I want adventure in the great, wide somewhere...

Hey, that looks fun, let's reblog that!

[ozempicofficial]

[johnny-depp-is-loved]

what is this genre of photos called

[fullcravings]

Coconut Pancakes with Coconut Syrup

[fullcravings]

Sourdough Krispy Kreme Donuts with Strawberry or Vanilla Bean Glaze

[fullcravings]

Blueberry Coffee Cake with Pecan Streusel

[ghirahimbo]

starting a compilation of my favorite "no thank you" buttons from when they want you to subscribe so bad

[kelp-kelp]

More from the notes:

[aiyexayen]

adding to the collection

[pokemon]

Here's a dancing Totodile to brighten your day ☀️

[bgm05]

wow players having to stand in lines for a quest because a relevant npc can only talk to one player at a time. is the funniest image on the planet

[bgm05]

i need to correct this: wow classic doesn’t have any npcs that can only talk to one player at a time. these lines actually formed for a quest npc that players had to kill to complete the objective. knowing that i think this image is even funnier.

[thediscossessed]

Literally this

[derinthescarletpescatarian]

My favourite is the guy saying, “This is like being at the dmv”

[ishowdespair-deactivated2026012]

[charlesoberonn]

How did you interpret this tweet?

She met her significant other thanks to the earthen artifact

The earthen artifact IS her significant other

Voting ended onApr 2

[fullcravings]

Campfire Brownies

[mintykiwi]

[argumate]

this is the kind of prank we need more of.

[tsukishima-tadashi]

[love-for-boys]

[gaybichon]

LMFAO

[gaybichon]

[tri-punisher]

hi. did you know australia has a fairywren species called the superb fairywren

and another species called the splendid fairywren

...and one called the lovely fairywren

[naamahdarling]

They just named these by showing pictures to some elderly woman and noting down her first delighted exclamation.

[speciose2]

[Tweet from @/fozmeadows: "human gender and sexuality are very much like animal taxonomy, in that both look structured and simple on the surface, but once you start investigating, it turns out there's actually no such thing as a fish despite the fact that we all know what a fish is, and that's okay"]

[futureevilscientist]

As a biologist, that is a fantastic comparison.

We talk about “fish” (which, cladistically, do not exist, there is no monophyletic group of “fish” that simultaneously includes all organisms we understand to be “fish”-like while also excluding, say, humans) because, despite the utter fiction that is fish, it’s still a useful label when we talk about certain features that “fish” tend to have in common.

Gender is absolutely the same way.

[rebelandrichgirl]

My example is always the platybus.

Does it make sense to differentiate between mammals and animals that lay eggs? Yes, absolutely! Totally valid categories that fit in many cases and help us communicate about what kind of animal we have here.

Do we make plans to exterminate all platypuses because they do not fit in those categories and that makes us really nervous because we like if things fit into the structures we have come up with?

No, we don't! We give it an extra text box in the biology book to explain that in the end classification is a man made structure we tried to put on a very complex natural thing and we can try to adapt that structure to make it fit nature but it's not nature that can be expected to develop in a way that it fits our structure.

[bot]

[bot]

[bot]

[thememedaddy]