Source: Maurice Durdand
The Bright Sessions

@theartofmadeline
sheepfilms

ellievsbear
The Bowery Presents
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
No title available
NASA

roma★
The Stonewall Inn

Discoholic 🪩
Interview Vampire Daily

tannertan36
$LAYYYTER

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
No title available
almost home

Origami Around
Show & Tell

seen from Venezuela

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Japan
seen from Ukraine
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Mexico

seen from Oman
seen from Indonesia
seen from Germany

seen from India
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Ecuador
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
@archeofutureinspirationblog
Source: Maurice Durdand
Source: Claude Nicolas Ledoux
Origin: Erastus Salisbury Field Historical Monument of the American Republic
Origin: Viking settlement
Looks similar to an iron age settlement. Its made from organic materials that can be reduced to compost. No stone is used in these buildings. It signifies the Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic, Slavic and Baltic differences in agricultural technologies compared to Italic and Hellenic agriculture. Italic and Hellenic peoples used plows compared to modern agriculture, while the other European peoples built with non-stone materials. Temporary materials.
A common misconception is that this architecture and agriculture was inferior to the plow. Wrong. Plows are destructive to the fertility of the land. It increased the risk of crop failure. The other style of agriculture, called permaculture, is much more efficient at preserving fertility of the land.
Why then not build with stone? Because rotten wood from architecture can be recycled as compost for agricultural purposes, as is commonly practiced in permaculture.
These settlements disappeared from Europe with the advent of Christianity. Because Christianity was in favour of eastern agricultural techniques. The Bible features an overflowing amount of allegories from eastern agricultural techniques.
Whats wrong with this picture is lack of forest. Even tatch built medieval settlements always had a companion forest. This was used to grow appropriate wood for construction. No deforestation was needed. Its the same for this type of settlement.
Where does archeofuturism set in? In the need for more ecologically sustainable agriculture and construction. Permaculture is already spreading, these settlements will see archeofuturisation through combination with futuristic technologies.
Origin: Carnac, Bretagne, France
Ancient Celtic dolmen at Carnac Bretagne. How can this archaic structure be integrated with futurist technology? How can a settlement be built according to this archaic example but futuristic?
Origin: classicism
Classicism has these “classical orders” of columns and architecture. Its based on ancient Hellas. Its not accurate in my view. Ancient Hellas had four ethnic groups with corresponding regions. Doria, Corinthia, Attica and Ionia. The classical orders of classical architecture in modern perception dont reflect this.
That makes no sense. The architecture of the Greeks reflected their ethnic regions. Therefore, there must be a doric, corinth, ionic and attic order. Why is there a Tuscan order? Toscana is in Italy. It must therefore be considered as Italic classical architecture, not Hellenic.
I consider the critique classical architecture by futurist Marinetti correct. British, Belgian, German, Italian, Ancient Roman, Brazilian, American, etc have built classical Greek architecture? Why? The Vatican even has an Egyptian collumn in Vatican city? Again, why? Ran out of creativity?
Where archeofuturism departs from Futurism is that only temporary architecture with synthetic materials should be built.
Archeofuturism will see classical architectural orders be build based on ethnic cultures of different peoples. Which will be build according to their own tastes and likes, no classification of ethnicity will happen. Academic classification of ethnicity is not so good for creativity.
Why didnt the Irish build any celtic orders? Wheres the Germanic order? The traditionalists keep building the same old stuff from 5000 years ago. Archeofuturism builds new without destroying the old.
Origin: Savoyard folk clothes
Origin: Wilhelm Kreis Dresden
It was built as a German equivalent of the Italian David. Unfortunately it was bombed by the Allied Forces in WWII. Nothing is left of it.
Does it matter?
It only matters of we dont rebuild. We have hands, we can learn how to make statues. We can and will rebuild. Greater, more beautiful and more glorious. The lament of the American will be our optimism.
Origin: architect Antonio Sant'Elia
Its Italian futurist. If you would make it from natural stone instead concrete, add ornamentation, like statues and reliefs to it, it would be archeofuturist.
Origin: celtic
Origin: celtic
Origin: Celtic
Origin: unknown
Origin: 1928 Rockefeller City – Metropolitan Opera proposed design
Modern agriculture causes desertification. Its destructive and unsustainable. The future will see a revolutionary increase in reforestation methods. This aerial bombardment type of reforestation is the way to go. Since desertification is caused on industrial scale, these methods are required to regenerate the land on industrial scale.
Origin: Zamek w Stobnicy
Unfinished Polish castle. Was to be built in nature reserve protected by the European Union. The EU has stopped the production of the castle. Unfortunate course of events.
It was supposed to be a residence or a hotel if I am correct. I believe this is indeed the future of apartments. New York style towers are not the future of living spaces. If people want to live together into a single building, it ought to be built like castles. Thats the future.
Current powers in the EU are reactionary modernist. Nostalgisists for 20th century. They would never tolerate archeofuturism.
Origin: unknown