The Secret History: Review
So first off, this book is not for everyone. I know everyone highly requests it, but really. If you don't like long winded movies like Barry Lyndon or Doctor Zhivago or even Boyhood, you will hate this book.
The Secret History is a slow moving book that follows narrator Richard in a small New England school in the 1980s where he meets, befriends, and end up in a small and almost cult like group. There are only 5 other people in this small select group all taught by one professor, Julian Morrow. They discuss greek classics, theology, and philosophy as Julian tries to make himself out to be a god, or at least one of the omniscient teachers of ancient greek such as Plato. The story at first seems to be based solely around the murder of Bunny but there is much more too it.
First of all, if you tend to read books at a surface level, there is a good chance this book will be a hit or miss. The Secret History is slow paced and long. At 500 pages and many without what some may call 'insignificant action to the plot', it can be a turn off. If you are expecting a mystery novel you'll be very disappointed very quickly. The purpose of this novel is not to explain how the murder of Bunny Corcoran came about. Rather, at a more surface level, this book is all about building a particular atmosphere. It's an atmosphere and aesthetic I've begun to link to winter; dark, cold, and solitary. Yet somehow something draws you back, whether the curiosity or the chilling beauty of the aesthetic and world it creates. (The chilling beauty is like a large sharp icicle to me. Beautiful but dangerous should you be under it when it falls. or somehow get stabbed by it). And this book is all about building this world and creating this feeling. So if that's not your thing, don't bother
If you read or even re-read books on a more in-depth, you might be more likely to enjoy this book. (I tend to read books very surface level but subconsciously will read deeper, for i noticed if you ask me the right questions i find that i have automatically proceeded the book at a deeper level then i may have originally thought).
This book focuses on 6 young adults who are all trying to create a perfect and ideal version of themselves. Even their professor can be shown as creating this image of perfection. So let's start with Professor Julian Morrow, the puppet master of all of this. Julian is a professor who creates an air of power and grandeur by acting as an all knowing teacher passing on his knowledge to students who wish to achieve this level of perfection that Julian seems to emit. He has traveled and knows important people. He is knowledgeable in philosophy and language. But most importantly, is his knowledge of ancient Greek and even Roman philosophy and theology. For many decades, and even now, the Greek and Roman schools of thought were seen as the foundations of all modern science, math, art, and thinking. They were the epitome of perfection. By creating this air around himself, Julian pulls in others that seek to achieve this level of aesthetic perfection. He spots those who fit is own form of aesthetic beauty, (rich, attractive, and all wearing masks of being greater than they are), and draws them in with promises that offer this grandeur and aesthetic perfection. To his students, he likens himself to the classic teachers of the old such as Plato, who would take on a few students and teach them all he knew. He even states this upon Richard's questioning as to why one he would take all his classes, save for french, with Julian. Julian points out that students of Plato, such as Aristotle, and learned all they had from only one Teacher. And that is what Julian does.
Moving onto the characters, each and every one of them are all flawed, pretentious and highly unlikeable. Perhaps most of all is Bunny. However with a closer look, you'll notice that they are simply playing a particular character and adopting an identity that they have created for themselves to live up to this expedition that as rich young adults, they must be perfect. in Bunny's case, it is of a rich and extravagant young man who has no cares in the world and where money is the least of concerns. For Richard, it is to fit in this seemingly closed off world of wealth and knowledge. Each of the 6 characters have a secret which they are hiding under their individual identity they have assumed-- And ever. single. one. is obsessed with this ultimate form of beauty that they all wish to achieve. (this can be seen being played out where the infamous quote of 'beauty is terror' is first spoken) Arguably, this quest for beauty is the True main plot of this book. The search for the unobtainable and the willingness to do anything to achieve it. to draw reference to ancient Greece, the unobtainable and perfect dimensions that rule the hellenistic marble statues.
Naturally, the dangerous of this one track minded-quest is also outlined. The characters have little interaction outside of each other. Most fall into an addition, weather it is alcohol, substance abuse or excessive spending. And ultimately, murder.
i think it's also important to remember the age of our characters, which is 19 through 21. They are at a time when the world is theirs to take. no fear at all and confined in their bubble in which they all search for perfection and hide their fatal flaw. Many of these flaws stem from deep rooted family issues and disillusion with their past.
Now to address the unbelievability of the Bacchus rituals. I have heard it once stated in a review, that they saw the Bacchus rituals as more of a cover. They believed that Camilla and Charles were caught in some compromising situation by the farmer, so they killed him along with Henry's help. Bunny had seen camilla and Charles as well, or he simply began to come closer to the truth of the matter. and thus they killed Bunny to protect both their hand in the farmer's murder and the reputations of the Twins and Henry.
Whether you choose to believe that version, the version in which they have achieved frenzy, or in which they were simply high and drunk off of substances and the moon's energy, is up to you.
http://www.readitforward.com/essay/why-i-hated-the-secret-history/ I think this review was very well written and showed the difference between a surface read and an in depth read of this book.
Why did i like it personally? I liked it because i could relate to it. This endless search for aesthetic beauty and a certain extent of extremes to get it. Naturally, The Secret History exaggerates beyond what most will go to achieve this, but never the less, for me I still could relate to the basic points of it. The longing to make oneself grander then they are, to seem more knowledgeable and classy. To have an air of wealth, perfection and independence.
Perhaps I am attempting to achieve the same thing just by reading this book and writing this review.
To sum it up, if you want to read this book I suggest a basic understanding of ancient Greek mythology and philosophy as well as an understanding of what aesthetic beauty is. Likewise, I suggest that you do not go into this book reading it as a mystery novel.