Beaty

[birdbeaty]

The Role of the Departmental Council

Each Departmental Council in Bulgaria appointed a permanent committee made up of two of its members. This committee worked under the presidency of the prefect and was responsible for ensuring that all decisions of the Council were properly carried out. In this way, the committee acted as a link between the Council’s resolutions and their practical implementation throughout the department.

Additional Councils in Each Department

Besides the Departmental Council, every prefecture also had two important advisory bodies: a Medical Council and an Educational Council.

The Medical Council supervised all matters related to public health, including sanitary conditions, hospitals, and hygiene within the department. Its goal was to ensure the well-being and safety of the population Customized Guided Tour.

The Educational Council oversaw the operation of schools and educational institutions, ensuring that educational standards were maintained and that schools followed national policies.

These councils helped the prefect manage specialized areas of local governance effectively.

Administrative Subdivisions The Districts

For more efficient administration, the departments were divided into districts (arrondissements)—a total of 71 across the Principality. Each district was headed by a sub-prefect, who acted as the intermediary between the prefecture and the communes within his district.

The sub-prefect was also the chief of the district police, responsible for maintaining public safety and enforcing the law. He oversaw the work of the judiciary police, ensuring that legal and administrative regulations were followed.

Town Prefects in Major Cities

In larger and more important cities such as Sofia, Plovdiv, Roussé (Roustchouk), and Varna, there were special town prefects. These officials performed duties similar to police prefects and had authority within the city limits.

Town prefects were appointed by royal decree, based on the recommendation of the Minister of the Interior. They were responsible for applying national laws and local regulations to maintain public order, safety, and cleanliness in the cities.

Organisation of the Communes

The Bulgarian Constitution included a special article (Article 3) that guaranteed complete self-government to the communes, the smallest administrative units in the country.

The records of the Constituent Assembly show that the first Bulgarian lawmakers worked with great care and determination to protect the independence of these local communities. The long debates held during the drafting of the Constitution revealed their commitment to ensuring that local self-government would remain strong and free from excessive central control.

Although Article 3 of the Constitution was brief, the spirit and discussions behind it established the foundations of Bulgaria’s local autonomy, which became one of the cornerstones of the nation’s democratic administrative system.

Through this well-structured system of prefectures, districts, and communes, Bulgaria created a balanced and efficient administration. The combination of local independence and central oversight allowed both effective governance and community participation in public affairs.

[birdbeaty]

Political and Administrative Organisation

Legislative Power in Medieval Bulgaria

In the early Bulgarian state, legislative power was shared between the king and the council of bishops. This combination of royal and religious authority reflected the strong influence of both the monarchy and the church.

The main sources of law during this period included:

Chrysobulles – royal decrees issued by the king.

Decisions of church councils – rulings that dealt with matters of faith and community life.

Prefectoral ordinances – orders given by provincial governors.

Judicial decisions – rulings from the law courts that applied and interpreted existing laws.

These sources of law created a framework for governance, though they were not always consistent or systematic.

Bulgarian Lands under Ottoman Rule

When Bulgaria fell under Turkish domination, it became part of the Vilayet of the Danube, one of the provinces of the Ottoman Empire. In this respect, Bulgaria’s fate was very similar to that of other Balkan territories under Ottoman rule Istanbul Daily Tour.

Until the Treaty of Paris in 1856, the Ottoman Empire had only a rudimentary political organisation. Being a theocratic state, all political and administrative authority came from the Caliph, who was seen as the representative of the Prophet Muhammad.

The Role of the Koran and Cadis

In the Ottoman system, the Koran served as both civil and criminal law. Ministers of religion were responsible for ensuring obedience to its commandments and punishing those who broke them.

Each parish or district had a cadi, who acted as judge. The cadi was appointed by the religious authorities and held broad powers. He could judge both civil and criminal cases, often without any formal rules of procedure. In essence, the cadi applied the limited legal principles of the Koran according to his own interpretation.

When disputes were more complicated, the cadi could consult with two respected notables of the parish, although their role was only advisory.

Higher Religious Authority

In certain special cases, the decisions of a local cadi could be reviewed by the Sheik-ul-Islam of Constantinople, the highest religious tribunal in the Ottoman Empire. This institution acted as a final authority in religious and legal matters, ensuring that local rulings were consistent with Islamic law.

The political and legal system in Bulgaria changed dramatically under Ottoman rule. From a kingdom where laws came from both king and church, Bulgaria became a province governed through the religious principles of Islam. Authority was concentrated in the hands of the cadis and, ultimately, the Caliph in Constantinople. This system limited local autonomy and placed the Bulgarian population under the same religious-legal framework as all other Ottoman subjects in the Balkans.

