Can you feel it? It's your finger very close to the pulse of our times.
Xuebing Du
★
Noah Kahan
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Keni

izzy's playlists!
YOU ARE THE REASON

Product Placement
ojovivo
🪼
cherry valley forever

bliss lane
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Sade Olutola

No title available

ellievsbear
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
taylor price
noise dept.
seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Greece

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Philippines
seen from Nigeria

seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Iraq

seen from Russia

seen from Jordan
seen from Costa Rica
seen from Türkiye

seen from Lebanon
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Mozambique
@apocalyscious
Can you feel it? It's your finger very close to the pulse of our times.
22 seconds · Clipped by Apocalyscious Apocalyscious · Original video "Timothy Snyder: One Road to Unfreedom or Many?" by Filozofická fakulta
Timothy Snyder made a laughing but serious prediction that Great Britain wouldn't exist in 5 years, Dec 10th 2018. For this to prove a little to accurate, there's 14 months left. Writing on the wall yall. I wonder if we will have time to learn our lessons and to apply them.
Sadly, in his own words identifying some of the political issues in our time: the inevitable became eternity. Personally, I've lost virtually all hope for the future we were promised by the optimism of previous eras. Minds have proven too resistant to change, namely to reason, evidence, empathy. And the forces against common people everywhere are arrayed against us at all odds, whether billionaire elites, corrupt governments and officials, wanna be aristocratic and bourgeois class, and the stifling, vast ignorance and hopelessness of the impoverished; the economy speeding towards cliff edges, billowing apocalyptic fumes, families become your mortal enemies, friends become worthless or world's away; no social mobility, private interests lining their pockets with the lint in yours; hostile, malevolent regimes and groups maligned towards enemies real and imagined. The enlightenment's apex in the information age gave way quickly to the misinformation age and a techno dark age, where we can't see beyond our own imaginations without running into the market mountain that must move but is programmed virtual and doesn't really exist, your struggle part of the system, as it monetizes your authenticity into offshore accounts that buy your own oppression through your own survival and someone else's means of production. These times are begging to end, but we aren't there yet, no where near, on fact further away than whence it began, and whatever is next will likely close us tight in its grip and might never let go. Life is short and the battles and wars are over, make for the exits while you can before the stampede. Get your passports and savings in order and find a place that will be more stable in the coming decades, and try not to think about what your descendents will have to face.
Just another day in florida.
Very true
Good analogy.
Which is why gun control proposals must address the existing pool of guns and how to reduce their availability.
Yes, criminals will obviously ignore the law, but that doesn’t matter if you reduce the supply.
So you openly admit you want some sorta confiscation?
That’s the only way to reduce the existing pool that reaches new record high every single day.
That won’t work. Confiscating anyone’s legally owned weapons on the account an asshole here and there out of 300-some-odd-million abused his rights? You really think that’ll work? Taking guns from an overwhelming majority of law-abiding citizens, leaving them basically unprotected from the government and criminals, and incorrectly assuming that criminals won’t just illegally bring in weapons? You reeeeeeeally think that’s gonna fly? You want criminals armed instead of hundreds of millions of law-abiding citizens?
Preventing criminal behavior by severely handicapping a constitutional right? It doesn’t work that way. It won’t work that way. Criminals break the laws in place as it is. What makes you think they’ll stop when you ‘reduce the existing pool’ and why doesn’t that matter to you? Why take guns away from law-abiding citizens, actively infringing upon their constitutional rights, and severely handicap said right on the basis of it hopefully reducing criminality and mass shootings? And even if such a thing were to be successful, we’d see a rise in different forms of violent crime and we would still have mass shootings and gun crime. As evidenced by both the UK and Australia who have, respectively, massive amounts of assault and murder with a deadly weapon (knives) and mass shootings.
Yes, let’s take firearms out of the hands of law-abiding citizens so that only criminals and the government have them. Great idea.
Dumb af.
I don’t really wanna get too into this bus I’m in England, so I’m my opinion, guns are scary af. Also why is everyone scared of the government having guns? Like guys you don’t have to be so paranoid lol
Sure gun are very powerful and can be scary but it’s a great for self-defence.
A lot of people don’t know martial arts or have the strength to fight so a handgun would be great if you live in a bad area.
In a city next to my town there are some sketchy areas with drug dealers and stuff. So the people that live there don’t leave their houses after sundown because it’s dangerous.
From what I’ve noticed from gunblr they aren’t afraid of the government having guns, they are afraid of only the government has guns. Firearms are seen as a way to protect yourself and your rights against the government if it gets tyrannical.
If the people have no way to defend themselves against an oppressive government they have nothing between them and absolute authoritarianism and no way to protect personal liberty. We literally had a war over this.
This is already the case. Civvies got nothing on the military’s training and equipment.
The old, tired gun debate is dead, folks. It was a casualty of Las Vegas. There’s no way to fix the problem without doing something about it, or win the old argument without changing it up.
What we need is to make guns mandatory. 2nd amendment PLUS.
It’s the only way forward.
