B1 Battle Droid

What is that? It looks like an explosive! How can you te- 18M; He/Him

[i-fuck-audis]

MY FUCKING CAR

[icpe]

The Long Dark, comics 29

[guyote]

The Long Dark: Wintermute

The Light at the End of All Things (x)

[bisexual-engineer-girl]

robotgirl asks you to use protection. you pull out a condom. she says "no, silly, I meant this" and pulls out a tin of antiseize.

[sodium-ion]

Maybe I am horribly uneducated but what is antiseize

[bisexual-engineer-girl]

Oil with a bunch of little metal particles to stop a screw from galling up or otherwise seizing inside an internal thread

[b1-battle-droid]

when she clank on my blaster till i roger roger

[iwanttoeatrocks]

Salt is sodium. Sodium is rock. I eats the rock.

Everyone eats rocks.

[b1-battle-droid]

ice is a natural, inorganic solid in a crystalline structure, so technically ice is a rock

water is the liquid form of ice

this means everyone also drinks lava on a daily basis

[anarchistmemedistro]

[anarchistmemedistro]

[boatgrave-deactivated20250901]

[mysteryteacup]

*Scrolls past*

*reluctant sigh*

*scrolls back up*

*rebogs*

[lucifer-the-gay-offical]

Gotta rebog it

[friendlylemon87]

Mmmmmmmm

bog

[lucifer-the-gay-offical]

Please do not eat the bog

[friendlylemon87]

No promises :3

[lucifer-the-gay-offical]

Don't do it, it's not yummy

[zeta-finnish]

EAT THE BOG

[lucifer-the-gay-offical]

ZETA NO-

[zeta-finnish]

I'M EATHIBG THED FUCBRING BOSG

[lucifer-the-gay-offical]

NIEN

[zeta-finnish]

OHM NOM, NOM OMN. FUCJSLINH DELISUCHOUS BOUG

[lucifer-the-gay-offical]

FFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCKKKKK

[bisexual-engineer-girl]

I love my life i love my friends I love being alive I love my friends I love doing things with my friends I love traveling to conventions I love eating good food I love camping and watching a thunderstorm roll in over the lake I love rolling down the windows and signing TOOL at the top of my lungs with my friends I love dressing up and looking pretty and going to Walmart I love being a girl I love being a boy too I love kissing guys and gals and nonbinary people I love cooking and hiking and running and seeing the sun

[b1-battle-droid]

i HATE waffle fries

END OF POST

[dudemandave115]

Item: The Map Rarity: ✦ Uncommon

What is the most beautiful world you've played on?

Feed your dashboard by answering my question, blogger.

the Long Dark

[b1-battle-droid]

Item: The Screen Rarity: ⏶ Common

Console or PC?

Feed your dashboard by answering my question, blogger.

PC!! I used to be a console boy but my pockets can't keep up anymore. I have a laptop that will last me a while and plus games are cheaper on Steam anyway

[sarebearcares]

My wife reviewing tumblr from reading it over my shoulder:

there should be more rocks on tumblr. Y'know. To be tumbled.

[b1-battle-droid]

if I were a greek god my patron animal would be an ostritch

no further questions, your honor

[b1-battle-droid]

I need answers asap 😭

In your opinion, are President Trump’s reasons for the U.S.–Iran war—like stopping Iran from making nuclear weapons, destroying its military power, and responding to its actions—enough to say that going to war is right or wrong?

This is a tough topic! Countries go to war for all kinds of reasons, and if we went to war because there was a country who was posing serious threat to my family, friends, and country, I would totally understand waging war!

However, what's important to remember is that none of the reasons the DOJ has given for this conflict have any proof behind them.

Starting with nuclear weapons, Iran has had a long standing religious doctrine called fatwa (read about it here) that declared the development, stockpiling, and use of nuclear weapons illegal under Islamic law.

Additionally, even the DOJ has admitted that Iran never had the capability nor intent to attack the mainland US (which you can read about here and here).

Now while the leaders of Iran say that fatwa may have changed if Iran was backed into a corner (say if Iran was attacked by the US and it's allies), Iran showed no signs of changing this, either by vote or by government behavior, disproving the statement that President Trump said about Iran developing nuclear weapons.

War is a difficult topic to rationalize, but the reasons Trump said we are going to war are not what he said they are. If I were going to guess about why we were going to war, I would guess that:

Israel pressured the US into attacking Iran for its own benefit

Trump may be hoping to provoke an Iranian attack for a Rally 'round the Flag Effect to save his party in the midterm elections

Distractions from the travesty that is the DOJ, the SAVE America Bill, ICE, and Epstein

Good ol' fashioned racism and Islamophobia

Control of oil for both decreased gas and energy prices and for the proliferation of non-renewable energy sources over renewables

Overall, if anything that Trump has said had any truth behind it, I would understand going to war, but the fact of the matter is that Iran was never going to attack us or even develop nuclear weapons. He is starting this war for reasons that I would seriously need to ask a historian, sociologist, or political scientist about.