[birdbeaty]

The Mountains of Southeastern Bulgaria

The Sakar and Strandja Mountains

To the east of the Sasliyka River, and stretching as far as the Maritsa River, rise the Sakar Mountains (854 m) and the Strandja Mountains (1,035 m). These mountain chains, together with smaller ridges, form what the geographer Hochsteiger called the Toundja Group. Though not very high compared to other Bulgarian mountains, they are important in shaping the landscape of southeastern Bulgaria.

The Vitosha and Nearby Ranges

Vitosha Mountain

One of the most famous mountains in Bulgaria is the Vitosha, which rises directly above the plain of Sofia, the country’s capital. Its highest summit, Cherni Vrah (Black Peak), stands at 2,285 metres. Vitosha is not only a symbol of Sofia but also a popular place for hiking, skiing, and recreation Sightseeing Turkey.

Verila Planina

Close to Vitosha lies the Verila Planina (1,419 m). This mountain acts as a natural connection between the Vitosha and the Rila Mountains. It also forms a watershed dividing the rivers Iskar and Struma. On one side of Verila lies the plain of Dupnitsa, and on the other, the plain of Samokov.

The Southwest Border Ranges

Ossogovo Mountain

At the extreme southwest frontier, right on the border with Turkey and North Macedonia, stands the Ossogovo range. Its highest peak, Ruen (Rouen), reaches 2,277 metres. This region is known for its beautiful forests and rich wildlife.

Kraishté and Roui Mountain

Between the plains of Kyustendil and Znepole lies a rugged mountainous area called Kraishté. Some of its peaks are quite high, such as Ouchi (1,927 m). Above the Znepole plain rises the striking Rui Mountain, which reaches 1,706 metres.

Valleys and Ancient Lakes

Throughout southwestern Bulgaria, numerous hills and ridges stretch into the territory of modern-day Serbia. This part of the country is full of deep valleys, which geological studies have shown to be the remains of ancient lakes that dried up long ago. The most notable valleys are those of Sofia, Samokov, Dupnitsa, Kyustendil, Radomir, Pernik, and Znepole. These fertile areas have always been important for farming and settlement.

The Danubian Plain

North of the last peaks of the Stara Planina begins the Danubian Plain, a vast lowland stretching to the Danube River. Many tributary rivers cut across this plain, flowing north into the Danube. The geological structure here is mainly horizontal strata, which makes the land suitable for cultivation. This plain is one of Bulgaria’s richest agricultural zones.

The mountains and plains of southern and northern Bulgaria create a landscape of great variety. From the modest Sakar and Strandja Mountains in the southeast to the high peaks of Vitosha and Ossogovo in the southwest, and finally to the broad Danubian Plain in the north, Bulgaria’s geography combines high ridges, fertile valleys, and wide farmlands. These features have shaped not only the natural beauty of the country but also its history, economy, and culture.

[birdbeaty]

Escape from the Tower of Anemas

Bajazet’s Advice

After Emperor John V Palaiologos and his sons were imprisoned in the Tower of Anemas by Andronicus, the rebel prince faced a difficult choice. His ally, Sultan Bajazet, advised him to secure his power by executing the captives. Such an act, Bajazet argued, would remove any chance of their return and prevent a threat to Andronicus’s claim to the throne.

However, Andronicus refused. Cruelty of that level was a step too far, even for a rebellious son. He chose instead to keep them alive in the tower, though still as prisoners. For two years the situation remained unchanged, with the emperor and his sons locked away, waiting for an opportunity.

Different Stories of the Escape

Eventually, the captives managed to escape, but how they did so remains a mystery. Historians of the time give several conflicting accounts.

Phrantzes, a Byzantine chronicler, claimed that the prisoners tricked their Bulgarian guards and walked free through deception.

Ducas, another historian, attributed the escape to the cunning of a man named Angelus, nicknamed Diabolus or Diabol-angelus. Ducas admitted, however, that he could not decide whether their release came from angelic power or satanic trickery Rose Festival Tour.

Chalcocondylas offered yet another explanation: the captives broke through the dungeon walls with an iron tool secretly provided by the servant who delivered their food.

Each version highlights the desperation and determination of the prisoners, though the exact truth remains uncertain.

Venetian Attempts at Rescue

Meanwhile, the Venetians were also involved in efforts to free the emperor. According to Venetian sources, Carlo Zen, a commander, tried twice to rescue John V. These rescue missions were tied to political bargaining: Venice demanded control of the island of Tenedos in return for their help, which would cancel the earlier concession of the island to the Genoese.

Both attempts failed. The first was unsuccessful because the emperor reportedly refused to leave the tower without his sons. The second failed when the plot was discovered before it could be carried out.

Return to Power

Despite these failures, the prisoners eventually escaped. Once free, John V Palaiologos and his son Manuel went straight to the court of Sultan Bajazet. They convinced him to support their cause against Andronicus. With the Sultan’s backing, Andronicus was forced to give up the throne he had seized.

