let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
will byers stan first human second
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
No title available

Discoholic 🪩

No title available
wallacepolsom
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Today's Document

#extradirty
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

PR's Tumblrdome

ellievsbear

Andulka

@theartofmadeline
Show & Tell
Cosmic Funnies
i don't do bad sauce passes

Origami Around
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Finland
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Estonia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Bolivia

seen from Singapore
@baninas
No it’s not. Panoramas like this are a painstaking, labor-intensive digital product, not made by just “rolling down a hill”.
This image, “Big Sur,” is part of a series called “Alterrnative Perspectives” by photographer Randy Scott Slavin. It is an example of stereographic projection.
“Slavin’s circular panoramic digital technique is a way of seeing only made possible through digital methods and is an orientation he masterfully devised after much experimentation. The time required to capture the images and then create the photographs, which can consist of hundreds of photos “stitched” together to create a single 360-degree image.” (Amy Frearson, Dezeen.com. 2 July 2012)
Here’s some more of his work:
I thought it was cool as is, but doubly so now with the right info
My aesthetic: when you take off your glasses on a highway and all the lights go soft and smudged, a trail of amber behind you like a quiet afterthought
My aesthetic: keeping my own glasses on so I can see the road and not die
Im so sorry youve been trapped in the passenger seat all these years Yellow.
GOD PLEASE LET ME OUT I MISS MY FAMILY
This nigga from 1920 be living in 3020
Wow it makes so much sense tho..
Why tf we ain’t got these?
Give me the forbidden parallel parking tire!
So.
Hi. My name is Mari Copeny. Im 11 years old and a kid from Flint, Michigan. You may know me as Little Miss Flint. Im an activist, an advocat
Hi. My name is Mari Copeny. Im 11 years old and a kid from Flint, Michigan. You may know me as Little Miss Flint. Im an activist, an advocat
A literal 11 year old: the government poisoned my city
right wingers: who cares, it’s just Michigan! America comes first!
11 year old: Michigan is in America
right wingers:
My kinda sport
UGH i hate sports but lesbians make everything better
Astronaut readjusts to life back on Earth
> Don’t give him a baby for a while.
HE GRABS THE CUP BUT THEN HE DROPS THE PEN 0.0003 SECONDS LATER
AND HE LOOKS UP AT THE CEILING INSTEAD OF AT THE GROUND WHEN HE CAN’T FIND THEM
I CAN’T STOP LAUGHING HE JUST DROPS IT
IT’S NOT FUNNY IT’S VERY LOGICAL THAT HE WOULD HAVE ADJUSTED TO LIVING LIFE WHILE HE WAS IN SPACE BECAUSE IT’S DIFFERENT FROM EARTH BUT I CAN’T FUCKING BREATHE
*THUNK*
YES IT’S BACK ON MY DASH THIS IS MY FAVORITE VIDEO
I could watch this video for hours and it would still be funny
It’s not your job to be likable. It’s your job to be yourself. The right people will gravitate.
4/20 praise it
Why is it cute and trendy for girls to wear men’s flannel shirts and baggy boy’s sweatpants, but when a boy tries to wear anything remotely close to girl’s clothes, they are considered “girly” or “gay”?
Do you know why?
Do you want to know why?
Because our society thinks its degrading to be feminine.
GIVE THIS THING AS MANY NOTES AS POSSIBLE. EVERYBODY MUST SEE THIS AND HAVE IT ON THEIR BLOG. HOLY SHIT.
No its because most boys look ridiculous in girls clothes, but girls look decent in “boyfriend” clothes. Stop trying to make EVERY THING into some form of female oppression.
It’s not “boyfriend” clothes. Clothes do not inherently have gender, they are pieces of fabric and no one cares about your hetero insertions. There was a time when it was normal for young men to wear dresses, clothing was much more gender neutral.
Cute little boys in their boy dresses!
And dresses and skirts look fine on men:
In different cultures around the world different items of clothing are worn that in many countries would be seen as feminine:
And they all look fabulous as fuck, like wow!
The only reason you think so now is because you are socialised differently. Which is ok, that happens, but when you assert things as facts and don’t look at any of the culture behind them you looking like an anal fissure.
Do not project your issues onto other men, men can wear whatever the fuck they want and look fabulous as hell.
YES YES YES!
Caleb is a fashion icon and the fact that this world doesn’t acknowledge it is pure racism
FASION ICON
TOP 50 BITCHES
pick your fighter
the ‘$1000 to go to Hawaii’ bride, the ‘I bought a $99 polygraph on amazon’ lady, or the ‘why was $200 so huge’ birthday girl
a lot of people seem to be confused and think the hawaii bride and the polygraph lady are the same but they’re actually 2 separate people so here’s all 3 in one go
the “$1500 to go to hawaii” bride
Ms Polygraph Test
$200 birthday
bask in the unfiltered nonsense of it all
since someone mentioned this and I had forgotten, a last minute entry fighter: “Squire Sebastian” lady
New to the arena, Kristie and her surprise wedding
pick your fighter
the ‘$1000 to go to Hawaii’ bride, the ‘I bought a $99 polygraph on amazon’ lady, or the ‘why was $200 so huge’ birthday girl
a lot of people seem to be confused and think the hawaii bride and the polygraph lady are the same but they’re actually 2 separate people so here’s all 3 in one go
the “$1500 to go to hawaii” bride
Ms Polygraph Test
$200 birthday
bask in the unfiltered nonsense of it all
since someone mentioned this and I had forgotten, a last minute entry fighter: “Squire Sebastian” lady
New to the arena, Kristie and her surprise wedding