
Janaina Medeiros
$LAYYYTER
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

No title available

No title available

â
DEAR READER
AnasAbdin
No title available
KIROKAZE
occasionally subtle
almost home
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Origami Around

izzy's playlists!

pixel skylines
Three Goblin Art

çĽćĽ / Permanent Vacation
Keni

seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Czechia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Luxembourg

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
@cygnean
Iâd love to meet the person who thought this photo was worthy of this frame⌠it gives off the vibe of a prized photo on a bedside table or a mantlepieceâŚ
South County Antique Mall, Saint Louis
from twitter user deejaygeejaygee
it just gets better
and better
Lean into the funny idiot archetype so that when youâre unexpectedly hypercompetent at something they give you The Look where you can see them reexamine their entire perception of you in confusion, respect and no small amount of fear, and when you keep playing funny idiot they will be forever wary of you. Let them find out, incidentally, that the jester keeps a knife under his hat, and never figure out how to deal with that because they wonât abandon their boxes.
I tried the Funny Idiot for a while, but ended up the Incompetent Genius.
An enemy is just a friend I haven't worn down
Are you saying that you're the main character of a kids cartoon?
I'm saying that "I'm going to be friends with you" is both a promise and a threat
I want to be called âsirâ but not in a bootlicker way or like a weird âgentlemanlyâ way, but in the exasperated retail worker telling someone they canât take the entire basket of ketchup packets way.
ah, like a cat who has committed a crime
*slams back a bourbon whiskey* listen mate Iâve been here for all kinds of ridiculous tumblr meltdowns I was here when Yahoo took over I was here for dashcon I was here when the notes disappeared I was here back when those superwholock chain posts of fucking up non believers were taken seriously and through every single one I have done fuck all. I have not changed a goddang thing. I waited for the end and the end never came. I do not plan on changing my status quo now. either things will go on as they always have and in six months time Iâll be here watching staff announce that anyone with over 1000 followers are being monitored or I will have been physically deleted from this wonderful stupid fucking website and either way Iâm gonna go out posting pictures of my cat
Another round for my buddy here
Letâs talk about something called the âsunk cost fallacyâ.
Say that youâve bought a concert ticket for $50 for a band that you donât know that well. Half an hour into the show, you realize that you donât actually enjoy the music and you arenât having a good time - instead of leaving the concert to go do something else, however, you sit through the remaining hours of the concert because you donât want to âwasteâ the cost of the ticket.Â
Congratulations, youâve just fallen victim to the sunk cost fallacy.
The âsunk cost fallacyâ is something that all humans are prone to when we make decisions. Simply put, itâs the human tendency to consider past costs when we make choices, even when those costs are no longer relevant. When youâre deciding whether or not to stay at that concert you arenât enjoying, you will likely consider the cost of the ticket when youâre making your decision - for instance, youâd probably be a lot more willing to leave a $5 concert that you arenât enjoying than a $50 concert that you arenât enjoying. But taking the cost of the ticket into account at all is a mistake.Â
When youâre making a rational decision, the only thing that matters is the future. Time, effort and money that youâre spent up until that point no longer matter - it doesnât make sense to consider them, because no matter what you decide, you canât actually get them back. They are âsunkâ costs. If you decide to stay at that concert, you are out $50 and youâll have a mediocre evening. If you decide to go leave and do something more fun, you are out $50 and youâll have a better evening. No matter what you choose, you have lost $50 - but choosing to leave the concert means that you havenât also spent an evening doing something you donât like.
The sunk cost fallacy is sometimes also described as âthrowing good money after badâ - people will waste additional time, resources and effort simply to justify the fact that theyâve already wasted time, resources and effort, even if it leaves them worse off overall.Â
Common examples of sunk cost fallacy in everyday life include:
refusing to get rid of clothes that donât fit or that you never wear because they were expensive
going to an event that you no longer want to go to because you already bought the ticketÂ
spending more and more money on repairing a car or computer (or something else that depreciates in value over time) instead of buying a new one because you donât want to waste the money you put into earlier repairs
continuing to watch a movie or TV show you arenât enjoying anymore because youâve already watched part of itÂ
finishing a plate of food that youâre not enjoying or are too full to enjoy, because you donât want to waste it
refusing to get rid of unused, unwanted or broken items in your home because the items were expensive
Perhaps the most damaging example of sunk cost fallacy in everyday life, however, is relationships.Â
People often use the length of a relationship to justify staying in it. Youâve probably heard this logic - you may even have used it yourself: âI canât break up with him or the two years we spent together will be for nothing.â
âIf I leave her, it will mean I wasted the five years I spent with her.â
The reality, though, is that staying in a mediocre relationship doesnât âgive you backâ the time youâve already invested in that relationship. It just makes the relationship longer. If you stay in a bad relationship for five more years to avoid âwastingâ the first two, you havenât actually made those first two years worthwhile - youâve simply spent seven years of your life in a bad relationship. Thereâs nothing we can do to recover time and effort (and in most cases, money) that weâve already spent. But we can forgive ourselves, and we can stop letting our past mistakes continue to define our futures.Â
i would get a phd just so i could be an âok - sent from my iphoneâ professor
Yesterday I confused a friend because I called him sir and he was like ??? why are you calling me sir weâre friends? And i had to explain that sir is not a word its a feeling. my mac shutting down for no reason is sir. My cat is sir. My pair of jeans is sir. An email that finds me unwell is sir. Two bugs outside my window are sirs.
Examples:
sir please stop eating plastic
sir do you really have to do this right now
sir *intense stare*
my good sir stop that right now
sir why are you just standing in the way
(warningly) sir...
please listen to me sir
(tiredly) sir please.
my heart says yes but my mom says no