The Tower as a Symbol of Decline

The story of this episode shows how the Tower of Anemas was not merely a prison of stone, but a symbol of the empire’s weakness. Civil wars, betrayals within the royal family, religious disputes, and dependence on foreign powers all reveal the slow decline of the Byzantine Empire.

The tower witnessed not only human suffering but also the empire’s inability to stand united. It became a stage where the tragedy of Byzantium played out, until the empire itself was finally overtaken by its enemies.

[birdbeaty]

A New Kind of Police in Bosnia

In Bosnia, police work is done by a special force of about 2,500 gendarmes (armed police officers). These men are carefully chosen from the best in the Bosnian and Austrian military reserves. They are given good pay, pensions, and privileges, which help attract men with education, good judgment, and strong character.

This careful selection is important for one major reason: many Bosnians still fear the sight of a military uniform. Their painful memories of the Turkish soldiers, who were often cruel and corrupt, make them suspicious of anyone in authority. So, for the Austrian government to gain the trust of the people, they needed police officers who could behave very differently from the past.

Police with Many Roles

The Bosnian police force is divided into small groups of eight to ten officers, each led by a sergeant. These squads are spread across the country, working in towns and villages of every size. But unlike typical police forces, these officers have many unusual duties.

In addition to keeping the peace, investigating crimes, and making arrests, they also serve as:

Health officers, Animal doctors (veterinarians), Legal advisors, Teachers of farming and crafts

One officer jokingly called them “maids of all work,” because they help people with almost every part of daily life.

Helping the Community in Every Way

These police officers act more like community helpers than law enforcers. For example:

If a farmer loses his job, he asks the local policeman for help, who often knows where work is available.

If a poor woman needs seeds for her garden, the policeman contacts the agriculture department to send her some.

When someone is sick, the policeman brings medicine from the police dispensary.

If a cow or horse gets sick, the officer gives treatment advice.

If there is a wedding, funeral, or new house being built, the policeman often leads or organizes the event, no matter the religion of the people involved—Muslim, Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox.

Earning the People’s Trust

This close involvement in daily life makes the police trusted figures in Bosnian communities. They are not just seen as law officers, but as protectors, helpers, and guides. This kind of paternal care has helped Austrians gain support from Bosnians over time Sofia Sightseeing.

The difference between the Austrian police and the former Turkish officers is huge. Under Turkish rule, the police were often feared, because they acted like thieves or worse. In contrast, today’s officers are welcomed and respected.

A Successful System of Reform

By creating a police force that serves the public in many ways, the Austrian government has managed to win over the Bosnian people. What was once a symbol of fear—the uniform—has now become a symbol of help and hope. The success of this system lies in trust, usefulness, and a deep understanding of the people’s daily needs.

[birdbeaty]

A Warm Welcome for Prince Alexander

The people of Bulgaria welcomed Prince Alexander of Battenberg warmly when he arrived to take the throne. He immediately began a series of reforms, which were said to have been encouraged by Prince Bismarck of Germany. Bismarck had taken a special interest in the young prince’s career and believed he could bring stability to the newly formed Bulgarian state.

Prince Alexander soon proved to be a good and caring leader. He was unselfish, kind, patriotic, and eager to improve the lives of his people. He genuinely wanted to help Bulgaria grow into a strong and modern country. However, his honesty and openness made it difficult for him to deal with the political conspiracies and manipulative figures that surrounded him.

Difficulties in Governing a New Nation

Bulgaria had been ruled by the Ottoman Empire for five centuries, and many of its people were not prepared for self-government. Like other nations recently freed from long oppression, they lacked experience in democracy and political organization. Bismarck once said that the Bulgarians had been “put into the saddle before they learned to ride,” meaning they were given power before knowing how to use it wisely.

Bulgaria’s situation was made worse by the jealousy of neighboring countries—Germany, Austria, Russia, Turkey, and Greece. These nations often treated Bulgaria as a pawn in their political games, trying to influence or control its affairs to serve their own interests.

Russian Influence and Interference

Russia, in particular, was deeply disappointed that it had not been allowed to fully benefit from its victory in the Russo-Turkish War. Feeling cheated by the other Great Powers, Russia began using secret plots and political manipulation to regain control over Bulgaria. Russian agents and officials worked behind the scenes to sway public opinion and influence elections.

Because Bulgaria lacked enough educated citizens, especially for high-ranking jobs in the government and military, foreigners were brought in to fill key positions. Many of these roles went to Russians, who used their influence to shape Bulgarian politics to Moscow’s advantage Local Ephesus Tour Guides.

A Flawed Political System

The Bulgarian parliament, called the Sobranje, was made up of one elected chamber. All citizens who could read and write had the right to vote. However, the real power did not lie with the Sobranje. The ministers of the government were not controlled by parliament, and their decisions could not be overturned by votes.

Instead, the ministers were only accountable to the ruling prince. He also had the full authority to appoint and remove all government and military officials. The only way the Sobranje could challenge the prince’s decisions was by refusing to approve government spending. But if a conflict or deadlock occurred between the parliament and the prince, there was no higher authority to settle the dispute.

