I've received a few comments lately on AO3 asking about the relationship between Max, Charles, and Lando, and they've made me wonder whether I wasn't as clear as I thought I was while writing.
So, just for the sake of clarification:
The love between Lando and Max is absolutely romantic and entirely genuine. Their relationship predates the beginning of the story by many, many years, and by the time we meet them, they have already built a life together.
I think part of the confusion may come from the fact that Lando is, affectionately speaking, a bit of a whore.
He enjoys sex, enjoys flirting, enjoys affection, and generally approaches those things with far less restraint than most of the other characters. That's simply part of who he is. But his enjoyment of casual relationships was never meant to be interpreted as a lack of love for Max.
To me, those two things are completely separate. Lando can be deeply devoted to Max while also being a very sexually open person. The existence of one does not invalidate the other.
At no point was I intending for readers to think that Lando was staying with Max out of guilt, obligation, or some sense of debt. If anything, Lando is probably the least likely character in the entire story to remain in a relationship he doesn't genuinely want to be in.
Likewise, the relationship between Charles and Lando is also romantic. It's a slower and more gradual development than Charles's relationship with Max, but it is nonetheless romantic.
One of the things I wanted to explore in this story was the idea that love can take many forms and grow in many different directions without necessarily competing with itself.
Ultimately, Max, Charles, and Lando are intended to be a triad. Their relationships with one another are different, and they develop at different paces, but they are all rooted in genuine love, affection, trust, and mutual choice.