Archive of harmful behavior. Minors should interact cautiously. All the evidence is sourced from public posts. This is not a "slander" blog, but an archive blog. Please don't mistake accountability with harassment
Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Rules of this blog + Legal Disclaimers
𫧠;; No cyber harassment
Throughout the situation, the Jellyfish system has been firm on one thing: cyber harassment is never okay, and we'll never encourage it, support it or accept it. We don't care whether you identify as a Pro-Shipper, an Anti-Proshipper, or anything else related to shipping discourse. Cyber harassment is a crime that provokes significant psychological damage, or even suicide, in the worst cases. It is a crime in several countries for a good reason and we firmly condemn it. Everyone that engages with this blog in bad faith, harassing us or other people who interact with this blog, will be reported and blocked. /srs
𫧠;; No false accusations
False accusations online can count as a felony or as a form of cyber harassment. False accusations undermine and water down the severity of crimes such as grooming, child exploitation, and predatory behavior towards children. False accusations are highly disrespectful for survivors of these crimes. If you are going to make allegations or accusations this severe, show evidence or proof, such as screenshots or screen recordings. This blog is based on evidence, not on rumors or speculations. /srs
𫧠;; No DMs, only reblogs and comments
We don't feel comfortable talking privately with anyone about this situation, so, DMs are closed. But you're free of reblogging and commenting. /neu
𫧠;; Minors can interact
This is a side blog, separate from our main blog. You won't find any inappropriate content here. However, minors must proceed with caution; some topics can be overwhelming for younger audiences. /neu
𫧠;; Don't rush to reply
We know that we can make posts quickly, but we also know that not everyone can keep up with our fast way of doing things. If you feel tired or overwhelmed, it's okay to step back and take a break. /gen
𫧠;; Working on one's wrongdoings is encouraged here
This means that sincere apologies and genuine remorse are welcomed here. As much as we condemn the online behavior of some individuals, we don't like to tag anyone as "irredeemable", unless severe crimes have been done (grooming, child exploitation, and so on). Everyone should have a second opportunity to be a better person, especially during youth. /gen
𫧠;; Minors, do not interact with our main blog
Our main blog contains NS/FW content, which isn't suitable for minors. We totally get it, teens usually are impulsive and curious, but if we find out a minor interacted with our main blog, we'll block said minor. This is to protect them from content not suitable for them. If you're a minor and you're reading this, you'll understand once you get older. /srs
𫧠;; If you're a minor, we won't discuss NS/FW topics with you
I've seen that some minors involved in this situation have things like "anti ddlg" or "anti age play" in their bio. While we totally understand their disagreement with certain 18+ activities (minors aren't emotionally mature enough to understand more "unusual" +18 activities, so their discomfort is totally understandable), we won't discuss these topics with minors. It would be highly inappropriate for a biologically adult system like us to talk about blatant NS/FW topics with a minor. If you're a minor, remember this: no adult on the internet should have explicit conversations with you. /srs
𫧠;; Don't water down serious terms
As CSA survivors, this is what annoys us the most. No, it's not "kiddie porn", it's CSAM/CSEM. No, it's not "kiddie diddler"; the correct term is child rapist, child predator or child abuser. Watering down serious terms made to name real life problems, that real life people go through, is not okay. All this kind of language does is trivialize and normalize these crimes. Also, it's highly disrespectful for survivors and victims. /srs
This blog is an archive of cyber harassment, false accusations, and abusive behavior by an online group of individuals whose accounts will be revealed in future posts. All content is sourced from publicly posted material and preserved for accountability and legal purposes. /srs
All the screenshots that will be posted are completely unaltered, excepting the elimination of metadata for safety purposes. These screenshots may be used in legal proceedings. We will fully cooperate with law enforcement if contacted. /srs
The posts may contain sensitive topics not suitable for all audiences, such as suicide incitement, threats and cyber harassment. Discretion is advised for younger audiences. /srs
If we find proof of child exploitation, CSAM/CSEM content, or grooming, we'll immediately contact local authorities. Also, we'll notify concerned adults who have requested updates on our DMs. /srs
Do not contact, and do not harass anyone involved in this situation. This is a documentation effort, not a call to arms. /srs
βBlock and move onβ applies to art, not to harassing people. Get that through your thick, ignorant skull.
And yes, you are a coward, K1tty.
Saying βI donβt care about your trauma, youβre weaponizing itβ is literally textbook dismissal of a survivorβs boundaries. Thatβs victim blaming, full stop.
Iβm comfortable calling you a predator, because anyone of any age can be one. βNot knowingβ isnβt an excuse after youβve triggered someone. You donβt get to wave that off β you still have to apologize. Instead, you block and run the second consequences appear.
Thatβs not strength, thatβs cowardice. Pathetic.
Mind explaining why you said "Dopamine Rush" and "It's amazing", when someone had bragged on your blog about how they triggered my childhood sexual abuse trauma? /srs /not at you OP
On a side note, the other user on the screenshots (@/silly4goose20) has properly apologized and took full accountability for their actions, we're on good terms now. /gen
@/k1ttywav-w3bp is a predator.
It's predatory to say "Dopamine rush!" and "It's amazing" when being informed about the triggered state of a CSA survivor. /srs
It's predatory to wholeheartedly support and defend someone who has been proven to be a sexual harasser (Dani/Hunter). /srs
It's predatory to call "filthy" a CSA survivor. /srs
It's predatory to use your own CSA trauma to excuse your predatory behavior towards another CSA survivor. /srs
I never said @/k1ttywav-w3bp was a child predator, I just said he behaved similarly to one. Finding amusement [Dopamine rush! / It's amazing] on someone who was triggered back to an early stage of development where he was sexually abused, is no different than the amusement child predators feel when they see their victims suffer during the abuse. In fact, finding amusement and enjoyment at people's discomfort (especially when that discomfort is sexual in nature) is a core characteristic of predatory behavior. /srs
Everyone can show signs of predatory behavior, including minors. Otherwise, COCSA wouldn't exist. I called @/k1ttywav-w3bp a predator because he's behaving exactly like one. I don't take the word "predator" slightly, as a CSA survivor. /srs
@/k1ttywav-w3bp is a coward for blocking people who don't excuse their behavior. He didn't "lose two friends", he was rightfully confronted by even his own social circle about the evidence I showed, asking for an explanation. And what did he do? Double down, deflect and run away. And surprise! Normal people don't want to be associated with someone who gets off on a CSA survivor dealing with flashbacks about how he was sexually abused as a child. /srs
Deep down, @/k1ttywav-w3bp knows there isn't a moral explanation to saying "Dopamine rush!" and "It's amazing", when informed about a CSA survivor's triggered state. That's why he never has publicly referred to those words on his blog. Because there's no logical or moral explanation to it! And if he ever does, he'll surely tell a false or distorted version of it to cater to his own predatory tendencies. /gen
I'm not filthy. I'm not a piece of shit. I'm a survivor who will rightfully call out someone who has preyed on my CSA trauma. If being a survivor taught me something, it's to never shut up when my boundaries were violated. /gen
I've been interacting with both sides, anti and proship, but only for the past few days. Let me explain myself.
It honestly started when Hunter was called out. At that point I had already been questioning my stance in the community. The violence, the doxxing and the general upheaval of all of the supposed core values. I saw how quickly some of you could change your morals the second it applied to a proshipper/radqueer.
Then I had my call-out post moment and I had Jellyfish show me some god awful screenshots of an alt a persicutor had made [we have found out who it was, by the way. They have been banned from accessing the internet at all.]. That was my "oh god wtf am I doing?!" Moment because, while I thought I had always been a good person, I wasn't. I made some choices, said some words and made bad mistakes.
So I started to change my viewpoint. I've interacted with proshippers over anon these past few days, even a few radqueers who had the same morals as me. It's been a lot.
And if you want to blame anyone for me "changing sides", blame yourself. If this community wasn't such a fucking shit show on wheels, maybe I wouldn't be so inclined to jump ship.
That is to say, I am still neither or. I'm not an anti, I'm not a proshipper, I'm just me. I'm here. I've got an open mind, an open heart and I want to be a better person. I want to make up for my past, for the things I've said.
You can be mad, you can be sad, you can treat this like I'm dead, but this is a choice *I'm* making. No one else. Even Cindy had little to no say in this [albeit she feels the same way]. No one is making me. I'm not any different than I already am. I'm still Meadow, and I'm still going to be here; I've just got a different viewpoint now.
Proshippers are allowed to interact as long as they're respectful. Darkshippers are on thin ice but as long as you tag your stuff, I'm fine.
If you have any resources for me, please send them!! My mind is open and I want to learn π
The psychological damage he has done to me goes beyond just using the words "cunt" and "dickrider". It's also about the fact that he found amusement in my suffering and discomfort, he publicly revealed my username fully aware that his followers were pushing me to suicide and sending me pedophilic messages, and the "apology" I received from him on DMs was weak at best and shitty at worst, especially considering he kept calling me a "proshitter" on his blog. /gen
He clearly said "Dopamine rush!" and "It's amazing" when you came to his blog to excitedly tell him how you had bothered me and how you were eager for making me uncomfortable further. This happened after the incident with the alt blog. You were bragging about triggering a CSA survivor, and I'm glad you finally recognized that this behavior of yours was unacceptable and cruel. /gen
Edit: I'll maybe continue this tomorrow, I'm sleepy as hell and I pushed the "post" button on accident lol /gen
It was more than unacceptable and cruel it was immoral and it should've never happened in the first place.