I'm going to email some college professors about this; I'll reblog this post with their opinions on this matter when I get their responses.

[b1-battle-droid]

Here is reblog #1 with a reply from my prior Sociology professor and his take on the matter. I essentially wrote him an email that matched this post.

I should admit that I am not a professional and anything you hear from me should be taken as the opinion and work of a student. These guys are the guys you should actually listen to.

[b1-battle-droid]

Reblog #2 with my former AP World History teacher's opinion.

He said that as to why the US is so involved with Israel that some Christians feel a need to protect the Jewish religion, hence why America is so closely allied with them.

Additionally, he reminded me that Iran isn't a democracy; it was ruled by a dictator who was killing protesters, and part of this is to replace the current regime with a new one that is less oppressive.

He agreed with me that this is also so that we can set a kind of banana republic that will sell us oil for better prices.

However, the main thing that reminded me is that the government never does things for one reason, right or wrong. He also agreed with me that the conflict is still in the fog of war area, which means it may be a while before we can draw accurate conclusions about the whole thing. Overall, governments do things for many reasons, and it is too soon to tell exactly why we are doing this.

[b1-battle-droid]

Reblog #3 from my former American Government & Politics professor

This was probably the most informational response yet, and my understanding of the situation has greatly improved.

Firstly, he said that nothing that I proposed couldn't be correct. The major issue with the situation and the DOJ is that they haven't given us a clear reason as to why we're doing this yet. He refused to give me his personal opinion (I believe this is because he believes in talking about politics without personal bias or party lines, which is a thing I like about him).

Overall, he agreed with my other teachers that it's too soon to tell why we are doing this. Everything I said could be right, but governments do things for a variety of reasons, so although the ideas I proposed could side reasons, there isn't enough information avaliable to firmly tell what the main reason for the conflict is.

[b1-battle-droid]

I need answers asap 😭

In your opinion, are President Trump’s reasons for the U.S.–Iran war—like stopping Iran from making nuclear weapons, destroying its military power, and responding to its actions—enough to say that going to war is right or wrong?

This is a tough topic! Countries go to war for all kinds of reasons, and if we went to war because there was a country who was posing serious threat to my family, friends, and country, I would totally understand waging war!

However, what's important to remember is that none of the reasons the DOJ has given for this conflict have any proof behind them.

Starting with nuclear weapons, Iran has had a long standing religious doctrine called fatwa (read about it here) that declared the development, stockpiling, and use of nuclear weapons illegal under Islamic law.

Additionally, even the DOJ has admitted that Iran never had the capability nor intent to attack the mainland US (which you can read about here and here).

Now while the leaders of Iran say that fatwa may have changed if Iran was backed into a corner (say if Iran was attacked by the US and it's allies), Iran showed no signs of changing this, either by vote or by government behavior, disproving the statement that President Trump said about Iran developing nuclear weapons.

War is a difficult topic to rationalize, but the reasons Trump said we are going to war are not what he said they are. If I were going to guess about why we were going to war, I would guess that:

Israel pressured the US into attacking Iran for its own benefit

Trump may be hoping to provoke an Iranian attack for a Rally 'round the Flag Effect to save his party in the midterm elections

Distractions from the travesty that is the DOJ, the SAVE America Bill, ICE, and Epstein

Good ol' fashioned racism and Islamophobia

Control of oil for both decreased gas and energy prices and for the proliferation of non-renewable energy sources over renewables

Overall, if anything that Trump has said had any truth behind it, I would understand going to war, but the fact of the matter is that Iran was never going to attack us or even develop nuclear weapons. He is starting this war for reasons that I would seriously need to ask a historian, sociologist, or political scientist about.

I'm going to email some college professors about this; I'll reblog this post with their opinions on this matter when I get their responses.

[b1-battle-droid]

Here is reblog #1 with a reply from my prior Sociology professor and his take on the matter. I essentially wrote him an email that matched this post.

I should admit that I am not a professional and anything you hear from me should be taken as the opinion and work of a student. These guys are the guys you should actually listen to.

[b1-battle-droid]

Reblog #2 with my former AP World History teacher's opinion.

He said that as to why the US is so involved with Israel that some Christians feel a need to protect the Jewish religion, hence why America is so closely allied with them.

