
祝日 / Permanent Vacation

if i look back, i am lost

Kaledo Art
No title available
hello vonnie
Three Goblin Art

Origami Around
Claire Keane
KIROKAZE
AnasAbdin
One Nice Bug Per Day
dirt enthusiast
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Love Begins
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

No title available
todays bird
noise dept.
Stranger Things
seen from India

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Sweden

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from France
seen from Netherlands
seen from Serbia

seen from Netherlands

seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands
@darwiodrade
I don't know if I will ever feel comfortable coming out as aroace, despite being comfortably aroace. The other day someone asked me if I was queer and I felt so uncomfortable saying yes, because even if it is true, I knew it was still painting the wrong picture in this persons mind. And throughout the rest of the evening it was obvious they thought I was bi but I couldn't correct them because it's not an easy "oh I'm not X I'm Y", it's a whole new conversation: opening yourself up to uncomfortable and invasive questions, opening yourself up to the other persons astonishment and bafflement which just makes you feel more othered, opening yourself up to being hurt by casual assumptions and dismissive comments or just plain awkward silence. and usually it ends with the feeling that you didn't do enough to paint the right picture, to explain everything in a way that leaves no false impressions, that you didn't find the right words to make them truly understand you. despite such understanding taking years and years of work. It's so frustrating!
This is a perfect time to read the brilliant and unforgettable graphic novel(s) Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, about growing up in Iran during and after the Iranian Revolution, and the rise of the oppressive theocracy that persists to this day.
Both graphic novels are available free online (Persepolis vol. 1, Persepolis vol. 2)
It also was adapted to a wonderful film (co-directed and co-written by the author) which is available to watch for free on Sundance Now (sign up for the free trial)
- v. hugo
Pick up your ticket for Pride!
💙
💚
💛
🧡
❤️
💜
💗
🤍
🤎
🖤
💓
💖
Pick a heart then pass it on!
Once when I was in undergrad, someone described something as “problematic” in class and our professor was like, “That’s cool, but ‘problematic’ doesn’t really mean anything. It means that the thing you’re describing has a problem, and in and of itself that’s not bad. Art, especially, should always have problems, or else it’s not interesting and not art, either. It sounds like you’re trying to say that this is bad, but you don’t want to say ‘bad.’ Is that right?”
So from then on whenever one of us called something problematic, he would make us talk it out until we could name the “bad” thing we were hinting at. In this particular class, 7/10 it was some type of oppression, and the remainder was like, “I’m uncomfortable because this is very new/confusing/pushing boundaries that made me feel safe.”
Once we stopped calling things “problematic” and stopping at that, class got way more interesting and... we all had to say, like, “that’s racist” or “that’s misogynistic” or “ew capitalism gross” out loud, which a lot of us had never done in a classroom before. Or we had to be like, “Uhhh... I’m not sure what’s so bad?” and confront our own beliefs and that was maybe even more useful.
Anyway. Whenever I see the word problematic, I can’t help but think of this professor being like, “Good starting point, now let’s get specific.” I think when we have to commit to saying “that’s ___” it requires a lot more careful thought about the truth and impact and complexities of whatever we’re claiming. Sometimes there really is some bullshit afoot, and also sometimes it’s art, and it should be full of problems, because that’s what art is.
#'this is present in the text' is often a good first step #but those second and third ones (naming it; describing its function) are vital (via @elucubrare)
Let me tell you that having entire streets closed and the mass transit system of your city thrown to chaos because the pope is visiting both feel very medieval and gives you certain inch to go burn some churches.
That being said, I’m certain that The Pope is going to meet The King at some point this week, so to keep up with the vibe, who is up to start a pleasant rebellion and communalize some lands? Comuneros, raise again!
To be fair, the fact that Bad Bunny is doing shows all this week in Madrid and 600k people are coming to see him is not helping with the chaos. But I don’t have anything against Benito, so let’s focus on that anticlericalism feeling, folks.