I really want you to know that I deeply regret everything. I regret everything that lead up to that persicutor deciding to make that account. And I regret not being aware enough to recognize the signs that someone was up to something.
I'm still trying to get into therapy, sadly it's very difficult here, but I'm working on myself. I'm gaining more viewpoints, I'm listening to people i never thought I'd speak to. Im learning how to cope with my paranoia, and how to cope with feeling like I need attention all the time. And while I'm not there yet, I hope one day I can be better.
Thank you. In a way I owe you, for both what you were subjected to by our system and for you forcing my eyes open like I needed it. /Gen
You're a good person. And I'm sorry if I ever made you feel other wise.
I hope you get the therapy and resources you need though. As far as I know, you're from the US, right? I know things have been really shitty over there, and I'm sorry for that. The US government has behaved like a clown and a dictator at the same time, and I rolled my eyes several times at how they are purposely rejecting science to push their hatred and oppression. /gen
Ain't no way actual politicians said something like: "Yeah, dear American nation, Tylenol causes autism. My sources, you say? Hell yeah, I asked my balls and they said yes!" in public. /j
I see you've taken accountability not only once, but twice, and I'm really happy for it. I can see you really want to put on some effort to have a better online conduct, and I think that's worth being proud of. /gen
With the other person, I can't say the same though. As I stated before, his "non-apology apology" was weak at best and shitty at worst. An actual, genuine apology comes with recognizing all the harm you've done and saying "I'm sorry for all of that", something that only you did, but not him, or anyone else involved. /srs
I think it's time to reveal the whole "conversation" we had. I don't know if this can be considered an actual conversation given the fact he blocked me shortly after I confronted him about the severity of his actions. /gen
What really pissed me off with his "apology" is that he "apologized" only for a small fraction of the damage he provoked. /srs
He said he had seen the reblogs you had made from my blog, where you properly apologized and I shed more light on the situation with the proper evidence (screenshots). In those reblogs, I also mentioned how he had enabled and encouraged all of these triggering comments against me. I know he can't control what people say or do on social media, something I also told him via DMs, but the fact that he knew that his followers / moots were making me feel uncomfortable and went along with it, made me feel uncomfortable at best and violated at worst. /srs
The screenshots I showed in an earlier reblog, where you came to his blog to brag about triggering my CSA trauma, shows that nasty bastard celebrating such an act. /srs
On a side note, I'm no longer mad at you, Meadow, because you properly apologized and you took full accountability for your actions. But I'm still mad at him and his supporters because none of them apologized or even acknowledged the harm they've done ( @/rileyfilm , @/swordmanzwijo , @/justballer , and other people I don't remember in this moment). /gen
He was okay with people making me uncomfortable and triggered. He celebrated and found pleasure in his moots / followers making me feel like I was being violated all over again. /srs
This is what I tried to explain to him via DMs, that it wasn't just about his use of the words "cunt", and "dickrider", it was also about the other things I've mentioned on the reblogs I made from your blog when you were apologizing to me for the first time. /srs /nm
I've said this before to @infinite-proship-choco and I'll say it again: /srs
Finding pleasure in triggering someone's childhood sexual trauma, and feeling no regret for it, is PREDATORY.
Especially if you never acknowledge or recognize your actions, and run away like a coward to insult me on your blog when you are confronted about the reality of your actions. /srs /not at you Meadow
Since he doesn't want me to call him "Syl" anymore, and given the sheer nastiness of celebrating the triggered state of a CSA survivor without seeing anything wrong with it, I think I'll call him and his supporters "Nasty Bastards" now. I think it really suits them. /srs /lu
Sometimes I want to laugh at how pathetic and false his message was. Because: /gen
When he sent me the "non-apology apology", he still had me blocked, meaning I couldn't reply to any post of him about the situation. I'm a firm believer that public incidents deserve public apologies, and when I read the first lines, I thought I could give him a chance. Until I read the entire thing and noticed his "apology" was... Weak, to say the least. /srs
He insulted me on his blog shortly after he "apologized" to me. I was made aware of this by one of my moots, because, as I said before, he had me blocked. My moot knew about the "apology" The Nasty Bastard had sent me because I told them. Then, my moot sent me the screenshot and told me: "It seems like he doesn't learn" or something similar. Meaning tha The Nasty Bastard's "apology" was as true as flying pigs, I guess. He kept calling me "cherrypicker", but just without the word "cunt". Not even bare minimum progress. /srs
And I can't forget the lies The Nasty Bastard spread about me in order to make me look irrational and false to his audience. I don't know how many times I have to explain this, but I'll say it again: /srs
I never said I wanted to doxx or to find his personal, real life information. I just said that, in case someone decided to put a formal report on him, his parents most likely would take his internet away. I wasn't giving a threat, I was only mentioning something that could happen in a hypothetical situation. /srs
The post The Nasty Bastard is purposely misunderstanding: β¬οΈ
π¬ 5Β Β π 13Β Β β€οΈ 10Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 01/??Β Β·Β
The term "Cyber harassment" describes a type of harassment that occurs online.
I've never said something like: "I think Syl should be doxxed", "I think Syl's personal information should be leaked on the internet", "I will encourage people on the internet to find Syl's personal information", "I think people on the internet should find Syl's personal information". I've never said any of that or something similar. /srs
Because, unlike what The Nasty Bastard wants to think, falsely accusing someone of being a pedophile on the internet is not something normal, and any parent would be appalled if they found their son falsely accusing someone on the internet of being a pedophile. I think that also was the reason why The Nasty Bastard freaked out so much, because almost any rational adult or rational individual would recognize that online conduct as unacceptable. /srs
After all he has done to me, I definitely think he's the bad guy. /srs
I've been interacting with both sides, anti and proship, but only for the past few days. Let me explain myself.
It honestly started when Hunter was called out. At that point I had already been questioning my stance in the community. The violence, the doxxing and the general upheaval of all of the supposed core values. I saw how quickly some of you could change your morals the second it applied to a proshipper/radqueer.
Then I had my call-out post moment and I had Jellyfish show me some god awful screenshots of an alt a persicutor had made [we have found out who it was, by the way. They have been banned from accessing the internet at all.]. That was my "oh god wtf am I doing?!" Moment because, while I thought I had always been a good person, I wasn't. I made some choices, said some words and made bad mistakes.
So I started to change my viewpoint. I've interacted with proshippers over anon these past few days, even a few radqueers who had the same morals as me. It's been a lot.
And if you want to blame anyone for me "changing sides", blame yourself. If this community wasn't such a fucking shit show on wheels, maybe I wouldn't be so inclined to jump ship.
That is to say, I am still neither or. I'm not an anti, I'm not a proshipper, I'm just me. I'm here. I've got an open mind, an open heart and I want to be a better person. I want to make up for my past, for the things I've said.
You can be mad, you can be sad, you can treat this like I'm dead, but this is a choice *I'm* making. No one else. Even Cindy had little to no say in this [albeit she feels the same way]. No one is making me. I'm not any different than I already am. I'm still Meadow, and I'm still going to be here; I've just got a different viewpoint now.
Proshippers are allowed to interact as long as they're respectful. Darkshippers are on thin ice but as long as you tag your stuff, I'm fine.
If you have any resources for me, please send them!! My mind is open and I want to learn π
The psychological damage he has done to me goes beyond just using the words "cunt" and "dickrider". It's also about the fact that he found amusement in my suffering and discomfort, he publicly revealed my username fully aware that his followers were pushing me to suicide and sending me pedophilic messages, and the "apology" I received from him on DMs was weak at best and shitty at worst, especially considering he kept calling me a "proshitter" on his blog. /gen
He clearly said "Dopamine rush!" and "It's amazing" when you came to his blog to excitedly tell him how you had bothered me and how you were eager for making me uncomfortable further. This happened after the incident with the alt blog. You were bragging about triggering a CSA survivor, and I'm glad you finally recognized that this behavior of yours was unacceptable and cruel. /gen
Edit: I'll maybe continue this tomorrow, I'm sleepy as hell and I pushed the "post" button on accident lol /gen
I tried responding to Choco but it didn't save π
I dont come here to fight, or harrass or anything. I want to talk, adult to adult, really.
For everything I did, I'm sorry. I had no fucking clue about that alt account, and I'm genuinely sorry to detective-jellyfish for the way you were treated. I don't know who created the account, who ran it, but I assure you they will not be allowed online anymore. I'm sorry for any stress or trauma we may have caused you, because that shit I read was genuinely deplorable.
To the victim I victim blamed, I'm sorry. I've had my opinion changed for weeks but clearly [/nm] it wasn't made clear enough. What happened to you was not your fault, and the reaction that I and my friends had was more than disgusting. And while I never directly sent anything, I'm sorry on their behalf for the threats and hate you were sent. It was completely and utterly uncalled for.