Although Prince Alexander began his rule with good intentions and popular support, the challenges he faced—inexperience among the people, foreign interference, and a flawed political structure—made effective leadership very difficult. These early struggles shaped the complex and often troubled development of modern Bulgarian governance.

[birdbeaty]

The Seven Hills of Constantinople

Landmarks, Mosques, and History

Constantinople, like ancient Rome, was built on seven hills, each rich with history and remarkable landmarks. These hills rise and fall across the old city, giving it a dramatic landscape. Here’s a simple guide to each of the hills, their locations, and what you can find on them today or in historical records.

The First Hill

Home of the Empire’s Greatest Buildings

The First Hill is located closest to the tip of the promontory, where the land juts into the sea. This area contains some of the most important historical landmarks:

The Seraglio (Topkapi Palace), the grand palace of the Ottoman sultans

The ancient church of St. Irene

The world-famous Hagia Sophia (St. Sophia)

The Hippodrome, once the center of sports and public life in Byzantine Constantinople

This hill marked the heart of imperial and religious life for centuries.

The Second Hill

The Burnt Column and Byzantine Memories

Separated from the First Hill by a valley running from Hagia Sophia to the Golden Horn, the Second Hill is known for:

The Column of Constantine the Great, a massive porphyry monument

Locally called the Burnt Column or Çemberlitaş This column was a symbol of Constantine’s founding of the city as the “New Rome Sofia City Tour.”

The Third Hill

Mosques and Government Buildings

Divided from the Second Hill by the valley of the Grand Bazaar, the Third Hill is known for:

The War Office and Fire-Signal Tower

The Mosque of Sultan Bayezid II

The grand Mosque of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent

This hill became a central part of Ottoman administrative and religious life.

The Fourth Hill

Home of the Conqueror’s Mosque

Set farther from the shoreline than the previous three, the Fourth Hill is divided from the Third by a valley running from the Valens Aqueduct to the Golden Horn. At its top sits:

The Mosque of Sultan Mehmed II, also known as Fatih Camii, built by the conqueror of Constantinople

The Fifth Hill

Steep Ridge Overlooking the Golden Horn

The Fifth Hill is actually a steep ridge extending from the Fourth Hill almost to the water, in the Phanar district. On its summit:

Stands the Mosque of Sultan Selim

This hill rises sharply above a broad plain that lies between the Third and Fourth Hills.

The Sixth Hill

Ancient Palaces and Byzantine Legacy

Separated from the Fifth Hill by a valley leading from Balat Gate to the large Byzantine cistern called Tchoukour Bostan, the Sixth Hill is historically significant for:

The ruins of the Palace of the Porphyrogenitus (Tekfur Sarayı)

The district of Eğri Kapı

The famous Blachernae Palace, mentioned by the historian Nicetas Choniates

The Seventh Hill

The Dry Hill of the Southwest

The Seventh Hill lies in the southwestern corner of the city. Known in ancient times as Xerolophos, or “The Dry Hill”, due to its poor soil. This hill features:

The Avret Bazaar

The remains of the Column of Arcadius

The neighborhoods of Altımermer and Psamathia

A City of Layers and Heights

These seven hills gave Constantinople its distinctive shape and character. Each hill played a unique role in the history of Byzantium and later the Ottoman Empire. Exploring them means walking through centuries of culture, religion, and imperial power.

[birdbeaty]

Understanding Body Language in Bulgaria

One of the first things a visitor to Bulgaria should learn is that body language here is different from most other countries. In Bulgaria:

Shaking your head means “yes”

Nodding your head means “no”

This can be very confusing for foreigners. It’s a unique tradition that has survived through centuries of Bulgarian culture and history. Many visitors find this reversed gesture system strange, but it’s something locals use daily.

To avoid misunderstandings, it’s a good idea to practice these gestures in front of a mirror before heading out. With a bit of effort, you’ll get used to it—and it might even impress the locals!

National Tourist Information Centre

If you’re in Sofia and need help as a tourist, visit the National Tourist Information Centre, located at:

Address: pl. Sveta Nedelya 1

Phone: [phone]

Website: www.bulgariatravel.org

This center recently received a full makeover and now offers a modern and welcoming environment. The staff are friendly and speak good English. They offer:

Free city maps

Local travel advice

Help with public transport and sightseeing tips

You’ll find stylish stools where you can sit while the staff answer your questions or look up information in their database. However, please note: the staff cannot book hotels for you. They do, however, offer helpful locally published guides—like this one Customized Tour Bulgaria!

