women and gays didnāt actually exist until 1969 when transwomen invented us at stonewall
Mike Driver

No title available
šŖ¼

Product Placement
Show & Tell

blake kathryn

oozey mess
occasionally subtle

JVL
No title available

ā
sheepfilms
taylor price

#extradirty

No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
todays bird
art blog(derogatory)

titsay

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Liechtenstein
seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Spain

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Tunisia
seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
@chichi-chia
women and gays didnāt actually exist until 1969 when transwomen invented us at stonewall
Radical Feminism Beliefs: the basics
āRadical feminism is a perspective within feminism that calls for a radical reordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts. Radical feminists view society as fundamentally a patriarchy in which men dominate and oppress women.ā
Prostitution
Purchased consent is not consent, itās coercion. Sex work is dehumanizing and traumatizing for women, and fueled by sex trafficking. The commodification of female sexuality is a mix of misogyny and capitalism.
Pornography
Prostitution on camera. See above for key points. Additionally, female sexuality should not be monetized and sold for male entertainment. The industry is rife with rape, abuse, coercion, trafficked women, drugged women, and CP. It harms not only the women involved in the videos (physically and mentally), but it also harms the viewers in the long run.
Surrogacy
Similar to prostitution and pornography in the sense that womenās bodies become acquirable products for sale or rent. A woman's organs should not be for rent, as it creates a perverse incentive. Most surrogacy is outsourced to disadvantaged women in developing nations, where they are made to sign contracts they can't read and undergo poor treatment.
Bodily Autonomy
Understanding that a woman should have complete and utter control of her reproductive system; including abortion, birth, and sterilization. Understanding a woman should have access to informed and accurate medical care. Understanding a woman should have complete control over when and if she engages in sex with a partner. Understanding that PIV is often an unequal act.
Nuclear Family
This allows for the isolation of women, both emotionally and financially. The family unit, ideally, includes a large safety net of family and friends who assist in child rearing. Women should not be financially dependent on men, as this open the potential for abuse and difficulty leaving via power imbalance.
Capitalism
The system that allows the commodification of women and their bodies. Women shouldnāt have to sell or rent out their bodies in order to survive.
BDSM/Kink
Wherein the majority of subs are women and the majority of doms are men. Fetishization of slavery, power imbalances, rape, incest, pedophilia, and abuse. Hurting your partner does not suddenly become healthy if you can orgasm to it. Power imbalances that lead to physical and emotional abuse and trauma.
Patriarchal Religions
All holy books were written by men and serve to maintain and legitimize patriarchal power structures. Patriarchal religions falsely attribute the gift of creation to men when in reality every man on earth was molded from the flesh of women.
Postmodernism/Queer Theory
Radical feminism is based on materialism. Women are oppressed because of their biological reality, which is not subjective, subjectable to changes or personal interpretations. Postmodernism and queer theory are.
The Beauty Industry
Fills up the pockets of men who make money by ever-changing standards of female beauty. Keeps women insecure, low self-esteem, their value and self-worth forever dependent on their physical appeal (to men). Demands women change how they appear (makeup, shaving, dieting, cosmetic surgeries) to appear prepubescent (lithe, hair free, firm not soft) which is a part of what we identify as 'pedophilia culture'.
Marriage
Marriage would be described by some as the wheels on which patriarchy is carried onwards. Historically, marriage has been nothing but a transaction: a daughter, who belonged to her father, now belongs to her husband. Her reproductive labor, domestic labor, emotional labor, and physical labor all at his disposal. This is how marriage continues to work and act culturally in a majority of societies
Individualism
As opposed to class analysis. Arguably the most overlooked and hardest āāissueāā to overcome. Itās understandable that most women gravitate towards liberal feminism because they donāt have to analyze the reasons behind their actions, they donāt have to come to difficult and unappealing conclusions, they donāt have to feel the need to take action and stop engaging in whatever they are doing thatās harming women as a class. Known as 'choice feminism', which affirms any choice as a personal one, despite what influenced that choice or how it may affect the female class at large (see: plastic surgery, "makeup makes me feel confident!", "I like being hurt during sex!")
Gender Critical/Gender Abolitionist
