Please, when it comes to the article about Welby mediating between Charles and Hazz, pay attention to something.
Why does Hazz demand to attend the Coronation that his titles not be removed?
Until a few weeks ago, what Hazz demanded, apart from a public apology from his family, was that his two children be officially given the titles of Prince and Princess. Are you talking about Charles’s weakness? Well, we are almost in February 2023, more than 4 months since the Queen died, where is the Letter Patent on the Sussex children’s titles? Charles isn’t budging on that. But suddenly, this twist. Hazz is demanding to retain his titles. Curious, shouldn’t he be demanding to have new titles? But no, if the leak is correct, Hazz wants to keep the ones he already has.
If you read about the abdication of Edward VIII, you know that the subject, before a resolution was adopted, was discussed with the Prime Minister, with the parliamentarians and with the archbishops of the Anglican Church. If the leak about Hazz’s demands came from Welby’s staff, then Welby has been consulted on the matter. And Hazz is no longer demanding anything for his sons, but to retain, however, the dukedom of Sussex, or even his title of prince.
Yes, Hazz can lose the title of prince. The 1917 Letter Patent stripped the title of Prince from the reigning Duke of Brunswick, head of the House of Hanover, and Hanoverians are not Princes in the UK. If the parliamentary project is approved so that Charles has the power to remove the noble titles, which entered the second reading (it will be on March 22, 2023), Hazz could lose his titles.
Some commenters here have no sympathy for Charles. I can understand it. But in the game that the Harkles play, it is necessary that you not ignore the details of the issue. Charles is not moving to favor the Harkles, on the contrary, he has been a great stumbling block for their claims for quite some time. And any article on negotiations that appears in the press, read it carefully. Nothing, nothing can be done if the Palace chief of staff, Edward Young, is not present. Not without the presence Charles’s still private secretary, Clive Alderton. And not without the presence of Simon Case, secretary of the current Prince of Wales. And Hazz hates them, hates all three viscerally. Bee, Fly and Wasp, the ‘usurpers’ Hazz called them in his book. Hazz doesn’t want them at the table, but it’s not his decision if they’re there or not. In fact, at the 2020 Sandringham summit, all three were there. It is not Hazz’s decision and their presence is not negotiable. And Charles, knowing how much Hazz hates Young and Alderton, keeps them by his side. What kind of weak and manipulable person does that?
Charles will make mistakes, because he is a person and people are not perfect. But any negotiation with the Harkles will be the same as when Hazz went out with Will to see the floral offerings: You will do what I say, when I say it, how I say it, or you don’t come and face the consequences. That’s Charles and Will’s position since 2020, and it hasn’t changed one bit.
areudirty
theartofmadeline
baratheonpilled
tangentwithtanner
andulkaphoto
prguitarman
germansingergirl
gummygunk
origamiaround
janainaart
