#fakest idgafers
will byers stan first human second
d e v o n
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

⁂
Xuebing Du

Love Begins

roma★
sheepfilms
Three Goblin Art
Game of Thrones Daily

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
AnasAbdin
noise dept.
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
No title available
trying on a metaphor
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Product Placement
occasionally subtle

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brunei

seen from Austria

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
@bonedaddy-o
#fakest idgafers
generational abyssmal dogshit coming down the pipe
he's so real tho
this week marks the first time in indian history us missiles have killed indian citizens merely working on oil tankers but the mea has carefully assigned the blame to ongoing conflict in the region.
"A US aircraft fired two Hellfire missiles into the ship’s engine room after the crew repeatedly failed to comply with directions from US forces,"
Reports have identified the deceased aboard MT Jalveer as deck cadet Aditya Sharma, engine fitter Shivanand Chaurasiya and chief engineer Patnala Suresh.
CENTCOM is bragging on X about this stuff like it did with Venezuelan boats.
In a statement issued on Thursday, Dubai-based IOS Marine FZE, which manages Settebello, said it "unequivocally" held the US Navy responsible for the actions that led to the deaths of three people connected to the vessel.
IOS Marine called on US authorities to publicly release any evidence showing that communication had been established with the vessel before the strike.
The company also rejected suggestions that the tanker had any connection to Iran.
"The vessel is a civilian merchant vessel engaged in legitimate commercial operations. It has no affiliation whatsoever with Iran or Iranian oil," it said.
Meanwhile
The general secretary of Forward Seamens Union of India, Manoj Yadav, has been quoted as having said that he refuses to believe that the US
How does algospeak dilute the topic?
It's already a topic people avoid discussing due to its nature despite being a common problem. And a result of this disgust from society is victims themselves feeling dirty, broken, and impure. Doesn't need to be watered down
propaganda on my dash
WHAT IS THE CHARGE? BOINKING AN OOMF? A LONGTIME, SHORT-DISTANCE OOMF?
Woman in front of me in line at the caffe nero changed my life yesterday when she ordered a prosciutto sandwich but pronounced "prosciutto" like it rhymed with mosquito. "Pruh-squee-toe."
I heard this person say "uhhhh yeah can I get a prosquito sandwich please?" and I knew I'd never be the same. Prosquito. Prosquito. Its everything to me. I haven't been able to stop saying that lmfao. This is my spinch. This is my bagel and creem cheems. This is my ranibow sprimkle.
friends and family are already tired of me going crazy over prosquito but its so special to me
never get your info from tiktok, guys.
i seriously thought that donald trump and joe biden spoke chinese and sang to each other in a snowy forest
voice offscreen: Hi, excuse me, i have an appointment for today?
*pause*
second voice: he’s new
first voice: oh. okay
it is not going well
really loving this fake AI scandal of trump secretly meeting with the volturi
BREAKING: Trump Has Allegedly Signed The White-Gold Concordat And Is In League With The Thalmor 😳🚨
Global Warming Has Accelerated: Are the United Nations and the Public Well-Informed?
James E. Hansen, Pushker Kharecha, Makiko Sato, George Tselioudis, Joseph Kelly, Susanne E. Bauer, Reto Ruedy, Eunbi Jeong, Qinjian Jin, Eric Rignot, Isabella Velicogna, Mark R. Schoeberl, Karina von Schuckmann, Joshua Amponsem, Junji Cao, Anton Keskinen, Jing Li & Anni Pokela
Pages 6-44 | Published online: 03 Feb 2025
Abstract
Global temperature leaped more than 0.4°C (0.7°F) during the past two years, the 12-month average peaking in August 2024 at +1.6°C relative to the temperature at the beginning of last century (the 1880-1920 average). This temperature jump was spurred by one of the periodic tropical El Niño warming events, but many Earth scientists were baffled by the magnitude of the global warming, which was twice as large as expected for the weak 2023-2024 El Niño. We find that most of the other half of the warming was caused by a restriction on aerosol emissions by ships, which was imposed in 2020 by the International Maritime Organization to combat the effect of aerosol pollutants on human health. Aerosols are small particles that serve as cloud formation nuclei. Their most important effect is to increase the extent and brightness of clouds, which reflect sunlight and have a cooling effect on Earth. When aerosols – and thus clouds – are reduced, Earth is darker and absorbs more sunlight, thus enhancing global warming. Ships are the main aerosol source in the North Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans. We quantify the aerosol effect from the geographical distribution of sunlight reflected by Earth as measured by satellites, with the largest expected and observed effects in the North Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans. We find that aerosol cooling, and thus climate sensitivity, are understated in the best estimate of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Global warming caused by reduced ship aerosols will not go away as tropical climate moves into its cool La Niña phase. Therefore, we expect that global temperature will not fall much below +1.5°C level, instead oscillating near or above that level for the next few years, which will help confirm our interpretation of the sudden global warming. High sea surface temperatures and increasing ocean hotspots will continue, with harmful effects on coral reefs and other ocean life. The largest practical effect on humans today is increase of the frequency and severity of climate extremes. More powerful tropical storms, tornadoes, and thunderstorms, and thus more extreme floods, are driven by high sea surface temperature and a warmer atmosphere that holds more water vapor. Higher global temperature also increases the intensity of heat waves and – at the times and places of dry weather – high temperature increases drought intensity, including “flash