Sharon: It's kinda cold
Steve: here take my jacket
Bucky: I'm cold too
Sam: well damn Bucky i can't control the weather
will byers stan first human second

#extradirty
DEAR READER
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Andulka

Origami Around
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Today's Document
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
trying on a metaphor
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

Janaina Medeiros
hello vonnie
todays bird

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosimo Galluzzi
taylor price

No title available
seen from Canada
seen from Brazil
seen from Thailand

seen from Russia
seen from Brazil

seen from Somalia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from Portugal
seen from Chile
seen from Brazil

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
@chellestation
Sharon: It's kinda cold
Steve: here take my jacket
Bucky: I'm cold too
Sam: well damn Bucky i can't control the weather
Benedict Cumberbatch has publicly stated that he thinks people viewing protagonists in media like Sherlock Holmes as autistic is ‘dangerous’ & ‘lazy’ because it ‘offers false hope’ that autistic people could be ‘brilliant’ or heroic…
so yeah i’m gonna give a pass on his superhero movie, because he doesn’t think people like me deserve heroes, or that we could ever be them.
http://touch.metro.us//entertainment/tiff-benedict-cumberbatch-is-sick-of-people-calling-his-characters-autistic/tmWnig—48TBOTRdxFl6k/ nasty…
THAT’S NOT WHAT HE FUCKING MEANS BY THAT YOU IDIOTS!!!!
Does anyone know the movie “Rainman”? Dustin Hoffman plays a severely autistic individual who is a savant at number patterns. Because of this movie, people got the false idea that all autistics had some sort of “trick” some sort of super ability. THIS IS NOT THE CASE AT ALL.
It also doesn’t help that anytime an autistic person is featured in the news positively is because their parent wrote a book or they have a savant ability. However, a savant ability has possibility to occur in like 1% of all autism cases.
So, when Benedict says that seeing his characters as autistic is “dangerous and lazy” and it “offers false hope”, what he means is that people seeing these brilliant, quirky, yet functioning characters as autistic severely skews their view of actual autistic people, so much so to the point where they want to know an autistic person’s “trick” upon meeting them and then proceed to be obviously disappointed when they don’t have one. It makes them think that “well this character has a few quirks but he’s still a functioning member of society why can’t this autistic person just get over it and be one themselves?”
I had a new math teacher my sophomore year in high school. During the first parent-teacher meetings of the year my parents went to explain to all my new teachers that I was autistic and would have trouble grasping some concepts and lessons. This math teacher sat there and listened to their whole shpeal, and when they finished she said, and I quote- “Oh, okay, by the way, what’s her trick? She hasn’t been doing too well with the geometry, is it something else?”
So congratulations, assholes. You’re trying to shame a famous person for wanting autistic people to be seen as actual people. Good fucking job.
And I do not appreciate you killing my men. Also, when I sent my men to kill your men for killing my men, you killed more of my men. Not cool. Not fucking cool.
Definitely using this as my lock screen pic. I goddamn love Negan.
ALSO AM I THE ONLY WHO WAS LIKE FUCK WHY DID THEY HAVE TO MAKE NEGAN SO FUCKING SEXY??
Correct predictions in Back To The Future II
October 21st 2015 starter pack
What day is it tomorrow!
This is the only moment you can reblog this. after today, it will be impossible forever.
THIS IS REBLOG RELEVANT FOR ONLY TODAY IN THE WHOLE OF HUMAN HISTORY AND ITS FUTURE
Thanks, Doc.
I’m not crying there’s just a DeLorean in my eye. :’)
NO I DONT WANT TO DOWNLOAD THE APP. THOSE STARS ARE A LIE, THE APP SUCKS, IT FREEZES CONSTANTLY, UPDATES DONT HELP AT ALL AND THE ONLY THING ITS PERFECT FOR IS LYING CAUSE THERE IS NO WAY THAT APP HAS 4 AND A HALF STARS YOU LYING LITTLE SHITS
omg I was hardly able to believe this but it’s real. fukken white ppl
Oh god, how can you be SO WRONG?
This picture you showed is the Portrait of a Moorish Woman painted by Paolo Veronese, you turd sandwich.