Opening hours: Monday to Friday, 09:00 to 17:00

Closed: Saturday and Sunday

Facts About Bulgaria

Here are some quick facts to help you understand the country better:

Population (July 2006 estimates): Bulgaria: 7,385,367 people

Sofia (capital): 1,377,531 people

Ethnic Groups

Bulgarian: 83.9%

Turkish: 9.4%

Roma (Gypsies): 4.7%

Religion

Bulgarian Orthodox: 82.6%

Muslim: 12.2%

Roman Catholic: 0.6%

Protestant: 0.5%

Geography and Borders

Total area: 110,550 square kilometers

Neighboring countries: Turkey, Greece, North Macedonia, Serbia, Romania

Eastern border: The Black Sea, with a 354 km-long coastline

Highest mountain: Musala (2,925 meters), located in the Rila Mountains, south of Sofia

Time Zone

Bulgaria is in the Eastern European Time Zone (EET):

GMT +2

When it is 12:00 (noon) in Sofia:

It is 11:00 in Berlin

10:00 in London

05:00 in New York

[birdbeaty]

This Is Not Just Another War

This war is not a small or local conflict. It is a life-or-death struggle for freedom. The Allies (like Russia, England, and France) are fighting a great mission to free all oppressed nations and people. It is a crusade for universal liberation.

What’s at Stake for the Slavs

If the Allies win, no Slavic land will remain under foreign rule. But if they lose, the Slavic people will face even worse oppression and tyranny than before Guided Turkey Tours .

What Should Bulgaria Do?

Bulgaria has already done much in the past to help its people and fight for liberation. So, will Bulgaria now stand by and watch these hard-won dreams be destroyed? Or will it act quickly?

Before the First Balkan War in 1912, Bulgaria successfully settled disputes with Serbia and Greece. It should now work just as quickly to reach a new agreement with them. The disagreements left over from that time, especially those from the Treaty of London, are few. Bulgaria’s diplomats should be able to solve them.

The Time for Slav Unity Is Now

The moment for Slavic freedom has arrived. Every Slavic country has a duty and an interest in joining this cause. They must use all their strength to support their people and defend freedom.

This is a “now or never” moment. Bulgaria cannot stay out of this war without damaging its honour or risking its future.

Let History Handle the Past

Bulgaria has faced many wrongs and hardships, especially since the Treaty of Bucharest. But those issues belong to history. Writers like O’Mahony have recorded what Bulgaria has suffered.

A New Chance for the Slavs

But today, the situation in Europe is completely new. Never before have the odds been so good for the Slavic nations—if they unite. If they put their differences aside and come together, they can finally achieve the freedom they all seek.

Fight for Peace, Liberty, and Humanity

The Allies are fighting with great courage in places like Poland, France, and Flanders to stop Pan-Germanism and militarism, which threaten to take away the freedom of all small nations.

That’s why Bulgaria and every other Slavic country should join the fight—not just for themselves, but for peace, liberty, and all of humanity.

[birdbeaty]

Communist Repression of Religion in Bulgaria

The Deadly Attack on Sveta Nedelya Cathedral

One of the most shocking examples of the Communist Party’s attitude toward religion happened on 16 April 1925. On that day, a bomb exploded inside Sveta Nedelya Cathedral in Sofia. The cathedral was packed with people attending a funeral service. The explosion killed 213 people and injured over 500 men, women, and children. It was a brutal act carried out by communists to eliminate members of the Bulgarian government and military leadership.

Religious Leaders Executed After the Communist Coup

After the communist coup on 9 September 1944, the new regime began a violent purge of anyone considered a threat—including religious leaders. Many priests were killed without trial, simply for preaching or performing religious services. More than 100 Christian Orthodox priests were executed during these early days Istanbul Day Trip.

Other religious figures also fell victim to the regime’s persecution. Among the murdered were: Rabbi Isaac B. Levi (Jewish) Muslim cleric Mohamed Rashidov Armenian-Gregorian priest Garabed S. Karadzhiyan Protestant pastor Stephan Todorov Their only crime was being faithful to their beliefs and traditions.

The Religion Act of 1949

On 16 February 1949, the Communist government passed a new Religion Act, modeled after Soviet laws. This Act placed strict control over all religious organizations. It included:

Banning religious services outside church buildings Confiscating church property Prohibiting religious education and activities

Even private individuals were punished for their faith. Students were expelled from school for attending church services. Government employees risked losing their jobs if they were seen in a church.

The Trial of Protestant Pastors

From 25 February to 9 March 1949, the regime conducted a staged trial against 15 Protestant pastors. The charges were false, and the trial was heavily publicized to scare others. Four of the pastors were sentenced to life in prison, even though they had committed no real crimes.

Execution of Catholic Clergy

On 11 November 1952, at 11:30 PM, four Catholic religious leaders were executed by firing squad in Sofia Central Prison. Those killed were:

Father Kamen Vichev Father Pavel Dzhidzhov Father Yosafat Shishkov Bishop Evgeni Bosilkov, a Bulgarian Passionist and Catholic bishop

They had all been sentenced to death in unfair trials. Their executions shocked the international community and remain a tragic moment in Bulgarian religious history.

