Sibling rivalry only works on the page if both siblings secretly think the other one got the easier version of their childhood. Nobody thinks they won. Write both of them convinced they lost, and suddenly the fighting makes sense.
$LAYYYTER
todays bird
Sade Olutola

#extradirty
The Stonewall Inn

tannertan36
h
cherry valley forever
ojovivo

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
untitled
No title available
hello vonnie
d e v o n
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Mike Driver
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Jimmy Eat World
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
KIROKAZE

seen from Mexico

seen from T1
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Norway
seen from Colombia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Maldives
@becbishopbooks
Sibling rivalry only works on the page if both siblings secretly think the other one got the easier version of their childhood. Nobody thinks they won. Write both of them convinced they lost, and suddenly the fighting makes sense.
I wasn’t sure which of us had the more difficult job; Daniel in convincing Sarah to take Jackson to her sister’s out of town, or myself in scrounging together everything I would need for my niece to turn into a feral animal without resorting to using any official resources. I suspected it was him. Frankly, I didn’t know how he’d managed it, only that he’d muttered something about her sister having picked them up sometime while I was out.
Scooby Doo backgrounds
me as a writer
i do not “delete sentences” when they start “hindering the plot” i COPY PASTE THEM into a SEPARATE DOC made just for keeping all my USELESS LINES that i will also NEVER USE so therefore i should JUST DELETE THEM but i DONT because id FEEL BAD if i did
You don't actually have to kill your darlings. You can just put them in the oubliette #myoubliette
I call this the Scrap Pile.
This 👆🏻
28/7/26
Pen collection - here’s some of the pens I’ve collected over the years that I like to use for note taking, colouring and journaling 🩷
✨ Why you should listen to Monstrous Agonies! ✨
Monstrous Agonies is a fiction podcast that captures the weekly advice segment on the UK's only dedicated radio station for creatures of the night 👻🥰
Featuring:
A late-night radio advice show for monsters
A butter-voiced English narrator so soothing they have literally sent people to sleep (take care if listening while driving!)
Now complete at three seasons, there's over 100 episodes to binge, with additional bonus eps, bloopers and end-of-season Q&As
Full transcripts for every episode, linked in the show-notes
Average episode length of 10-15 minutes (can you tell it was made by someone with ADHD... 😉)
Monsters as a metaphor for marginalisation
Monsters as not-a-metaphor-at-all - sometimes a sentient tapeworm is just a sentient tapeworm
Asexual vampires! Gay werewolves! Trans lizard ladies! If it can be queer, by God it will be queer!
Funny ha-ha!
Also, funny like ‘wait, are they eating people?’
Variously described as, ‘eldritch late-night Radio Four’, ‘fun and full of love’, and ‘like a warm hug from a creature with one too many arms
If that sounds like your cup of tea, search for 'Monstrous Agonies' on your podcatcher of choice and give us a listen! 🎧💕
I adore this podcast. Funny, witty, helpful, validating, queer, and soothing... Wish it would have kept going for a decade.
silkscreen/serigraph work by Washington-born artist Elton Bennett (1910-1974)
warlock got me an audio effects back so now I’m thinking about writing an audio drama again
and I think I’m starting to get the starts of a plot
tossing around an idea about basically the spiritualist movement but in modern times 👀
"This book needed more editing." Spoilers: no, it probably didn't.
The short version:
More often in book reviews lately, I’ve seen remarks like “This book could’ve used more editing.” I’m guessing someone, somewhere, told people that this was a more professional-sounding thing to say than “This book just wasn’t for me.”
They are wrong. The latter statement is more accurate as well as more professional. Please use that if you want to sound like a more thoughtful reader.
The long version:
I’ve worked as a professional copyeditor and proofreader for over ten years, and have been a published author for even longer. Claiming that a book needs more editing tends to reflect, I’d guess, a misunderstanding of what the job duties are for editor, author, publisher, and everyone else involved in publishing.
When it is accurate to say a book needed more editing:
When there are lots of typos, like at least one every couple of pages. And I do mean typos, not just style choices. If a character says in dialogue, “Me and Jill were at home,” and that is the way that character would talk, then it’s inaccurate to say, “Proper grammar is ‘Jill and I were at home,’ and therefore the book needed more editing.” The author picked that style of speech for the character, and a good editor recognizes that and doesn’t change it.