To Choco, I'm sorry for dragging you into the Mr Fruitcake situation. The whole situation only made things worse for you and I'm sorry for any extra burden I may have brought you. We really did try to use you as an agenda at some points there, and while I may not have recognized it until you called it out [thank you, genuinely], it should've never happened in the first place. I should've also kept your name out of my mouth after things had been resolved, I was an idiot not to.
I don't know if you'll take this, and I don't blame any of you for not, but I do genuinely regret everything. I am especially disgusted and regretful of that god awful alt account. I'm going to start therapy soon, and I'm going to get help for the attention seeking I've been displaying for a while now. I don't expect you to be buddy buddy and I also don't expect you to even be nice, which is fair. But I really do mean this.
First of all, thank you for coming forward and offering your regret and apologies. While my Archive Blog focuses on archiving evidence of harmful behavior, I don't think any person is irredeemable unless severe crimes have been committed (such as grooming), which you clearly aren't guilty of. Given you're a traumagenic system, I can understand the amnesia and confusion. I'm not exactly a system, but I deal with chronic dissociation on a day to day basis and I can relate to forgetting things I've done. /gen
By the time those messages were sent, I had your old account blocked because you have been telling radqueers to kill themselves, something I strongly disapprove of, even as an anti-radqueer. /gen
The alt account popped up in my comments section a while ago, when Syl had discovered this Archive Blog and falsely accused me of trying to doxx him, called me a cherry picking cunt and a dickrider. I don't like sexualized commentary or insults related to genitalia due to my CSA trauma. This bad reaction by Syl provoked several of her mutuals and fellow anti friends to come and harass me on my blog. The following screenshots are some examples of this: /srs
And you also went to brag at Syl's blog about how you had bothered me and triggered me at this blog, which Syl approved: /srs
I wouldn't say the comments you made towards me were traumatizing, I would say the comments were triggering. Because I'm already traumatized (I'm a CSA survivor) and dismissive comments towards my experience with triggering messages triggered me even more rather than traumatize me. /gen
I really hope everything goes well in therapy for you because that behavior was not normal nor healthy at all, and you have a lot to make up for. /gen
I'll be more respectful from now on and my veiws on a lot of things have changed.
I'm so sorry for only retraumatizing you. That was sick and twisted of whoever it was and I cannot believe they'd do that do you. No one deserves that.
I'm disgusted with myself and the fact I wished death apon someone. I really am. I wish I could take it back but I can't, so the best I can do is get help.
I wish you and Choco the best, really. We may never talk again and that's how I'd prefer it, but I wish you two only good in life. Stay safe, and if there's anything else I need to do please let me know.
I tried responding to Choco but it didn't save π
I dont come here to fight, or harrass or anything. I want to talk, adult to adult, really.
For everything I did, I'm sorry. I had no fucking clue about that alt account, and I'm genuinely sorry to detective-jellyfish for the way you were treated. I don't know who created the account, who ran it, but I assure you they will not be allowed online anymore. I'm sorry for any stress or trauma we may have caused you, because that shit I read was genuinely deplorable.
To the victim I victim blamed, I'm sorry. I've had my opinion changed for weeks but clearly [/nm] it wasn't made clear enough. What happened to you was not your fault, and the reaction that I and my friends had was more than disgusting. And while I never directly sent anything, I'm sorry on their behalf for the threats and hate you were sent. It was completely and utterly uncalled for.
To Choco, I'm sorry for dragging you into the Mr Fruitcake situation. The whole situation only made things worse for you and I'm sorry for any extra burden I may have brought you. We really did try to use you as an agenda at some points there, and while I may not have recognized it until you called it out [thank you, genuinely], it should've never happened in the first place. I should've also kept your name out of my mouth after things had been resolved, I was an idiot not to.
I don't know if you'll take this, and I don't blame any of you for not, but I do genuinely regret everything. I am especially disgusted and regretful of that god awful alt account. I'm going to start therapy soon, and I'm going to get help for the attention seeking I've been displaying for a while now. I don't expect you to be buddy buddy and I also don't expect you to even be nice, which is fair. But I really do mean this.
First of all, thank you for coming forward and offering your regret and apologies. While my Archive Blog focuses on archiving evidence of harmful behavior, I don't think any person is irredeemable unless severe crimes have been committed (such as grooming), which you clearly aren't guilty of. Given you're a traumagenic system, I can understand the amnesia and confusion. I'm not exactly a system, but I deal with chronic dissociation on a day to day basis and I can relate to forgetting things I've done. /gen
By the time those messages were sent, I had your old account blocked because you have been telling radqueers to kill themselves, something I strongly disapprove of, even as an anti-radqueer. /gen
The alt account popped up in my comments section a while ago, when Syl had discovered this Archive Blog and falsely accused me of trying to doxx him, called me a cherry picking cunt and a dickrider. I don't like sexualized commentary or insults related to genitalia due to my CSA trauma. This bad reaction by Syl provoked several of her mutuals and fellow anti friends to come and harass me on my blog. The following screenshots are some examples of this: /srs
And you also went to brag at Syl's blog about how you had bothered me and triggered me at this blog, which Syl approved: /srs
I wouldn't say the comments you made towards me were traumatizing, I would say the comments were triggering. Because I'm already traumatized (I'm a CSA survivor) and dismissive comments towards my experience with triggering messages triggered me even more rather than traumatize me. /gen
I really hope everything goes well in therapy for you because that behavior was not normal nor healthy at all, and you have a lot to make up for. /gen
Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ PSA for my followers and bystanders - The future posts and what will be done in the meantime
Good day or night, dear followers and bystanders. Today, I have a small announcement for all of you. /neu
This Archive Blog has been directly receiving rude and hostile comments towards me. You may not be able to see those comments, since I've already blocked the people that have left those messages. Currently, I'm compiling a series of detailed posts about the recent harassment I've received here on my blog, but it'll take time, of course. Stay tuned! πͺΌπ«§ /srs
I don't want to leave my blog inactive for too much time so, in the meantime, I'll upload educational posts about topics related to CSA/SA trauma and trauma recovering. Hope you'll like them! /srs
The next post will be educational and will talk about what we do scientifically know about the role of art therapy in CSA/SA trauma healing/recovery. /srs
I'm sorry but when it comes to psychology, I'm a huge nerd lol. I usually use a really technical language when it comes to psychology, but I'll do my best to explain it in the simplest terms! ππ¦ /lh
Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ PSA for minors: Grooming isn't always obvious - Please read and share to protect yourself and your friends on the internet
Grooming doesn't always start overtly graphic or blatantly explicit. In the vast majority of cases, it begins with building trust and pushing boundaries. Here are subtle but dangerous behaviors adults (or even older teens) may use to desensitize minors to exploitation: /srs
The groomer may discuss and/or expose the minor to kinks, fetishes, paraphilias (pedophilia, and almost every word that ends in "philia"), and/or BD/SM, excusing himself/herself with "I'm just educating you", "I'm just teaching you", "I'm telling you this because you're mature for your age", "I'm showing you this because you're mature for your age", etc. /srs
The groomer may share, discuss, and/or expose the minor to NS/FW content, such as pornography, NS/FW drawings, NS/FW books or writings, and so on. /srs
The groomer may encourage private conversations with the minor, and/or online interactions in private spaces. A private Discord server, or directly going to the minor's DMs, are some examples of this. Groomers may prefer private platforms, such as Discord or Telegram, to exploit the minor. /srs
The groomer may ask the minor to keep their conversations, relationship, and/or interactions as a "secret". The groomer may discourage the minor to tell his/her parents, and/or friends about the situation. /srs
"Don't tell your parents about our chats. They wouldn't understand", "What we have is special, it's a secret because others wouldn't understand", "It'll be our little secret", are common phrases used by groomers. /srs
"You're the best artist/writer/dancer in the world! π«"
"Who is my best friend? π You are! π"
"You are perfect and beautiful! π"
"I can't be without you π"
Some common phrases of Guilt-Tripping are the following ones: /srs
"If you tell someone about this, I'll be so sad π"
"If you tell someone about this, I'll be so mad π«€"
"What? After everything I've done for you? You're going to do this to me? π" -> Especially common when the minor confronts the groomer about his/her actions.
"You'll ruin my life if you bring this out to light. You know that, right? πΆ"
"Oh! So, I'm the guilty one? You started all of this! π«€"
"If you tell someone about what we have, I'll kill myself. Seriously"
The groomer may ask invasive questions to the minor about his/her relationships, his/her body, his/her underwear, his/her sex life, and other questions that cover highly private (and even sexual) topics of the minor's life. /srs
The groomer may "joke" with the minor about taboo or disturbing topics such as rape, incest, age gap relationships, child abuse, pedophilia, kidnapping, grooming, sexting, and so on, to gauge reactions. /srs
The groomer may treat the minor as a therapist or as an adult. The groomer may talk with the minor about adult problems, such as sex or relationships. /srs
The groomer may send the minor money, art, or gifts to create obligation, and to position himself or herself as a reliable person. The groomer may offer "private mentoring" or "private lessons" in art, writing or any other activity within the minor's interests and hobbies. /srs
Remember kids, if someone online tells you something that makes you feel uncomfortable, don't be afraid to block and tell a trusted adult! It could be your father, your mother, your neighbor, your teacher, your uncle, your aunt, your older (adult) sibling, your cousin, or even a police officer. Search for hotlines in your area to reach out for help and support. You are not alone and none of this is your fault. The groomer is the guilty one, and the one to blame, not you. /srs
What happened wasn't your fault. You deserved better, and it's brave to talk about it now π± /gen
Here are some resources that might help you or any other person who went through inappropriate behavior too: /gen
Chat one-on-one with a support specialist, any time 24/7. The Online Hotline is confidential and anonymous. RAINN does not log IP addresses
This is RAINN's online hotline. Completely anonymous (they don't track IPs and won't file a police report unless you ask for it!), ready to offer support by trained professionals 24/7. /srs
Since 1959 Childhelp has existed to meet the physical, emotional, educational and spiritual needs of abused, neglected and at-risk children.
