month or so??? ago, and the time I did not finish it, I only saw snippets of it and it never showed what he had said . there's also a version of the book that removes the n-slur .
I finished the one that didn't remove it, and, just like how we're supposed to feel; I got VERY uncomfortable, but was able to separate that the movie adaption removed that aspect ( though I do have a lot of criticisms about the film this blog is not for that, maybe I'll make another sideblog that is just for movie and stuff criticism?? idk just yet ) so I continue to yume/selfship with only the movie version, only selectively adding some of the book aspects on all of the characters, but I genuinely draw the line at him being a racist fuck .
again, not a blog for this but, I would like to remind people; I do have moral ocd, well, suspected ocd but my moral ocd has been the biggest reason as to why I even heavily suspect myself of having such . unfortunately, this does mean that when one version of the character I like is bad, to my moral ocd; every last portrayal of them is... "contaminated" .
I don't need anyone else telling me that I'm a bad person because I like a version of a character that in their source material is tentimes more awful, my brain already does that constantly .
no, this is not me trying to deflect or trying to victimize myself, but I want you guys to know, that even when I know other teenagers can do and say genuinely awful bullshit at their age but can change as they grow; I am still not comfortable with the full-blown book version of him for the racism he showcased .
that is why I now emphasize that it is the 2019 movie version rather than the book version .
also, no, I'm not going to sanitize him and make him completely flawless like some of these people very condescendingly demanded recommended . that would also be defeating the whole point of the goldfinch, all of the characters, including theo, are NOT supposed to be moral saints . they are flawed teenagers for half of both the book and movie, surrounded by god awful peers and family members . chained to both different and similar systems that prevent them from healing, or anything akin to such . also because the fact he was a realistic representation of what neglect and abuse can do to a child, the fact he was messy as a result of long-lasting trauma, was the thing that drove me to him in the first place .
It also makes me just... sigh because, when was this conversation ever about who I ship myself with?? usually my conversations are why about why incest or adjacent shouldn't be romanticized, alongside hypocrisy shown by these communities that encourage beyond horrid shit .
It truly feels like a logical fallacy because it is, it is at the end of the day an ad hominem .
but anyways, wanted to clear that up AGAIN for what feels like the millionth of time .
same mfs who are profic or whatever btw ๐ญ goddamn let me kiss up on an adaption that I love while I condemn the behavior of his original book version because two things can coexist at once
like guys please I already have a mean girl in my head that critiques every little thing I do or am presumed to have done wrong ๐
I return to this blog only to see radqueer darkshippers jumping me in my inbox and strawpage ask gimmick thing and also for some reason pointing out the fact I don't post much?? ok?? oh no, someone has a life outside of "discourse" and is hanging out with family more rather than being online constantly!!!! oh no, a teenager is not letting "discourse" and the internet consume them even further oh no guys!!!!! ๐ฅบ๐ฅบ๐ฅบ
surprise guys, I'm busy with hanging out and joking with family especially siblings alongside being too focused on my hyperfixation on the goldfinch to ever keep up posting consistently omfg call the press .
I have a life outside of debating or whatever pro/darkshippers or radqueers, obviously I'm not going to be posting 24/7 .
that's like wondering why mice don't actually eat cheese, even more so exclusively, like what the cartoons make people believe ๐ญ
also don't you guys, especially adult proshippers, say that you guys "have a life" and don't care about "discourse" because of it?? suddenly it's a crime that a teenager also has a life outside the internet??
hiya im the anon that sent an ask like a month ago about how u gave me hope that i could heal, and you dont have to answer this but i just wanted to let you know that after the month i feel much better already and theres farther to go but ive made a lot of progress and im proud of myself so thank you for helping me spark that :) have a lovely night ๐
OMGGGG CONGRATS!!! I'M SO PROUD OF U!!!!!!! ๐๐ :D
cool theme and cool blog ๐ฅน idk why I didnโt follow soon but hehโฆ. +1 follower for the win
TYYYYY :D ALSO YIPPEEEEEEE
OK WAIT WAIT BEFORE I GO TO SLEEP saying that there are harmless transids is wrong, and harmful within itself, especially since the concept of them is "being one thing but wanting to be another thing" is rooted in transphobia and what transphobes say about trans people, and no trans both as an identity and an umbrella term isn't a transid .
you fucking the brand up ๐ /ref
I sprung up just to say this so
pro/darkshippers and radqueers thinking their harassment can shake me but too bad I'm kissing my wonderful boyfriends of 4 whole years ๐๐
ok I'll actually go back to sleep sorry .