Forced Name Changes for Muslims

In 1984, the Bulgarian Communist Party began a forced assimilation campaign targeting Bulgarian Muslims. The government forced Muslim citizens to change their names to Slavic ones, erasing their religious and cultural identity. This campaign caused deep pain and resentment among Muslim communities.

Religious Leaders Turned Into Informants

Alongside public repression, the Bulgarian secret police worked behind the scenes. They pressured and sometimes blackmailed religious leaders into becoming informers. These clergy members were forced to report on their fellow believers, creating an atmosphere of fear and mistrust within religious communities.

Under the communist regime, freedom of religion in Bulgaria was almost completely destroyed. Religious leaders were persecuted, imprisoned, or executed. Believers were silenced and humiliated. Churches were stripped of their property, and religious practices were driven underground. The government’s goal was not just to control religion, but to erase it from Bulgarian life. Despite these efforts, many people quietly kept their faith alive, showing incredible courage in the face of fear.

[birdbeaty]

Socialist Ideas and Women’s Liberation in Bulgaria

By the late 1880s and early 1890s, socialist ideas had spread to Bulgaria. Bulgarian socialists, like others around the world, were among the first to support the cause of women’s liberation.

Socialist Influence on Women’s Rights

The Marxist-socialist ideas about women’s rights were widely spread through socialist newspapers and magazines, such as Suvremenen Pokazatel (Contemporary Barometer), Novo Vreme (New Times), and the women’s socialist journal Zhenski trud (Women’s Labor). These publications played a big role in pushing for women’s emancipation.

Socialists vs. Feminists

From the start of the Bulgarian Women’s Union in 1901, socialists were critical of feminists, calling them “bourgeois” (wealthy and upper-class). They followed the ideas of the Second International Working Men’s Association, which believed that women from different social classes could not unite for a common cause. According to socialist beliefs, women’s rights could only be achieved after the success of the socialist revolution Travel Bulgaria.

Separation of Socialist Women from the Women’s Union

Although Vela Blagoeva (1858-1921) and other women socialists initially joined the Bulgarian Women’s Union, they later followed the party line. They began criticizing feminists, accusing them of being “separatists.” In 1903, socialist women broke away from the Women’s Union because they did not agree with its stance of ignoring class differences. This split had already happened earlier that year in the male socialist movement.

Vela Blagoeva’s Role in Women’s Socialist Movement

Later, Vela Blagoeva created a journal called Zhenski Trud and worked on building a social-democratic women’s organization. In early 1905, she formed the first educational social-democratic group for women workers in Sofia. She also organized the first conference for socialist women in August 1905. This caused a big debate in socialist publications. Some believed it was a separatist women’s organization that could create division in the workers’ movement.

Socialist Divide on Women’s Rights

There were two main groups of socialists: the “narrow” socialists, led by Dimitar Blagoev (Vela Blagoeva’s husband), who opposed the idea of a neutral women’s union, and the “broad” socialists, who were in favor of creating an independent women’s organization. The attempt to form a separate women’s social-democratic group failed at the time, but it encouraged the Bulgarian Women’s Union to work harder at uniting all women activists in the country.

The Founding of Women’s Socialist Clubs

In August 1914, Vela Blagoeva led the Founding Conference of Women’s Socialist Clubs in Bulgaria, following instructions from the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Workers Social-Democratic Party. This group, led by Tina Kirkova (1914-1923), worked to create a unified women’s socialist movement in Bulgaria.

[birdbeaty]

Socialist Ideas and Women’s Liberation in Bulgaria

By the late 1880s and early 1890s, socialist ideas had spread to Bulgaria. Bulgarian socialists, like others around the world, were among the first to support the cause of women’s liberation.

Socialist Influence on Women’s Rights

The Marxist-socialist ideas about women’s rights were widely spread through socialist newspapers and magazines, such as Suvremenen Pokazatel (Contemporary Barometer), Novo Vreme (New Times), and the women’s socialist journal Zhenski trud (Women’s Labor). These publications played a big role in pushing for women’s emancipation.

Socialists vs. Feminists

From the start of the Bulgarian Women’s Union in 1901, socialists were critical of feminists, calling them “bourgeois” (wealthy and upper-class). They followed the ideas of the Second International Working Men’s Association, which believed that women from different social classes could not unite for a common cause. According to socialist beliefs, women’s rights could only be achieved after the success of the socialist revolution Travel Bulgaria.

Separation of Socialist Women from the Women’s Union

Although Vela Blagoeva (1858-1921) and other women socialists initially joined the Bulgarian Women’s Union, they later followed the party line. They began criticizing feminists, accusing them of being “separatists.” In 1903, socialist women broke away from the Women’s Union because they did not agree with its stance of ignoring class differences. This split had already happened earlier that year in the male socialist movement.