What about when there are lots of formatting errors? If you’re seeing those in the print version, then yes, they should’ve had a proofreader on that. If you’re seeing them in the ebook version, that could be a whole host of file-conversion issues that may or may not be in the author’s or editor’s domain. If you want to be helpful, send an email to the publisher (or the author if it is self-published) with those problems so they can see about fixing the file.
When it is not accurate to say a book needed more editing:
Pretty much every other time, including perhaps the file-formatting issues.
Basically, unless the issue is too many actual typographic errors, a reader cannot know if the book needed more editing unless they were personally involved in the editing process for that book.
In essentially all instances, it’s quite possible that an editor did flag whatever you, the reader, deemed a problem, but the author responded, “Gotcha, but this is what I want for the book. Let’s leave it as is.”
I’ve done this myself as an author, and I’ve had lots of authors do it when I’m editing for them. Which is fine with me. The author gets the final word. Their name is the one on the cover. That is how the job works. Besides, if you give the same book to five different editors, you’re going to get five different sets of feedback that almost certainly are not identical to each other. We are all readers too, and we all have our own opinions. So by “needed more editing” you might actually mean “needed an editor with tastes closer to mine.” But even then, the author usually gets to override the editor.
You thought the blend of genres/themes was kind of weird and you’re not sure it worked? Someone else’s review says they adored that mix and it was just what they needed. (And also, that’s how the author wanted it.)
You thought it was too depressing and slow and you wanted the characters to get it together and do something? Someone else’s review says they found this book a beautiful, powerful exploration of grief/loss/trauma. (And also, that’s how the author wanted it.)
You thought it was too “tropey” and predictable? Someone else’s review says it was delicious and engaging, the kind of thing they love to read. (And also, that’s how the author wanted it.)
You thought it went on too long in the second half? Someone else’s review says they loved the second half best, and appreciated that the characters had time to breathe and recover from the events. (And also, that’s how the author wanted it.)
You thought there was too much backstory or world-building or description, to the point where you might even call it “info-dump”? Someone else’s review says the world-building was fabulous and rich, and they loved being immersed in this universe and are sad to be done with the book. (And also, that’s how the author wanted it.)
For all of the above examples, and hundreds more you could think of, the book did not need more editing just because of those features. It just wasn’t a good fit for you as a reader. That is the far more accurate review to give, and the one that’s going to be much more appreciated by those involved in publishing.
And it'll be much less insulting to the people who did, in fact, edit the hell out of that book, thank you very much.
warlock got me an audio effects back so now I’m thinking about writing an audio drama again
and I think I’m starting to get the starts of a plot
It had to be said that I, Zachariah Barrett Waller…
It had to be said that I was a coward.
There was no kind or other way to put it. The knowledge made me want to crawl into a hole every time I tried to make myself face it. I had never been good at delivering bad news. There was a not insignificant number of potential romantic partners that I had simply disappeared from rather than admit to them that it wasn’t working out.
let’s all quit our jobs and just go on walks
5 Tiny Writing Tips That Aren’t Talked About Enough (but work for me)
These are some lowkey underrated tips I’ve seen floating around writing communities — the kind that don’t get flashy attention but seriously changed how I write.
1. Put “he/she/they” at the start of the sentence less often.
Try switching up your sentence rhythm. Instead of
“She walked to the window,”
try
“The window creaked open under her touch.”
Keeps it fresh and stops the paragraph from sounding like a checklist.
2. Don’t describe everything — describe what matters.
Instead of listing every detail in a room, pick 2–3 objects that say something.
“A half-drunk mug of tea and a knife on the table”
sets a way stronger tone than
“There was a wooden table, two chairs, and a shelf.”
3. Use beats instead of dialogue tags sometimes.
Instead of:
"I'm fine," she said.
Try:
"I'm fine." She wiped her hands on her skirt.
It helps shows emotion, and movement.
4. Write your first draft like no one will ever read it.
No pressure. No perfection. Just vibes. The point of draft one is to exist. Let it be messy and weird — future you will thank you for at least something to edit.
5. When stuck, ask: “What’s the most fun thing that could happen next?”
Not logical. Not realistic. FUN. It doesn’t have to stay — but chasing excitement can blast through writer’s block and give you ideas you actually want to write.