ChildHelp, in case you are under 18. /srs
We are the global network of member hotlines, leading the fight against child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online.
INHOPE is an international network of hotlines for anonymously reporting CSAM and online grooming. /srs
Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ PSA for minors: Grooming isn't always obvious - Please read and share to protect yourself and your friends on the internet
Grooming doesn't always start overtly graphic or blatantly explicit. In the vast majority of cases, it begins with building trust and pushing boundaries. Here are subtle but dangerous behaviors adults (or even older teens) may use to desensitize minors to exploitation: /srs
The groomer may discuss and/or expose the minor to kinks, fetishes, paraphilias (pedophilia, and almost every word that ends in "philia"), and/or BD/SM, excusing himself/herself with "I'm just educating you", "I'm just teaching you", "I'm telling you this because you're mature for your age", "I'm showing you this because you're mature for your age", etc. /srs
The groomer may share, discuss, and/or expose the minor to NS/FW content, such as pornography, NS/FW drawings, NS/FW books or writings, and so on. /srs
The groomer may encourage private conversations with the minor, and/or online interactions in private spaces. A private Discord server, or directly going to the minor's DMs, are some examples of this. Groomers may prefer private platforms, such as Discord or Telegram, to exploit the minor. /srs
The groomer may ask the minor to keep their conversations, relationship, and/or interactions as a "secret". The groomer may discourage the minor to tell his/her parents, and/or friends about the situation. /srs
"Don't tell your parents about our chats. They wouldn't understand", "What we have is special, it's a secret because others wouldn't understand", "It'll be our little secret", are common phrases used by groomers. /srs
"You're the best artist/writer/dancer in the world! π«"
"Who is my best friend? π You are! π"
"You are perfect and beautiful! π"
"I can't be without you π"
Some common phrases of Guilt-Tripping are the following ones: /srs
"If you tell someone about this, I'll be so sad π"
"If you tell someone about this, I'll be so mad π«€"
"What? After everything I've done for you? You're going to do this to me? π" -> Especially common when the minor confronts the groomer about his/her actions.
"You'll ruin my life if you bring this out to light. You know that, right? πΆ"
"Oh! So, I'm the guilty one? You started all of this! π«€"
"If you tell someone about what we have, I'll kill myself. Seriously"
The groomer may ask invasive questions to the minor about his/her relationships, his/her body, his/her underwear, his/her sex life, and other questions that cover highly private (and even sexual) topics of the minor's life. /srs
The groomer may "joke" with the minor about taboo or disturbing topics such as rape, incest, age gap relationships, child abuse, pedophilia, kidnapping, grooming, sexting, and so on, to gauge reactions. /srs
The groomer may treat the minor as a therapist or as an adult. The groomer may talk with the minor about adult problems, such as sex or relationships. /srs
The groomer may send the minor money, art, or gifts to create obligation, and to position himself or herself as a reliable person. The groomer may offer "private mentoring" or "private lessons" in art, writing or any other activity within the minor's interests and hobbies. /srs
Remember kids, if someone online tells you something that makes you feel uncomfortable, don't be afraid to block and tell a trusted adult! It could be your father, your mother, your neighbor, your teacher, your uncle, your aunt, your older (adult) sibling, your cousin, or even a police officer. Search for hotlines in your area to reach out for help and support. You are not alone and none of this is your fault. The groomer is the guilty one, and the one to blame, not you. /srs
Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ 01; The worst case of targeted harassment we've seen - How did it all begin?
The Jellyfish system will publicly call out an online circle of hostile Anti-Proshippers, who engaged in the worst harassment campaign we've seen in all these years on the internet. Dogpiling, death threats, false accusations of predatory behavior towards minors, and more crimes, were committed. To this day, no one who participated in these cyber felonies has taken accountability for their actions, neither less faced legal consequences. To this day, none of the harassers have shown regret or acknowledge the damage their actions provoked, and, to some extent, they feel proud of their actions and have shown a pattern of justifying their own violent online behavior. /srs
They called themselves "The Cosmic Guardians". /srs
We condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. We do not encourage, support nor accept cyber harassment towards any of the people involved in this situation. /srs
April 18th, 2025, the following post is made on the now non existent blog @/the-proship-hellhole. Days after uploading this post, the blog was mysteriously taken down (not deactivated by the mods). /neu
An anonymous user sent an ask to the blog @/the-proship-hellhole, making a call to report the now non existent blog @/rainbow-starheart-deactivated. Rainbow, initially, had several blogs (@/rainbow-starheart-deactivated being the main one), but she deactivated all of them after being called out, and came back with a brand new blog with the exact same name @/rainbow-starheart as if nothing had happened. So, if you look for @/rainbow-starheart on Tumblr, you'll see her new blog, not the old one. /srs
The intention behind reporting said blog, according to the anonymous user, is that Rainbow was endangering minors. The anonymous user didn't send any proof, such as screenshots or screen recordings, so, we won't take in consideration any of these accusations unless they're proven true with reliable evidence. /srs
One of the mods of this account, asked for proof. Something to back up such serious accusations. Which, in our opinion, was the most responsible thing to do. This anonymous user has not been identified, by the time we're writing this. /srs
To our surprise, Rainbow and her circle noticed this post. We say "to our surprise", because almost all her mutuals have something like "Proship dni", "anti proship", or "proshitters dni", implying that they clearly don't want to interact with Pro-Ship blogs. Besides, the anonymous user didn't directly tag Rainbow's account, so, we don't know how they found said post. We want to think "Well, maybe they were simply looking at blogs on Tumblr and they found this", but, considering how strongly they are against the concept of Pro-Shipp, we find it improbable that they were willingly looking at Pro-Shipp blogs. The important thing here is that they found the blog and Rainbow responded. /srs
Furthermore, on May 8th, 2025, Rainbow herself admitted that she was a minor this entire time, but that she pretended to be an adult woman. /srs
We condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. We do not encourage, support nor accept cyber harassment towards any of the people involved in this situation. /srs
If you happen to find any of these blogs or posts, we firmly encourage you to report and block. /srs
Viewer discretion is advised due to the hostility of certain users. /srs
The post on the first screenshot was originally uploaded on April 24th, 2025. You might be surprised that Syl always appears in these screenshots, but to us, this is already common. Due to the fact that Syl is still a minor, sometimes we want to believe that there's still time for him to change his hostile online behavior before he turns 18. Because the law will be harsher on him, and the accountability he will be asked to have will just raise once he becomes legally an adult. But, since he always appears in these screenshots willingly engaging in this type of behavior, we are starting to lose hope. We fear he'll continue with this behavior by the time he's an adult. /gen
To be honest, we think generalizing Pro-Shippers and generalizing Anti-Proshippers are equally bad (and kinda stupid) things to do. When people generalize a group of real life people (whether inside the internet or outside the internet), they tend to fall into overgeneralizations and simplistic points of view, which can lead to white and black thinking, and prejudices or idealizations. /srs
Human brains look for simplicity. It's a universal law (check out The Gestalt Laws for more information). For the human brain, it requires less effort and energy to generalize or overgeneralize a certain group of individuals, instead of seeing said group as diverse and complex, full of distinct individuals. Everyone has done this at least once in their life, even if they kept their generalizations to themselves (without sharing them). This thinking process is also influenced by sociocultural and personal factors. /srs
However, this makes humans fall into what we said earlier. Black and white thinking; prejudices and idealizations. /srs
There have been groomers on both sides of shipping discourse. There have been cyber harassers on both sides of shipping discourse. There have been criminals on both sides of shipping discourse. /srs
Unfortunately, predators and generally awful people can be found in any online community. This has been known from the beginning of the internet itself, and this is the reason why adults often teach minors to not disclose information about them on the internet, to not send pictures of themselves to any adult online, to not enter into 18+ sites, and so on. /srs
We don't say "unfortunately you can find predators in every corner of the internet" as a way to express something like "well, it is what it is", but to express a call to protect online spaces and block and report awful people. We know that Tumblr moderation (and moderation from any other social media, to be honest) is shitty as hell, but if we unite our efforts it'll be more probable for the staff to take down blogs of hostile people. /gen
β οΈ MINORS, DON'T GO "SEARCHING" FOR "REPORTABLE" BLOGS. YOU'LL HAVE TO SEE CONTENT NOT APPROPRIATE FOR YOU TO REPORT THESE BLOGS, AND THAT IS NOT OKAY. JUST BLOCK.
