It always grinds my gears when I hear people talk about superheroes like they're all meant to be these perfect, larger than life figures. Like, sure there are some superheroes who're meant to be that, many DC heroes, but I heard this argument from people whose only exposure the superhero media was the MCU. The MCU!
The same MCU where one of the most beloved character spends the beginning of his movie being a snarky douchdag. Seriously, we all know that Tony deliberately antagonizes people because he's insecure, Steve indirectly contributes to the Avengers falling apart by never telling Tony that Hydra killed his parents, and Peter is also bundle of issues. Hell, the Avengers spend almost the majority of their time on screen bickering and disagreeing with each other. They're FAR from perfect, and the only way to think they are is if you never actually watched any of the movies.
What makes superheroes admirable is not they're perfect and have cool powers, but their ability to overcome obsticles. Tony Stark is admirable because of his readiness to confront his flaws, Peter Parker wants to help people, even when he's not sure how to do that, Matt Murdock believes that everyone van be redeemed even if he think he can't. When the Avengers come together after an argument it feels triumphant and when they don't it feels tragic. Thinking that people like superheroes, especially ones in the MCU, because they're these perfect ideas completely misunderstand not just the characters themselves, but what makes great.

