In Shakespearian time describing someone as “dark” meant someone with dark hair or Mediterranean features. Amelia Bassano (also known as Emilia Lanier) got indeed published (check her collection of poetry Hail, God, King of the Jews) . She was born to a Venice musician Baptista Bassano and Margaret Johnson in 1569 and from what we know, was Jewish. No sources describe her as black or African.
Stop spreading bullshit for your racist propaganda.
- Emerald
Saw Jurassic World for the first time today. Fell in love with the raptors and Rexy who is still a badass after 20+ years. Gonna be forever upset that one raptor got fucking BLOWN UP AND THE OTHER GOT FUCKING INCINERATED The entire raptor squad is still alive and you cannot make me believe otherwise
Welp.
Chris Pratt finally fucked up. Here’s the interview.
Be warn though. Your fave is probably going to be your problematic fave now.
I thought I could trust you Chris
I can NOT believe this
oh that sonovabitch!
I knew what it was, but I clicked anyway.
Ikr , who knew Chris Pratt was that awfull
I wouldn’t say his behavior was “problematic”, and I think you’re all blowing this out of proportion here. Yes, he has some unfavorable opinions and yes, I can totally see where the people he targeted are coming from, but let’s be honest, he does have freedom of speech.
GODFUCKINGDAMMIT I CLICKED THE DAMN THING GODDAMMIT
I’ve said before and I’ll say it again until people has it ingrained in their heads.
You CAN dislike John Green’s books.
You CAN dislike movies based on John Green’s books.
You CAN dislike John Green’s Youtube channel.
You CAN dislike John Green’s blog.
Heck, you CAN dislike John Green, himself.
I DON’T CARE. THAT’S YOUR CHOICE.
What CANNOT and SHOULD NOT DO is to spread malicious stuff about him that could ruin him and his family.
CHILD MOLESTER. PEDOPHILE. SEXUAL ABUSER. TEEN PERVERT.
You people have gone too far. TOO FUCKING FAR. It’s one to joke about how stupid his books are but it’s a whole different matter for you people to accuse him of such derogatory shit.
HE IS A PERSON. HE IS TRYING HIS BEST TO SPREAD USEFUL AND HELPFUL INFORMATION THAT MAY EVEN SAVE THIS PLANET. AND EVEN IF YOU DON’T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT WHAT HE DOES, YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHT TO SAY LIBELOUS SHIT ABOUT HIM. YOU ARE RUINING HIS LIFE.
hes a 30 year old man writing romance novels about 15 year olds in romantic relationships its kind of creepy
Why isn’t it creepy when Cassandra Clare does it? Or Rainbow Rowell? Or Suzanne Collins? Or JK Rowling? Are they all pedophiles and sexual abusers too?
Literally the only problem people have with him is that he’s a white man and not a woman
Please tell me they were kidding
It has to be a joke, “What if I don’t identify myself as a women?” Well then you wouldn’t have titled that post, “Homosexual men are oppressive towards women” now would you? I mean that part kind of says troll humor to me, or maybe I’m just really really hoping it is.
Please let this be a joke
These are women. Slandering another women for not using a label.
Even after all she has done to empower young girls and women.
And you people wonder why no one listens to your incessant babbling about “EDUCATE YOURSELVES” “ DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE DEFINITIONONOONO”
Wow.
I'm very upset about this. Not at Michelle Phan, no, I'm upset about the people coming at her for not being a feminist. For not picking up a political label. How hard is it to understand that you can still believe in equality and not be a feminist? Feminism does not have a monopoly on equality. I'm sure, like most other women, that Michelle Phan is grateful for the first and second wave of feminism, but slandering her for not conforming to this wave? Absolutely atrocious. I repeat, you do not have to put on the label of feminist to believe in equality. Stop thinking that feminists are the only ones who believe in equality cause now yall look dumb. And before whoever comes at me says "good luck not having rights" or "she owes feminism so she has to be a feminist" or "feminism got you here to be independent and you are being ungrateful" then I need you to look in the mirror and think about how you've turned into such an awful, manipulative creature. tl;dr let people adopt any label they want, feminists aren't the only ones who believe in equality, stop slandering people for not being feminists when they really do believe in equality.
The #DisneyPrincessProblems hashtag amused me greatly.
They’d probably amuse me too if I’d never actually watched Disney movies.