Gender is a social class applied to biology. Each individuals sex is innate, and gender is the series of roles, expectations, socialization, cultural practices, and personality traits applied to that sex. Sex is "this baby has a vulva" and gender is "so give that baby a pink blanket and a dolly". Therefore, radical feminists understand that gender is a means of oppressing women. They wish to abolish gender. This creates clashes with pieces of trans rights activism, which upholds ones gender as innate. Read more here on this topic.
The main clashing beliefs are as follows:
-Being dysphoric doesnāt automatically means trans, since transitioning is only a way of treating dysphoria, and there are many reasons someone might be dysphoric.
-Instead of āidentifying as a man/woman/nonbinaryā, we should abolish gender altogether.
- Males remain male and females remain female, even if theyāre dysphoric/gnc. Biology is innate. Therefore, for example, a transwoman that rapes someone, is an male abuser. It is male violence.
- Males have male privilege, regardless of how they identify, because society is built upon upholding and amplifying males.
- Females will be opressed, regardless of how they identify, because society is built upon the females-as-a-resource model that holds us as sexual and reproductive resources for male pleasure and male heirs.
Radical Feminist Goals
Women's liberation via the dismantling of male power structures, and the rejection of a woman's "role" within society as a lesser class.
Ways to Achieve This
Separatism/Male Exclusion - simply deciding to center oneās life and actions around females in all possible aspects. The keeping and protecting of female only spaces. Ultimately, this might look like a female-only society that any girl or woman could enter or leave at will.
Introspection - analyzing oneās actions and maybe asking oneself: why do I want these things? What's drives this action? Is this the healthiest option for me, physically and mentally? Am I hurting a woman or girl if I partake in this option?
Raising Awareness - of all the issues mentioned above. Talking to women and girls about radical feminism. This is not a solution but a step towards finding or creating more solutions as a community.
Being Politically Active - political agency and action is essential for female liberation; especially concerning topics such as reproductive rights, legislation of prostitution, electing representatives ETC.
Male Reform - investing time and effort into making men aware of the issues, in the hopes that theyāll do their part for the liberation of women and do the same with their fellow men.
Childrearing - Focus on advocacy and action around raising girls and boys the same way, to begin to treat the class divide at the root. This is very difficult without full societal support.
Conclusion
Radical feminism is for female people, by female people. It's ideology goes beyond these tenets, but the ideas presented above should allow you to derive answers as to what that might be. Radical feminism is also referred to as second wave feminism, and is compatible with Marxist feminism and the original principles of intersectional feminism. Thank you for reading.
Full offense but some of you really need to stop framing being gender critical as the common sense idea that men canāt be women. Being gender critical means youāre actively fighting to end gender roles because they oppress women, itās not simply thinking ālol trans bad.ā Youāre all way too eager to support openly racist/homophobic/conservative people just because you donāt bother to find out what their other views are. Next time you see a celebrity make a pronoun joke, take the time to think about if theyāre criticizing trans rhetoric because itās anti science and harms women or if theyāre just a Republican who thinks seeing a man in a dress is funny.
i would just like to point out that the recent conversation surrounding the male birth control trials isnāt justĀ ālol weak men canāt deal with side effectsā itās the fact that when they were testing hormonal birth control for women in the 50s & 60s, the side effects were much worse, and the women who participated in them, mostly in puerto rico, were not told about the side effects or that the drug was experimental
and THEN when women dropped out, they started using incarcerated women as their guinea pigs, and then despite the fact that some scientists who participated in the original trials were likeĀ āuh i donāt think this is actually good, itās making a lot of these women sick,ā the pharmaceutical industry & fda were likeĀ ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ and approved it for the general population anyways, without really warning women about the potential for all these negative side effects
and THEN researchers basically ceased to do any type of research on side effects like depression and decreased libido for 50 years, despite the fact that women were still complaining about them, and because there was noĀ āhard evidenceā of these side effects, a lot of doctors basically just assumed women were exaggerating or making it up. and that continued until the first major study of depression in women who take hormonal contraceptives was released just. this. year.
