Can’t believe that people are still defending that disastrous “Saying Yes to the Devil was the better plan, Dean deserved what was coming to him” argument. I mean, I get why people do that. Because, that idea, that entire Cas beating the shit out of Dean for not being obedient scene, that entire sequence where Sam/Bobby approve the use of violence against Dean to make him compliant hinges on the pretention of Dean’s plan being the greater of the two evils. Remove that blind and you have no excuses left to use as justifications.
Anyway, to all those “Dean was going to say Yes to Michael and that would have destroyed the world” people, just look at what Dean did in last season. Dean faced the most powerful supernatural being in the entire existence and convinced her to change her mind, to change her basic nature. He didn’t need super-powers or demon-blood or angel-wings to do any of that. He singlehandedly saved the entire creation just by being Dean.
So, if Dean could do this to Amara, if he could influence the primordial darkness to the point of changing her true nature, then, isn’t it conceivable to assume that he would have done the same to Michael? Doesn’t this effectively close the “But Dean couldn’t have defeated/influenced Michael like Sam did with Lucifer” question?
I adore you..
