the ideal media diet for a child is books and music from at least fifty years ago so they are always out of touch with the references and allusions of their peer group
Show & Tell
hello vonnie
almost home
sheepfilms
official daine visual archive
YOU ARE THE REASON

Discoholic đȘ©

#extradirty
The Bowery Presents
Jules of Nature
tumblr dot com
NASA
Misplaced Lens Cap

pixel skylines

if i look back, i am lost
The Stonewall Inn

Love Begins
Noah Kahan
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Hungary
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Indonesia

seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Spain
seen from Spain
seen from United States
@charonnyxtides
the ideal media diet for a child is books and music from at least fifty years ago so they are always out of touch with the references and allusions of their peer group
had the realization that with calibre i can make custom covers for my ebooks :]
Every Dracula screenwriter, novelist, comic book writer, playwright is like, "Is anyone going to make this ten times more orientalist and twenty times more misogynistic" and don't wait for an answer
Genuinely. At this point I'm skeptical as to whether there's ever been an actual good adaptation, just because no one can seem to leave well enough alone
I want to say the way that every movie I've seen depicts lucy westenra is not only obviously sexist but incredibly defamatory towards victims of sexual assault but we're not ready for that conversation
The Fandom when a character who has suffered through abuse isn't the Perfect Victim: If you think about, the real villain is actuallyâ
I would take your hangover if I could
I love hangovers âșïž
the chad masochist has left me too stunned to speak
You know when there's like, a straight show and everyone's like "it's full of queer subtext between the main straight dudes, and this character is obviously autistic and they really meant to say trans rights"? And then there's a queer show and all of a sudden it's "no but they weren't sensitive about this character's trauma and the queer sex scenes are too short and they're all problematic as fuck, i can't even watch"? And then our shit doesn't get renewed, and we hated on it the whole way for not embodying the perfection we'd never dream of demanding from the straight show?
Yeah, something like that
girl with ptsd voice: hey, so something really bad is gonna happen, right? you guys are picking up on that too, yeah? The other shoe is about to drop, I just know it.
Thereâs a quality that certain books/movies/TV shows have that leads me to say, âYeah, I can see people making fanfiction of that.â Itâs something to do, I think, with how tight the story is, how much feels open-ended or like it could be elaborated on.
Something like Breaking Bad, for example, has low squiggability (thatâs what Iâm calling this quality). Itâs tightly written, the characters are consistent, thereâs little left to interpolate or extrapolate. Obviously, people DO write fanfic of Breaking Bad, but it still has a low squiggability score. Whereas something like Supernatural has a high squiggability score. Fantasy and science fiction often have high squiggability scores. This suggests squiggability could also be related to worldbuilding and potential for people to borrow a premise or setting.
And sometimes youâll read or watch something and youâll say, âAh, low squiggability,â and then youâll open tumblr and find out that everyone else seem to think its squiggability was very high indeed.
I don't know why this is the first read through where I viscerally felt that Jonathan knows he's being fed on. Like he knows knows that the fresh blood on the count's mouth is his own, that the leech is gorged from feasting on him. And yet he still went through the monster's pockets, still bashed him with the shovel, still wrote it all down methodically. I just can't.
reading a historical romance novel and reflecting on the way these stories often present woke nobility for the contemporary reader. a big thing is servants. you canât not have servants in those times but many modern readers think âbut I would never have servants. it would be so weird to have servantsâ and in order to make the protagonists of the story more relatable they are actually friends with the servants. but flip your perspective and think of it from the side of the servants. wouldnât it be so awful if your boss was always trying to be friends with you. a really common thing youâll see is the woke baronet having tea in the kitchen with the servants bc heâs not like other baronets. but what if your boss wanted to hang out and talk during your lunch break every day. not so charming when you think about it that way
Can you tell us more about how this version depicts Kate Reed instead? I did not like her in Anno Dracula either (she had potential alas)
I am going to encourage you to seek out Dracula Unredacted (it's about 20 dollars on Drivethrurpg here, but also it's a pdf, you can find it in other places if you get my drift) but here's the cliffnotes on Kate's part in it if you're interested:
Essentially, Kate Reed is introduced as a school friend of Mina and Lucy's, and a lot of the more incidental parts of their story are tied to her - she's the one who slips Mina the tip about Lucy seeing Arthur, for instance, and she's also revealed to be the one who wrote most if not all of the newspaper articles from the book. She's one of four characters who are kinda tertiary figures to the main crew, all of them based on Stoker's original notes, and all of them with their own little subplots - Kate's arc, in particular, is about investigating Dracula's cover in England, getting pulled into a satanic cult he's founded and almost getting eaten by a newly vampirised Lucy as a result.
This event, combined with Lucy's death, kinda send Kate off the deep end, and as the book goes on she becomes increasingly manic - like, to the point that noted pillar of mental health John Seward starts getting concerned for her. This only gets worse after Dracula visits Mina, and culminates in her attempting to poison Mina, and getting committed to Seward's asylum.
Why exactly she does it is left to interpretation for the most part, largely because the Dossier expects the players to use their own interpretation. The book itself presents two interpretations that the characters discuss - either it's an act of mercy on Kate's part, attempting to save Mina from becoming a monster like Lucy, which is what Kate claims, or it's as the rest of the group believe, that Kate was compelled by Dracula when she encountered him, and he made her try to kill Mina to speed up Mina's transformation*. It's a really interesting concept, and way better than anything anyone else has done with Kate (yes, I'm looking at you, Newman buddy.)