But if you're an adult, it would be great if you report blogs or posts that go against Tumblr's policies or even international laws, whether they're from Anti-Proshippers or Pro-Shippers. /gen
Crimes are crimes, independently if the person is Anti-Proshipp or Pro-Shipp. /srs
Crimes are crimes, independently if the person is a minor or an adult. /srs
This is all we think about what the Anon in the first screenshot said to Syl. /srs
In relation to Syl's words... Oof. We've already pointed out Syl's hipocrysy, but we fear we'll have to do it again this time. His complains about how "Pro-Shippers always generalize Anti-Proshippers as bad", is ridiculous, considering how much he and his group generalize Pro-Shippers as "inherently child predators" or "soon-to-be child predators". Don't get us wrong, we'll call out groomers no matter if they identify with the term Pro-Shipp or not (we have done this here), but "calling out" that a literal, entire group of people are criminals without previous evidence is defamatory and a crime in several countries. /gen
Think about it in this way: if we become hostile Pro-Shippers, and gather a considerable amount of people who are also hostile Pro-Shippers, and say all Anti-Proshippers are doxxers that must be bullied off the site, and we falsely accuse someone of doxxing, and the proof we show is "well, they're an anti", and then we and our friends basically dogpile that person... Do you think that would be okay? /srs
Remember that Syl falsely accused @proship-froggo of being a child predator, and his "proof" was "well, they're a proshitter" β¬οΈ
π¬ 1Β Β π 1Β Β β€οΈ 1Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 02/??Β Β·Β
We condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. We do not encourage, suppo
And remember that this isn't the first time Syl has been hypocritical β¬οΈ
π¬ 14Β Β π 25Β Β β€οΈ 157Β Β·Β Post by @detective-jellyfish Β· 10 imagesΒ Β·Β Syl's behavior, and the behavior of the online circle he willingly associate
The post on the second screenshot was originally uploaded on April 20th, 2025. Please believe us when we say that we wanted to believe that this post was just a shitpost or something like that, but, keeping in mind the other posts from this individual, we doubt if this was "just a shitpost" or "a random rant". /gen
Not gonna lie, we wish people would understand that coping mechanisms for trauma are more like tools your brain randomly comes up with and sticks to in case they are useful to keep you alive, rather than moral failings. /gen
Obviously, we know the difference between unhealthy coping mechanisms and healthy coping mechanisms. People without access to mental healthcare are more prone to unhealthy coping mechanisms; and people with access to mental healthcare are more prone to healthy coping mechanisms. Unhealthy coping mechanisms include drug abuse, alcohol abuse, social isolation, self harm, risk behaviors, and so on; healthy coping mechanisms include playing sports, asking for professional help, meditating, making art, seeking support from friends or family, and so on. /srs
Again, a person can't say "they're worried about survivors" or "they support survivors", if he or she: /srs
Judges and shames coping mechanisms. No therapist will recommend you to do that to support a survivor. /srs
Falsely accuses CSA/SA survivors of being predators. /srs
Spreads misinformation about therapy and healing. /srs
Uses the incorrect terms (for example, "CP" instead of CSAM/CSEM). /srs
Incites suicide online. /srs
Defends and supports harassment and dogpiling. /srs
Dehumanizes real life people. /srs
This is basic human decency, but unfortunately, some people aren't able to hold onto the most minimum human values. /neg
The user @/chubbibunni has stated that therapeutic art from CSA survivors and CSAM/CSEM are the same thing (which is false, of course) β¬οΈ
π¬ 0Β Β π 2Β Β β€οΈ 4Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 04/??Β Β·Β
The term "Cyber harassment" describes a type of harassment that occurs online. Cy
The post on the third screenshot was originally uploaded on April 20th, 2025. The user @/chubbibunni was agreeing with a statement from Syl that communicated that it should be normalized to tell Pro-Shippers and Radqueers to "keep their shit private". /neu
We won't dive into Radqueer ideology because it has NS/FW ideals not suitable for minors (the "contact stances", for example), but we want to make something clear: The Jellyfish system is strictly Anti-Radqueer. /srs
Telling people to keep their things private is something that reminds us of this post β¬οΈ
π¬ 0Β Β π 2Β Β β€οΈ 4Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 04/??Β Β·Β
The term "Cyber harassment" describes a type of harassment that occurs online. Cy
Now, from those two posts alone we can't say whether they are referring to therapeutic art or vent art coming from Pro-Shippers who are survivors, or just any type of fictional content that contains relationships that are explicitly dark, disturbing and abusive. It's really difficult for us to determine what the definition of "Pro-Shipp" is for Syl, @/chubbibunni and the people they interact with, since their go-to answers are usually the following: /srs
Pro-Shipp = Pedophilia
Pro-Shipp = [Insert other weird shit we can't say because there are minors reading this]
Adult Pro-Shippers = Absolutely all of them are child predators or soon-to-be child predators. Absolutely all of them are cyber harassers who deserve to get bullied off from all platforms. Absolutely all of them should have their devices checked. Absolutely all of them are pedophiles and enjoy and support CSAM/CSEM. Absolutely all of them are a danger to minors and society itself. Absolutely all of them deserve to commit suicide and go through the most painful deaths.
Minor Pro-Shippers = Absolutely all of them are victims of online grooming for Adult Pro-Shippers who need to be saved as soon as possible for an Anti-Proshipper.
Obviously these aren't the right definitions, but these are the definitions they follow and willingly decide to follow. /gen
We've already talked, in our previous post, about how victims and survivors of any type of abuse deserve to speak up and make therapeutic art or vent art about it. Regarding people who don't make fictional content with fictional characters for trauma processing purposes, you must know we're all by freedom of speech. But as any right, that comes with responsibilities. /gen
When making fiction with fictional characters that may have triggering content, remind the following (this goes not only for Pro-Shippers, but for everyone, really): /gen
Add the correct tags and put trigger warnings for all topics that can provoke a trigger response in people. /gen
Don't promote 18+ fictional content on your profile/account/blog if you have followers who are minors. /gen
If you make 18+ fictional content and realize a minor is interacting with it, block said minor. /gen
Don't pressure people to read or see things they are uncomfortable with. /gen
Don't give access to minors to 18+ fictional content (by example, giving them the link of an 18+ fanfic). /gen
Don't cyber harass people under any circumstances, whether you are an Anti-Proshipper, Pro-Shipper, or anything else. /gen
Feel free to block content you aren't comfortable with or content you don't want to see. /gen
When writing about harmful things, don't promote them in real life. If you write about a fictional character overdosing on drugs, for example, don't go out of your way promoting this behavior in real life. /gen
Besides, it's kinda hypocritical for @/chubbibunni to say that not everything needs to be on the internet because she has revealed on that same, public blog of hers, that she had committed a crime in real life. We have screenshots of it, but that update will come soon. The crime @/chubbibunni has committed isn't something incredibly awful like murder, sexual/physical violence, or threats, but it's a crime after all, and telling people to keep things to themselves while she willingly admitted on her public blog to do things in real life that police won't be happy of realizing, it's quite hypocritical, being honest. /gen
These two posts alone don't count as cyber harassment by themselves. However, if we take into consideration all the other posts they made... Yeah, it definitely shows a pattern of engaging in harmful behavior, supporting harmful behavior, and inciting harmful behavior, which are crimes in more than 10 countries around the world. /gen
The post on the 4th screenshot was originally uploaded on April 12th, 2025. We think we don't need to explain too much here. Let us remind you that this cyber harassment isn't an "isolated incident" within the group of individuals we've exposed on this blog, but a clear pattern of abusive behavior they aren't willing to stop. Death threats online are considered a crime in several countries too, since it's considered a form of cyber harassment. /gen
The posts on the 5th and 6th screenshot were originally uploaded on February 21st by the Tumblr blog @/differentfiregarden and then reblogged by the user @/chubbibunni. /srs
It seems like we have to say again the definition of Pro-Shipp: /srs
Pro-Shipp (ππ / ππ) is a stance that supports the creation and enjoyment of all types of shipps involving fictional characters only, including those that might be considered controversial, problematic or taboo. Pro-Shippers believe fiction is separate from reality, and that enjoying problematic content in fiction doesn't necessarily mean endorsing it in real life. Pro-Shippers believe that both creators and fans should have the freedom to explore any type of relationship in fiction without censorship or judgement. Pro-Shippers often advocate for content warnings and tags to help others avoid content they might find triggering. /gen
Also, remember the Jellyfish system is strictly Anti-Radqueer! /srs
The moral panic behind the statement that Pro-Shipp ideals inherently glorify and normalize pedophilia, is often based on the misconception that writing, or drawing, about any relationship dynamic that is inherently harmful in real life, is the same thing as perpetuating or advocating for it, which isn't true, of course. The lack of nuance is incredible here. Depiction and endorsement aren't the same thing. /gen
Pro-Shipp supports fictional exploration with clear boundaries, like the ones we just mentioned before. Meanwhile, abusers and people who enable abusers, glorify real life harmful relationships, or harass other people. /gen
The line between fiction/art and harm is drawn by intent, not just by content. /srs
Being a Pro-Shipper isn't inherently harmful or predatory towards children, because fictional storytelling is not equivalent to real world harm. /srs
Actual child abuse involves real life children and should be universally condemned. But hostile Anti-Proshippers purposely avoid this fact. No, making a fanfic about a fictional minor being in a relationship with a fictional adult is not the same as a real life predator who commits real life crimes against a real life minor, where said minor ends up with short and long term physical and psychological consequences. As CSA survivors, it feels like a big joke when someone acts like a fanfic of a fictional little kid being sexually abused by a fictional adult, is just as bad as a real life minor being abused by a real life adult. Like... Genuinely? Sorry to break this out for some people, but fictional minors don't have human rights. Instead of wanting to burn in a stake someone who wrote a fictional story about a fictional relationship between a fictional adult and a fictional minor, and added all the proper tags, hostile Anti-Proshippers should: /srs