Make personal liberty and safety mandatory; put the authoritarianism literally back in the hands of the people, by law. We all need to consider it.
If the right to bear arms is an inalienable right, then let’s put our money where our mouths are and give everyone guns. Let’s unify the state and the people and make it the same thing. Governed by the people, right?
Let’s do this.
> “…make guns mandatory…”
Based. Fucking based.
Farse and satire sir. It's okay if you missed the point though man, getting people to kiss the point was the point. It's been a while since I thought about this though, perhaps one of my most potent brain shits.
Mandatory guns is an argument to turn both sides of the gun debates on its head for a reexamining, and to point out how half assed everything is, and how impotent especially the calloused ignorant, apathetic mind is to changing or seeing the other side. It's to hopefully preponder pondering about the people you wouldn't actually want to have guns and be proficient with them, such as children and a possible mass of would-be enemies.
It takes the thrust of the pro gun argument and turns it around on itself like ju jitsu so that it can finally lose by winning, and paradoxically the gun restriction argument as well. Imagine needing a license or doctors pass NOT to have a gun for example, for state over reach and the like.
It's supposed to demonstrate the horror of the state and the people unifying into a single entity, as there is no such thing and never should be. That every time a gun is shot, justice is administered, no matter how indiscriminate or untrue, because of its finality, lack of decency and humanity, and lack of due process - another right that's not talked about much. It takes us to a premodern form but with modern means to shed mass blood on a whim, for those untrained in law or literature, or philosophy or science, or anything else humane.
It's a fun thought experiment though. For a sense of irony, livid and inspired, I doned the wolf clothing and I wrote 87 of the 100 senators with such a suggestion, the only time I ever did such a thing in a decade of writing. I've seen what activism does though, it only distracts and subverts from the actual cause in exactly such a manner. I regret contemplating bad ideas to demonstrate how bad they are, only to see people not get it; to acknowledge without realizing it that amendments to the constitution can in fact be amended.
The argument was to hopefully make even gun supporters shutter, especially at those that would agree, and then hopefully make those that would agree to shudder at themselves too. But times have changed a bit, and now there are more people that think this sort of thing would be reasonable and sensible and actually solve what ever problems are in their minds. And this the culture wars were lost as the millennial era peaked, and bad state and corporate actors, and a horde of people that didn't know any better took over the internet. Happiness might not be a warm gun, but I often joke that the solution to every problem is a gun to demonstrate and prove the absurdism in it. It's usually nervous laughter in response with a hint of fear because the ugly truth is known: that humans are predators, and his faculties of reason, of uncultivated, are useless over his gut.
I once had a drunk disabled Vietnam vet scoff at the idea in conversation, because of everyone had guns, then blacks and criminals would have guns too. Oh really! This exposing the racism and the classism which is apparently also an inalienable right to speak (ie not get jailed or shot for it by the power of the state). As it often turns out they don't have such a right, as it's the first thing the police yell or think they see before they shoot, something which also happens to whites frequently but no one talks about, at least not anymore. I've got a bad feeling no one's really going to talk about police brutality or unarmed police killings for a while anymore after Floyd. This country can't handle it's racial legacy.
It was Republican governor of California, Ronald Reagan which instituted the first modern concealed carry laws, for the sake of the openly carrying Black Panthers which - in those days this was possible to do -marched into the state house with automatics, or something to that effect. A little history, and then a little more history, will teach you things outside of our little temporal bubble.
The idea is, if we can't be reasonable and responsible enough to not pose a barely veiled hostility and simmering mortal threat to ourselves and our neighbors at all times, and thus become the surveilers of each other - like they did in Nazi Germany and Stazi Germany alike - every citizen a secret policman and informant, then maybe we don't deserve safety, the rule of law, or rights anyway. And everything the forefathers gave us with their minds, and everything the soldiers died for was all for naught, and the US would be fully transformed into its final and monstrous orouborus form. These days we pay and sign up for the cellphone services that spy on us for them.
Go in peace, and read like hell until you find your mind changed in some way about something. Find your humanity and then give it away. Then shudder and tremble in the face of history and all the dead faces of the giants, past and future, we will account to for our actions, thoughts, and our hearts.
I've given up and will leave the country one day, hopefully sooner than later. I wish I could go back and tell my ancestors we wouldn't belong here, the whole place doesn't belong here. There's no point in trying to preserve the US or the union anymore, it's a lost cause. Human folly is too great a force in history and there will come a time when it reaches critical mass, as it always does and always will. Better to cut the cultural red states loose so they can be free to their tried and true anachronisms and fatal fates. Heaven could only hope. One thing coming to a narrowing truth though, this place is doomed.
Know when to hold em, know when to fold em. Stick a fork in the US, we are nearly done. Imo we will be much better off if we cut ties with trying to preserve this useless union with our zombific, parasitic cultural twin that has dragged us down into mediocrity on all fronts. We need massive reform, some of which can't be reformed, we'll likely have to cut some states loose.