Additionally, he reminded me that Iran isn't a democracy; it was ruled by a dictator who was killing protesters, and part of this is to replace the current regime with a new one that is less oppressive.

He agreed with me that this is also so that we can set a kind of banana republic that will sell us oil for better prices.

However, the main thing that reminded me is that the government never does things for one reason, right or wrong. He also agreed with me that the conflict is still in the fog of war area, which means it may be a while before we can draw accurate conclusions about the whole thing. Overall, governments do things for many reasons, and it is too soon to tell exactly why we are doing this.

[b1-battle-droid]

I need answers asap 😭

In your opinion, are President Trump’s reasons for the U.S.–Iran war—like stopping Iran from making nuclear weapons, destroying its military power, and responding to its actions—enough to say that going to war is right or wrong?

This is a tough topic! Countries go to war for all kinds of reasons, and if we went to war because there was a country who was posing serious threat to my family, friends, and country, I would totally understand waging war!

However, what's important to remember is that none of the reasons the DOJ has given for this conflict have any proof behind them.

Starting with nuclear weapons, Iran has had a long standing religious doctrine called fatwa (read about it here) that declared the development, stockpiling, and use of nuclear weapons illegal under Islamic law.

Additionally, even the DOJ has admitted that Iran never had the capability nor intent to attack the mainland US (which you can read about here and here).

Now while the leaders of Iran say that fatwa may have changed if Iran was backed into a corner (say if Iran was attacked by the US and it's allies), Iran showed no signs of changing this, either by vote or by government behavior, disproving the statement that President Trump said about Iran developing nuclear weapons.

War is a difficult topic to rationalize, but the reasons Trump said we are going to war are not what he said they are. If I were going to guess about why we were going to war, I would guess that:

Israel pressured the US into attacking Iran for its own benefit

Trump may be hoping to provoke an Iranian attack for a Rally 'round the Flag Effect to save his party in the midterm elections

Distractions from the travesty that is the DOJ, the SAVE America Bill, ICE, and Epstein

Good ol' fashioned racism and Islamophobia

Control of oil for both decreased gas and energy prices and for the proliferation of non-renewable energy sources over renewables

Overall, if anything that Trump has said had any truth behind it, I would understand going to war, but the fact of the matter is that Iran was never going to attack us or even develop nuclear weapons. He is starting this war for reasons that I would seriously need to ask a historian, sociologist, or political scientist about.

I'm going to email some college professors about this; I'll reblog this post with their opinions on this matter when I get their responses.

[b1-battle-droid]

Here is reblog #1 with a reply from my prior Sociology professor and his take on the matter. I essentially wrote him an email that matched this post.

I should admit that I am not a professional and anything you hear from me should be taken as the opinion and work of a student. These guys are the guys you should actually listen to.

[b1-battle-droid]

I need answers asap 😭

In your opinion, are President Trump’s reasons for the U.S.–Iran war—like stopping Iran from making nuclear weapons, destroying its military power, and responding to its actions—enough to say that going to war is right or wrong?

This is a tough topic! Countries go to war for all kinds of reasons, and if we went to war because there was a country who was posing serious threat to my family, friends, and country, I would totally understand waging war!

However, what's important to remember is that none of the reasons the DOJ has given for this conflict have any proof behind them.

Starting with nuclear weapons, Iran has had a long standing religious doctrine called fatwa (read about it here) that declared the development, stockpiling, and use of nuclear weapons illegal under Islamic law.

Additionally, even the DOJ has admitted that Iran never had the capability nor intent to attack the mainland US (which you can read about here and here).

Now while the leaders of Iran say that fatwa may have changed if Iran was backed into a corner (say if Iran was attacked by the US and it's allies), Iran showed no signs of changing this, either by vote or by government behavior, disproving the statement that President Trump said about Iran developing nuclear weapons.

War is a difficult topic to rationalize, but the reasons Trump said we are going to war are not what he said they are. If I were going to guess about why we were going to war, I would guess that:

Israel pressured the US into attacking Iran for its own benefit

Trump may be hoping to provoke an Iranian attack for a Rally 'round the Flag Effect to save his party in the midterm elections

Distractions from the travesty that is the DOJ, the SAVE America Bill, ICE, and Epstein

Good ol' fashioned racism and Islamophobia

Control of oil for both decreased gas and energy prices and for the proliferation of non-renewable energy sources over renewables

Overall, if anything that Trump has said had any truth behind it, I would understand going to war, but the fact of the matter is that Iran was never going to attack us or even develop nuclear weapons. He is starting this war for reasons that I would seriously need to ask a historian, sociologist, or political scientist about.

I'm going to email some college professors about this; I'll reblog this post with their opinions on this matter when I get their responses.