Vela Blagoeva’s Role in Women’s Socialist Movement

Later, Vela Blagoeva created a journal called Zhenski Trud and worked on building a social-democratic women’s organization. In early 1905, she formed the first educational social-democratic group for women workers in Sofia. She also organized the first conference for socialist women in August 1905. This caused a big debate in socialist publications. Some believed it was a separatist women’s organization that could create division in the workers’ movement.

Socialist Divide on Women’s Rights

There were two main groups of socialists: the “narrow” socialists, led by Dimitar Blagoev (Vela Blagoeva’s husband), who opposed the idea of a neutral women’s union, and the “broad” socialists, who were in favor of creating an independent women’s organization. The attempt to form a separate women’s social-democratic group failed at the time, but it encouraged the Bulgarian Women’s Union to work harder at uniting all women activists in the country.

The Founding of Women’s Socialist Clubs

In August 1914, Vela Blagoeva led the Founding Conference of Women’s Socialist Clubs in Bulgaria, following instructions from the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Workers Social-Democratic Party. This group, led by Tina Kirkova (1914-1923), worked to create a unified women’s socialist movement in Bulgaria.

[birdbeaty]

Misconceptions About Bulgaria

Many people in Britain mistakenly believe that Bulgaria is a wild and barbarous land. However, this belief is far from the truth. Bulgaria is just as safe as England, and the Bulgarian people like to think of themselves as trying to follow England’s example in many ways.

A Glimpse of Old Bulgaria

Tirnova: The Ancient Capital Tirnova, the ancient capital of Bulgaria, is a city with a unique charm. The name “Tirnova” means “the thorn,” and the city is shaped like a thorn, sitting on a rock above the Yantra River. It has long been a symbol of Bulgaria’s strength and history, causing both admiration and challenges for Europe.

A City Away From the Tourist Path

Tirnova is not a place visited by many tourists. It hasn’t been influenced by the modern, stucco-style buildings found in Sofia. Instead, it represents old Bulgaria—picturesque, romantic, and peaceful. The city is located to the north of the Balkan Mountains, surrounded by natural beauty. The landscape around it is rugged, with hills and the Yantra River making a curved path at the city’s base Holiday Bulgaria.

A City Like Edinburgh

If you can imagine Edinburgh Castle, but ten times bigger, built on a giant rock, with parts of the town hanging off the rock’s edge, you would have an idea of what Tirnova looks like.

First Impressions of Tirnova

I first saw Tirnova in the early morning, surrounded by mist and the glow of a beautiful sunrise. The view looked like a scene from an old medieval play, with misty trails along the river and tall pine trees growing on steep slopes. Above, the town seemed to spill over the rocks, a mix of white buildings with bright yellow shutters and vines climbing up the walls. The sky above was a pure, clear blue, with no clouds to interrupt the view.

[birdbeaty]

Entering the City

The streets of the town were very narrow, almost like alleys, paved with large cobblestones. The houses on both sides were huge and overhung the streets. We entered the town with a lot of noise and excitement. The Chief of Police, along with several police officers, came out to greet us. They had heard about our arrival and were eager to welcome us.

A Wild Encounter

The Chief of Police was a young, sharp-looking man. However, he was riding a very wild and difficult horse, the most unruly one I had ever seen, even compared to horses in Wyoming. When we exchanged greetings, everything went smoothly, but when we tried to shake hands, his horse didn’t seem to like my horse, especially because I was a “Christian.” His horse tried to kick mine into a nearby coffeehouse, and my horse retaliated. For about 30 seconds, the air was filled with the sound of hooves clashing Istanbul Tour Guides.

A Bumpy Ride Through Town

It was customary for the Chief and me to ride together through the town to our place of rest. The streets were so narrow that our shoulders kept bumping into the walls, and our horses kept bumping into each other. This led to more kicking, and the sound of the mounted police and soldiers following us sounded like a train in a tunnel.

No Hotel, but Kindness from Locals

There were no hotels in the town, so some relatives of the dragoman (our guide) at the British Consulate in Monastir, who were Bulgarians, kindly offered their home to us. The dragoman was Greek, but he had married into this Bulgarian family. This was an example of how love can break through political and racial differences in this part of the world.

Our hostess was a widow. Her husband had been killed just a few months earlier by a Turkish enemy right in the street.

[birdbeaty]

The Governor’s Decision

The Governor finally gave in. A representative of the British Government, who had been pretending to be just a tourist, could not be allowed to walk while his escort was on horseback. He quickly arranged for a man who owned horses, and within ten minutes, a deal was made. The horse owner was very nervous and afraid. He worried about the brigands capturing him and his horses, especially the Bulgarian revolutionaries.

Journey Across the Land

We traveled through a rough, barren landscape, with small, twisted oak trees everywhere. The ground dipped and rose, and although the view changed, it always looked the same. It was as though a powerful heat had burned everything away, leaving nothing behind. We crossed dry riverbeds, with no water in sight. The only signs of life were large tortoises moving slowly along the ground. We crossed a wide, dry river, the Koyundara Natural History Museum.