so yeah, the patriarchy. *waves flag*
further reading:
the puerto rico pill trials
the racist & sexist history of keeping side effects of birth controls secret
āitās not in your headā striking new study links birth control to depression
the side effects of male birth control stopping drug trials reveals a disturbing sexism
male birth control shot prevents pregnancy, researchers call for further study to reduce risk of depression, other side effects
oh, and fun fact: even after this new study was released, a lot of the scientific community is still being likeĀ ābut can we PROVE these women arenāt just depressed because theyāre LOVESICK?ā
Are lesbians inherently more abusive? I keep on seeing people say they are and people talking about that statistic.
Thereās a statistic going around about domestic violence/abuse and the rates when it comes to people of the same sex living together.
What people miss or deliberately obfuscate about that number is it isnāt just romantic partners. Itās any same sex cohabitation. So that can mean parents, siblings, friends, roommates etc.Ā
The survey found that same-sex cohabitants reported significantly more intimate partner violence than did opposite-sex cohabitants. Among women, 39.2 percent of the same-sex cohabitants and 21.7 percent of the opposite sex cohabitants reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a marital/cohabiting partner at some time in their lifetime. Among men, the comparable figures are 23.1 percent and 7.4 percent (exhibit 8). At first glance, these findings suggest that both male and female same-sex couples experience more intimate partner violence than do opposite sex couples. However, a comparison of intimate partner victimization rates among same-sex and opposite-sex cohabitants by perpetrator gender produced some interesting findings: 30.4 percent of same-sex cohabiting women reported being victimized by a male partner, whereas 11.4 percent reported being victimized by a female partner. Thus, same-sex cohabiting women were nearly three times more likely to report being victimized by a male partner than by a female partner. Moreover, opposite-sex cohabiting women were nearly twice as likely to report being victimized by a male partner than were same-sex cohabiting women by a female partner(20.3 percent and 11.4 percent) x
Dishonest Journalists have spun this study to suggest that lesbian relationships are more violent than heterosexual or gay male relationships because 39.2% of women who have lived with women have experienced domestic violence. However, 11.4% report being victimized by a female partner, and 30.4% of women who have lived with women report being victimized by a male partner. Ā The difference (20.3% vs 30.4%) suggests that either bisexual women are more likely to experience violence, OR, bisexual women who experience violence are more likely to date women then a bisexual women who has not experienced violence.
link
Thanks for the fact checking, EMH!
Bringing this one back too.
Also I think an important factor to look into is the women who are too afraid to speak out about the rape and abuse that their husbands have caused them. Afraid of death, afraid of being called crazy, afraid of children being taken away, afraid of being called a liar, not believing that the rape they experienced was rape because they were married⦠Many reasons to be afraid.
I canāt fucking wait until this ālesbians are more abusiveā myth dies.
Oh people just jumped all over this without looking at the study, practically gleeful that they thought they could say lesbians have the higher rate of domestic abuse. Itās excusing men, homophobia and misogyny all in one!
The Stonewall You Know Is a Myth. And Thatās O.K. | NYT Celebrating Pride
Happy Pride! Know your history!
14 is a young man?
Its so crazy how you can get caught grooming children and just go "hey I'm gay š¤·āāļø"
Lmfao how insanely out of touch and disengenuous do you have to be to think a porn site actively recruiting young girls through a MLM style referral program is harmless?? Why are we pretending exposing children and young people to porn and āsex workā constantly on social media has anything but marked negative affects? You arenāt ājust existingā. Youāre actively recruiting for your cut and chanting āsex work is workā to impressionable girls who donāt understand the risks and the trauma theyāre taking on. Shut the fuck up.
Corgi pups march in single file to conceal the strength of their number from the enemy
(Source)
hereās the thing, if you consume porn i donāt want to hear your opinion on social issues at all. you donāt like racism but you watch videos from a site that has slavery themed porn? you want to smash the patriarchy but youāll watch 18 year old girls get pissed on by grown men. you hate homophobes but youāll watch porn on a site that has videos titled ālesbian forced to take cockā? you want to battle transphobia but youāre okay with pornhub recruiting trans identitied teens to be abused on film for a couple hundred bucks? if you can boycott a spice brand for prejudice why canāt you do it for porn? if your activism ends the moment you want to nut, shut your fucking mouth and stop pretending like you give a fuck about any of this.
