BITCH IM ABOUT TO JUST [DISAPPEARS UNDER MYSTERIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES]

blake kathryn
🪼
Peter Solarz

oozey mess

tannertan36
almost home
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

No title available
Acquired Stardust
hello vonnie

JBB: An Artblog!

ellievsbear
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
h

Discoholic 🪩

Andulka
taylor price
todays bird

pixel skylines

PR's Tumblrdome

seen from Brazil
seen from Belarus

seen from Germany

seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil
seen from Ireland

seen from Russia

seen from Germany
seen from United States
@cooljoweaves
BITCH IM ABOUT TO JUST [DISAPPEARS UNDER MYSTERIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES]
Anne Yano Renault / Seiran Tsuno’s grandma wearing her works for ITS2018
The Art of Quintessenz
Hanover and Berlin-based art duo Quintessenz recently completed a large-scale installation for the newly funded Paxos Contemporary Art Project, which is currently taking place on the island of Paxos in the Adriatic sea. Although designed to be appreciated and enjoyed in person, the images of their intervention created inside of a 400-year-old ruin are quickly becoming viral due to the work’s strong contrast against the historic setting. Similar to the Paradis Perdus piece, their latest intervention in Greece used the architectural structure to emphasize the effect of their creation. Like digital abstract images somehow transferring into the real world, both these pieces employ color shades and different size layers to create depth and perspective illusion. Appearing bigger and smaller depending on the observer’s movement, they leave room for individual experiences of these interfaces between analog and digital worlds. Although exceptionally photogenic, the artists’ idea is to enjoy these works in person. “We hope that the visitors of our work leave their mobile phone cameras in their pockets for a moment and simply enjoy the light and the translation of the wind in the material,” Quintessenz explains.
re: geoglyphs and thinking in 3D
people who insist geoglyphs like the nazca lines must have been intended to be seen from above are failing to put themselves in the shoes of people who never once saw ‘up’ as a direction you could go.
imagine you’ve never even been up a tall tree, let alone in an airplane. you might have some idea of what birds see, maybe, but it’s going to be incredibly inaccurate. gods might be ‘in the sky’ but they can see you perfectly well without you having to do big landscaping projects; they’re gods, for fucksake.
so why would you build weird loopy hummingbirds
and leaping horses
and a guy with a really big dick
flat on the ground or on a shallow slope if you didn’t intend for it to be seen from above?
well, for the same reason you build the other really popular kind of geoglyph, the labyrinth:
to get mazed.
being down in a shape that you know is bigger than you can see is an altered state, just like the trances brought on by dancing or chanting or ritual sex.
even when the labyrinth is small enough to see all at once just by standing on a chair or going upstairs, it’s not designed to be looked at as a whole. it’s designed to be followed, by walking it or simply with your eyes, to induce a meditative state. and the bigger the maze gets, the more you’re forced to give up on the idea of comprehending the whole thing, and simply put one foot in front of another.
but modern people have forgotten that perspective. we’re so used to seeing things from above that it doesn’t even occur to us that not being able to see the whole drawing at once is the whole point.
one more thought: even when people theorize that the nazca lines are intended to be walked on, they talk about ‘ritual roads’, they assume the path has to lead somewhere, so the lack of any obvious destination makes them tend to discard the idea. but you know what i’ve noticed about the nazca figures?
they’re a closed loop. just like the meditation mazes and mystic labyrinths of europe.
if you walk on that line, you go a long long way without going anywhere at all, and you come right back where you started, but different than when you left. the spider in your mind is not the spider on the ground. it’s liminal, uncertain. because ‘up’ was never an option, and the gods don’t need a billboard, they can hear you whisper behind your hand. the spider isn’t a picture, it’s a trip.
influenza like illness heatmap
https://www.weavingsouthwest.com/collections/x-rug-yarn?page=3
https://www.yarn.com/products/valley-yarns-valley-cotton-10-2?via=5a4cdb716170700aec04bc00%2C5a4cdb716170700aec04bc01
In one sense kindness is always hazardous because it is based on a susceptibility to others, a capacity to identify with their pleasures and sufferings. Putting oneself in someone else's shoes, as the saying goes, can be very uncomfortable. But if the pleasures of kindness - like all the greatest human pleasures - are inherently perilous, they are nonetheless some of the most satisfying we posses. How have we come to repudiate them?
On Kindness, Adam Phillips and Barbara Taylor
kindness resource 002
Annotated Bibliography 01
reflection on On Weaving by Anni Albers
1/9/2018