*cracks knuckles* Here, let me tell you all how wrong these people are.
1. “Your husband only loves you for your shoe size,”
Actually, he loved her for her, but a shoe was his only clue to her identity. Cinderella takes place in a time before DNA testing, and as much as he was absolutely head-over-heels (no pun intended) for this girl, all he had in order to find out who she was was the glass slipper that fell off her foot as she was running away. I am so sick of people claiming he only loved her for her shoe size - you’re missing the point! He was trying to find her.
2. “Being sexually assaulted while you’re asleep by a man you’ve never met is considered a happy ending,”
Again, did you watch the movie? At all? He didn’t rape her, he kissed her. And kissing her was the only way to wake her up from a spell put on her by a misunderstood poor woobie an evil sorceress who was mad she wasn’t invited to a birthday party. Also, Aurora (that’s her name, for all you noobs out there who still call her “Sleeping Beauty”) had met Prince Philip before he kisses her - they have a little romantic duet together and bond. Now, this movie came out during a time when love at first sight wasn’t considered so taboo they had to condescend the main character and the viewers for believing in it, so it actually works out and doesn’t end with a two-dimensional villain leaving the princess to die.
Finally, kissing a girl awake to break a curse is not assault - he was saving her life. Does a guy need consent to give a girl mouth to mouth if she’s drowning and unconscious?
Moving on…
3. “Growing up in a world where your only worth is through marriage”
Wow, seriously? Watch a damn Disney that wasn’t made in the 2010′s for once in your life. Every Disney Princess has something of value to them, and not just because they find their prince charming.
4. “You’re expected to kiss a talking frog instead of putting him on youtube and making $$$$ like normal folks would”
The Princess and the Frog takes place in the 1920s, you moron. The Internet didn’t exist back then. Do you know anything about that movie besides the fact that the princess was black?
Also, let’s see; if a guy finds a talking animal that turns out to be a girl cursed into being said animal, and decides instead of saving her, he’s going to exploit her for cash, he’d be considered a vile monster, not smart. Also, no one expected Tiana to do anything with Naveen at the time she first found him. She kissed him because he told her it would save him.
5. “You’re either kissing a frog, a beast, or a creep who doesn’t even have the decency to wake you first,”
You are referring to three separate cases and each of them was unique.
Now in PATF, yes, Tiana kissed a frog, but it was part of the story and meant to serve as a plot point. It was the only way to break the spell - or rather, so it was thought, since the actual way to break the spell on Naveen was if her were to marry a princess.
In BATB, Belle never actually kisses him in beast form. He’s transformed into a human by the time the two kiss, so your point there is rendered completely null.
Finally, I’ve already discussed the issue with Sleeping Beauty. Why is he a creep for wanting to break the spell cast on her? He essentially performed magical CPR on the princess - apparently you need to ask permission to the unconsious person before you give them mouth-to-mouth.
Of course, then there’s Snow White. Very similar scenario. Kissing her was literally the only way to revive her. Now, I’ll give you this much, the prince in this situation didn’t know that at the time, but 1. He isn’t a creep just because he loves her, and 2. He and Snow meet before she’s put under a curse.
6. “Retinal damage from unnaturally large eyes,”
Oh look, one that refers to more recent DPs! Bout time.
It’s called stylistic choice. They are stylistically designed to be big. Ariel’s hair shouldn’t have as much volume as it does, but no one talks about that.
7. “I’m being stalked by seven horny midgets. Send help.”
How in the world did you even get this out of the plot of Snow White, you dolt? Snow was never stalked - in fact, she went into the dwarves’ house (uninvited, though in her defense she was on the run and needed a place to stay). The dwarves decided not to kill her because they felt sorry for her. In fact, she took up the role of “team mom” towards them all.
Seriously, how did you get “stalked” and “horny” out of any of that?
So, in conclusion:
You’re going to prison stat. You just murdered the whole post.