some pictures I like from the We Are Everywhere book on LGBT history
i get so angry thinking about this one time when i was 12 in school and i needed to change my pad but my 50 y/o woodwork teacher refused to talk to me for 2 seconds & didn't want to shout out and tell the whole class i was on my period, but it got to the point where i was scared blood was gonna start bleeding down my leg, so i went in my my bag, visibly took my pad out so everyone could see, including him, and walked out carrying it, (i then cried in the hallway because i was so embarrsed about my period and i had just done that in a class with like 10 boys and only 2 other girls) anyways when i came back he shouted at me that i should drink less water in class time (i used to carry one of those rhinestone covered water bottles everywhere) but i looked him dead in the eyes and said āi didn't need to pee i was changing my pad,ā (which was literally the most nerve wracking thing to proclaim as a 12 year old girl) he got the most disgusted look in his face and screamed at me to get out and that if i wanted to talk about that it would have to be with a female member of staff, so i grabbed my stuff and walked out, i told my guidance teacher but she said āsome older men are just like that, nothing i can really do about itā so i ditched that class for 3 years- anyways that's when i decided to become a misandrist š
canāt wait for that generation of men to die out
PCOS and endometriosis are barely studied despite the large number of women suffering from it, feminine hygiene products are still too expensive, girls are having to drop out of school in poor parts of the US and in their world countries cuz their period makes them miss too much of school, there still is a period stigma but you got the woke handmaiden brigade on Twitter calling feminists' preoccupation with menstruation immature and saying we're still stuck in the 8th grade š
Period conversations is the quickest way to make me peak over and over again
The absolute western narcissism! The complete disregard for any woman not in their western self congratulatory masturbation circles! Can you believe this? These women are absolute enemies to female progression. They'd throw away all the advances that women have gained if it meant pleasing men.
āwouldnāt you rather earn something than have it just handed to you?ā
Yeah when it comes to actual awards and fancy goods, but when it comes to basic needs, basic human decency, and accomodations, those things should always be handed to people. No one should have to āearnā those things.Value people as people, not base it on how much they produce.Ā
yeah but that creates a severe dependency that could be exploited easily, and creates a slippery slope @musical-clarity
Actually studies show that people who live in places with universal income (who are given money with no strings attached just for being citizens) do far better work than those who donāt and are more enthusiastic to do work.
This is because they still want nice things and will work for those but the part of their energy that was devoted to worrying about if they have enough money to pay the rent and bills this month is now freed up to do other things.
Some people will always be lazy and take advantage of the system, but they are always a tiny percentage and it seems ridiculous to me to punish the majority and severly hamstring their abilities just because a handful of people will simply live of basic income rather than work.
Do you have sources? Iām trying to convince a friend
Providing Personalised Support to Rough Sleepers. An Evaluation of the City of London Pilot by Juliette Hough and Becky Rice (2010)Ā - This is a study on what happens when you just give homeless people money instead of setting up expensive bureaucratic programs. Spoilers: the vast majority of people get off the streets.
Policy Brief: Impacts of Unconditional Cash Transfers by Johannes Haushofery and Jeremy Shapiroz - A look at the new trend of charities just giving people in need money and letting them get on with it. (Case study is a charity called GiveDirectly)
Cash Transfers and Temptation Goods. A review of Global Evidence by the World Bank Policy Research Working Group - This study shows that poor people who are just given money do not spend any more than they usually would on luxury goods such as alcohol and tobacco and in some cases the spending on these items actually decreases.
āCash Transfers for Children. Investing into the Futureā An Editorial article in The Lancet - This is the study that out and out says giving people money makes them less lazy and less dependant on the state. Direct quote:
āEmerging data from cash transfers, conditional or unconditional, largely dispel the counter arguments that these programs prevent adults from seeking work or create a dependency culture which perpetuates intergenerational poverty.ā
The Town With No Poverty by Evelyn Forget - A look at the case study of Dauphin Manitoba that introducedĀ āmincomeā to the poorest citizens to bring everyone above the poverty line.