LILO & STITCH (2002)
june will be good june will be good june will be good june will be good june will be good june will be good june will be good june will be good june will be good june will be
Academy Award winner Marcia Lucas has died. While winning major awards for her work as an editor for Star Wars (alongside a team of editors, including Paul Hirsch and Richard Chew; some of her contributions outside of her work with George Lucas include Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, Taxi Driver, and New York, New York), she mostly disappeared from the public eye following her divorce and essentially retired.
While Marcia dispelled the belief that she singlehandedly saved Star Wars in the edit (and very passionately defended George's craftmanship and ideas, which she felt were undercredited, as well as the work of their team in general), there was a lot of work she specifically did and I thought it would be good to highlight just how much she did and give her credit where it is due. There is a lot that came from her that most don't know about. Most of those examples are from Howard Kazanjian's biography, A Producer's Life, published in 2021.
On some of the uncredited dialogue and story revisions for Star Wars:
On some of her work in Star Wars:
On having the iconic trench run on the Death Star as her biggest work while working on Star Wars:
On her uncredited work in The Empire Strikes Back:
On how her input changed the ending of Raiders of the Lost Ark:
On her joining the Return of the Jedi crew, an emphasis in finding the right cut for actors, cutting together footage of Luke in ROTJ after she and George disagreed with the characterization the director had given to Mark Hamill and unable to reshoot footage:
On editing the climactic ending in the Throne Room in ROTJ:
[Text:
Lucas completed his script (with a dialogue polish by Huyck and Katz) and went on location to Tunisia to shoot out in the desert what was eventually called Star Wars. A freak storm destroyed part of the outside sets; his droids weren't functioning correctly; he was having problems with some of the crew and was worried about aspects of his film's story. "Of course, I had an editor-director relationship with George," Marcia says, "but I also had a husband-wife relationship with him. So, one night, we were getting ready for bed in Tunisia, after the day shoot, and George said, 'I can't believe this. I'm going to get laughed out of Hollywood.' The robots weren't working. The Jawas weren't working. He said, 'Nothing's working in my film, and then he said, They go into the Death Star and everybody just runs out and jumps into the Millennium Falcon and flies away. Nobody's going to believe that.' "He didn't say why, he just said that probably it's not going to work. I said I'd think about it. The next time we had a conversation around it, I said 'I have a good idea. What if Han Solo gets shot in the leg and Chewbacca has to carry him back.' But Peter Mayhew couldn't do that because he had bad legs. What if one of the robots get shot up?' 'No, no, no, no, the robots can't get shot up. My movie starts and ends with the robots. 'I said, 'Well, what if Darth Vader strikes down Obi-Wan Kenobi?' He has nothing else to do at the end of the movie except stand in the war room with the rebels talking to Luke. George said, 'I think that'll work.''* Marcia then sat at a typewriter at the hotel pool "writing this horrible dialogue," she says. "Once you were the master, now I'm the master.' And Obi-Wan says, 'If you strike me down, I'll become more powerful …' and I was just writing all of this silly dialogue." In fact, Obi-Wan's statement about continuing in the afterlife"If you strike me down, I'll become more powerful than you can possibly imagine"-was a result of Marcia's belief in "life after death," she explains. "I was born and raised Christian Science. I got out of the Christian Science religion when I was eleven or twelve, but l'd attended Christian Science Sunday school. Christian Scientists believe man is spiritual and not material. But I had to part ways with Christian Science because I believe we're spiritual beings in material bodies. We have material bodies that we have to take care of. So I didn't get along with them about not going to doctors, but that whole religion was a lot of 'we're spiritual beings' and I grew up with that. I'm a spiritual being, and so Obi-Wan was a Jedi Master and a spiritual being. That just made sense to me."
