It's funny how part of the endogenic narrative is reading the DSM-5 backwards and studying absolutely nothing else. I spent more than 6 years studying DID from my adolescence into adulthood, and I will keep doing so until I graduate and can finally specialize, but you can't tell me all that knowledge is garbage just because people who haven't done a rigorous study to verify what can already be seen with the naked eye (that endogenic systems do not exist, and being neutral is directly or indirectly supporting the abuse of other systems) say so—just because you want to engage in deep roleplay and feel special in a fantasy world to which you will never belong, because your parents didn't love you enough and you weren't taught the core values given to another human being in kindergarten.
You cannot approach me, a survivor of child sex trafficking, to tell me that you are multiple and that you didn't survive trauma. That you are happy that way and that your life is all rainbows and butterflies because, according to your criteria and three Tumblr posts, that's fine. Let me remind you that the endogenic narrative subjects young survivors to befriending them because they are highly manipulable, and you, in your erotic madness, can abuse that child by saying it is an identity, because child abusers already do that without claiming to be endogenic.
They have problems, and serious ones. They don't even seem to have the gift of reading, because they read three paragraphs and shield themselves behind a supposed system that has DID, is endogenic, and is a psychologist. That kind of person is a danger to society; they should revoke their license for going against what is known as established studies.
The endogenic narrative is harmful.