Advocate for sex education for everyone, according to their age. /srs
Advocate for longer prison sentences for child predators. /srs
Support organizations and institutions against childhood sexual abuse. /srs
Support organizations and institutions that protect and offer valuable resources for victims or survivors of CSA. /srs
Share advice on how to be safe on the internet as a minor. /srs
Share advice on what should a minor do if he/she thinks is being sexually abused. /srs
Stop spreading misinformation about trauma, therapy and recovery. /srs
Stop inciting suicide. Statically speaking, minors who are survivors or victims of CSA, and adults who are survivors of CSA, are more prone to commiting suicide than people who didn't go through CSA. /srs
Stop falsely accusing CSA survivors of being child predators. It isn't only illegal, but also incredibly cruel and inhumane. /srs
Inform themselves on children's human rights. /srs
Tell a trusted adult if you think a child is being a victim of CSA. /srs
Share hotlines minors can turn to in case they were sexually abused, or if they think they were sexually abused. /srs
Share advice on how minors can recognize online (and offline) grooming and who they should turn to in case they're being actively groomed. /srs
Learn about the situation of children's human rights around the world. /srs
And so many things we don't remember at this time. /srs
Harm arises when, instead of fictional minors, real life minors are involved in these shipps, or when there's cyber harassment involved. /srs
Being Pro-Shipp isn't about inherently mocking people with disabilities or trauma. But of course, any ableist behavior should be called out whether the person is a Pro-Shipper or not. /srs
Also, many survivors are Pro-Shipp because fiction and art helps them process their own experiences. /srs
And not, Pro-Shipp ideals don't inherently groom minors. Groomers are real life adults (or older teens, even) who willingly manipulate real life minors for abuse. /srs
The term "Cyber harassment" describes a type of harassment that occurs online. Cyber harassment causes severe anxiety, severe depression, PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) symptoms, social withdrawal and increases the risks of self harm. Victims often are dismissed because their situation is usually brushed off as "internet drama". /srs
Cyber harassment is considered a crime in several countries, where fines or jail time can be applied to the perpetrators, depending on the country's legislation. /srs
We firmly condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. /srs
If you happen to find any of these blogs or posts, we firmly encourage you to report and block. /srs
Viewer discretion is advised due to the hostility of certain users. /srs
The post on the first screenshot was uploaded on April 21st, 2025. There, you can see the user @/syltheanti willingly engaging one more time in online activities that could be considered harassment. Saying that an entire group of people should "die in a goddamn hole" could be interpreted as wishing harm (which Tumblr can ban if reported under Community Guidelines). Adding to that, it can count as inciting harassment with violent rethoric, since his post can encourage others to attack Pro-Shippers. Besides, complaining about mass reports could be considered hypocritical since Syl himself willingly engages in targeted cyber harassment, like you saw in previous posts. /srs
Proof of @/syltheanti purposely making up false accusations against @proship-froggo with the objective of justifying the targeted cyber harassment towards them down here β¬οΈ
π¬ 1Β Β π 1Β Β β€οΈ 1Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 02/??Β Β·Β
We condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. We do not encourage, suppo
Proof of @/syltheanti willingly engaging in cyber harassment while defending and supporting people who do that as well, can be found down there β¬οΈ
π¬ 0Β Β π 2Β Β β€οΈ 3Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 01/??Β Β·Β
The term "Cyber harassment" describes a type of harassment that occurs online. Cy
The post on the second screenshot was uploaded on April 22nd, 2025. You can see that both Anon and Syl have misunderstood the terms Pro-Shipp, Com-Shipp, and Dark-Shipp. But don't worry, we'll explain it just in case. /srs
Pro-Shipp (ππ / ππ) is a stance that supports the creation and enjoyment of all types of shipps involving fictional characters only, including those that might be considered controversial, problematic or taboo. Pro-Shippers believe fiction is separate from reality, and that enjoying problematic content in fiction doesn't necessarily mean endorsing it in real life. Pro-Shippers believe that both creators and fans should have the freedom to explore any type of relationship in fiction without censorship or judgement. Pro-Shippers often advocate for content warnings and tags to help others avoid content they might find triggering. /gen
Com-Shipp (πΈπ / ππΈ), short for "Complicated Shipping", refers to exploring or enjoying shipps that involve complex, messy, or morally ambiguous fictional characters. These relationships often have layers of conflict, tension or emotional depth. Com-Shippers are drawn to fictional relationships that aren't purely wholesome or healthy, but aren't toxic and abusive either. Com-Shippers like to explore themes like power imbalance, unresolved tension or emotional turmoil, something present in enemies to lovers fictional shipps, by example. Com-Shippers may acknowledge the problematic aspects of a shipp but still finding it interesting or meaningful. /gen
Dark-Shipp (π±π / ππ±) is about shipping fictional characters in relationships that are explicitly dark, disturbing or taboo. These shipps often involve themes like abuse or manipulation. Dark-shippers are usually drawn to the exploration of dark or taboo themes in fiction, often for the sake of storytelling, emotional intensity, catharsis or shock value. Dark-shipps aren't meant to be normalized or romanticized but are instead explored as part of the story's darker elements (canon or fan made). Besides, most Dark-shippers don't endorse real life behavior, and they often emphasize the importance of content warnings and ethical storytelling when dealing with sensitive topics. /gen
Com-Shipp does exist. Maybe Syl just doesn't like the term "Com-Shipp", but that doesn't mean the term doesn't exist or shouldn't exist. For example, we don't like some things created on the internet, but that doesn't mean those things don't exist. Because the world doesn't revolve around anyone. /gen
And we just showed you that Pro-Shipp β Dark-shipp. Not all Pro-Shippers are Dark-shippers. In fact, some Pro-Shippers are just Com-Shippers. /gen
Also, calling an entire online group of people "nasty fucks" is dehumanizing language meant to incite disdain or violence. /gen
The comment on the third screenshot was made on April 22nd, 2025. The user @/silly4goose20 appears once again. Let's remember it's not the first time she appears in those screenshots willingly engaging in cyber felonies. /srs
Proof that @/silly4goose20 has encouraged several people to commit suicide can be found here β¬οΈ
π¬ 0Β Β π 1Β Β β€οΈ 2Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 03/??Β Β·Β
We condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. We do not encourage, suppo
Telling people to get help or "take the trash out themselves"... Is this what we think it is? Another phrase similar to "you should get help but if you don't then you should kill yourself"? /srs.
Curiously, on the post on the fourth screenshot, you can see the hypocrisy of this individual. The post was originally uploaded on April 22nd, 2025. It seems like that, for @/silly4goose20 , inciting suicide online is okay, but she shouldn't receive a similar treatment. If she really was this worried about "people getting help" she would condemn suicide incitement in any way, shape or form. We hope her hypocrisy talks by itself. Even if the suicide incitement was unsuccessful (in the best case scenario), she still has blood in her hands and is acting no better than a real life abuser. /srs
The post on the fifth screenshot was originally uploaded on April 23rd, 2025. Well, this post (or reblog, better said) is less harmful than the other ones we've seen, but it can still count as mild cyber harassment. Comparing a group of people to literal trash is dehumanizing, and intended to degrade and insult. The post can serve as a public signal to @/sho-can-g 's online circle that mockery towards Pro-Shippers is acceptable. /srs
The post on the sixth screenshot was originally uploaded on April 13th, 2025. The user @/chubbibunni is not as active as the other users when it comes to shipping discourse, but her online behavior can be equally violent sometimes. There are several things wrong within this screenshot. /srs
The user @/smacksalad made a post saying that vent art / therapeutic art from survivors should be kept in private. As survivors of CSA and extreme physical abuse, we disagree with that statement. The Jellyfish system thinks survivors should be able to upload their vent or therapeutic art to online spaces, as long as they add the proper tags, as long as it's their own decision, and as long as they aren't willingly exposing vulnerable audiences to heavy and traumatizing topics. /gen
Survivors deserve to speak up and express themselves about the things they survived without being pressured to "be silent" or "backpedal". Many survivors (SA survivors, CSA survivors, physical abuse survivors, emotional abuse survivors, abandonment survivors, neglect survivors, and so on), are forced to stay quiet and silent by their own abusers or by the environment that enables their abusers, and this can go on for years or even decades. With this in mind, telling survivors to just "keep it to themselves" is not only disrespectful, but deeply unfair. Don't silence or censor survivors' voices and art. Yeah, some vent or therapeutic art can be deeply disturbing, but the best option is to block people who make that art, instead of urging them to "keep it private". /gen
The rage we feel every time we see someone saying "CP" instead of CSAM/CSEM is unreal omg (`ηΏΒ΄οΌ) /gen /neg
To keep it short (and family friendly), if you want to support survivors, especially CSA survivors, use the correct terms. Using the term "CP" downplays and undermines the physical, psychological, and moral long-term damage survivors go through. Terms like CSAM and CSEM help remind people that it isn't a type of "porn genre", or "18+ entertainment". It's sexual violence against minors. Survivors deserve that clarity and acknowledgment. /gen
Purposely comparing vent art or therapeutic art from CSA victims/survivors and actual CSAM/CSEM is beyond fucked up. Let us do a quick explanation: /srs
Vent art / Therapeutic art about CSA
Made in a consensual and safe space. /srs
The minor has control over what happens and what doesn't happen. /srs
The main purpose is trauma processing and healing. /srs
The adult (in this case, the therapist) can guide the minor in their healing journey to achieve a better mental and physical well being. /srs
Usually consists of drawings, poems, or just phrases. /srs
CSAM/CSEM
Made in a non consensual and exploitative space. /srs
The minor has no control over the circumstances. Their autonomy and dignity are violated. /srs
The main purpose is preying on vulnerable minors and catering to pedophiles, child predator rings, or human trafficking groups. /srs
The adult (in this case, the perpetrator) often commits another type of sexual violence against the minor, provoking further physical and psychological harm.
