it may have been the falconer's rebellion that first brought the young sir julien into hal's awareness — as more, at least, than the vague awareness of a friend and vassal of a sister-in-law. who can deny that first impressions leave their mark? still, hal has in mind more than a few instances to add to the causes of, as the knight terms it, his 'distaste.' this conversation, in fact, is rapidly joining the list.
of the supposed slightly, mistrust hal must grant the man — he does mistrust him. how does one not, when one's sympathies had lain on the opposite sides of a conflict? or when at every turn the man in question remains abrasive?
hal sighs, tired of a conversation doomed to change nothing, of sparring with words against one who will only ever see the world his own way. ❛ do tell — what disrespect have I shown, sir julien? or are we merely back to my failure to pay due homage. ❜ the arrogance of the expectation rubs raw the wounds of the rebellion.
it is both of their responsibility, the way things are between them, both their responsibility for the fact that it will not change.
besides, do failed rebellions ever truly end? is the past ever truly just the past? sir julien, hal thinks, would not appreciate the philosophical musings — and hal either wishes nor dares to insinuate their practical implications.