-
"George asked me if I'd cut Star Wars," says Marcia Lucas, "and I said sure, I would love to do it, because I wasn't pregnant. I have nothing to do. I'll work on the movie; so we started cutting." She began by reediting an assembly cut that had been kluged together by an English editor (who was not asked to complete the film). The film was in such "bad" shape that Marcia had to "reconstitute back to dailies." She recalls of the film's beginning: "That kitten thing George told me about-you can create a villain, have him kill a kitten. Well, the rebel officer in the ship was the little kitten Darth Vader kills by breaking his neck, so immediately you know Darth Vader is a bad dude." Among other tasks, Marcia Lucas worked on problematic desert shots of the droids and R2-D2's capture by the Jawas. In the assembly, this moment had been edited as: the Jawas jump up and shoot the droid, which falls over; they then pick him up and carry him to the Sandcrawler vehicle. "I was looking at the dailies on it," she says, "and these Jawas are looking weird and I thought, They should shoot him, then they should look and see if it worked. Then we should get big electric currents around him-then he should fall over slow and they should surround him. When you're editing, you have ideas." "George came to me a few weeks in and said, 'You have to work on the end battle. LM needs that scene cut yesterday." That was the big assignment —the climax of the film. Richard Chew was also already editing, but they weren't going to meet the schedule, so Marcia recommended bringing in Paul Hirsch, who had cut for their friend director Brian De Palma. George Lucas agreed and she got to work on the end battle.
-
They decided that the Death Star would be minutes, then seconds away from destroying the rebel base, the rebels, and the rebellion—a plot element that Marcia realized could be manufactured completely in editorial-"because we had all the shots of the Death Star getting ready to fire up and destroy Princess Leia's planet of Alderaan. We have Tarkin watching the battle. We could create the tension from the footage we had. Then ILM made a visual [an illustrated graphic] that showed the Death Star rounding the planet to get in position to make the shot to blow up the rebel moon." It was a huge effort to get it all to work—the X-wings, TIE fighters, Leia, the droids, the voice of Kenobi, Luke and Vader and the pilots in their cockpits, Tarkin, etc.—but they pulled it off, with ILM basing its shots on Marcia's edit. The end battle ultimately became one of the most seminal film sequences in the history of cinema, an almost musical piece that would withstand and even demand multiple viewings.
-
Hirsch recalled that "George asked Marcia to do a 'guest cut' on a romantic scene between Han and Leia, because he felt a woman's touch was needed. She happily obliged." In editorial, Marcia Lucas, although not cutting herself, would occasionally look in. One day she came and saw them working on the sequence in which Darth Vader confronts Luke in the carbon freezing chamber (where Han Solo is put in hibernation). Their lightsaber duel began "on this big platform that was all red, like being in hell, with the devil," she says. "But the sword fight wasn't working for me. So I looked at some dailies and I added some cuts. And there was this wide shot they had that was so breathtaking, but it wasn't in. Oh my god, they're editing it out? I thought, Why didn't they use this? It was so visually great. Cut it in." Paul Hirsch, the film's primary editor, would eventually thank her for the assist.
-
"We ran the cut," Marcia Lucas says, "the movie was great, and everything was working and I was impressed. This is working like gangbusters. At the end, they tie up Indiana with Marion on a post, they open the Ark, all the Nazis are killed off, and then they cut. Indiana's in Washington, DC, in this meeting with the bigwig Washington people, and they say, 'Thank you for taking care of it.' And then a cut, and they're nailing shut the big box, and they're wheeling it into that warehouse full of a million boxes, right? "I said, 'Wait a minute.' There was a scene in the script where Harrison came out of that meeting in Washington and he met Marion. And Marion said, 'Come on, let's go get a drink.' And they walked off together. I said, 'What happened to that scene?' 'We didn't need it.' George said it, and Steven said it. I stopped and said, You guys are nuts, You don't understand how good the relationship between those two is. It's magical. They were going to go walk off and get a drink together. You need that scene. You need to put a period on that part of the Marion and Indiana relationship. Otherwise, you leave her tied up on that stick.' George said, 'I'll shoot a second unit.' And George went down to San Francisco City Hall, got Harrison, and got the actors and shot the scene where they walk down the stairs together." (Kazanjian made the arrangements and assisted Lucas for the pick-up.)
-
In editorial, despite having the coverage he required, Lucas was having problems, too. "George struggled in editing," Kazanjian says. "I said, 'Let's bring on Marcia to help, as we usually do.' George said, 'You're going to have to ask her.' So I did. Marcia is a brilliant storyteller. She knew how to cut a picture and to tell the story. She concentrated on the actor's performance. She didn't care if in one shot the actor's hand was up, in the second shot the actor's hand was down."