*Which, fun little thing about this - one of the annotations in the book suggests the idea that one of the initial steps on the transformation into a vampire is turning the victim's blood into a universal recipient, hence explaining the staggering coincidence of Lucy being able to survive four transfusions from four different men.
pen studies with photos from @liminalspacesandplaces
Less "what if one of the protagonists whose thoughts and feelings we extensively know open and clear because THEY LITERALLY LIVEBLOGGED THEM were evil" "Lucy likes sex and that kills her dead", more outladish yet still possible scenarios like "what if Mr Hawkins tried to sacrifice his foster son for profit by allying with an ancient evil" And without making him a madman. Or make Queen Victoria ally with him for expansion instead of being a hapless imperial victim, screw you Newman.
See this is where the Dracula Dossier scenario for the Night's Black Agents TTRPG gains points, because it's starting premise is 'What if Mr. Hawkins was working for British Secret Intelligence and the initial journey to Castle Dracula was an attempt by the SIS to recruit Dracula that went tits up because Dracula didn't want to play ball?'
It also has an in-built way of severely reducing the chances of people misinterpreting Dracula by having a key part of the gameplay be the players fully reading a copy of Dracula, albeit with some things added in to give you plot hooks for the TTRPG side.
I love how one of the classics of Romanian literature is a short story about Jesus encountering a rude peasant and turning his entire corn crop into a dildo crop, with voice-activated dildos that provide joy to anyone who wants them to - or not, in the case of a priest.
This story was published in 1878 by a man who used to be a priest.
It's âPovestea poveÈtilorâ by Ion CreangÄ, also known as âPovestea puleiâ. There are no translations in English, as far as I'm aware.
But if enough people want a translation, I guess I could translate it?
Please do, I wanna read about voice activated corn dildoes
Wellp, that's all the excuse I needed. :D
@theothersarshi I'm just curious, did you ever get around to translating this story?
I'm asking because I ended up writing a translation of my own, but I am very much Not A Professional Translator, so I kinda want to see your approach.
It's half-finished in a folder, waiting for me to get back to it. I got stage fright while translating it (it's a thing! Sometimes I think "I'm a pro translator, that means this has to be great" and then I panic because what if it's not, or what if I'm trying too hard - and somehow I feel like that more often in casual spaces than I do in an actual work environment) and then I got busy.
If you want to post a translation of your own, I fully encourage you to go ahead! It's not like having *two* translations is a bad thing, and if you want to talk shop about it, I'm game.
I NEED TO SEE THIS
WONâT SOMEBODY THINK OF THE ENGLISH SPEAKERS
Ok, thank you @azzandra, for getting me to get off my arse and actually finish the translation I started back in June.
I'm sure it can be improved*.
(* What would usually happen at this stage in a professional setting is that I'd send this off to a reviewer who'd check my work and offer improvement suggestions.)
So! Some context for the translation.
Ion CreangÄ was Moldavian and quite proudly so. He was born in 1839 and grew up in the village of HumuleÈti, in present-day Romania. That's a bit to the East of Northern Transylvania. âCreangÄâ is a pseudonym, meaning âboughâ, but it sounds cool. He didn't have a "real" last name. Last names were not yet a thing for the lower classes back then.
CreangÄ's life is pretty complicated and worth its own essay, but the point is that, despite very shoddy public education in villages back then, he attended seminary, got married early became priest and schoolteacher, got divorced, got defrocked, and eventually settled in a hut with a woman who loved him and about a million cats.
CreangÄ had wit, charm, and a regional accent that's very fun, but also hard to read, especially for 21st century mainstream audiences. I haven't tried to reproduce it because I would butcher any English accent I attempted to substitute his with. A part of me says Scottish would be a good touch - with its random Gaelic words that you have to look up in a dictionary.
Religion-wise, Easter Orthodox Christianity is a different beast from Catholicism, and it's a very different beast from Protestantism (and whatever else is to the West of the protestants).
This goes doubly so for popular religion, which is barely held in check by dogma and has a rich tradition of myths and stories about the saints and whatnot. CreangÄ's audience would have probably been more surprised to hear "Baby Jesus loves you" than to hear a story about Jesus and St. Peter traveling the world.
Although, make no mistake. CreangÄ was defrocked for a reason. And that reason wasn't that he respected the Church and its traditions too much.
Aah, I'm pleased to have provided the impetus for this!
This is a fun read in English when familiar with the original text as well. One of the things I was most curious about was how to approach the distinctive regional flavor of the language. I felt like a lot of the humor actually derived from the little flourishes of language and phrasing, and that's not the kind of thing that always has a one to one translation. I'm not surprised you also mention that's the hardest part to reproduce, because that aspect sure stumped me!
I translated the story just as an exercise to entertain myself, and so my chosen approach was to call more to the informal storytelling tone and use casual, more modern language. I don't think mine is the most thorough translation, because I traded some of the more long-winded sentences for shorter, more pithy ones.
Anyway, here was my attempt, I'm adding it under the cut just as a fun comparison.
my pipe dream is to live long enough to see a dracula adaptation movie that a) is a good movie, b) significantly adapts the events of the novel dracula (1897), and c) but not any of the really racist parts and also doesn't add in any additional racism of its own. I've got a handful of movies that get 2/3, but let's be real, most drac adapts are 0/3. I think it's possible I think we can do it I think it just might take forty more years.