Why Not Guarantee Everyone a Job? Why Negative Income Tax Experiments of the 1970s Were Successful by Allan Sheahen (warning this link is a download link, not a webpage) - Study of a similarĀ āmincomeā experiment in Denver that found that when people did stop working as many hours as they had done before the money it was because they were furthering their education or working hours better suited to raising their children. One woman who had dropped out of High School to get a job in order to provide for her children went back into education and ended up with a psychology degree and a job as a researcher.
āDaniel Moynihan and President-Elect Nixon: How Charity Didnāt Begin at Homeā by Peter Passell and Leonard Ross for The New York Times - This is a look at how President Richard Nixon (Yes, thatĀ Richard Nixon) wanted to introduce basic income to the USA and was defeated by ignorant congressmen and senators that trusted their gut over the clear evidence.Ā
The Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend: An Experiment in Wealth Distribution by Scott Goldsmith - This is a look at Alaskaās policy of using the State oil revenue to give every single citizen $1000 a year.
Relationships Between poverty and Psychopathology - A study that outlines how growing up poor exposes children to a myriad of psychological problems and mental illnesses.
Assessing the Economic and Non-Economic Impacts of Harrahās Cherokee Casino, North Carolina - The Harrah Cherokee Casino is widely studied and a resounding success as a case study for Basic Income.
An Estimate of the cost of child poverty in 2013 by Donald Hirsch - This is a British study that estimates child poverty costs £29 billion (£44 Billion-ish). Basically child poverty is massively expensive for governments and Basic Income could essentially pay for itself by removing these expenses.
When Pundits Blamed White People for a Culture of Poverty by Matt Bruenig - Article that discusses how the idea that poor people are lazy and deserve to suffer is racist, classist and morally dangerous.
Rediscovering Poverty: How We CuredĀ āThe Culture of Povertyā Not Poverty Itself by Barbara Ehrenreich - An article on how trying to improve the morals of the poor so they can work harder and get themselves out of poverty is a ridiculous waste of time and money and quite frankly an insult to the people we force into these programs. My favourite waste of money that Ehrenreich points out is the $250 million dollars that President Clinton set aside forĀ āChastity Trainingā for impoverished single mothers, the US government in the 90s simply assuming that poor women were too stupid to understand where babies came from and thatās why they were poor, rather than, you know, having no money, no support structures and no affordable child care and healthcare.
In the Shadow of Speenhamland: Social Policy and the Old Poor Law by Fred Block and Margaret Somers - Speenhamland was a town in the UK where a Universal Income was introduced at the end of the 18th Century. After a few years it was declared a terrible failure and proof that poor people are evil and lazy and should be punished for being poor not helped out of poverty. Speenhamland led to the creation of Workhouses and the abolition of the Poor Laws that had worked as a form of social welfare up to that point. For 150 years Speenhamland was used by politicians and academics all over the world as proof that poor people were almost pathologically incapable of being trusted with their own money. Except the whole thing was a lie. The man sent to study Speenhamland hated the project and was unable to correctly interpret the data or factor in cultural issues that were also affecting the town. Modern researchers almost unanimously agree that Speenhamland was a success but the damage that 150 years of ignorance has done is deep and long lasting.
All of these examples and hundreds more can be found in Utopia for Realists by Rutger Bregman which lays out the argument for this issue far better than I ever could and also discusses issues such as raising the minimum wage and drastically cutting working hours.Ā
@keep-counting-stars have fun debating your friend.Ā
Can men fight for their fuckin selves? I actually do not care that you're scared to cry around other men. I really can't do anything about that. Do you think men listen to me? Do you think me fighting for you is gonna make any fucking difference? You don't even listen to me.
You want crying in front of people to be normalized? You know how you normalize shit? You do it!
Not to mention "sensitive" men are fucking manipulators.
āAs in most Latin American countries, there are no official statistics on femicides. Unofficial figures suggest that Argentina has nothing like the problem faced by countries like El Salvador and Mexico, where women are killed daily. et, the number of gender-related deaths is still staggering. La Casa del Encuentro, a womenās shelter that carries out the only national estimate on femicides, calculates that a woman is killed every 31 hours. More than 1,800 women have been shot, stabbed, beaten, burned, strangled or drowned to death since 2008, when the records began.ā
(via Argentine women hit back at violence - BBC News)