- Finally Marcia Lucas began helping out in editorial. "Marcia had really good ideas and she wanted to focus on story and character," Herman says, "whereas George, he focused on action. Faster, faster, and so she put in a lot of things that wouldn't be there otherwise." "George liked to give me heavy dramatic scenes," says Marcia. "And that's why George pulled me in to do Jedi, because the English director and editor didn't fully understand the Jedi philosophy. What Marquand did when he was directing is he had Luke being angry a lot. George said, 'A Jedi isn't angry. I need you to come in and look at these scenes, and find out what you can do to soften this.' ' I looked at the cut, and when Obi-Wan Kenobi appears in his ghostly form and Luke is saying, 'Why didn't you tell me?' about Vader—Luke was very angry and upset. So I had to recut that scene. I had to find Mark's softest performance, which was there. Sometimes I even had to print an outtake that wasn't printed because I was looking for a reading on one line, 'Why didn't you tell me?' (softly) Not, 'Why didn't you tell me?! Luke was also very angry in the scene where Yoda dies_'Is Darth Vader really my father?"
-
Marcia noted that when Vader threw the Emperor down the "chasm" in the first cuts—"he just would fall and plop down, and he's dead and let's get on with the scene," she says. "I said, 'This is not going to work. You cannot kill the most powerful man in the galaxy, who can shoot electric bolts out of his hands, and have nothing happen. We need ILM and Ben Burtt to make a cacophony of noise and sound and an atomic reaction. So I recut all the death scenes. I used to enter the editing room and say, 'The queen of death is here.'"
]
debates i didn't know existed + a very humorous distinction
hostiles = antagonists that Murderbot is worried about 😳
targets = antagonists that need to worry about Murderbot :)c
GLaDOS voice: "Would you like to see some artwork I generated? I've heard from other test subjects that AI-generated artwork produces an uncanny valley response in human viewers because they can't perceive it as fully real. They've told me that it looks absolutely hideous to them, that they can't imagine anything more disgusting than AI art. But, well I've been practicing and wanted your honest opinion. Feel free to let me know how ugly you find this by ranking it on a scale from 'vomit-inducing' to 'eye-bleeding'." A robotic arm lowers from the ceiling holding a hand mirror up to Chell's face
one time I told my therapist "I tend to have issues with people who think of themselves as authority figures" and she burst out laughing and then said "I think we need to pause and reflect on how you phrased that"
I mean, what, was I supposed to refer to them as if they actually are authority figures? those don't exist
y'all are doing some weird discourse on this post. no that therapist doesn't need to be "investigated" lmao. she didn't say I was wrong, she reacted because the phrasing was specific as fuck and revealed a lot about my worldview which is totally reasonable to want to explore.
well maybe i don't wanna work in a fast-paced, flexible environment that requires great verbal communication skills
Obsessed with Han and Obi Wans dynamic in anh they are so utterly unimpressed with each other at all times. Han wants nothing less than to jump this old man who keeps dragging him into progressively worse and worse situation like some imperial comedy of errors and Obi Wan, who has fought in wars and seen shit beyond Hans comprehension, is deadpan like “wow you fly fast? On your piece of shit ship? That’s sooo cool”. They had to kill off obi wan because if they hadn’t han and obi wan would’ve killed each other in some spectacularly dramatic fashion and the empire would’ve won
Han never learned Obi Wans name and Obi Wan made the conscious decision to forget Hans
This is it
Everybody and their mothers understood why removing Sokka's misogyny in the ATLA live action was a bad idea and made the story worse but suddenly when they remove Sanji and Zoro's misogyny in OPLA it's a good thing?? Make it make sense
Sure, I'll make it make sense. Because comparing the two starts from a place of false parallelism.