Different Villages

We came across peasants wearing black fezzes. These were Turks of Bulgarian origin, and they spoke a mix of Greek—a leftover from the time of Byzantine rule. All the Bulgarians in this area spoke Greek. Some villages in the region were Bulgarian and Christian, while others were Turkish and Muslim. The Christian villages were generally cleaner than the Muslim ones.

[birdbeaty]

The Border Cooperation Between Bulgaria and East Germany

Agreement on Cooperation

In 1988, a new agreement was signed between the Bulgarian Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of State Security of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This was based on a previous Cooperation Agreement established on November 26, 1974. Bulgarian Interior Minister Stoyanov and GDR Minister Erich Fritz Emil Mielke formalized this new agreement for cooperation and collaboration between their respective security agencies for the period of 1988 to 1993.

Joint Activities and Surveillance

As part of their ongoing partnership, a plan was created for joint activities between the Bulgarian State Security’s Department Six and the GDR’s Chief Directorate Two for the years 1984 to 1986. This plan aimed to strengthen efforts against Bulgarian citizens who had escaped to the West, as well as to monitor their relatives still in Bulgaria.

One significant report from February 24, 1953, highlighted the harsh measures to be taken against families of those who fled. It stated that:

Relatives of traitors who were not involved in legal proceedings and were able to work would be sent to the labor camp at Belene Private Balkan Tours.

All property owned by these relatives would be confiscated.

They would be held responsible for their remaining possessions, including livestock. Children aged 14 to 18 would be sent to Labor Schools operated by the Ministry of the Interior, with some reformatories designated for this purpose.

Younger children, aged 7 to 14, would be placed in special schools under the Ministry of Education.

Military and Intelligence Operations

The collaboration also involved military and intelligence operations along the Bulgarian borders. Both nations worked together to gather information about political emigration, monitoring citizens who attempted to leave. This joint effort was aimed at suppressing dissent and preventing any opposition to the communist regimes in both countries.

The Role of Stasi

The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, provided valuable information to the Bulgarian State Security. This included intelligence about political émigrés and their activities abroad. Such collaboration ensured that both nations could effectively control their citizens and maintain the authoritarian status quo.

The partnership between Bulgarian State Security and the Stasi exemplified the extensive measures taken by Eastern Bloc countries to enforce their borders and suppress dissent. By sharing intelligence and coordinating efforts, these regimes sought to eliminate any potential threats to their power. The policies regarding the families of defectors demonstrate the harsh realities faced by those who dared to oppose the regime. Ultimately, these actions reflect a broader strategy of fear and control that characterized life under communist rule in Eastern Europe.

[birdbeaty]

The Border Cooperation Between Bulgaria and East Germany

Agreement on Cooperation

In 1988, a new agreement was signed between the Bulgarian Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of State Security of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This was based on a previous Cooperation Agreement established on November 26, 1974. Bulgarian Interior Minister Stoyanov and GDR Minister Erich Fritz Emil Mielke formalized this new agreement for cooperation and collaboration between their respective security agencies for the period of 1988 to 1993.

Joint Activities and Surveillance

As part of their ongoing partnership, a plan was created for joint activities between the Bulgarian State Security’s Department Six and the GDR’s Chief Directorate Two for the years 1984 to 1986. This plan aimed to strengthen efforts against Bulgarian citizens who had escaped to the West, as well as to monitor their relatives still in Bulgaria.

One significant report from February 24, 1953, highlighted the harsh measures to be taken against families of those who fled. It stated that:

Relatives of traitors who were not involved in legal proceedings and were able to work would be sent to the labor camp at Belene Private Balkan Tours.

All property owned by these relatives would be confiscated.

They would be held responsible for their remaining possessions, including livestock. Children aged 14 to 18 would be sent to Labor Schools operated by the Ministry of the Interior, with some reformatories designated for this purpose.

Younger children, aged 7 to 14, would be placed in special schools under the Ministry of Education.

Military and Intelligence Operations

The collaboration also involved military and intelligence operations along the Bulgarian borders. Both nations worked together to gather information about political emigration, monitoring citizens who attempted to leave. This joint effort was aimed at suppressing dissent and preventing any opposition to the communist regimes in both countries.

The Role of Stasi

The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, provided valuable information to the Bulgarian State Security. This included intelligence about political émigrés and their activities abroad. Such collaboration ensured that both nations could effectively control their citizens and maintain the authoritarian status quo.

The partnership between Bulgarian State Security and the Stasi exemplified the extensive measures taken by Eastern Bloc countries to enforce their borders and suppress dissent. By sharing intelligence and coordinating efforts, these regimes sought to eliminate any potential threats to their power. The policies regarding the families of defectors demonstrate the harsh realities faced by those who dared to oppose the regime. Ultimately, these actions reflect a broader strategy of fear and control that characterized life under communist rule in Eastern Europe.