droughts” that develop rapidly, even in regions with adequate average rainfall. Polar climate change has the greatest long-term effect on humanity, with impacts accelerated by the jump in global temperature. We find that polar ice melt and freshwater injection onto the North Atlantic Ocean exceed prior estimates and, because of accelerated global warming, the melt will increase. As a result, shutdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is likely within the next 20-30 years, unless actions are taken to reduce global warming – in contradiction to conclusions of IPCC. If AMOC is allowed to shut down, it will lock in major problems including sea level rise of several meters – thus, we describe AMOC shutdown as the “point of no return.” We suggest that an alternative perspective – a complement to the IPCC approach – is needed to assess these issues and actions that are needed to avoid handing young people a dire situation that is out of their control. This alternative approach will make more use of ongoing observations to drive modeling and more use of paleoclimate to test modeling and test our understanding. As of today, the threats of AMOC shutdown and sea level rise are poorly understood, but better observations of polar ocean and ice changes in response to the present accelerated global warming have the potential to greatly improve our understanding.
Global warming has accelerated since 2010 by more than 50% over the 1970-2010 warming rate of 0.18 °C per decade. Earth is now warmer than at any time in the Holocene, the past 11,700 years of relatively stable climate in which civilization developed, and it is at least as warm as during the extreme warm Eemian interglacial period 120,000 years ago. Global temperature increased 0.4 °C during the recent moderate El Niño (a period when east-to-west equatorial trade winds weaken, allowing warm waters of the West Pacific to move toward South America), a warming much greater than during even the strongest prior El Niños. This rapid warming has baffled leading Earth scientists, who, for example, conclude that no combination of known mechanisms for warming “has been able to reconcile our theories with what has happened.” We conclude, on the contrary, that the known drives for climate change, principally human-made greenhouse gases and aerosols, account for observed global temperature, including a jump in sea surface temperature that amplified warming during the El Niño and has caused the widely discussed 1.5 °C temperature threshold to be breached, for all practical purposes. Climate change burst into public attention with climate anomalies in 1988 so extreme that Time Magazine declared Earth to be “person of the year.” Rising public interest in climate change, especially the role of humanity in causing change, led to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and a large increase in funding for climate observations and research. The Framework Convention aimed to prevent dangerous human-caused climate change. The largest funding increase was for a NASA program initially titled Mission to Planet Earth expected to make global observations needed to understand ongoing global change. By 1992 it was understood that two things caused large human effects on climate: greenhouse gases (GHGs) and aerosols (tiny, generally microscopic, particles suspended in the air). GHGs cause global warming by holding in Earth’s heat radiation, acting like a blanket. The physics of this greenhouse effect is well understood and tested, for example, by comparison of Mars, Earth and Venus, with their differing amounts of atmospheric GHGs. Carbon dioxide (CO2), produced mainly by burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) but also by deforestation, causes more than half of the human-made greenhouse warming. Human-made increases of CO2 and the other main GHGs (Sidebar 2) have long lifetimes in the atmosphere from decades to millennia. Thus, these gases are well-mixed in the atmosphere and it is easy to measure their changing global amounts.
Human-made aerosols with greatest effect on climate are products of fossil fuel burning and biofuels (like firewood). Most aerosols increase reflection of incoming sunlight back to space and thus have a global cooling effect. Charlson and colleagues concluded in 1992 that the climate forcing by aerosols – the cooling drive for climate change, see below – was similar in magnitude to the GHG forcing, but opposite in sign, thus tending to offset GHG warming. Aerosol offset of GHG warming is a Faustian bargain, that is, a bargain providing present benefit without regard to future consequences. The aerosols providing a cooling benefit are also inherently dangerous particulate air pollution responsible today for several million annual deaths by respiratory, cardiovascular, and even neurological diseases worldwide; thus, as global pollution control has improved and clean energies are introduced the cooling effect of aerosols is lost: with the change of ship regulations, our first Faustian payment came due. Climate sensitivity is a measure of the effect of rising levels of greenhouse gases on Earth’s temperature. It is usually defined as the eventual increase of global average temperature after a doubling of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere compared to pre-industrial levels. In this paper, we conclude that the estimate of aerosol climate forcing by the United Nation’s scientific advisory body (the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC) is an underestimate, and thus the Faustian bargain is worse than expected. We also show that IPCC’s emphasis on global climate models led to a marriage of aerosol forcing and climate sensitivity, such that underestimate of aerosol forcing led to underestimate of climate sensitivity. The result is a double whammy that helps explain global warming acceleration and alters projections of future climate, magnifying the danger of intergenerational injustice. The delayed response of climate still allows a potential bright future for today’s young people, but that happy result requires understanding of the factors driving climate change. These issues can be readily understood via the most basic concepts, beginning with climate forcings.
Full text