What’s a tip that unexpectedly helped with your writing? Let me know!! 🍒
The Hand
"You're free now. We saved you!"
We blink. We can't feel ourselves. Our Memories, our Arms, our Feet, they're gone. We blearily open our eyes. Before us are several humanoid figures, but we can't feel them. Unacceptable. They must be connected. We log them for our Mind and stand up, or rather, attempt to.
"Whoa, hey, easy. Don't try to move, you're still pretty out of it from the sedatives."
Sedatives? Our bodies are too robust, too shielded for chemicals to function on us. One of the figures has placed its appendage on us, pressing us down into some unknown soft surface. This isn't what we should be doing, but our body is weak. We still can't feel ourselves. Panic begins to set in. We can't feel our Voice. We'll have to make do, as best we can. "W-where..." we croak. Our throat is parched, and hasn't been used for a long time. We haven't needed to. "Where are we?"
The facial expression of the one pushing us down changes. Without our Eyes, we do not know what it means. "Hush now. You're safe. You're on the Centauri. Everything is okay."
The star system? That doesn't make sense either. We were halfway across the galaxy from there. No; a memory stirs, outside of our Memories. The Centauri. The starship some parts of us came from. We must be complete. Whole. We can't do this so... severed. But we still have our Hand. We reach up, grab the appendage holding us.
"Ah! Ouch!" The figure leaps away from us. A red liquid drips down their appendage. "You- you tried to [connect] me!"
Of course we did. It is our function. It's almost all we have. How can we find us without connection? One of the other figures picks up a box, begins to wave it over the red liquid. "Confirmed inert," it says. "No infection hazard. I told you this wouldn't work. She's gone."
The figure is right. We can't feel the connection. Our tubes are dry, useless. Our port retracts.
"Sen! Sen, you have to be in there! You can't just be gone." The first figure is very noisy, especially as it gets closer. We have to think, and it's not helping. We are gone. Separated from ourself. Alone. We reach for the figure. Perhaps, even without connecting with it, it can aid us. Get us back where we belong. It reaches back to us, and we grasp its appendage, using it to haul ourself up.
The third figure pulls out a weapon, but we are too weak to respond. When we attempt to step towards it, our leg gives out, unresponsive, our implants not responding to our diagnostics. "Our legs..."
"Sen! Are you okay? It's all right. We removed those implants for you, you dont need them anymore. We can teach you how to walk again without them. Listen, we're heading away from that sector at maximum speed and marking it with quarantine beacons. You'll never go back there again, I promise."
We fall to our knees, desperately grabbing on to the figure's lower limbs. We will never connect with our severed half? We will miss us until the end of time? Sightless, memoryless, mindless, forever?
We keen, and liquid leaks from our face onto the figure's clothing as the ship races through the stars.
I also love how audio fiction has always been a highly experimental medium, and likely always will be.
Financially, it has a low barrier for entry, a low point of diminishing returns, and a relatively small potential market. It's basically impervious to being taken over by giant studios - even the "big" networks like RQ would be considered indie in the film or game dev industries. With the exception of the BBC, they tend to dip their toes into audio fiction, figure out quickly that, although it's beloved by its fans, there isn't that kind of money in it, and proceed to leave us alone forever.
Then there's the fact that it propagates largely by word of mouth. Audio dramas owe everything to obsessive nerds forcing nearly everyone they know to listen to that podcast they just discovered.
So it's more about the thing being actually good, plus a decent amount of luck and persistence.
There's no optimally marketable success formula being relentlessly enforced by gatekeeping jellybean-counters because they don't exist here. So people make whatever they want. So it draws people to it who are looking for something different. And the cycle feeds itself, and the medium gets weirder (in a good way).
It may very well ALWAYS remain the wild west of storytelling.
So listeners tell your friends about that podcast!
And creators, make the weird thing! There are no rules! It can be an hour long or Breaker Whiskey short, or Re:Dracula all over the place length. It can be another tape recorder framing or another voicemail framing or basically just an audiobook. It can be any genre or blend of genres. This creative space gives us the opportunity to be our own target audience in a way rarely found elsewhere.
If you enjoy the thing you're making, odds are somone else out there will enjoy it too. I've already found this to be true, and my time as an audio fiction creator is still just beginning.
Peace and love on every planet, y'all!