Lustiges Taschenbuch Young Comics 11
GOOFY IS A GINGER?!
Two canonical gingers off to get their monthly haircut.
Misplaced Lens Cap
art blog(derogatory)
Acquired Stardust
DEAR READER
One Nice Bug Per Day
dirt enthusiast
YOU ARE THE REASON
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
i don't do bad sauce passes

izzy's playlists!
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Sade Olutola
Peter Solarz

tannertan36

oozey mess

PR's Tumblrdome
h

blake kathryn
noise dept.
No title available
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Germany

seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Hungary

seen from Portugal
@choochoobear
Lustiges Taschenbuch Young Comics 11
GOOFY IS A GINGER?!
Two canonical gingers off to get their monthly haircut.
Lustiges Taschenbuch Young Comics 11
GOOFY IS A GINGER?!
I can’t quite decide if PeeJee would burn it all down and salt the earth or use this game as a torture device: https://youtu.be/4xO50wpjlyo?si=108-df3wuVJMKwD7 (my friendly neighborhood)
Oh, she'd never play it. In fact, I warned ANOTHER friend of mine who's Canadian and has a puppet fear about it.
Dunno how it is I know two Canadians who are afraid of puppets.
Cover mockup for my upcoming game, Dinosaur Erotica: The Role-Playing Game. Coming to Kickstarter this February.
Edit: So a tag with "Erotica" in it will definitely de-list your post. Still not sure about just the word.
Mickey Mouse dose not need your protection
Since Mickey Mouse became public domain, I’ve seen some really wild takes and misinformation going around. Yes, Mickey Mouse is public domain. No, you do not need to protect him. It’s fine if people other than Disney make Mickey Mouse stuff, even if you don’t like the things that are made.
You are not protecting Mickey Mouse. Mickey Mouse is not real. Even if he was, you STILL wouldn’t be protecting him. You’re just sticking up for a megacorporation. Disney has more money and resources than you will ever have and they horde them. You shouldn’t be trying to help them do it.
Disney is a company that loves using public domain properties to make things. They have just tried their absolute hardest to make sure that nobody else could do the same thing. If you think Mickey Mouse should only be used by Disney, you should be upset that Disney made money off public domain stories like Snow White and Rapunzel.
What about things like Winnie the Pooh? Disney didn’t come up with him but they were happy to make money off him. They bought the rights to him and then didn’t share.
‘Ah!’ I hear you say. ‘But Winnie the Pooh actually helps prove our point! When Disney – that poor poor super rich company that should be protected – lost the exclusive rights, a Winnie the Pooh horror movie was made! That’s not in the spirit of the original character!’
Firstly, you can just ignore that movie if you want. I did. Nobody is making you watch it. You are responsible for your own media consumption.
Secondly, there are nice Winnie the Pooh stories out there that aren’t by Disney or the original author. The Pooh books by Jane Riordan are lovely. Her stories are much more in the spirit of the original character than a lot of the Disney comics were.
This is an official Disney comic with Winnie the Pooh
This is a picture from one of Jane Riordan’s Winnie the Pooh books
One of them is sweet, kind and in the spirit of the original character. The other is Disney owned and approved.
What would the original author A.A. Milne think of the different adaptions and new works? Well, we don’t know because, at the end of the month, he’ll have been dead for 68 years. However, I can quote one of the original Pooh books about sharing,
And really, it wasn’t much good having anything exciting like floods, if you couldn’t share them with somebody.
Thirdly, Disney dose not respect authorial intent.
PL Travers, the author of the Mary Poppins books, did not want Disney to make a movie based on her work. She got coerced into letting them make one. She hated the movie and refused to let them make any more.
What happened after she’d died, the ban on them making more Mary Poppies movies ran out and they got their hands on the rights? They made a sequel.
I think you should be more upset that Disney went against the direct wishes of an author than the fact regular people can now use a character that megacorporation uses. PL Travers was a person. Disney is a company. There is a difference.
I love the original Mary Poppins movie. I don’t care about or like the sequel. However, PL Travers died in 1996. People sure be able to use the character now, no matter how you or I feel about those newer stories. Again, you can just ignore them if you want.
The original stories are still there.
Royalties are different to public domain. The profits from PL Travers original books go to her descendants and the Cherry Tree Foundation. They will continue to go there for 80 years after her death and then the royalties will be shared out among any decedents who are alive at that time. The money from those books will continue to go there, no matter what new stories with Mary Poppins get made.
You all seem okay with Disney making money off public domain stories and buying the rights to other stories. Why can't you extend that right to other people?
No one has stolen Mickey from Disney. Disney can and will continue to make money off him. All that’s change is that other people can now do that too.
J. K. Rowling and Neil Gaiman are such a funny contrast to me, like Rowling: Oh, and by the way, I put gay characters in my books. People: Is there anything... showing that? Rowling: No. Also trans women don't deserve respect People: wtf Gaiman: Here are some immortals that transcend all human concepts of gender and attraction who use a variety of pronouns, and also some clearly canon human queers. People: Are the immortals queer? Gaiman: That is an entirely valid way to view them. Other people: Ugh, pushing a modern woke agenda. It used to be- Gaiman: Fuck you
So apparently you all like it when I draw named people.
Should I take this as a hint?
"Randy, what's your favorite wrestling move?" "The Gilbert Fender-Plex."
When Tumblr first switched to it's, "NO NUDES" TOS years ago, literally every drawing I'd posted on my tumblr was marked for review. I had to go through every damn drawn and contest it, because it was all stuff like, "Here's a drawing of Flip the Frog." No smut in sight.
So, to celebrate the new ToS, here's a nude drawing.
Soooooo I guess I can start drawing and posting explicit images now.
I probably won’t - but it’s nice it’s an option.
This is how I decided to come out as non binary btw
Quitting gender like quitting a bad customer service job
handing in your notice at the cis factory
I’d rather stop being male than stop enjoying food and drink.
So that’s basically how it went down
I resent just how fucking accurate this shitpost is, congratulations OP, you effectively illustrated how Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection became accepted by the wider public using a FUCKING MUPPETS MEME, here is your A+, get the hell out of my office
Going through DMs of indeterminate age and was informed one of my old reblogs ended up belonging to a VERY toxic C.Gater account. Removed. Sorry for giving them any attention.
I haven’t been on tumblr in like a year? Two years?
Log in... first thing I’m greeted with is, “The one webcomic reviewer is talking shit about you.”
... okay, vanishing again.
Do you have a fetish for men or something
Does anyone have that anon accusing someone of fetishising trans men because he, a trans man, kept drawing them?
It was infact the same man
Clickbaitcowboy has been through too much 😔
cartoon network commercial from 2004
lol so anyway it’s basically canon. Johnny and Jack said so.
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Why is this really cute? (◕ヮ◕ヽ) their aesthetics compliment each other so well
This is the forbidden reboot couple we deserved
Honestly love this
me trying to tie who framed roger rabbit, space jam and looney tunes: back in action within the same continuity
“Lola Bunny is Roger and Jessica Rabbit’s daughter.”
Okay, I think I got it:
Yes, this means we are currently living in the dark timeline where Judge Doom destroyed Toontown. (Inspired by @lepowned‘s reply)
... I’m curious how the original novel, “Who Censored Roger Rabbit,” plays into this because it is a very different story and WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY darker.