In ATLA, Sokka's misogyny was present for 3 episodes in the very beginning of the show, and then used to deliver narrative carthasis in episode 4, in the form of Sokka's 180 turn into feminism. The tension of flexing the rubber band of Sokka's misogyny was brief, and the release of that tension then felt appropriatly sized, because it came so soon in the series. The the rest of the show continued slapping instant karmic punishments to characters who expressed misogynistic beliefs. (Anyone who underestimated Toph, Yue's bethored, the guys who catcalled Katara, etc, etc). The world of ATLA is such, that it bends itself to always prove the misogynist wrong. (of course atla also has it's weak points where it falters with this aim, but the express aim is clearly there) The audience is primed, so that they can ignore the flinch of hearing a misogynist micro (or macro) agression, because they can expect the cathrasis of a karmic punishment to follow.
This works very well in the genre of escapist fantasy adventure. Shows like Succession, or Breaking Bad, or IWTV can present misogynist characters, who never learn or face any consequences, because the cathrasis of those shows comes from watching unpleasant people wallow in their self-inflicted miseries. They are shows about characters you love to hate.
Escapist fantasy adventure as a genre doesn't want to create characters you love to hate. It wants to create characters you love to love.
One Piece is an escapist fantasy adventure. It wants to create characters we love to love. So, it also has to ask the question of: How much can we pull on the rubber-band of discomfort before delivering any kind of cathrasis to the audience. The complaints that animanga One Piece faces, comes from the fact that for a lot of people, the answer is not this much.
Complaints about ATLA liveaction removing Sokka's *Suki teaches him about feminism* moment, and complaints about animanga One Piece having characters dropping misogynistic microagressions casually all over the place, come from the exact same emotion. 'I wanted to see a moment of fantasy-wish-fulfillment where a man changes how he behaves, and I was not delivered that emotional cathrasis.'
This has nothing to do with whether any of the misogyny of the characters makes sense in universe.
Different people will find different character flaws more or less bearable, and it's always a tight-rope you have to walk on. But creators do have a choice in what flaws they expect the audience to find interesting and where the line of so-insufferable-I'm-picking-a-different-show lies. I think for OPLA crew, the choices would have been
Leave it as it is, rubbing that *discomfort without any comfort* button way too roughly for a HUGE chunks of the new audience.
Create an entirely new storyline about Sanji and Zoro facing consequences and *changing their ways*. And I would be willing to bet actual money that the fans of the animanga would have been even more pissed if OPLA had started soloing with the storyline like that.
Just sand down the sexist corners, as the show did. And from these three options, I fully belive they picked the right one by pikcing this.
This turned into a pretty long rant, but it does bother me that it is often the case that misogyny is seen as *bigotry light* and the onus of accepting that media has misogyny in it, is put on the female audiences. I have a feeling that we as as society are much more accepting that making a character a racist is going to need helluva strong narrative justification, because the discomfort that choie like that causes in an audience is expected to be very high. But often it seems that the discomfort misogyny is expected to cause in an audience is.... much less. I don't like that assumption.
With Zoro especially, his backstory sets him up to have rejection of sexism as part of his underlying motive as a character, which his writer then failed to follow through on.
In ways that might be partly to make the character more complex, because rejecting it and not perpetuating it are in fact different actions, with a social trend that ingrained, but I think were mostly just the writer kind of losing interest in that narrative thread.
This guy is set up to be actively angered by the idea that women have any kind of inherent weakness, because his rival he couldn't beat was convinced that she was doomed to fall behind him because of the male puberty buff to muscle development, and he was like ABSOLUTELY NOT HOW DARE YOU CHEAPEN MY INEVITABLE TRIUMPH LIKE THAT and then she died in an accident, so the question was doomed to remain unresolved forever.
Zoro by rights has a more intense relationship with sexism-qua-sexism than any of the girls on the crew. And Oda simply did not write that, because he is not up to it. His reach exceeds his grasp, which I don't resent as much as I might because I can't help giving him credit for reaching at all; it puts him well above industry standard.
Removing some of the unexamined sexism Oda put in is honestly one of those places where an adaptation has an opportunity to avoid a failure point of the original material. Not just on ideological grounds, but in that the way Oda wound up writing Zoro on gender was a failure of execution compared to the initially presented concept.