how does anyone genuinely believe there's some shadowy Jewish conspiracy running the world when Mel Gibson didn't even stay cancelled
$LAYYYTER
untitled
macklin celebrini has autism
Doug Jones
Noah Kahan
The Bowery Presents
occasionally subtle
Cosmic Funnies

Discoholic đȘ©
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available
hello vonnie

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Interview Vampire Daily
RMH
Xuebing Du
The Stonewall Inn
noise dept.

Andulka
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Germany
seen from Vietnam

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Ukraine
seen from Netherlands
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Morocco
@dawdlenoddle
how does anyone genuinely believe there's some shadowy Jewish conspiracy running the world when Mel Gibson didn't even stay cancelled
Do you agree with the statement âI donât find Ryan Gosling attractive as himself or as other characters, but I do find him attractive as Ryland Grace?â
Yes
No
Poor Graham Platner. He lost his Senate race AND his favorite tattoo :(
eitanthegoalie:
Some #Jewish thoughts on Scott Weiner and #Pride
The DSA trying to sell itself as the Democratic Tea party is such a weird self-own.
So you're telling me you're racist and going to make the party worse? Cause that's the legacy of the Tea Party.
so this is insane
Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada is failing Jewish Canadians and the community is being brutally targeted by hate.
I have to do activist shit and I'm upset about jt
I knew it was all downhill when the youtuber I was starting to like started associating with Taylor Lorenz :(
You can really tell who actually grew up poor and who's been LARPing this whole time.
Update: by 11AM it's 3 killed, 40 injured in Kyiv.
I finally have access to internet after 70+ days of internet block out at the hands of the Islamic Republic of Iran (yes, the same one you first-world country people are so eager to defend).
You have been brainwashed and you don't even know it. Do you have the slightest idea what it feels like to be cut off from the rest of the world? Yet you defend our oppressors.
Where are the "human rights" activists now? Are we not human enough for you?
Fuck your fake morality.
If youâre a Democrat running in a red or purple district, listen up!
A couple weeks ago, I was in a briefing with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse all about home insurance prices.
I know, that probably sounds incredibly boring, but itâs not, itâs actually the most important conversation and issue across much of the US, especially in red areas.
92% of Texans say that home insurance costs are their most important issue.
92%!
Thatâs higher than care about healthcare OR groceries. Thatâs even significantly higher than the amount of Texans that own homes. Cause this effects renters too, and everyone WANTS to be able to own a home.
But itâs not just that they care about the issue, they also know what causes it. Yes, in Texas. 66% of Texans connect it DIRECTLY to climate driven extreme weather.
And thatâs not the only state.
In Florida, 44% OF TRUMP VOTERS connect it directly to âclimate changeâ yes, as a phrase. Not the concept of climate change reworded to be Republican friendly, but to actual âclimate change.â
Whitehouse has been going to Florida over the last few years to talk about home insurance costs and climate change. Heâs shocked that every time he goes, the local media covers it as if he was doing a big rally. It gets media attention no matter how in the weeds he gets, because this is something theyâre genuinely concerned about.
And heâs seeing this across all states, red and blue, anywhere there are extreme weather conditions.
In the next few years this could lead to recession. First is the climate risk, then the insurance market collapses, which dominoes into the mortgage market, property values plummet, and weâre back in the 2008 recession.
We fight back by winning elections, and getting these Republicans out of office. And we do that by making sure they are the ones getting the blame. Them and the fossil fuel industry, who knew the risks and did nothing to stop it.
This isnât partisan. I mean, it is at the governmental level, but it isnât when talking to people. Those most concerned about this are the Republicans in local chambers of commerce around the country. They are affected by this every day. So are realtors. And we have to show we are the ones listening. The Republican politicians and candidates are lying, but weâre listening.
Jerome Powell, Chair of the Federal Reserve, is terrible on climate, BUT even he admitted, earlier this year, that in a decade there will be large swaths of the country where mortgages wonât even be available.
So we have to fight this now!
I went into this meeting knowing virtually nothing about home insurance. But I left thinking this is the issue all Dems running, especially in red and purple districts, should focus on.
Republicans are willing to listen on this one. Theyâre willing to hear the phrase âclimate change.â Especially in places with extreme weather, they have experienced this first hand.
We heard from a woman who lives in Ashland, NC, and a man on Pine Island, FL. They both said the same thing. Insurance companies would reimburse for less than half the work that needed to be done to make their homes livable again after recent hurricanes.
The woman, Nicole, said they demanded receipts for things like the roofing and dry wall, except the house was decades old by the time she bought it and she didnât have access to any of those things.
Home insurance is already becoming cost prohibitive, but not having it is even worse.
We have a real shot of convincing Republicans, on this issue specifically, that we are the ones who get it. And we know exactly who to blame and how to stop it.
Itâs not flashy, itâs probably not gonna get you attention online, but it will get votes, and at the end of the day, your district supporting you is what matters most anyway.
Right?
I need people to understand that there are people who are anti-Israel for purely antisemitic reasons and it is in your best interest to not include them in your pro-Palestinian activism
Someone talked down to me about a subject I am deeply familiar with so I guess my whole night is ruined đ
"What is happening now in left and progressive spaces quietly reverses that progress. It teaches people, often without realizing it, that some identities can be treated as morally contingent. It reshapes how people think about other groups. It lowers the threshold for dehumanization. It makes it easier, over time, to more broadly justify dismissing suffering, othering, acts of discrimination anywhere it becomes politically inconvenient.
That is exactly how prejudice evolves itself into something systemic. By changing the rules of who is allowed to be seen clearly. And this is where it becomes personal.
Most people reading this do not think of themselves as antisemitic. They would never use a slur. They would never straight out and openly deny someoneâs humanity. But that is not how this shows up anymore. It shows up in smaller decisions we make as progressive and left leaders these days. In what we excuse. In what we scroll past. In which deaths feel complicated instead of tragic and unacceptable. In whether we instinctively see a person or a position when we hear the word âZionistâ or âanti-Zionist.â
You can oppose Israeli policy. You can reject Zionism. You can defend it. None of those positions require you to sort Jews, Israelis, Palestinians, Arabs or Muslims into categories that determine whether they deserve empathy. If your framework depends on deciding which Jews are acceptable and which are not, or which civilians matter and which do not, then the issue is not that your politics are controversial. It is that your reasoning has already crossed a line that civil rights traditions were meant to prevent. The civil rights standard was never agreement. It was consistency. No collective guilt. No dehumanization. No conditional empathy.
We already know how to apply these principles. We are watching what happens when we fail to. The only question is whether we are willing to apply them when it challenges our own assumptions. Because if we cannot, then all we have really done is learn how to recognize injustice selectively.
And selective justice is not justice for all."
How We Learned to Sort Jews Into âAcceptableâ and âUnacceptableâ Again and Why No One Wants to Admit It