The vast majority of times contains images or videos of real life minors being actively harmed. /srs
While the post from @/chubbibunni isn't directed to one specific user, it still can count as cyber harassment. Equating therapeutic art with literal CSAM/CSEM is not only a false comparison, but a deeply harmful one. Falsely accusing CSA/SA survivors of being child abuse perpetrators can be considered defamatory, therefore, this online behavior can be considered cyber harassment. Adding to that, this incident is not an isolated one, but a pattern of ignorant and hostile online behavior. /srs
Syl's behavior, and the behavior of the online circle he willingly associates with, will never fail to surprise us. /neg
There is no evidence of Froggo cyber harassing people. We searched on Froggo's blog and we found no tangible evidence of cyber harassment towards someone, Anti-Proshipper or not. This online circle claims that Froggo uploading screenshots of their posts and commenting about said posts is cyber harassment, which is not true. Criticism about posts from other people isn't cyber harassment. If that was real, then, respectful online discourse wouldn't exist in its entirety, and everyone would be arrested for respectfully debating online. /srs
Adding to that, there is no evidence of Froggo defending CSAM/CSEM. There is no evidence of Froggo defending l_licon, Froggo has even stated that they aren't into that type of content. /srs
We won't dive into the controversy of Tori Woods and her book "Daddy's Little Toy", since it's a highly graphic and disturbing book with content not suitable for minors, and this blog wants to remain suitable for everyone. Either way, the author would have ended up in prison because she was accused of plagiarism, which is a crime in several countries for a good reason. /gen
We would like to know the definition of "gossiping" according to Syl, to be honest. Froggo and everyone else who got hurt by the online behavior from Syl and people related to him, deserve to speak up about it. We don't talk about hostile Anti-Proshippers merely for shipping discourse. /srs
We talk about hostile Anti-Proshippers because the online behavior they willingly engaged in is illegal and provokes significant psychological harm. /srs
We talk about hostile Anti-Proshippers because they claim to care about survivors while inciting suicide is encouraged within that group under certain circumstances. /srs
We talk about hostile Anti-Proshippers because they falsely accuse CSA/SA survivors of being child predators. /srs
However, the adult alters within the Jellyfish system that contribute to this archive blog, have already uploaded proof of felonies being committed by Syl. /srs
SYL WILLINGLY ENGAGES IN CYBER HARASSMENT AND DEFENDS AND SUPPORTS PEOPLE WHO ALSO DO IT β‘οΈ The proof is down here β¬οΈ
π¬ 0Β Β π 2Β Β β€οΈ 3Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 01/??Β Β·Β
The term "Cyber harassment" describes a type of harassment that occurs online. Cy
SYL FALSELY ACCUSING FROGGO OF BEING A CHILD PREDATOR TO "JUSTIFY" HIS TARGETED HARASSMENT TOWARDS THEM β‘οΈ The proof can be found down here β¬οΈ
π¬ 1Β Β π 1Β Β β€οΈ 1Β Β·Β Λ . κ· πͺΌ . π¦ΉΛβ Cyber harassment; 02/??Β Β·Β
We condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. We do not encourage, suppo
Cyber harassment is a crime in the following countries: /srs
United States of America
Canada
Australia
United Kingdom
Japan
South Korea
Germany
France
Argentina
Brazil
Colombia
Peru
Chile
Ecuador
Uruguay
Ireland
Spain
Switzerland
Norway
Kenya
South Africa
Nigeria
Tanzania
Uganda
Botswana
Egypt
China
India
Singapore
Philippines
Malaysia
Pakistan
Kazakhstan
Falsely accusing someone of predatory behavior towards minors is a crime in the following countries: /srs
United States of America
United Kingdom
Germany
Canada
Australia
France
India
South Africa
Japan
Brazil
And so many more
Yet, for some reason, Syl is convinced that we're "the bad ones", and he's "the normal one". Falsely accusing someone of felonies when he himself is just a police report away from being registered as a felon in several countries? Sounds like projection to us. /neg
Oh, cherry picking and twisting words? Well, we have a few questions for him and his supporters. /neg
We have a screenshot of Syl telling an entire group of real life people to "die in a goddamn hole". According to Tumblr's policies, that's inciting violence, and, according to international laws, that's cyber harassment. Do you care to explain this? /neg
We have a screenshot of Syl agreeing with an anonymous ask that absolutely all Pro-Shippers are inherently child predators. According to Tumblr's policies, that's cyber harassment, and according to international laws, that's pushing false accusations. Do you care to explain this? /neg
We have a screenshot of Syl saying that hostile Anti-Proshippers are valid. According to Tumblr's policies, that's inciting violence, and according to international laws, that can count as cyber harassment. Do you care to explain this? /neg
We have another screenshot of Syl reblogging that all people within an online group are inherently groomers and child predators. According to Tumblr's policies and international laws, that is cyber harassment and pushing false accusations of predatory behavior towards minors. Do you care to explain this? /neg
We have a screenshot of Syl saying that being Anti-Proshipp is just being a "normal person". However, his online behavior and the online behavior of the circle he willingly engages with is far from "normal". "Normal" people don't act like felons online. Do you care to explain this? /neg
We have a screenshot of Syl agreeing with an anon ask that said that using the word "Daddy" was pedophilia and incest, which felt racist to us since we're Latino and the word "Daddy/Papi" is used like "bro/dude" in our culture. Do you care to explain this? /neg
We have a feeling that at least one person within that online circle is aware of this archive blog. Even though we have a bunch of those people blocked to avoid direct cyber harassment, we know that online circle tend to make a lot of alternative accounts. If you don't want to be called out as a cyber felon, then, don't commit cyber felonies. It's that simple. /srs
People that aren't even interested at all in shipping discourse have reached out to us and said how fucked up and awful this situation is. See? This isn't a "proship vs anti drama", it's "wanting to hold people accountable for their cyber crimes". What they need to understand is that they've literally committed cyber crimes against a certain group of people, and being called out for it is not "harassment". It's basic human decency. The bare minimum they should do is delete all the cyber harassment and apologize. But they don't seem like they want to do that. If they struggle so much in being online without being a felon, then they shouldn't have a platform at all. /srs
If people already think the online behavior we have shown through evidence is awful... OH BOY, WE'RE JUST GETTING STARTED. /srs
We have at least more than 30 screenshots to show. Without a doubt, this will be a wild ride. There is so much shit we haven't shown yet. /srs
Since we made this archive blog, we've been aware that some people involved in this situation had deactivated their accounts and started new ones as if nothing had happened. We know who they are. They won't escape that easily the consequences of their own actions. /srs
THANK YOU SO MUCH TO THE PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT US! WE WILL KEEP UPLOADING ALL THE EVIDENCE WE HAVE! πͺΌπ
most people who were wrongfully put on her blocklist couldn't message her because. you know. being on the blocklist almost always meant that you were blocked by her, and therefore can't message her without creating a new account. i only knew about the blocklists because i have email notifs turned on for tumblr
i got around this by using an alt, to which she responded by posting screenshots of our dms and leaving out context to make it seem like i was attacking her. i will admit, i was getting angry, but i feel pretty justified for that. scroll down my blog if you're out of the loop, i really don't have the energy to fully explain again.
