"A woman has the right to walk down the street without being a sex object, without being arousing just because she’s a Black woman strolling down the block and a white guy with a fetish happens to see her. A woman has a right to seek independence and autonomy in her relationships, and shouldn’t have to second-guess mixed-race relationships, wondering if her partner only sought her out because she’s Asian" Just read this article about fetishes and what is and isn't okay. The whole article merely illuminated the flaws of the feminist ideology, but this quote sums up many of the abundant flaws. Basically feminist anger when women give a guy a boner is she did not give it consensually. Feminists are complaining about men's reactions. There's nothing a guy can do if a girl turns him on, he can't help it! Feminists, do you want him to come up to you and ask permission to be turned on? "Ma'am excuse me but you are really appealing to me, may my dick grow now?" This article also fails to properly define a fetish. A fetish is merely a preference that is arousing. This article asserts that a fetish must not be permanent, thus ethnicity should not be a fetish bc it cannot be taken off. Maybe in a perfect world people would only be aroused by non permanent things, but in this world people are aroused by everything. So you can't say it's wrong to be aroused by skin color. It's not wrong.
