I can do one better and debunk these with sources.
1. “Blacks to the Back” in 2006:
This situation, to what should be nobody’s surprise, was misinterpreted and blown woefully out of proportion. The bus driver instructed her older students to move to the back and make room for the newer students, and this is something she had done for over twenty years. This had nothing to do with race at all. In fact, a former black student who rode the bus of this driver spoke out and had this to say: “’Ms. Davis was my bus driver from elementary through his school,’ says Kapatrea Smith, who rode Davis’ bus for 12 years. ‘When I heard the allegations I just felt compelled to call her and let her know that all the years I rode her bus I never heard her make a racist remark or show any prejudices towards me or any of the blacks kids on the bus,’ says Smith.” http://www.ksla.com/story/5328738/blacks-to-the-back-bus-driver-accused-of-segregating-students-speaks-out?clienttype=printable
2. Alabama Sorority Desegregation in 2013:
First thing that should be noted is when I search the exact question they pose in the above video, “When did the university of alabama desegregate their sororities?” the top results are as shown below.
marieclaire.com, buzzfeed.com, jezebel.com, & huffingtonpost.com
Yeah, that’s where everyone goes for their most credible information, right?
Anyway, I feel like the implication above was that this discriminatory behavior was in some kind of way condoned by the University or all of the sorority members or something, because I mean it’s not like the fact that discrimination and racism still exists is a fact many people actively dispute. So the first thing I want to clarify is that it is illegal and was illegal in the state of Alabama and at the University of Alabama specifically in 2013 to discriminate against students on the basis of their race, as I think, most people would have assumed. And there did seem to be discrimination in the sororities specifically at the University of Alabama up until 2013, with only 1 black student having been accepted to a sorority at the school prior to 2013. Gentry McCreary, a former director of Greek affairs from 2007 to ’11 for the university said the following when this was at the height of controversy, “The issue is the alumnae and not the undergraduates. There’s definitely some fear, whether real or imagined, that there would be some repercussions if a sorority took an African-American member. They’re able to subvert the will of the chapter, and it’s gone on for far too long.” The implication being it wasn’t even for an inherent racial prejudice that the students of the sorority really had, but a fear-induced obligation they felt to maintain tradition from pressures of alumnae. The university itself, however, was only growing in diversity at the time, more than ever, and even elected its first black student to an executive position in student government just a year prior. http://nation.time.com/2013/09/16/university-of-alabama-moves-to-end-segregated-sorority-system/
3. M-I-S-S-I-S-S-I-P-P-I-I-S-R-A-C-I-S-T –What does that spell? 2013:
I actually thought this was a common known fact, though of course the wording above is extremely loose and I don’t even think technically correct. The whole thing was a clerical error that didn’t actually influence Mississippi life in any real legal way. The document abolishing slavery was actually in existence and was ratified –just never sent to the archivist to be recorded. Because the document was ratified and everything, when the error was pointed out, all that had to be done was have it archived and it was official. And if it had been legal in a meaningful sense it ought to be more of a testament against racism and to where society has come that people chose not to act on it than the other way around. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/02/19/172432523/after-snafu-mississippi-ratifies-amendment-abolishing-slavery
4. North KKKarolina 2013:
Okay, last one. I don’t even want to bother acknowledging this one, but ok. William L. Saunders (1835-1891) is who this is referring to, and yes, he was a chief organizer of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1800s. He was also a lawyer, soldier, editor, state official, and amateur historian. In essence, his notable achievements were not limited to his KKK affiliation. The building was named after him in 1922. Idk how it’s so unbelievable and mind blowing people were racist in the 20′s but ok. I find it more unbelievably far-fetched that we somehow expect people to constantly review every year every hall and building and event named after someone in history and then rummage through their receipts and be outraged at the first offensive thing we come across and rename everything. When someone put it to a vote to have the building renamed because of the affiliation the motion was passed the first time. http://chapelboro.com/news/unc/saunders-hall-to-be-renamed-carolina-hall
@huffingtonpost you got the treatment I usually reserve for @micdotcom today! I can’t tag micdotcom anymore, by the way. Wonder why… lol.