but yeah, it came to a point where i had to threaten reporting her to tumblr for her to finally leave me alone. i've never interacted with rainbow before she interacted with me, and if it weren't for her i wouldn't know she exists. you'll have to take my word for this bc i'm really not sure how to prove that
also, i'll just leave this here:
what rainbow was doing was by definition harassment. it was unpleasant for me, hostile, uninvited and unwelcome. i have a right to be pissed off about it
The Jellyfish system has gone through a similar experience with Rainbow Starheart. /srs
The adult alters within the Jellyfish system, who make this archive blog possible, have read all the posts on your blog, so, we're already aware of your story with her. /srs
We don't know if you are aware of the accusations against Rainbow Starheart and her online circle before she nuked all her accounts. Rainbow Starheart was mainly accused of lying. Rainbow had stated in a post from her main account that "The Cosmic Guardians" was a private, +18 only, safe, and respectful online group. However, there was evidence that there were minors within this group, and that online felonies, such as targeted cyber harassment, false accusations of predatory behavior towards minors, and suicide incitement were common and even encouraged and supported within that online circle. /srs
Most of the followers of our blog already know where we come from, because we were the ones who provided evidence (screenshots) to dismantle Rainbow's lies and publicly expose that online circle as potentially dangerous. Their response, you may ask? Rainbow's group picked their go-to tactic: falsely accusing people who called them out respectfully and with evidence of being child predators and pedophiles, which didn't beat at all the allegations. /srs
Of course! Because, when a CSA survivor calls you out with irrefutable evidence, the correct thing to do is to falsely accuse them of being a child predator! That's it! We'll falsely accuse them of having the exact same behavior as the person who tore apart this survivor's mental health! Surely, there is nothing wrong with this type of behavior! Surely, it won't affect at all this survivor's mental health and surely won't trigger them! As we said, we are a safe space for survivors! We are normal people! Look at us! Look at us! Look how normal and moral we are! /s
Just as we expected, Rainbow and her supporters/defenders were mad at us. Rainbow uploaded a post on her (now inexistent) main account telling us to "settle the situation" in private, via DMs. In this post, she rejected all the evidence we showed, and (falsely) accused us of spreading lies about her and her online circle. /srs
We were falsely "accused" of being Pro-Shippers by Rainbow Starheart too. /srs
Rainbow has built her entire online presence based on an "Us vs Them" mentality with characteristics of black and white thinking, with no place for nuance. /srs
"All Anti-Proshippers are inherently good and moral. Unlike Pro-Shippers, Anti-Proshippers can do no harm. And if they do harm, they can get away with it without even recognizing it or apologizing for it. Anti-Proshippers are always the heroes in this story" and "All Pro-Shippers are inherently evil. All Pro-Shippers are child predators or soon-to-be child predators. It's justifiable, and even encouraged to bully them, harass them, and mock them". /srs
We don't consider us Pro-Shippers. You'll find more information about this here. /srs
But one of the things that really made us mad was the fact that Rainbow, within that same post, encouraged her followers to pressure us into having a private conversation with her. /srs
The most important issue is that there are followers of Rainbow who are minors, and our main blog that we used to upload the evidence, was strictly NSFW. Rainbow was leading minors to +18 spaces. In case she didn't know, since we had her and her entire group blocked to avoid direct cyber harassment, that was careless of her and she should've thought twice before weaponizing her audience. In case she did know, that would be beyond fucked up, especially considering she was "posing" as a reliable, moral, and protective adult online, when in reality, she was a teenager. /srs
Of course, we immediately rejected talking via DM with Rainbow, and pointed out her manipulation tactics. To this day, the Jellyfish system still rejects having a private conversation with Rainbow Starheart. /srs
Are we mad with her and her supporters/defenders? Of course we are! We never received a proper apology for this. We never received any type of compensation for the damage inflicted on us. /gen
This online group is one of the most disgusting, vile, and nauseating we've ever come across in our entire life. We would expect this type of behavior from grown ass people from fucking 4chan, but not from literal teenagers on Tumblr. We can't imagine how it must feel like being a teenager committing literal online crimes and being just a police report away from having our parents notified and getting registered as a felon. They are no better than the abusers they claim to hate and reject. /gen
The adult alters in the Jellyfish system, who contribute to this archive blog, have come to know a terrible situation that's happening regarding a webcomic called "Sparklecare", its creator Kittycorn, and the people she associates with. /srs
We know perfectly well that this isn't related to our archive blog at all, but it's necessary to comment on it since there are minors who follow this blog, and we want to warn them about dangerous users. /srs
The blogs you have to block, as a minor, to keep yourself safe, are the following ones: /srs
@/askfreakycare and @/sparklecarehospital
@/planetspinch and @/realangeldog
@/jk-tech-blog1 and @/luxuryaerozona
@/hemeraphilia
As you may know, the Jellyfish system will never call someone a groomer without actual, irrefutable evidence. There is proof that the people behind these usernames are groomers who have already hurt victims and may want to do it again. /srs
The Tumblr blogs @/askfreakycare and @/sparklecarehospital are managed by a groomer. The internet personality behind those blogs goes by the name "Kittycorn" online, you may already know her from somewhere. She's the creator of a webcomic called "Sparklecare Hospital". But her fame and success were cut short when her association with sexual predators was discovered. Kittycorn is friends with actual child predators, people who have been proved to harm minors. As if this wasn't bad enough, Kittycorn tried to silence a victim of a groomer within her online circle. /srs
The Tumblr blogs @/planetspinch and @/realangeldog are managed by a groomer. He goes by the name of "Woofles" online too. When he was 18 years old, he sent a 15 year old person inappropriate content. He hasn't taken any accountability or responsibility for his actions, and, when confronted, deletes his accounts and starts a new one. Also, Woofles victim-blamed the 15 year old person he himself groomed. /srs
The Tumblr blogs @/jk-tech-blog1 and @/luxuryaerozona are managed by a pedophile. There is no evidence that this user has groomed someone, but there is evidence that this person has defended and participated in a certain online pedophile ring where CSAM/CSEM was being shared, which is just as exploitative and illegal. Obviously, we won't share the name of this online pedophile ring. /srs
The Tumblr blog @/hemeraphilia is managed by a pedophile. This user has willingly engaged with CSAM/CSEM, which basically makes this person a child predator and a dangerous person to be around minors (and anyone else really). /srs
We find ourselves in a bit of a predicament here. We'll never call someone a pedophile or a groomer without adding evidence to back up our claims. But we are followed by minors and showing evidence would mean to expose our minor followers to explicit conversations, which is not okay. /srs
So, we'll describe the sources where we found the information. If you're an adult, you can ask us for the links so you can see the entire evidence. We strongly discourage minors to see the original source, since it was pretty disturbing, even for us who have come across gross people both in real life and on the internet. /srs
The evidence about Kittycorn was found in a public Google Doc which was last updated on March 25th, 2025. /srs
The evidence about Woofles was found in a public 58 pages Google Doc. /srs
The evidence about Jk-tech was found on a Tumblr blog where several external links were shared. /srs
The evidence about @/hemeraphilia was found in the same Google Doc where the evidence about Kittycorn was found. /srs
The Jellyfish system wants to recommend you to stay away from people who support Kittycorn. Literally all the users mentioned here have a close relationship with Kittycorn and support her. Remember that Kittycorn associates herself with groomers and child predators, so, it wouldn't be a good idea to be near her circle of supporters, right? /gen
We'll use Pro-Ship and Anti-Proshipp tags in this situation to warn more Pro-Shippers and Anti-Proshippers. Both groups deserve to stay safe. /srs
We condemn cyber harassment in any way, shape or form. We do not encourage, support nor accept cyber harassment towards any of the people involved in this situation. /srs
If you happen to find any of these blogs or posts, we firmly encourage you to report and block. /srs
Viewer discretion is advised due to the hostility of certain users. /srs
On the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th screenshot you can see a post made by the now inexistent user @/that-one-friend-caleb , who actually is @/dani-the-donut . The original post was made on April 7th, 2025. Caleb was the teenage girl who falsely accused the user @proship-froggo of pedophilia, cyber harassment, predatory behavior towards minors, cyber stalking, and spreading false rumors. All these accusations were false and made up, with no plausible evidence backing them. Also, Caleb threatened with taking her own life if the user @proship-froggo didn't delete their blog, which enabled a massive hate campaign against Froggo for crimes they didn't commit. We hope Caleb's behavior, and the behavior of her online circle, talk by themselves. /srs
On the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th screenshot, you can see Caleb purposely creating false accusations towards Froggo, with the objective of making Froggo look like a person who "deserved" such hostility. Froggo never defended sexual abuse, in any way, shape or form. Froggo never spread lies about Caleb. Froggo never used Caleb's trauma to "win an argument". Froggo did never "victim blame" her. /srs
On the 4th screenshot, you can see another user, which could be considered an accomplice by believing false accusations of that severity, specially considering that falsely accusing someone of being a pedophile, a child predator, or a harasser/stalker, is considered a felony in several countries. @/anti-kink-queen is a minor too. /srs
On the 5th screenshot, you can see another cyber crime being committed. The user @/silly4goose20 , admitted to willingly engage in suicide incitement online. /srs
Don't get us wrong, we are strictly anti Rad-queer because that ideology is potentially dangerous (especially considering the "contact stances" that are common within the community). But telling Rad-queers, who are more likely extremely traumatized and beyond manipulated people, to kill themselves, won't solve the problem and it provokes more harm than benefits. No one gets benefitted in that situation. The user @/silly4goose20 shouldn't even offer "help" to them, if the other option is inciting them to take their own lives. Real help emerged from genuine concern doesn't look like that. Which you can actually see here, on the screenshot, is behavior common in abusers and abusive people on general. /srs
