Myself as a Nature Interpreter
Taking care of the environment around you is a key ethic of mine in everything I do. The quote “take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but footprints” is one that I have always followed in life, and is one that I hope to bring into my future endeavours as a nature interpreter. This quote is often credited to either Sir Robert Baden-Powell or John Muir of the National Park Service. However, the actual source of the quote is unknown at this point in time. If I were to adjust this quote, I would encourage others to “take nothing but memories and knowledge, leave nothing but footprints and improvements”. I have always been taught to leave the world better than you found it, and I want to instill this idea in those I interact with.
Sir Robert Baden-Powell was the founder of Boy Scouts and the co-founder of Girl Scouts alongside his sister Agnes. Prior to this, he was a military man who fought in Africa. Upon his return, he found out that some of the handbooks he had designed for soldiers were being used to teach young men and boys about the wilderness, which became the roots of Scouting as it is known today.
John Muir was fascinated by the interconnectedness of nature. He had a passion for educating and inspiring others to care for nature as much as he did. As noted in the textbook, Muir was well-known for his sentiment that nature has intrinsic value, beyond the value it holds for humankind; this is a sentiment that I myself also share.
Personally, I feel that my views and values around sharing nature with others align with some of the perspectives of these individuals, which is part of why I love this quote so much. However, I want to make it clear that I do not view either of these individuals as role models – I could never look up to someone who has expressed homophobic or racist views towards others. In my opinion, regardless of the time period and of what was deemed ‘acceptable’ at the time, everyone should feel welcome to enjoy and explore nature – it should not be gatekept from those with unique identities. One cannot claim to care for nature and yet disrespect Indigenous people, who are the original caretakers of this land. If you truly care about preserving nature, then everyone’s attempts to do so should be welcomed and valued. Nature is not property – it belongs to everyone equally.
As an interpreter, I have the responsibility of teaching others that every action has a consequence, whether it be good or bad. This could be in reference to their own actions, to the actions of humans as a whole, or to the actions of nature itself. Predators pursuing prey, increases in global warming, pollution – everything impacts the balance of nature in some way. Some things can be rebalanced, like the population dynamics between predators and prey; others, like water pollution, are much harder to counteract and rebalance. This does not mean that I will discourage people from interacting with nature; I will simply help them to understand the impacts so they can make informed decisions about what they do.
My main belief when it comes to nature interpretation is that no one knows everything, but everyone knows something. As discussed throughout the textbook and this course, everyone comes from a unique background and has their own experiences; therefore, there is always room to learn from new perspectives. Learning from others makes me a better interpreter, and allows my audience to gain insights they did not previously have.
As a young female in STEM, I feel that my best approach to interpretation would involve treating others as equals. While I may posses knowledge that they do not, there is no other power dynamic that puts me above them. I aim to create an environment that is conducive to learning for all. My approach also involves being inclusive to all that enter my programs, regardless of age, gender, ethnicity, or ability. All of these aspects play a role in how my audience and I see the world, but they are not barriers. I like to think of them as different glasses a person wears. They alter your views and mindset but beauty is still seen, even if it is different than the person next to you.
In conclusion, my view on nature interpretation is that everyone is welcome and everyone has something to contribute. Learning from and protecting the environment are everyone’s responsibilities.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/53006178
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-Stephenson-Smyth-Baden-Powell-1st-Baron-Baden-Powell
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sierra-club-muir-racism-board-vote_n_619548aae4b0f398aeff3677
https://www.johnmuirtrust.org/about-us/about-john-muir
https://yourmileagemayvary.net/2020/01/17/the-iconic-tourist-destination-that-youre-not-allowed-to-take-a-picture-of/
Hey Amanda!
That was a great post!
First of all, I loved how you modified that quote, and changed it to “take nothing but memories and knowledge, leave nothing but footprints and improvements”, because it was always an important sentiment, but holds even greater importance now, as we face the repercussions of the damage we have wrecked on the environment, through climate change.
In one of your paragraphs, you mentioned that we shouldn't gate keep nature and that we cannot claim to care for nature yet not for the Indigenous people, who originally took care of this land. That sentence took me back to one of my blog posts where I talked about the dark history of national (and provincial) parks. These parks were once large swaths of land that belonged to various indigenous tribes, yet the government made them leave their homes to essentially create an empty shrine to nature. Now, many people who love nature and who love the existence of these parks are unaware of this dark history and that they were essentially stolen from these tribes. In an effort to not gate keep nature, I think we need to invite indigenous peoples back into these spaces, and allow them to share with us what they’ve learned from nature. The core of many native Canadian and/or Native American beliefs is an interconnectedness with nature, which is something akin to ecocentrism and missing from most of western culture in this day and age. Thus, we need to let these people back into the spaces we stole from them and give them the chance to instill in us an ecocentric worldview. Perhaps then we’ll take climate change seriously as a species, and actually do something meaningful about it.
The last thing I wanted to mention before I sign off, is that I love and totally agree with your approach to interpretation. You mentioned having an approach that is based on inclusivity and equality, and I love that, because many people, often minority groups, feel alienated from nature interpretation and feel like they cannot really take part in it for a variety of reasons and barriers.






















